Can we rule #3[1] this one please? Its only going to get worse.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0

When I saw your trolling posts, I was thinking why you are doing this! Now, I got it! It was just an advertisement spam! You can also use your signature to advertise about that book!

All because of 1 person , Quickseller , who marked me the 1st day I was here for no reason. Doesn't seem fair to me.

have duo hw1 and have set both up to use the same seed and can pair multiple devices to the wallet. however, it appears transaction authorisations are only push out successfully to the last paired device. is there a way to get this to work for more than one paired device?

I'm wondering why I got no reset email for my Account Salmen.
With this Account I got a reset mail without any problems.

As far as i know, Brainwallet.org is a web resource, which is centralizing your Bitcoin (your security is being weakened and made more easily attackable because of).
Web resources are constantly getting hacked, so yes, even though a web resource can be properly secured and maybe Brainwallet.org was, it still has the big vulnerability of coalescing BTC into one vulnerable environment.

Then again maybe it wasn't. I can't personally vouch that Brainwallet.org's deterministic algorithm was secure, or that there was no security vulnerability on their side, or exploits, or was legit.

So yes this is centralizing your Bitcoin security/vulnerability.

Especially never put anything over half a coin on a web wallet that has the private key and you don't. It is ridiculous this keeps happening.

Has anyone heard of www.e-coin.io ?  Apparently they offer a Visa debit card, which is both fiat and digital currency.

I was never a fan of brainwallet... The idea sounded too insecure to me. I hope those seed words used by electrum are safer.

i spend 8 hour to earn bitcoin using faucet not bad my earning is 200k satoshi daily. my favorite faucet payment if using faucetbox

Thanks.

 -snip-

Do you know how to contact the devs? Its jackjack's lib, but there seems to be something wrong. This is what happened when I tried to make the picture just now.

[ img]https://i.imgur.com/wpWnwV8.png[/img]

Edit:

Contacted chainquery as they have thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1115048.msg12097893#msg12097893

just want to check can greenbits sign a message?
if yes, how

Is it possible for bad bear to dig the messages which are deleted permanently because deleted by both parties sender as well as receiver.

i think blockchain online wallet is the best and i'm only using this wallet to save my bitcoin and perhaps some people said using blockchain have a lot a problem but  for me since the first time i save my bitcoin in this wallet and until now i never have a issue with my wallet

Wah.... having 1 Phs vouch and selling more than that... and you call it legit ? It is another AM hash in the making, which will wipe out millions from people once again.

Some details that are not clear to me:
1. If I am a third-party (i did not participate in the creation of the multisig address or with any of the transactions or the redeem script) and I look at the blockchain and find a multisig address, will I be able to know which Bitcoin addresses were used to create the multisig address?
2. If I am a third-party (same conditions as above) and I look at the blockchain, I see a confirmed transaction where a multisig address was used to send BTC to some other address, will I be able to know which of the individual Bitcoin addresses used in the creation of the multisig address actually SIGNED the transaction? i.e., if Addresses #1, #2, and 3# were used to create MultiSigAddress #1 (2 of 3 signatures required). Will I be able to know if for #1 and #3 signed the transaction (and that #2 did not participate)?

Well, how much time does it take to confirm a transaction..its taking too long? I sent 0.002 2 times 2 hours ago and each tx carried a fee of 0.0001 BTC .. Its still unconfirmed.. Is it the problem with the wallet? thanks!

You can't import keys into MultiBit anymore. That function was removed. The only thing you can do is to send the Bitcoin from Bitcoin Core to MultiBit.

-nip-
What are VDPOS and HIPOS ?

if they are good strategy why bitcoin developers didn't apply them on BTC ?

That page is pretty embarrassing.   There is absolutely no mention of the fundamental flaw in PoS consensus which none of your proposals have addressed:  As of yet none of the proof of stake proposals are workable because there is nothing at stake!   If someone is PoS mining it is in their best interest to attempt to concurrently build an honest chain as well as all possible attack forks just in case one of them happens to win.  Under most schemes this is the profit maximizing move, in all I've seen so far its at least neutral.  Mining an attack under PoW actually involves _spending_ something and taking the risk other miners will extend it. PoW works because your work is at stake so even a very small amount of honest miners make mercenary rational miners behave honestly too.

Moreover, I don't see why you argue here that it better aligns incentives. Parties can't mine PoW without having a validating node (or face the extreme risk other miners will toss them off on forks).  All it does is redistribute control, which might be useful— if not for the fact that it makes attacking more attractive for selfish participants.   I was hopeful of these techniques but as of yet I don't see how any can be workable.

You misunderstand.  The risk isn't that someone could attack the network, it is that they could attack the network with no cost.

Imagine bitcoin worked using a PoS.  An early adopter had acquired 1M BTC at one time in the past but over time he lost/sold/spent/transferred them.   Today he has no bitcoins but the blockchain contains a history of a time when he did have 1M BTC.  If the amount of the stake being used is <1M BTC he could rewrite history not by using coins he has today (a real cost), not by buying millions of mining rigs (a real cost) but by using the history of the coins he once had (no cost).  He has absolutely nothing at risk and nothing to lose.   If he and potentially others decided to attack the network they would rewrite the blockchain starting from when they had a larger stake, creating a parallel history where they didn't lose/sell/spend/transfer the coins. 

They can attack the network based on what they had (but no longer do) in the past.  There is nothing at risk and no cost to the attack.  THAT is the PoS problem. 


Sure they can, however there is a cost to that attack and there is something at risk which they lose if they fail.  With PoS you can attack the network for "free" using something you had but no longer do.  It is very hard to secure against an attack where the attacker can do so at any time without any cost and without any risk.

I never Told Or stated that Theymos Will Mind This but what i mean was it is not Recommended.
There is alot what Recommendation Means. Moreover once you PM regarding any issues to Tomatocage ,QS,Hilario or other concerned Mods they look up if the reason is legit and Nuke the Scammers profile ASAP.

Note: One who don't know about Trust system will also not bother about checking  Scam Accusations section over BCT.

We don't intend to add this no.
Being able to recover your bitcoin, in extremis, from your wallet words is a real life saver.

With Classic support calls we would always ask if the user had made backups. I only ever recall ONE person saying that they had, normally the reply was a deafening silence.

We call it the 'wallet words promise'. As long as you write down your wallet words and keep them safe, you can get your bitcoin back.

-snip-

2. Someone asked me the other day, "How can MultiBit HD be trusted if it isn't open source?" I was under the impression that MultiBit HD was open source, but it seems like I was incorrect about this?

Thanks!