Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 10:30:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 118 »
1281  Other / Meta / Re: The case of an account with no posts and 250 merit on: September 20, 2018, 05:21:07 AM
There are a few more accounts that self-deranked, I think one even went from Hero to Newbie.

Afaik, hero and legendary memberships are permanent even if the users deleted all his posts. Maybe he was a senior member then deranked to newbie.

Hero can be certainly demoted. I have a proof of it where Hero demoted itself just to take part in signature campaign to satisfy Merit requirement.

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355801

http://loycevsbasement.privatedns.org/Merit/history/355801.html

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Hell-raiser

See, user earned only 15 merits but has total of 515 but currently a  Senior Member.

Did not find a legendary demoting itself, but I think it will be possible also.

You are correct. It is possible to demote yourself from hero.


1282  Other / Meta / Re: One merit for newbie ! on: September 20, 2018, 05:07:15 AM
Anyone can give us an advice what are the other forums that were able to join a campaign signature? I really wanted to join a campaign signature as this will help me to improve my knowledge to understand more about the crypto word.

It is really hard for me to get even 1 merit as my language and grammar are not perfect and fluent.

Signature campaigns don't help improve you knowledge. Signature campaigns only advertise. If you want to learn - you don't need merit for that.

If you really want to learn:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=search
and
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4322078.0

1283  Other / Meta / Re: The bitcointalk academy awards - best shit-poster fables to obtain merit on: September 20, 2018, 04:56:14 AM
Hahahaha this I will definitely follow. You probably have to have to switch from the image screenshots to using quotes instead though. You're going to need more space on your thread. Tongue

Also, I got you a better logo. You're welcome.

Use the height=450 tag for a better not-so-big image size
Code:
[center][img height=450]https://i.imgur.com/b3D1wwF.png[/img][/center]


LOL  - I will update the logo !

I just wanted to show up and accept my award!

I would like to thank the academy for the nomination.  

Also by the way I wouldn't rip the forum for being outrageous trying to stop spam and allowing signatures to continue and call out the obvious bullshitting of upper members if I was going for merit.  Not good form to rank on the people your trying to get merit from.  




Take it easy, you are just being nominated. I love your post tho we are just all tired of that certain post of how to  blah2  something. If you really care about stopping this shit posting then start acting (report moderately). A post confession will for me never help solve the issue. By that I would like to vote for this guy @xtraelv please count in my vote to this guy thanks!

I will create a poll once the Merit begging dies down.  Grin
1284  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: Cryptopia SCAM on: September 20, 2018, 04:34:52 AM
This is my own personal observation and opinion.

People think all exchanges are created equal and do the same things. They are not.

https://www.blockchaintransparency.org/reports/

Quote
A few differences can be seen where a few exchanges such as Bittrex, Kucoin, Cryptopia, and Bithumb have much higher unique visitor counts than their volume would expect to show.  This gives further evidence of their accuracy as they could report much higher volume.  Instead they appear to be accurately reporting that their users spend less per session.  These exchanges trade many low cap coins and with most of the big volume spenders on high market cap coins these numbers fall in line with the accuracy of their reporting.  Cryptopia, well known for having low liquidity on many of its coins naturally has one of the lowest dollar amount traded per visitor per day inside the top 50.


There are distinct differences between exchanges. One of the distinct difference between Cryptopia and most other exchanges is the sheer number of coins they have listed.

They are one of the top exchanges for both promising newcomers and shitcoins. In terms of coin trading volume - they are huge. The coins traded are low value so the value traded (market cap in $) is much lower than some other platforms.

But the amount of transactions that take place on their trade engine and the volume of coins traded is huge.

Small new coin networks with new blockchain and wallet code tends to cause more problems than established coins. Cryptopia is the exchange that can often make or break how a coin is going to do in the big wide world. I have personally benefited from buying coins there that were unknowns and now are considered mainstream.

Trading value (market cap)  is not the only factor to look at. Much of the market cap on some exchanges is fake volume created by bots operated by an exchange and incentive low or no fee trading by coin developers themselves.  

Recently hacked exchange Zaif is an example on how due to a system glitch it sold more bitcoins than there are bitcoins in existence.

Then there is the Bitfinex tether issue: https://medium.com/@eklavya9/the-tether-bitfinex-scam-might-be-a-lot-more-elegant-than-what-most-people-think-and-might-hurt-54616255e7c1

That's why everyone embraced binance so much.
The exchange itself was built on a much more advanced stack and doesn't even bother with fiat.
That's why it runs so smoothly.

Binance is an exceptional platform with 382 markets and the lead in the value of volume traded. They are a relative newcomer and had a lot of funds to start their platform with in comparison to some of the other exchanges. It now turns over $900 million daily.
Their ICO raised a lot of funds and they were able to take advantage of the 2017 crypto boom.

But try getting an new coin listed on Binance....

Cryptopia is not a scam.
They just have outdated servers that constantly cause coins to not be credited properly.
This has been a problem with all of the older exchanges or exchanges that deal with fiat.

Cryptopia has 697 coin markets and turns over $4 million daily. In early 2017 they were run by 2-3 part time staff and volunteers. Now they employ a team of over 100 staff. During the peak of December 2017 / January 2018 their platform was struggling with the sheer demand from the massive increase in users - as a result they trained more staff, set up a UK office, improved their back-end software, changed their management structure and made numerous other improvements.

After taking advantage of the 2017/2018 crypto boom they upgraded a lot of their infrastructure and as they say - the proof will be in the pudding.

The coins not being credited are not due to outdated servers - the primary issue is with the coin wallet code - code developed by the coins themselves.
The coins that cause issues are generally the same coins due to outdated leveldb libraries being used and other issues due to the coins being cloned from outdated source code. Why are there hardly any issues with BTC, LTC and Doge that have the most volume ? Because the wallet code is better.

Running a personal wallet with a few hundred transactions is not the same as running an exchange wallet on an enterprise scale with hundreds of transactions hourly or daily. It results in dust issues and issues with the wallet code not coping with the number of stored transactions. Resulting in slow syncing and even wallets not wanting to fully sync at all.

Actually, almost all of the big name exchanges are fading into existence.
Poloniex, kraken, Cryptopia, hitbtc, etc. just can't keep up.
In order for them to update their exchange, they would literally have to shut down all trading and take weeks to a month to upgrade everything.
Yeah, I don't see them doing that.

A lot of the large exchanges have concentrated on becoming legitimate trading platforms in the eyes of the authorities of the countries that they reside in.
Crypto is still in the infancy of the growth and regulation. Platform security, Hot wallet strategies, Government regulation, Anti Money Laundering rules and Taxation issues are all eventually going to catch up with exchanges that don't take it seriously.








1285  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Zaif hacked for $60 million on: September 20, 2018, 03:28:06 AM
Exchange wallets are still big targets for thieves. These thefts make bank heists look small.

Quote
Yet another Japan-based cryptocurrency exchange has been hacked, losing a 6.7 billion yen (about $60 million worth of cryptocurrency), including 5,966 bitcoins.

The licensed exchange, called Zaif, is operated by the Tech Bureau. It said on Thursday that the exchange first noticed an unusual outflow of funds on the platform around 17:00 Japan time on September 14, after which the company suspended asset deposit and withdrawal services.

Tech Bureau explained that after further investigation, it discovered that hackers with unauthorized access to the exchange's hot wallets had stolen roughly $60 million in bitcoin, bitcoin cash, and MonaCoin. That being said, the exact amount of bitcoin cash stolen remains unknown.

The exchange added that since its own asset reserve is currently around 2.2 billion yen (or $20 million), it has reached an agreement with a Japan-listed firm called Fisco to receive a $44.5 million investment in exchange for a major share of ownership
.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/crypto-exchange-zaif-hacked-in-60-million-6000-bitcoin-theft/
1286  Other / Off-topic / Re: Free bitcoins on Zaif Land Japanese exchange in regulatory fix on: September 20, 2018, 03:21:12 AM
https://www.coindesk.com/crypto-exchange-zaif-hacked-in-60-million-6000-bitcoin-theft/

Looks like they actually got 60 million now rather than just a "credit".
1287  Other / Off-topic / Re: A generous act, who wants some merit? on: September 20, 2018, 03:05:23 AM

First things first am not a  shitposter I hardly post am mostly an observer in this forum I go through the forum to learn and I have learnt a lot.
Am not spammer obviously neither am I a scammer.


Really ? Show me a post in your history that benefits the forum.   Roll Eyes
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2094388;sa=showPosts;start=0

1288  Other / Meta / The bitcointalk academy awards - best shit-poster fables to obtain merit on: September 20, 2018, 02:30:10 AM
I thought I'd start this collection before some of them get banned or have their content deleted.

Meta is in a sad state and will be for a while. This is a collection of the posts that will make you smile again.

The ruses, fables and sob stories for merit:


Logo courtesy of mjglqw

Please post entries in the following format:



Marital issues caused by bitcointalk.



Confession to sins.



Banned for plagiarism. 1100 posts and 0 metrit (0 merit too)



Praise the system ! - If I say it is the best and tell them what I think they want to hear I might get some lucky merit.



Words from a shitposter with over 500 posts and no merit
1289  Other / Meta / Re: Confessions of a bounty hunter/shit poster on: September 20, 2018, 02:00:19 AM
Or just ban or boycott projects that employ shit-posters in their signature campaigns.

There are many people on this forum that use their signatures for non commercial purposes and people that are good forum citizens that participate in genuine campaigns.

While I agree that the signatures cause problems,  It is not the root cause of the problem. Closing the forum down would also stop the spam - but is also not an adequate option.

Banning new users from posting would also greatly reduce spam or hiring thousands of moderators on bounty style payouts to censor posts but are also not adequate options.

Those options go against the values that the forum stands for.

I have already attacked ANN threads that use shit-posters to bump their threads with large images warning of shills and how shilling is investor fraud. It tends to work and I would encourage others to employ that method.

Signature campaigns are a bit more complex because I suspect a lot of the signature campaigns are on organised on telegram or externally of bitcointalk. I have viewed numerous profiles that make no mention of any signature campaign or any posts about joining a campaign that are clear shit-posters. They are either farmed accounts or participating in a signature campaign organised elsewhere.

Personally I think a shit-poster tag would be a good option. It is something a user automatically gets if they get a number of posts deleted and automatically lose once they obtain a certain amount of merit.
1290  Other / Meta / Re: Oh! Xandry , you are leading the wrong list on: September 20, 2018, 01:20:23 AM
Merit sources and moderators can get fooled too.  Getting fooled doesn't make them any less effective.

They are also no longer giving out merit for reported posts so no changes are necessary - It is already resolved and the same scenario will not happen again.
1291  Other / Off-topic / Re: A generous act, who wants some merit? on: September 19, 2018, 05:36:48 PM
If members give a good enough reason to be an upgrade member and display no real signs of untrustworthiness, why not?

This is not "look at me, look at me" in the slightest. If that's the way you wish to perceive it, that is no more than your own train of thought. The motive behind this thread is an example of the repercussions of treating bitcointalk members who are upstanding, follow the rules and mind their own business...like crap. The forum is slowly heading toward a centralized, pyramid style community, and in my eyes based on the beliefs I've been pushing since I joined here, it's atrocious. I personally do not want any involvement in that, so I am giving members who deserve a shot at being a ranked member the chance to do so.
Also I am suspicious of your sudden altruistic gesture as I think it is a butthurt reaction to getting caught and tagged for meriting shitposts in an effort to up-rank the demoted newbies that were shills in your ANN thread.

Sudden? Are you aware of the project I have been operating over the last year?
If not, do some reading instead of wasting your time posting garbage like this.



Yes- "sudden altruistic gesture". You haven't touched merit before the 17th of September 2018.

You also sound familiar. Did I previously talk to one of your alts ?
1292  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Help me DESTROY Bitcoin! on: September 19, 2018, 12:44:04 PM
I think I understand the economic idea behind your plan which seems sound  but I suspect that you don't quite understand how wallet addresses work.

Effectively a valid bitcoin address is between 26-35 alphanumeric characters beginning with the numbers 1 and 3

Issues:
1) A lot of wallets will prevent you from sending it to an invalid address outside of that range.
2) If a transaction is sent to an address outside of that range it can still be potentially recovered (For example as a cross chain recoveries).
3) If a transaction is sent to a wallet address (regardless of what it is) it will by default have a private key that can potentially unlock it - regardless of whether it is known or not and regardless of whether it was initially generated from a a private key or not.

The private key and wallet address are related by a complex mathematical equation.

Bitcoin is allocated to a wallet address and that record is stored on the blockchain. A private key is needed to spend those coins (transfer them to another address) .

Regardless of what you do offline - the coins are stored online on the blockchain - every wallet has an associated private key or keys - regardless of whether they are known or not.

The blockchain is a ledger. A public record of transactions. A private key is the mathematically related secret alphanumeric passphrase associated with the wallet address that allows you to generate a message acceptable to the blockchain that provides the ability to transfer it from one address to another.


Chart source: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Address


The aim is to destroy the consumed coins and be never accessible by anyone. Essentially taking them away from the market and in turn they would be replaced by these newly generated 'Phoenix' tokens/coins.
If you are interested in getting onboard as a coder, DM me, we can have further discussions about this.

And its not going to be a wallet ergo a single wallet solution.
The idea is to design a system that will consume inputs - tokens / other cryptos, irrevocably removing them from circulation and the free market.
AND in turn generating some new coins - Phoenixes.

If your concern is future recovery due to discovery of the private key there is a method to prevent this.
Rather than burning it to one address you can do it by sending dust. Effectively multiple output transactions sending the bitcoin in 1 or 10 satoshi increments to millions of addresses that of which the private keys are unknown. Making it economically not viable to recover. You could call it "Proof of ending" or "Satoshi Nakamotoed".  Grin

Currently (under RIPE-MD160 ) there are (2^160) 1,461,501,637,330,902,918,203,684,832,716,283,019,655,932,542,976 potential bitcoin addresses and  around 2^96 private keys whose corresponding public key hashes to that address

The total size of the multiple output transaction must be under 100K bytes or it will not be included in blocks or relayed on the network.
A compressed pubkey p2pkh is 146 bytes and an uncompressed pubkey p2pkh is 178 bytes.
Source: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/How_to_cheaply_consolidate_coins_to_reduce_miner_fees


1293  Other / Meta / Re: The new rule (1 Merit for Jr. Member) is already reducing spam on: September 19, 2018, 11:45:16 AM
The reductions are actually more in the other topics if you take into account the influx of merit related posts now in Meta.

Meta - one of the few safe harbors from spam has be decimated by threads about merit.
1294  Economy / Exchanges / Re: \\\LIMITLESS EXCHANGES AVAILABLE/// on: September 19, 2018, 11:11:35 AM


There are multiple unresolved scam accusations against this company.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1307188

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4988982.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4619534.0

https://archive.fo/Yfnbj (Their advertisement archived today)

As of 18 September 2018 they still have an unaltered advertisement on Bitcointalk stating: The service is non-custodial, limitless and does not require any sign-ups.

Their website contains the same misleading statement. Their Terms of Service contradict their own advertising.

https://i.imgur.com/9JFmYfE.png
 
It is evident from their response in the scam accusation that such service is not being provided and users have lost substantial funds as a result.

One of their customers has even paid for an advertisement warning of the scam.

1295  Other / Off-topic / Re: A generous act, who wants some merit? on: September 19, 2018, 12:20:42 AM
If members give a good enough reason to be an upgrade member and display no real signs of untrustworthiness, why not?

This is not "look at me, look at me" in the slightest. If that's the way you wish to perceive it, that is no more than your own train of thought. The motive behind this thread is an example of the repercussions of treating bitcointalk members who are upstanding, follow the rules and mind their own business...like crap. The forum is slowly heading toward a centralized, pyramid style community, and in my eyes based on the beliefs I've been pushing since I joined here, it's atrocious. I personally do not want any involvement in that, so I am giving members who deserve a shot at being a ranked member the chance to do so.

Actually your posts look like someone who bought their account and is unfamiliar with the conduct usually expected on the forum.

Merit begging is something which is not acceptable and this thread will promote just that.

Also I am suspicious of your sudden altruistic gesture as I think it is a butthurt reaction to getting caught and tagged for meriting shitposts in an effort to up-rank the demoted newbies that were shills in your ANN thread.

Having looked at your recent posting history it is obvious that you are unfamiliar with the rules and etiquette such as multi-posting and the purpose of merit. Something that is suspect when it comes to an account that has been around for as long as it has.

It indicates to me that it is likely to be a bought account of  someone who has had problems before with their other alts or who is oblivious of the etiquette and rules of the forum.

This is what you said in another thread and is inconsistent with your "I abide by the rules" stance:
https://archive.fo/ZYgLd

<snip>
I do not agree with the merit system so I merited those contributing positively to our thread.
If a negative trust is really the course of action here, then so be it. It makes no difference to me or the project I am running.
<snip>

Suchmoon had a great suggestion:


Post a message signed with this address:

Btc address: 1BgbrQVTn7Z1AApimu7PzqK2Tk9CtwtXGo


Until then I view your account as probably being bought and associated with these likely hacked accounts :

Let's not be naive here. What it looks like to me is those accounts have been employed by you to bump your thread with fake volume/comments. Is it a coincidence that all the accounts of that page look to be hacked?

These accounts below are just from the last three pages of your thread and have all recently had their details reset and have woken up from a long period of activity:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=220679     Tulpa
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=165124     dark143i
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=29369 speedracerrick69
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=72232     Arrogance
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=25401     hobo
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=314785 Eirecoin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=102512     bnjmnkent
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=199385     macioman
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=162055 missworld
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=209858     dioncodot
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=119698     alkuluku
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=27535     Donald_Norman
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=82082     weirdthall
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=205508 catcoinminer
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=170247 Cesar22
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=298495 cryptzilla
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=313787 glenntalbot
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=29204 sareea
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=115980 hany103
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=136849 slap666
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=138155 hffule
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=25406 ibisy70
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=495378 d-leit
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=316024 sunnyxiong
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=218747 screenman
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=246731 agf
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=137126 quentinn
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=198543 alquinte
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=394451 Sasha00
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=132669 Xtremist
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=98101 ivann

1296  Other / Meta / Re: Ban Criptomen on: September 18, 2018, 11:18:28 PM

I bought an account from the owner. Not hacked one

Moderators bans a man who violated the rules and its forbidden to create a new account on the forum for him. I got a ban for something I didn't do and now I cant write on the forum

That is a novel excuse but it is not going to work.

Account sales are discouraged for a reason.

People who make multiple alt accounts and sell those accounts often plagiarize posts to increase their post count.

Buying accounts from account farmers contributes to the problem.
1297  Other / Meta / Re: The case of one account with no posts and 250 merit on: September 18, 2018, 11:02:44 PM
I've seen this before with farmed accounts. By deleting the post history they can sell the account and re-use the previous posts to farm a new account without getting caught for plagiarism.

1298  Economy / Reputation / Re: This account is not compromised and is not 'abusing the merit system' on: September 18, 2018, 12:30:26 PM
This is what you said in another thread:
https://archive.fo/ZYgLd

<snip>
I do not agree with the merit system so I merited those contributing positively to our thread.
If a negative trust is really the course of action here, then so be it. It makes no difference to me or the project I am running.
<snip>
1299  Other / Meta / Re: Copper membership resent statistic/list? on: September 18, 2018, 12:07:00 PM
I did a recent write up about it here:

Units of Evil, copper membership & list of copper members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5025522.msg45476567#msg45476567

(Last week)

As of 10 September 2018 there are 1020 copper members.
1300  Other / Meta / Re: How newbies or Jr member ranks are treated on: September 18, 2018, 11:57:19 AM
I am not posting this to gain merit or to pamper those newbies but ever since this Enhanced newbie restrictions & requirements or this updated Merit & new rank requirements came out, these people started to cry, shout out for justice or starting creating post to take consideration with the changes.

Now, here is what I observed. Those newbies with or without hundred activities are treated as shit posters now or an eye soar when they are creating a suggestion thread related to or like how to gain merits. Those comments I am seeing from higher ranks sounds discriminating. I respect how you react with those post but try to think before you react negatively. Try advising them what's wrong with their post and help them to improve. Don't look down on those post created by newbies and stop thinking that they are only creating this thread to gain merit to rank up.

Yes, your rank is higher and you might be too knowledgeable but why don't you act base on your rank? I mean, act in a professional way and give them a proper advise instead of discriminating their post.  Roll Eyes

Some people just shouldn't be on here.  If they post continuous spam and haven't bothered to read the rules then they don't deserve anybodies time.

If someone came to your house with dirty shoes (ignoring the please take off your shoes sign)  turned on the TV loudly, wrote on your furniture, slowed down your internet by downloading constantly, invited their friends over and ate from your fridge empty and was there purely for the "free food and drink". Would you tell them what they were doing wrong or tell them to go away in a less than polite way ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=search

Any question they have they can search on the forum. Instead a lot of people are too lazy and start a new thread. Some people have started more topics in one month than I have in two years.

Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 118 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!