Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 04:29:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 »
1841  Other / Meta / Re: AI Bot on the forum? on: June 24, 2018, 09:02:40 AM
If that is an AI bot then Artificial Intelligence is probably doomed.

Looks like someone who types like they talk. Without punctuation.
1842  Other / Meta / Re: Done with this forum on: June 24, 2018, 04:51:54 AM
Why would you bother with the risk of getting scammed by an account farmer (and contribute to the account farming and hacking problem) when you can just buy a copper membership.
1843  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Merit abuse. 50+12 merits received within 1 day and 1 minute. on: June 23, 2018, 03:05:59 PM
Why did i get red? My merits were diminishing and i decided to distribute them, because in the message appears! "There is no point in accumulating sMerit; Keeping it yourself does not benefit you, and we reserve the right to decline the unused sMerit in the future." I received only 7 merit, received merit and returned to who gave me, why this?

Have a chat with the person that gave you the red trust.

The problem is that https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=911155 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=996343

Both have been identified as merit abusers.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=911155 is undeniably an account / merit farmer.

It is discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4508271.msg40681482#msg40681482
1844  Other / Off-topic / Re: Flat Earth on: June 23, 2018, 01:48:05 PM


Genuinely concerned.
1845  Economy / Reputation / Re: nullius - Where are they now? on: June 23, 2018, 01:23:34 PM
If he was using TOR then the Units of Evil might have got him.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=711968.msg8044683#msg8044683

Using TOR can get expensive is some scammer has been getting banned using the same IP.
1846  Other / Meta / Re: Trust system abuse on: June 23, 2018, 01:08:15 PM

Yes I know: digaran if you don't like this system you are free to leave and start your own forum. guess what? day after day you people are losing your credibility and soon you'll become irrelevant to the crowd.


I imagine that the majority of people are oblivious to the trust system and probably also the merit system.

Slightly off-topic and no offence intended - but each time I see "internal investigator"  I think of a colonoscopy.

1847  Other / Meta / Re: The 1st hero account ranked up from senior?! Cleary an abuse, alts or bought? on: June 23, 2018, 10:28:05 AM
I can see at least one staff member opposing this..
Doesn't that seem a little questionable where a moderator is giving merit to so many posts that are being deleted?

Forget the part where they're staff: where's the sensibility in determining quality posts when you rapid-fire merit to users who consistently have deleted posts? (i.e. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1762404)

The Russian moderator gives merit for users that help identify spam. Which is why there are so many deleted posts on some of the merit history of Russian users.

It indirectly does help keep the forums clean. The Russian forum is quite tidy, organised and often a good read.

It is discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4330297.msg38817096#msg38817096
1848  Other / Meta / Re: Is this a merit bug ? on: June 23, 2018, 10:15:22 AM
No LOL... You missed the topic to read. Hold on I am bringing it in a min.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4508271.msg40681482#msg40681482 ==> Re: The 1st hero account ranked up from senior?! Cleary an abuse, alts or bought?

We are calling it "de-ranked"  Tongue

Looks like we've got a few cases of a kind, gaining the infamous status of "de-ranked":

I must have just missed the defrocking. When I took the screenshots they didn't have red trust yet.
1849  Other / Meta / Is this a merit bug ? on: June 23, 2018, 10:04:24 AM


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=911155



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=828879

1850  Other / Ivory Tower / Re: Protection against armed robbery of Bitcoin on: June 23, 2018, 08:38:15 AM
If you've invested in Bitcoin then you've stumbled upon some new found wealth. With this wealth you should buy a tank. That should be pretty well suited against the averaged armed robbery.

Seriously though the best protection would be spreading your coins into multiple wallets. Even if you did get robbed you could just give up one private key which would have less than 5% of your true investment.



I have always wanted a tank. I'm not sure how useful they are against armed robbery but it would be a lot of fun. Ex military or a Howe & Howe Ripsaw ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5FjZUwe000

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WxO6TwnFzU
1851  Economy / Reputation / Re: FAKE NEGATIVE TRUST SCORE FROM CORRUPTED USER. on: June 23, 2018, 07:50:20 AM
Buying accounts is considered dodgy.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4508940.0

Spamming is also considered dodgy .
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-spam-bad-filip-poutintsev/




Source: http://archive.is/qvxyB



1852  Other / Meta / Re: FAKE TRUST AND MERIT SYSTEM ON BITCOINTALK on: June 23, 2018, 06:54:10 AM
Quote
But unlike Bitcoin it’s not open, transparent nor equal. Bitcointalk is full cronyism that is

It really does not matter what kind of account you hold except for 2 things.

1. Only account with specific status can post links to signature and therefore promote their website.
2. Only old account can alter your Trust rating and therefore completely poison your account.

Users can either trade Merit (send it to each other) or:
Buy old accounts of people who no longer use Bitcointalk and want to sell them.

Let me give you some advice:

Posting dodgy ICO or pump and dump coin ANN
Offering dodgy MLM or Ponzis
Asking for loans without collateral from an untrusted account.
Offering to sell goods without trusted escrow from a untrusted account.
Offering to buy, sell or trade merit.
Offering to buy or sell accounts.
Doing anything else that appears dodgy or fraudulent.

Will result in being tagged with negative default trust.
It is to protect others. It won't stop you from posting.

There are certain groups of people that respect each other. I wouldn't describe it as cronyism. I've had big disagreements on here but that hasn't resulted in being tagged by a DT2. You have to do or suggest doing something scammy to receive that.

You can purchase a copper membership that has the same rights as member status for a small fee: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=credit;promote It allows you to post links in your signature.

Buying accounts is considered dodgy.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4508940.0

Will buy Hero or Legendary Bitcointalk account.

Must be with positive or zero Trust.

Contact me at:

Skype: filip.poutintsev
Telegram: @poutintsev

Do not PM me here, I'm not reading those messages!


PS: Spamming is also considered dodgy on bitcointalk.






Source: http://archive.is/qvxyB

1853  Other / Meta / Re: mindset of some people here on: June 23, 2018, 06:17:58 AM
~

I got your point, right that's why its a "discussion" however what I think OP is pointing out is that there are so many useless threads and it is being used by shitposters just to create "at least 50-75 characters constructive posts" without reading that it was answered multiple times. Btw whats the next big ico this year?  Grin

Hardly anybody reads comments. Google search takes effort. It is easier to ask questions without thinking. I want someone to pre-chew my food for me too. Is that 70 characters yet ? I can't be bothered to count. Damn I think I exerted myself and wrote too much.
1854  Other / Ivory Tower / Re: Research on Satoshi Nakamoto identity on: June 23, 2018, 04:03:57 AM
Convicted fraudster Ronald Keala Kua Maria applied for the trademark of Bitcoin Cash, and calls himself Satoshi Nakamoto

Wants to charge 2% royalties for transactions over $800

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMahwybUUd4

http://satoshinakamoto.ws/







There are just so many suspects:  Who is really Satoshi Nakamoto ?
1855  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk on: June 23, 2018, 03:46:40 AM
More likely not a person due to the complexity of the code. AI makes sense complex computational power. Through deep learning AI controls financial resources feeds on broadness of blockchain to grow and expand.


I disagree. Everything is complex if you don't understand it.

People like Wei Dai, Adam Beck, Hal Finney, Gavin Andresen, Martti Malmi, and many others are all capable of understanding and developing the complexities of bitcoin.
1856  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk on: June 23, 2018, 03:39:17 AM
There is a conspiracy on bitcointalk that Satoshis nakamoto was a member of this forum and set it up while going out of the forum. But I don't believe it.

More than a conspiracy. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3
1857  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Merit abuse. 50+12 merits received within 1 day and 1 minute. on: June 23, 2018, 02:29:54 AM
My humble opinion, to solve this problem of over merit, just modify the merit voting taking away the possibility to decide how much merit to give to an user by the voter himself.

Permit to vote a merit to a user just with 1 point.

Simple and will avoid any abuse

Then they would send 1 merit 50 times.

No permit to send only one vote for post for user and will never happen

50 different posts 1 merit each.

Well in that case the user had to prepare 50 posts, not one and at that point find that all 50 posts are of good quality to merit a point, can be a different challenge, and can reveal underneath games....
I don't believe this is a necessary approach. Since the airdropped Merit is almost spent there would only be problems for Merit sources reaching their limit of distributed Merit. I could imagine this needs a lot of time to find good posts and if a Merit source finds a good one, why not rewarding it with 10 Merit or more?

Personally I read Theymos post about merit and see the purpose of the merit system as rewarding users that provide good content. So when I look at giving merit now I look at whether a person does regular shitposts -  if they regularly post shitposts - I won't give them merit for a good post because in my opinion defeats the purpose of merit.

Generally I try to restrict one merit per post because I only have a limited amount to give and now am involved in lots of interesting projects documenting bitcointalk history - so there are quite a few contributors to reward now for quality contributions. It is quite useful as a bookmark. Previous to this I found it quite difficult to find good posts and see no problem with merit sources rewarding consistent good posters with up to 50 merits.

With ANN - it is a commercial post. It should be written to a decent standard of the language it purports to be in. It is different for a user attempting to answer a thread. I'm dyslexic - my language skills are not perfect. Enabling the browser spellcheck has been useful. If I write in some of the other languages I attempt to get better at I would not put an important thread up without getting it checked over by a native speaker. You'd be surprised how easy it is to get someone on the forum to help translate.

The theyoungmillionaire (who I only had a very brief conversation with via PM) helped me translate an important anti phishing post into Filipino (A lot of Filipino users are victims of exchange phishing scams) and another user helped me translate the same post into Russian (my Russian is quite poor). I like reading the Russian and German forums because it has some high quality posts in there - even though I am not particularly good at either language.

On June 10 User 1miau https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2143453 received 50 merits (33+17) from a mod of a German board phantastisch https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18312 for a topic called  Übersetzungs-Spam gefunden? Hier könnt ihr ihn berichten (Translation = Found a translation spam ? Here you can report it.) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4415262.msg39318850#msg39318850 Also he received 12 merits within 1 minute on June 14 for the same topic from the user qwk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=24140. I think this is a record for merits giveaway from two profiles to a single profile in that short period of time for a REGULAR TOPIC. This people are either fiends or 1miau is just their alt account, that is pushed to Full Member status via merit abuse. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2143453



I don't know whether you checked but phantastisch is bitcointalk staff.


and qwk is one of the most generous merit senders. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=topsend

and legendary detonator... Grin


Also - "Übersetzungs-Spam gefunden? Hier könnt ihr ihn berichten" translates correctly into " Translation Spam found? You can report it here" rather than:
"Found a translation spam ? Here you can report it"

1miau won't even benefit from the merits because his activity count first has to catch up.
                       Activity     Merit
Member             60             10
Full Member   120            100
1858  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk on: June 23, 2018, 01:18:45 AM
Have you reported this to CIA or the FBI already? That looks like very valuable information and it could help them find him. On the other hand, maybe you should try to delete all this information.

I think you are on the right path, but since Satoshi was the creator of bitcoin, and we all thank him for that so maybe we should try to not help in the discovery of his identity as a token of appreciation. If you don't let this one go, you will probably ruin bitcoin, Christmas and very important companies in our society. Some things are better left hidden.

I think Santa is safe for now. Just remember that Kris Kringle has used pseudo-names for decades and the elves at the bitcoin foundation will keep him safe.

Besides:

Convicted fraudster Ronald Keala Kua Maria applied for the trademark of Bitcoin Cash, and calls himself Satoshi Nakamoto

Wants to charge 2% royalties for transactions over $800

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMahwybUUd4

http://satoshinakamoto.ws/








1859  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Ronald Keala Kua Maria claiming to be Satoshi and registering trademark. on: June 23, 2018, 12:09:33 AM
 Not sure whether this should be in the "alts" section. Since the trademark is for "Bitcoin cash".  Grin

Convicted fraudster Ronald Keala Kua Maria applied for the trademark of Bitcoin Cash, and calls himself Satoshi Nakamoto

Wants to charge 2% royalties for transactions over $800

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMahwybUUd4

http://satoshinakamoto.ws/








Fascinating that "Satoshi" doesn't know the difference between "bitcoin" and "bitcoin cash".

Knowing a bit about copyright and trademark law - the obvious flaws are quite amusing.

Now that the IRS know who the real Satoshi is.....


Satoshi would never write something like this:



Unfortunately for Ronald the real Satoshi could spell and was a meticulous writer.

The real Satoshi also owns around a million bitcoins - so wouldn't have to bother getting patents of charging a fee.

1860  Other / Serious discussion / Re: Thorough analysis: Terms&Conditions & Privacy on crypto exchanges !BE WARNED! on: June 22, 2018, 11:09:28 AM

* MERCATOX:




This concerns me. For a large exchange to be operating as a shell company.


* COINEXCHANGE:

1. Terms of Use:
Didn't find where CoinExchange is based.

While it isn't specifically stated on their site there are lots of clues in their T&C:

You and CoinExchange submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New South Wales. (Australia)

Anti-Money Laundering Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) (Australian legislation)

Should you use Services from CoinExchange which cost less than AUD$40,000 certain guarantees apply to those Services. These guarantees apply regardless of any express warranties to which you may also be entitled under these Terms. (Australian Currency)

You may not use the Services if you are located in, or are a citizen or resident of any state, country, territory, or other jurisdiction that is on the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade's Consolidated List, or any other location where your use of the Services would otherwise violate any applicable law.


* BINANCE:


Binance location is hard to find:

Registered in Hong Kong but located in Hong Kong and Japan.
Secretive with its exact location for security purposes.



Currently in the process of moving to malta



https://cryptoslate.com/binance-malta/




* BITFINEX:


Registered in the British Virgin Islands under the name iFinex Inc, with subsidiaries Bitfinex in Hong Kong and BFXNA in the US.

Founder Raphael Nicolle, who is based in France, and director of community and product development Zane Tackett, based in San Francisco.
CSO Phil Potter, based in New York, and director of infrastructure Adam Chamely, who is in Atlanta.

It is believed that bitfinex is a resurection of failed exchange Bitcoinica.
Source: https://www.coindesk.com/bitfinex-examined-bitcoin-exchange/

Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!