Core nodes?
Blocking TXs?
So we have centrally controlled network?
So, they shut down most of nodes and made more mess than there was before, so rest could not synchronize?
Network should synchonize itself. Always.
You've made my day.
Don't bitcoin nodes reject repeated invalid Tx's automatically and ban the IP for 24 hours ? A node or wallet that repeatedly sends a tx with an invalid transaction signature (for whatever reason) wouldn't it be near impossible to differentiate between that and ddos. With sync issues, network delay, orphans etc wouldn't be an equally valid explanation for lots of small Txs. |
|
|
|
And it's a pool that handles ~ 1% of the total SIGT hashrate. Show me another pool that has that many orphans. You can't because there isn't one.
Actually if you look back in the posts i pointed out another pool earlier with the same problem. But it looks like it is limited to the smaller mining pools. Since then I looked at the three largest ones and they don't appear to suffer from orphans. |
|
|
|
there is no fork lol... you are an ass hat. the end.
That must be why Nova is now in maintenance due to a FORK. Because there is none. |
|
|
|
Cryptopia is Cryptopia,but now Nova on maintenance. And when I asked them,what happened,and will I get my coins that i sent there,they said that signatum being forked .
It must be the <<<<<<looking for next scapegoat>>>>>>> They will be running out of excuses soon. |
|
|
|
stfu craptopia fanboy...there was no fork...your craptopia friends have been ddosing sigt network. devs fixed it..network is back to 100%..all wallets syncing
Bullshit. There is no Ddos. Just excuses.  |
|
|
|
My transaction from craptopia came through 4 hours after making the withdrawal. It works, but is slow, and everything else still sends/receives exactly as it always has.
So Cryptopia made good on their promise to enable clients to withdraw the funds from the crashed wallet. You have your SIGT so why are you still moaning. I love that the craptopia response email makes a clear and simple statement that signatum "does not have an active dev," but the nonsensical diatribe describing their failure to implement the wallet explains that a dev physically visited, has been in constant contact, and claims to be informing the rest of the SIGT team.
 Shows no activity since 23 July 2017 My suspicion is that craptopia is owned and operated by a bunch of teenaged computer nerds with entitlement and culpability issues. The whole response reads like a list of excuses for not having done one's homework. Could easily be reduced to "we couldn't figure it out. It kept crashing, so we gave up."
Cryptopia is a registered company with publicly available information about who owns it. Who is your coindev what is his name and address? lazy idiots then smear the coin, because every failure is a blame game with millennials. Craptopia does not have an active dev. just a bunch of fat, lazy, extortionists, who think they're super smart.
Did your coin DEV help with wallet problems ? - NO Cryptopia is an exchange - not a software consultant for failed shitcoins. If the coin fails to meet the required quality standards and results in loss then it gets delisted. Cryptopia had three developers working just on getting the wallet working - instead of doing core development. Here is a link to the FORK https://mining-enthusiasts.net/sig/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks |
|
|
|
I warned you a month ago of this currency and now you are enjoying loss and problems
What did u warned ? that crytopia will F*** the wallet ? whats the problem on Signatum mate ? everything works fine .. Yes -everything is fine - nothing to see here. .  |
|
|
|
xtraelv, you can fud and troll as much as you want with your cryptopia buddies, here, on twitter, reddit, 4chan, steemit, in the ann thread of signatum and in your own reality bubble (cryptopia discord), oh sorry, i mean in your familiy of course  the words and actions of the admins on discord speaks for itself as well as the official statement ( especially the last sentence), feel free to keep trying but the disinformation strategy will FAIL. It isn't Cryptopia that FAKED emails and circulated on Twitter and 4chan. Signatum claims to be Ddosed but their cloudflare is working fine. Time will be the test. Time will prove who the trolls and scammers are. As you may saw i have deleted a few posts
Yes - I noticed. I stand by everything that I have said. |
|
|
|
Except so far it's only Cryptopias wallets that have had problems, the website just crashed recently when it didn't when Cryptopia was consolidating those thousands of addresses, and I'll wait on the verdict from the mining pools about whether or not a fork has occurred.
Nope - some people on Reddit, Steemit and other sites also have reported recent wallet issues. Just google it. Time will tell. A lot of people just buy and hold onto their coins but whenever there is panic people withdraw from their wallets and find out it doesn't work. |
|
|
|
Unsure honestly at this point , is this a cryptopia thing or a SIGT thing.
Cryptopia - around since 2014 with hundreds of coins listed and loyal client base. Signatum - around since July 2017 based on old copied code - made the wallet that crashed, made the website that crashed, made the block explorer that crashed, made the blockchain that looks like it has forked. You decide. |
|
|
|
 Which is the real Signatum ? Aren't these supposed to be sequential ? |
|
|
|
Delist Notice: Signatum As the vast majority of Signatum customers will be aware, there have been recent issues with this coin, which has led to us putting it in the delisting queue. Signatum is currently scheduled to be delisted on 20 Oct 2017. Read on for the reasons why this has been deemed our best course of action at this time. The combination of us having 18,000 addresses and users mining directly to our addresses caused there to be over a million small inputs. This caused the wallet to irreparably break while syncing. We attempted to resolve this many times, using different distros and hardware configurations, however this did not work. If we synced the blockchain first, then imported the keys, it would start importing 5-10 keys / second, however this rate drops to about 1 key every 3-4 seconds after ~15k. After a week of importing keys on several instances the wallets corrupted and crashed every time. We also tried importing the keys first then syncing the blockchain, in this case it synced back to around 19th August and then also crashed and corrupted. We have determined this to be likely due to the leveldb library used within the coin which is extremely out of date. It is the same library used in many other coins, however most use a much more up to date version. This is why the Signatum wallet had been in maintenance for around the last month, while we have been constantly attempting to work with it. During this time, we had a Signatum team member visit our office in person and found no issues with our implementation of Signatum, and observe the sync issues. We have also been in constant communication with a Signatum team member informing of what was happening throughout and were told by him that he was informing the rest of their team. To finally resolve this, we have managed to set up 8 separate wallets and imported 1/8 of the overall keys into each of these. We then had to move transactions around to consolidate the tiny inputs. This is a terribly painful process and not scalable. FYI we are currently having to move coins from the 8 wallets to 1 consolidated wallet to process withdrawals. Once this process is complete, we will then scan the 8 wallets for any missing deposits, so anyone that has made deposits while it has been in maintenance will have to wait until this before their deposits show up so they can withdraw again.(edited) The reason we are now closing the markets is that the Signatum community and now the core Signatum team have blamed us for this issue and are threatening us with litigation, when the issue is purely with the Signatum wallet and out of date codebase. The dev does not seem able or willing to fix the issues with their code. We have put in a very significant amount of time trying to get this up and running so our users can use their coins. However, it is not our responsibility to work with the Signatum codebase (or any other coin) to fix their problems any further, we've already gone well beyond what we should be doing to resolve this. Some users have been comparing us to other exchanges and asking why they don't have a similar problem. We have a significantly higher number of transactions than the other exchanges that currently list this coin. They will run into similar issues when they reach a more significant level of transactions. The problem with Signatum codebase is provable and replicable. They need to fix this or this will happen again wherever Signatum ends up. Signatum now appears to also be threatening Cryptopia with legal action (via twitter) and accusing Cryptopia of not knowing how to use wallets. We run and maintain literally many hundreds of wallets. Signatum built just 1 wallet by copying very old code from elsewhere and don't seem able or willing to update it to something that actually works at scale. Draw your own conclusions, and if you back Signatum after all this good luck to you. Published by: Hex @ 9/19/2017 2:49:29 AM https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/NewsRegardless of where the fault lies, a major exchange has now put this out there about SIGT. The SIGT team is going to have to fix the problems described should they exist, or make some other changes if they don't. Whatever is done needs to be sold to people as a faster & more efficient SIGT. They have to do something and make it very public they did something in order to rebuild confidence and move beyond this. Is this true that signatum is not scalable? That they are using an out if date codebase? This makes me nervous for the long term if this is true The project is open source and you can check the source code online. https://github.com/signatumd/source. Appears that Sigt is using leveldb for backend database, specifically version 1.17, released in May 2014. As of now the newest version is 1.20. Per Cryptopia guys said this db was outdated, true. They say it's been outdated for 6 years, false. Was this causing the Cryptopia wallet problem, uncertain but yes according to their response. Will this outdated db cause any other problems, uncertain. Are there any other coins using the same db with the same version and have no issues so far, don't know but worth looking around(maybe I will later). Should the devs update this db, should. That is as far as I know. Would really like to hear more from the devs and sigt community. Should you sell or hold is up to you. Where does it say 6 years in his statement ? I only see where he says it is extremely outdated. |
|
|
|
Apparently the network was DDoSed. And your question should be who initiated the DDoS, if you know what that is.
How can all the nodes be DDoSed ? Why doesn't that happen to Ethereum or Bitcoin ? Where is the DDoS protection ? Nahhh I smell bullshit. I think the network is not capable of handling the volume. If it was DDoSed then there would be no connection to the website. If it was DdoS then cloudflare wouldn't let it through. Excuses...Excuses... Time will prove the lies. Just like the FAKE Cryptopia emails from MrFloppy circulating in the Signatum community - it clearly shows who the SCAMMERS are. They cannot handle the truth so now are resorting to FORGERY and SCAMMING  |
|
|
|
Apparently the network was DDoSed. And your question should be who initiated the DDoS, if you know what that is.
How can all the nodes be DDoSed ? Why doesn't that happen to Ethereum or Bitcoin ? Where is the DDoS protection ? Nahhh I smell bullshit. I think the network is not capable of handling the volume. If it was DDoSed then there would be no connection to the website. |
|
|
|
 What happened Who are the Signatum DEVs going to blame that on ? <<<<<<looks around for scapegoat>>>>>>> |
|
|
|
Do cryptocurrencies even constitute "assets" for the purposes of applying to the court for a lien? Lmao. It seems some people became a lawyer overnight.
In other words - you would have to put cash in a trust account so you can prove that you can pay if you don't succeed. |
|
|
|
finally, thanks to cryptopia to release our funds after several weeks. As you may saw i have deleted a few posts but i must state that i regret after seeing the following bashing from your discord admins:
I noticed that the signatum.io website has crashed and that people are now complaining about issues with their personal wallets on reddit, steemit and bitcointalk. Cryptopia gets bashed whenever a coin has issues. People tend to talk shit until the problem is solved. The Cryptopia team have to solve a lot of problems that the coin developers should be solving - that is why some coins get delisted after the initial problem is solved. Cryptopia has only recently grown to a big exchange. To some of us it is more like a big family. Longterm members like myself are protective of this exchange. EDIT: I notice that Cryptopia also now have issued an official response: https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/News |
|
|
|
withdraw from cryptopia 300 for test. says completed in history right away, but no sign of it. I assume this is because the log jam is internal to cryptopia, within the wallet, or address they consolidated to.
Did you click the email link that it sends with each withdrawal to authorize the withdrawal ? |
|
|
|
Looks like everything is collapsing around this coin. Maybe we should bring Legal Action Against the DEV.
what the shit are you talking about? lol cryptopia is messing up big time, people are flooding the tiny market with movements of coins all at once what else do you expect from a junk website. but i don't mind a panic, its when i come in a purchase cheap! lol Sounds like the blockchain has SCALING issues if it can't cope with the volume from just ONE exchanges wallets. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
