Nice thread! Herewith, some proof of work timestamps, for reference; Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc., - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0Re: Satoshi is Back, suggests Fortune - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg41411073#msg41411073... some more proof of work ... Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies. - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg38965734#msg38965734Quote from: satoshi on July 14, 2010, 06:15:19 PM Quote from: satoshi on July 15, 2010, 01:42:17 PM Quote from: satoshi on July 15, 2010, 05:32:31 PM Win32 CPU Cycles vs 'Live Protection' Engines ? - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35.0Re: EARLY BITCOIN WALLET.DAT - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822045.msg18148803#msg18148803  The reason I made this thread was to consolidate the great information on the forum. Not by replicating it but by linking to it. Another reason I made it was to stimulate some intelligent conversation and hopefully draw out some of the legends on here that were part of that history in the making. I feel I have succeeded with all those objectives. When seeing this - that is impressive: https://i.imgur.com/J4tToO2.png - in case image doesn't load.  |
|
|
|
i guess there is a reason why they put the flames in the title ... lol ... this will go up in flames  Yeah flames and red flags. Warning - some of the people on the "team" of this ICO are fake profiles. |
|
|
|
Here's one I found when checking the post history to see if the user was worthy of receiving a merit; unsurprisingly, he was not worthy: because when the market is down the price of each cryptos are going down , it was affected , so many crypto are have been sold . ao the market os down , but when it is down it is the best time to buy tokens
If it had been posted by a user called "magicsmoker" I'd understand the reason. It is a nice mind, to sell some party if you need money. I think in general, if you are investing in Bitcoin you must have a plan about some surprises in your life about the money.
Same with me but the one saw i'm masturbating is my sister. It's so ankward.
Sometimes I wonder if I believe in human evolution. Which led me to this old topic. (Don't ask how) |
|
|
|
All MeFy Team members profile are in public for everyone to view. All our offices and address to our clinic is available on our website. Do visit our clinic for your health check-up.
Yes - and for the average person just looking at the information on your website it is hard to verify if the profiles are real. All advisors and team members has been onboarded based on our due diligence and the contribution that they can make to the product and ICO. Some of those profiles are fake. SO I am interested in the due diligence that you said that you did. |
|
|
|
Anything relevant to "escrow" applications and their member's credibility is not off topic. Suggesting people delete their posts and post them somewhere else is not very ethical especially trying to convince them and moderators it is on topic, when it actually is. This post as well is on topic, discussing the situation of scam escrows and random people wanting 100 grand thrown at them to "keep safe". This guy's red tag is well deserved. Might as well consider this a scammer baiting thread  That's the only thing this thread will be helpful for. For 100k, any russian cyber security firm will do this job. No idea what OP was thinking while creating this thread.Maybe hype? Perhaps the OP can place it on escrow with two escrow agents in a multisig account. Like suggested here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4627105.msg41874894#msg41874894 |
|
|
|
archived for reference
~
This is off-topic here. Discussing about this issue will bring distraction only for the goal OP is trying to achieve. I suggest you to delete the post and move the contents either on this topic or on this topic. The second one is more appropriate. It is too late here. So, you are not going to get any response now from me. Tomorrow I have a busy day but I will find some of my time to reply. The delay of my reply will also going to give you some more time if you want to edit/tweak your post. PS: I am happy that you improved a lot and actually started to contribute for the forum ( content creation and merit history backs up my claim) after I picked you on you and Lafu case. Before the incident - your concentration was only in Lafu and cryptopia support thread. It is not off topic - you brought it up in your first post. It was a reply to what YOU posted. http://archive.is/IfFdoYet another attempt to silence me. Cryptopia forum closed recently. So I moved to post more on Bitcointalk - and only because I found how much history is on here. My posting on here more has nothing to do with you. It was something that The Pharmacist said and what Eddie13 said about the cryptopia/btct - Hatfield/McCoy rivalry. It lead to me having a closer look at what bitcointalk had to offer and resulted in this research. Other peoples enthusiasm for the history on here is why I am here more. Otherwise I would probably only made a few posts between then and now. Lafu and cryptopia support thread.
(Lafu has no thread and Cryptopia doesn't offer support on Bitcointalk) ANN thread posts were only during the time Cryptopia was having a support crisis. I was helping users. Their support team was having difficulty dealing with the volume of requests and I helped users that were having serious problems because I was in a position to help. Normally I rarely posted on bitcointalk. Your content creation and merit history link proves nothing. It only shows merit - it shows nothing of the two years prior. I'm not here to earn merit or to earn in bounties. I rarely used to make threads. Most of my posts were interacting with others on existing threads. Making new threads every time you have something to say makes a mess of the forum - even more so if it is multiple threads about the same issue. You are trying to distract from the accusation against you by constantly regurgitating your accusation against me that I sent 19 merits to a user with 542 merits. To a user that is not a shitposter. I respect Lafu for what he does in his own free time for no reward - helping people. You are trying to re-litigate your accusations against me over and over again because you were unhappy with the result. I am the troll ? I'm here to talk about stuff that interests me. If there is stuff on this forum that interests me I will write here. If there is not - I will be elsewhere. As far as I was concerned my issues with you were over and unless you keep on regurgitating old accusations. I prefer to not talk to you and have largely ignored you. I will comment when you mention me - especially if other users alert me that you are talking about me. Don't try and redirect me where I can and cannot talk. You brought me into this with your post so I have every right to respond here. If you don't want me to comment then don't bring my name into the conversation.I have no intent on commenting in any of the other threads and if you can refrain from mentioning me further then I have nothing further to say about you that I haven't already said. So, he started to troll me everywhere and ended up doing all sorts of investigations I started one thread in meta and moved your info to investigations so google can't index it. Further reply here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4221113.msg42063192#msg42063192 |
|
|
|
My Facebook, LinkedIn, business website everything has been bought publicly. There was a manipulated biased investigation (backup screenshots #1, #2 and #3 ) against me by a member because I made him upset for merit abusing. So, he started to troll me everywhere and ended up doing all sorts of investigations just to humiliate me in the community. In the process he basically pulled almost everything about me on his investigation topic. So my identity is fairly open. Anything unpleasant from me will ruin my career and the reputation I have earned in the community which I won't let it happen. I agree that your identity is open and information was easy to find. The investigation is not biased. You drew attention to yourself so I looked into who you are and reported your actions.
All the information provided is accurate to the best of my knowledge and if there is anything that is not - I will happily edit it when proof of inaccuracy is provided.You expressed your opinion about me and opened numerous threads in which it was discussed. When I challenged you on the accusation and you didn't get the result you were wanting you opened more threads. Perhaps you can show me where you did that to anyone else ? That fact is not hidden and for fairness I have mentioned on numerous occasions that you accused me of merit abuse. The accusation was thoroughly discussed here: here and here. You have kept repeating the same accusations every time I have criticized you. The conclusion was that no merit was intentionally swapped and that on one occasion I gave merit to a post that was not well worded but was helping a user. I maintain that Lafu helps out many users on Bitcointalk and myself and many others feel that he deserves merit. As a precaution both Lafu and myself decided to avoid giving merit to each other to avoid even a hint of impropriety. I maintain that there was no conspiracy to swap merit and both my posts and Lafus posts have received merit from many other users. I don't care much for rank or status since I don't participate in campaigns or bounties. I could have easily been a higher ranking member if I had made more posts since 2016. On a number of occasions you have attempted to bait me which I ignored. I even asked a DT member I know not to tag you (not that I would be able to control that - it was only a request since I was concerned about perception towards that member) so it would be judged fairly on the merits of the accusation. The trolling accusation is also unfair. Other than pointing out what I disagreed with I did not "stalk", "follow" or "troll" you on this forum. On a number of occasions I had you on ignore and others alerted me of yet more accusations towards me. I edited some of my posts to be fairer or clearer and to take into account comments that others made criticizing my accusations. I also have the unfortunate situation where I am dyslexic so make a lot of mistakes and often have to re-read and edit them. Not once did I try to silence or limit your input - like you attempted to do to me on numerous occasions. Here and your now deleted timer post and abusive posts. Here and hereI didn't troll your posts - I only responded to posts where I was mentioned. You make about 5 threads for topics that can be in just one and then complain when people post in all 5. People who know me will vouch that I do not let my opinion of someone cloud my judgement to deliberately misrepresent their character. Likewise I will not let my opinion of someone cloud my judgement if they scam someone. It will call it out for how I see it. People who criticize me fairly and ethically often end up as friends or gain my respect. Those that turn out to be hypocrites do not. |
|
|
|
Gollum’s question requires us to know what the initial airdrop for each person was, and since that has not been published yet, and due to the fact that it depends on the activity of each user in the year (roughly) prior to Merit Kickoff, we have to give this question a pass. The only approximation that can be done on this is to calculate the “has at least got” value for each forum member, much like vod dues on his BPIP. The indicator nevertheless necessarily leaves out the 600K global total airdrop, which is a big figure to discard.
This is my guess at the airdropped smerit. Member: 1 Full Member: 10 Sr. Member: 25 Hero Member: 50 Legendary: 100 |
|
|
|
Thank you for your advice, I hope you don't have problem with the product.
Just for everyone's benefit and those who believe in the product and the benefits that it can bring to the society, whitelist is on.
Presale Requirements
Whitelist [Starting 8th June]
Presale - to be announced
Min/Max Contribution: 50 ETH - 1000 ETH
Min/Max Contribution: 5 BTC - 80 BTC
That is not what is says here in your advertisement: https://www.listico.io/ico-calendar/mefy-crowdsaleArchived here: https://web.archive.org/web/20180709004631/https://www.listico.io/ico-calendar/mefy-crowdsaleAll advisors and team members has been onboarded based on our due diligence and the contribution that they can make to the product and ICO. Really? So you're claiming to have conducted some due diligence when you on-boarded 'Mark Haynes'? There is a reason why lowbander80 'Mark' has suddenly gone quiet in this thread. He is not who he claims to be and for you to assert that your team members are vetted prior to inclusion serves only as damning insight into how shoddy your operation is. I strongly suggest you follow my advice in this regards: You'd be far better off cancelling this ICO and, if you are a legitimate operation, going about it the right way instead which includes oversight managed by one of the big four audit firms and having the ICO funds held in escrow. Taking the time to provide proper controls and oversight will serve to assuage the concerns surrounding your platform. 
Do you agree that if the person promoting the ICO is dishonest that it would make the ICO look extremely suspect ? |
|
|
|
By comparison, in the English locale give 10 merits in one post is considered normal. In our locale, at once the conversation about dual accounts, buying, and so on. Again, all this fuss is unhealthy due to the fact that Merita little. I hope this at least somehow clarifies the logic of the action and problems of our locale I think you will find that in the English section the merit from genuine sources is not an average of 10 at a time. It might be more between older accounts but it is definitely not my experience from the regular sources. Also there should always be an incentive to lure the English speaking users that have plenty to offer into the English language section where more people can read it. Interaction with people from other countries is one of the things I like about this forum. Edit: One thing that I noticed but not investigated is that on some of the Russian users that I clicked on at random they had received merit but hadn't spent their sMerits. Not spending sMerits can hinder the flow of merits. Maybe one of the statistics gurus on here can look into it more. |
|
|
|
|
There are sections of this forum I don't even bother to go to. unless it is to report shitposters to do my bit in helping clean up the forum.
I don't have a problem with people having low quality conversation but when bots and shills add to that with complete and utter nonsense (spam) then conversation has been broken down altogether and the real purpose of human interaction has been lost.
If bots and shills had no incentive to "bump their thread" and post nonsense to spread their blatant advertising then intelligent conversation can surface again.
It would also mean that some more genuine projects that give bitcointalk a miss would be on here - or be more on here.
After all the forum is called "bitcoin forum" and not "altcoin advertising" or "altcoin bots talk to themselves".
There are high ranking accounts that have low quality posts. They either just make the standard, improve their standard or eventually get banned.
|
|
|
|
Key fingerprint = 8021 8C39 0508 2174 C9BE 26F9 B3E1 A628 2807 D642 -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=9aqv
-----END PGP MESSAGE----- |
|
|
|
[ There are several problems in this direction. We have one of the biggest locales on the forum, millions of messages. Only 2 active moderators for this whole mass. Also very meager with merit-sorse, in our locale of merit is simply not, in comparison with the English locale. The moderator decided to give him such options. By the way, he threw him in the usual posts that he saw and they were interesting to him. Now this possibility is not present, but our sections have considerably changed. So this definitely was good, although not in the standard way. But in this there is nothing direct such secret  By comparison, in the English locale give 10 merits in one post is considered normal. In our locale, at once the conversation about dual accounts, buying, and so on. Again, all this fuss is unhealthy due to the fact that Merita little. I hope this at least somehow clarifies the logic of the action and problems of our locale The statistics do not support your claims. Russian section gets plenty of merit per user. Spam has been tidied up in that section and some other local boards should take notes. (Some local boards are great) The only concern I have is that some of the reporting on there is of an industrial scale and this thread shows how that can be abused by malicious reporting of targeted users. It is not the moderators fault but they should keep an eye on it so it doesn't develop into a problem. When enforcing the rules the goals should always be kept in mind.   Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3093768 |
|
|
|
What about: Satoshi Bitcoin and Bitcointalk Founder Wei Dai creator of the Bitcoin predecessor b-money (1998) Gavin Andresen Bitcoin Chief Scientist Sirius Bitcoin Core Developer and Bitcointalk.org domain owner (First dev to work with Satoshi) theymos Bitcointalk Admin & he wrote the Bitcoin Block Explorer, although he does not run it anymore. coblee Litecoin Founder Vitalik Buterin Ethereum Founder ocminer (Suprnova Mining Pools) who now twice alerted users about verge exploits. In April and May |
|
|
|
|
You can already achieve that by giving double the merits to a good post from a consistent good poster that also show a reliable sMerit history.
By giving someone merit you are not only complimenting their post but also their ability to spread cheer.
Especially if they are Legendary already they have nothing to gain by it.
If you make the merit system too complex then it just opens it up for abuse or confusion.
Some good tracking tools are already available to see how the merit spreads.
Merit sources can use those tools to easily track and predict suitable recipients.
|
|
|
|
I hope this clarifies and if you still have any further question, feel free to write back to me.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4410505.msg41518853#msg41518853I was hoping to get a reply to my questions in the other thread. This is not just something that he said - It is something that you supposedly said and told him to communicate to me.If you said that - why did you say it ? If you didn't say it then why did I receive that message ?  A very important question: Do you agree that if the person promoting the ICO is dishonest that it would make the ICO look extremely suspect ? |
|
|
|
Honestly speaking - from outside, the Russian section seems a mess. A total mess. It could be a better place than it is now. Seems like mismanagement is killing the section.
You don't have to accuse so categorically. There is no disorder, the more complete. Xandry long was alone. After I was appointed as a moderator, the situation in the Russian section improved. And users talk about it. By the way, I helped theymos in the investigation of this case. And provided evidence that the case with chimk is a hoax. I'm writing this not for praise. It's just unpleasant when people say that. Unjust words. I disagree that the Russian section is a mess. It is one of the most active local forums on here and has some very unique articles and tidy organisation. I have said this in private before but I will say it here too: The reasons I like the Russian forum - I find the standard of posts there good, highly organised and often find information there that is not available in the English forum.I have the utmost respect for the moderators there and while it may not always be perfect - you cannot please everyone all the time. Criticism is heard and acted upon. Russian is a complex language and things like trolling are not clearly obvious unless you understand the language. Russian trolling is far more subtle. Whenever a system is implemented people will find loopholes to cheat the system. It doesn't necessarily mean that the system is flawed. It just means that modifications need to be done to patch those holes. Just like here in Meta there are respected members in the Russian forum that discuss how to make those changes. It is very hard to balance the undeniable massive problem of shitposts against the incidental deletion of user posts that technically breach the rules but not the purpose of the forum. (e.g. minor errors by beginners). |
|
|
|
Today at 12:28:23 PM: 5 from Sate Jamu for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
Today at 12:26:27 PM: 23 from Sir Paijoe for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
Today at 12:24:55 PM: 16 from Bacotan Bae for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
...
I think that may have been a bug that caused that. I can still see all the posts. Do you have the user on ignore ? The "Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored" is not a bug, it's just that I have the respective boards on ignore. The posts themselves don't appear to warrant merit. The times are suspect too.
That's what I was talking about. He received a lot of merit for shitposts with usually a 2-minute-margin in between. Looks a lot like someone using his alts' merit. Let them use up all the merits from their alts and then hopefully they banned for shitposting. |
|
|
|
The negative feedback doesn't affect your trust score. Leave 'em be.
I noticed that. I wasn't sure, and I value my reputation. Thanks for the reassurance. gives a negative impression to me? No, I can't say that it does. If anything you seem to wear them as a badge of honor.  Untrusted feedback doesn't show on your rating. Only someone on the default trust list placing feedback affects your trust score. The person you placed feedback on already got tagged by Suchmoon who has DT (Default trust)  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4610912Untrusted feedback can mean it is completely fake or that the person is not on the trust list. Untrusted feedback is nothing to worry about unless it is true. This is why when you place feedback make sure that: 1) Get your facts correct (which you did) 2) document them using an archive like https://archive.org/web/ in case the post gets deleted. 3) Always use a reference for the feedback. This way the person reading it can make up their own mind. (which you did) https://www.virustotal.com is good for checking files you don't want to load onto your computer.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
