Faketoshi's Vision: "Set in stone, until we change it, again."
The White Paper doesn't Change - it's set in Stone as well. Digg out Satoshi's comments - he told us - it is set in Stone already He never said that, you liar. The white paper is simply an outline of an idea. Its a very basic blueprint and is largely void of technical details. How you create the end product based on the idea in the white paper could have taken a hundred different paths, including SegWit. Faketoshi's Vision is based on the lie that Craig is Satoshi, ergo he should know what Bitcoin was really all about. One small problem: Craig isn't Satoshi. He's Faketoshi. Your coin is based on fraud. Didn t expect u r capable of google. But only know to attack ad hominem Here Read Stop whining https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195.msg1611#msg1611You're referring to a famous comment he left about the protocol, which has changed immensely since vers 0.1, with several changes made by Satoshi himself. Your code contains even more changes made by Bcash developers that aren't included in today's actual Bitcoin (BTC). The "core design" of bitcoin has been altered more by Bcash and BSV than it has in BTC. Funny you linked that comment, because he also said this in it: I don't believe a second, compatible implementation of Bitcoin will ever be a good idea. So much of the design depends on all nodes getting exactly identical results in lockstep that a second implementation would be a menace to the network. The MIT license is compatible with all other licenses and commercial uses, so there is no need to rewrite it from a licensing standpoint.
The main problem is your are relying on a proven fraud's definition of what "set in stone" refers to. And why was need for change it - except for bug fix? Agsin u know only af hominem. Fine boy
|
|
|
Faketoshi's Vision: "Set in stone, until we change it, again."
The White Paper doesn't Change - it's set in Stone as well. Digg out Satoshi's comments - he told us - it is set in Stone already He never said that, you liar. The white paper is simply an outline of an idea. Its a very basic blueprint and is largely void of technical details. How you create the end product based on the idea in the white paper could have taken a hundred different paths, including SegWit. Faketoshi's Vision is based on the lie that Craig is Satoshi, ergo he should know what Bitcoin was really all about. One small problem: Craig isn't Satoshi. He's Faketoshi. Your coin is based on fraud. Didn t expect u r capable of google. But only know to attack ad hominem Here Read Stop whining https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195.msg1611#msg1611
|
|
|
Dragi sei Dank - Banken können mit 0 Zins nix mehr verdienen - da steigen die Gebühren
Und dadurch sinken die Kundenzahlen. Nuja, bei manchen Kunden sind die Banken ganz froh, wenn sie weg gehen ... Aber das schlimme daran ist ja...wenn sie fast Pleite sind oder Superhoch verschuldet zahlst Du / Wir es ja. Also der Deutsche Bürger. Schau doch mal inne Vergangenheit wie viele Milliarden an Geldern dort draufgegangen sind. Da kannst locker Binance mit kaufen. Das kommt bei den 2-3 ganz Grossen so hin - die kleinen kriegen in der Sippenhaft den Arsch mit voll - das kanns auch nicht sein Da 2015 dazu klammheimlich etwas beschlossen wurde und es hierzu passt, quote ich mich mal aus dem AKV: Das ist ja heftig und war mir bisher total unbekannt. Sollte man sich nun systemunrelevante Banken aussuchen?* Und bevor hier jemand schreibt "Nein. Bitcoin ist die Antwort.", dann kann er sich das sparen, weil das wissen wir schon Welche Diskussion würde das aber im Volk ergeben, da insbesondere gedeckte Einlagen bis 100.000 Euro und besicherte Verbindlichkeiten davon ausgenommen werden. Eine Diskussion zwischen Arm und Reich, die da oben usw. Andererseits könnte so eine drohende Insolvenz auch vorgeschoben werden, um bestimmte Konten einzufrieren .....nein, das ist zuviel Verschwörungstheorie. Aber guter Stoff für Autoren wie Andreas Eschbach Wenn der E-Euro da ist, funktioniert das allerdings sehr einfach. Und bei entsprechender Konditionierung des Volks vielleicht auch ohne Aufschrei. *Edit: Nö, ist egal. Wenn man Kunde einer systemunrelevanten Bank ist, erhält man nur das normale Programm Potenziell systemgefährdend sind aber nur Institute und Finanzgruppen, die eine gewisse Bedeutung haben. Für Institute, auf die dies nicht zutrifft, steht das normale Insolvenzverfahren zur Verfügung. https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/DE/Fachartikel/2015/fa_bj_1501_sanierungs-abwicklungsgesetz.htmlDas klingt nach Kommunismus - die SystemRelevanz und Staatssicherheit ... die Grossen machen watt se wolln
|
|
|
Faketoshi's Vision: "Set in stone, until we change it, again."
The White Paper doesn't Change - it's set in Stone as well. Digg out Satoshi's comments - he told us - it is set in Stone already If some ppl dont understand why and how that could work / have other ideas: copy the code, alter it and build ur own coin Wait, call it SegWitCoin ?
|
|
|
Nothing to see here, folks. Move along... move along.
Are you folks seriously still under the delusion that bitcoin is a natural monopoly ? Because if you are then I'd consider investing in yellow socks since they're about as likely to establish one. What do you think's has been happening over the last 10 years ? The so called "altcoin" market is about as utterly hammered into profit-take oblivion as any modern asset's ever seen and bitcoin's still only 16% away from having a minority market share. Wake up and smell the coffee. Alts are the lungs of BTC and they're about to initiate a sharp intake of breath after an epic exhale Nice hypothesis. Is it based on one market cycle? Not really. It's based on a theory of how hard/more persistent assets and soft/more utilitarian monetary assets are structured. Profit-takes leak capital into layers lower down the pyramid following successive market cycles of the upper layers. The lower layers become less volatile but more persistent and therefore serve as a market reserve while most of the profit from growth is made in the upper layers. You can see this occurring with bitcoin on any long term chart including the log chart of price and the market dominance chart. See, for example this article from a couple of years back: Nice Picture. The black bottom Needs to be stable af and set in Stone ? - yes, or it all falls over
|
|
|
Good - more fees than coinbase reward after next halving. Sustainable for eternity ?
|
|
|
Funny - but BTC isn't good for Shopping - wait
|
|
|
Dragi sei Dank - Banken können mit 0 Zins nix mehr verdienen - da steigen die Gebühren
Und dadurch sinken die Kundenzahlen. Nuja, bei manchen Kunden sind die Banken ganz froh, wenn sie weg gehen ... Aber das schlimme daran ist ja...wenn sie fast Pleite sind oder Superhoch verschuldet zahlst Du / Wir es ja. Also der Deutsche Bürger. Schau doch mal inne Vergangenheit wie viele Milliarden an Geldern dort draufgegangen sind. Da kannst locker Binance mit kaufen. Das kommt bei den 2-3 ganz Grossen so hin - die kleinen kriegen in der Sippenhaft den Arsch mit voll - das kanns auch nicht sein
|
|
|
Anyone who says BSV isn’t “good tech,” is criticizing BTC from 2009 until late 2017. BSV simply didn’t add the technical bloat of Core. Today, BTC has exponential more lines of code, but less than .01% of BSV’s throughput. THAT is “bad tech.” The secret history of BitCoin. RBF crap is not part of BitCoin SV afaik But good plot.
|
|
|
I just had a transaction confirmed for $0.05 in 6 minutes. There is no reason to use bitcoin imitators, now, or ever.
#scaling #winning #thanksSegWit #thanksLightning
SegShit LN BSCore Coin falls into this dilemma https://cointelegraph.com/news/why-blockchain-startups-failIt works for the moment, for some nerds in a niche
|
|
|
Edit: Even better - from your quoted article:
BSV is also up 120% in the past six months—compared to 52% for Bitcoin (BTC). bigger number mean better coin? Actually, the bigger number doesn't qualify a crypto to be better but the user base level, miners and community support level which no other crypto surpass bitcoin in terms of the mention features are what can be use to judge how better a coin is not the act of price manipulation which are used by centralized coin team Besides, no other crypto can survive the government pressure as bitcoin did. People like the CSW team won't admit to the truth until the coin vaporize from the market which will definitely happen sooner or later. Any coin, any global project can vaporize cause of many reasons. Like - bad governance - no scaling , just tech dept - not compliant - not on purpose / rather altered to go darker / nichy use - too much illegal use / no real use ( like store of value without medium of exchange/ interoperability) - support only by haters, anonymous and anarchos I do not see BSV to be vaporized or u see other reasons why? You left out some of the biggest ones: - being created with the intention of scamming others - not having any real-world use case scenarios - being a copycat/clone of a pre-existing idea - being led by frauds who perpetuate a culture of dishonesty around their coin Sure, the major change / uasf / segwit fork created a new coin On bitcoin.org all the business who wanted the 2x have been denounced and kicked out of the new Segshit coin Besides Segshit BScore kept the name of Bitcoin , copied it, and scammed all others who bought in earlier - better way d ve been to call it Segshit Airdrop ( there was some announcement here...) Honest mining is defined in the white paper. Segshit has no, that is fraud
|
|
|
Edit: Even better - from your quoted article:
BSV is also up 120% in the past six months—compared to 52% for Bitcoin (BTC). bigger number mean better coin? Actually, the bigger number doesn't qualify a crypto to be better but the user base level, miners and community support level which no other crypto surpass bitcoin in terms of the mention features are what can be use to judge how better a coin is not the act of price manipulation which are used by centralized coin team Besides, no other crypto can survive the government pressure as bitcoin did. People like the CSW team won't admit to the truth until the coin vaporize from the market which will definitely happen sooner or later. Any coin, any global project can vaporize cause of many reasons. Like - bad governance - no scaling , just tech dept - not compliant - not on purpose / rather altered to go darker / nichy use - too much illegal use / no real use ( like store of value without medium of exchange/ interoperability) - support only by haters, anonymous and anarchos I do not see BSV to be vaporized or u see other reasons why?
|
|
|
I think I see your problem. There in step four... Math-inating is haaaaard. For some. Evidently. Guess this is Toddlers way after fork to more than 21mio?
|
|
|
Yes, good the message comes out, that Segshit was the biggest fork and crap that came from BScore, but all the crippling and darkening shit does also more harm than good. Selling this fucked up version as 'Bitcoin' is the scam, but scammers are used to shout louder and try to smear the protectors of the original, esp in cost free post environments like our entire internet still is. Metanet gonna fix that. More cool stuff. A wordpress plugin for BitCoin paywall https://twitter.com/BTC_de_Blog/status/1193171661387960330
|
|
|
.. snip
.., it was copied from original ...
nope It was SAFED to STAY ORIGINAL
|
|
|
Sure, the Satoshi CW Datacenter BitCoin BSV showing capacity for the globe as designed to scam people into thinking dumb things. Do you have to be such a cheesy lying shill? What else do you do for money? Satoshi told it will go datacenters. Easy man, it's the truth
|
|
|
Sure, the Satoshi Datacenter BitCoin showing capacity for the globe as designed
|
|
|
@hv_ Burning curiosity: why tack on all the extra stuff onto the chain?
Is it supposed to be a use case or a monetary transfer protocol? Before you ask about any false dichotomy, consider why merging the two would be better than having just two independent systems.
Sure, why should you be able to 'post' anything for free ? Isn't that one of the Major flaws of the Internet we know? (> Spam, fake , trolling ,...) If you can attach value ( yes - also micro-values) for sending and receiving Content - we agree this Content gets a new Quality and by pay for publishing it / storing it (not fully on-chain - depends ...) and using it (paywall, tipping = liking) all the Internet activites will have real monetary value - this is how e-comerce will be properly enabled and distributed globally and ppl can earn money for e-work and trade. All via the same ledger - minimzed any frictions to trade / interact P2P So e-money / e-cash has real use So Bitcoin was designed to do that - compliant with any law on the planet / Transparency of BitCoin is a Feature that ENABLES trust. Annonymous shit never did Just new to read about here: https://coingeek.com/the-origins-of-bitcoin-satoshis-vision/
|
|
|
No signal or anything else can predict the future
The future is at risk at any time for anyone
|
|
|
|