|
1322
|
Other / Beginners & Help / Re: How to send a fake bitcoin transaction ?
|
on: June 07, 2015, 05:11:33 PM
|
LOL is that just curiosity? You can't send a fake one just like that since every single node connected is responsible for verifying each transaction as far as I know. I think it was a mistake. He asked a different question than what he wanted. i think i find a way to do it in testnet network (just like bitcoin but for research ans testing) He want to confirm the transactions just like miners do but in a different way, I assume. Even though he said he don't want to confirm transactions, it looks like he want confirm transactions.
not confirming the transaction cause i should be a miner to do, just checking if it's a valid transaction.you insert the transaction hash(tx hash) and the appli. should say yes it's valid or no it's not valid. |
|
|
|
|
1323
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22]
|
on: June 07, 2015, 05:07:22 PM
|
Try with -r command. It is working for me. Another example: what if I want to feed those patterns into vanitygen: 1super 1superd 1superdu 1superdup 1superdupe 1superduper and I want it to print out the privkey/pubkey pair whenever one of those matches is found. What method can I use to achieve that and REALLY have vanitygen print out all intermediate key pairs, without ignoring my wishes.  PS: I know that I can achieve that by starting 6 different vanitygen processes. But I do require that this happens withing one vanitygen process. I tried with these but vanitygen is only finding for 5 keywords not 6 but it is better than nothing.  |
|
|
|
|
1325
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22]
|
on: June 07, 2015, 04:28:55 PM
|
You can't take a result '1Super', and then feed that back into vanitygen to get '1SuperDuper' at a lower cost.
When did I ever say that I want to "save time" or achieve "lower cost"? As I stated, I just desire that vanity gen doesn't automatically get rid of patterns that overlap,but instead it should continue working with them as if they were unique. Right now, vanity gen stops the processing of overlapping patterns, I would like that it continues the processing anyway.Could you please give an example. I am not understanding correctly. It would be great if you give an example for the problem and for what you are trying to achieve. |
|
|
|
|
1327
|
Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Blockchain.info giving me "Chain Head Not Found" Message?
|
on: June 07, 2015, 04:18:08 PM
|
@HelpMySituation-
You need to try and relax a little bit man... Lol I hope most of your posts in this thread weren't actually serious.
I'm getting the maintenance message when I try as well. They've updated their Twitter with this:
"We're activating maintenance mode again to investigate a database issue. All funds and wallets are secure."
As I said earlier in this thread, I trust their security. They've had many BTC experts work for them and look at their systems including Andreas Ant.
If you look at previous things, you won't trust Blockchain.info's security but people's* trustworthiness. P.S. * I mean people behind Blockchain.info. |
|
|
|
|
1328
|
Local / India / Re: Zebpay - Flipkart,Amazon,BookMyShow,Dominos,PVR,MakeMyTrip vouchers at 10% off
|
on: June 07, 2015, 04:14:37 PM
|
App is crashing when it verify the pin I enter. Current iOS version: 8.1.1. Update is available but I don't want upgrade it now. Zebpay Bitcoin Wallet iOS version 0.2.0 is crashing. I don't know why. Please fix it. Thank you!
P.S. We buys vouchers/gift cards from this app, right?
Yeah i saw you just joined , i got notification. We buy vouchers , send btc , introduce your friends to bitcoin with it! I sent you an egg! There are cool features in it and many more to come . I totally love it!  |
|
|
|
|
1330
|
Other / Meta / Re: User creating massive amounts of referral spam - EmpoEX
|
on: June 07, 2015, 04:10:10 PM
|
The link that was spammed by this account was spammed by others in the Altcoin ANN section. The thread which I saw was yesterday at about 2-3 PM here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082561.msg11550385#msg11550385 (since deleted).
Here is a backup of the thread:
[img]https://i.imgur.com/DAL6Rpv.png[/img]
Link was clicked and visited showing a site which downloads a miner exe. Upon double clicking it, nothing appeared to have happened. A few hours later, our accounts started getting logged into such as here, twitter and other sites. Security emails were received, and we tracked it to this IP: 37.123.112.27. After this, posts were made throughout every section on the forum with a referral link + a locked thread. We promptly went through and edited all posts to request them to be deleted.
Not entirely sure how the passwords were leaked but it seems the trojan gained access to stored passwords in Google Chrome, as all passwords in use were 30+ chars long and not guessable or weak by any means.
[quote author=Quickseller link=topic=1082790.msg11552287#msg11552287 date=1433619233]
Upon closer inspection of the referral links he is posting the domain of the referral link matches his handle
[/quote]
The link that was spammed contained an ID on the end of the URL specifically "?ref=271292" for a hashminer.net site, which does not in any way match our handle.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/WEMOjep.png[/img]
Here is a backup of the thread which was posted by us into the Altcoin ANN section yesterday showing a totally different ref number, for cloudminer.biz domain:
[img]https://i.imgur.com/08Yuj5n.png[/img]
Please refrain from unnecessary accusations.
I would like to clarify that we do not own and are not associated with the site that was linked. You can check the history of our account, we are running a professional exchange. It would be greatly appreciated that anyone who has placed negative trust to edit their trust to restore our account to good standing.
Hopefully this helps clear up the situation.
#EmpoEX Team
Cloudminer.biz referral ID will be different from Bitcointalk UID. Edit: I think we need more Global Mods. YourNewGod excessively spamming. Hope these accounts will be banned soon. |
|
|
|
|
1331
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Blockchain info showing:Got error 157 'Unknown error code' from NDBCLUSTER
|
on: June 07, 2015, 04:07:49 PM
|
Have it also. Got a payout from Eligius to my Bitcoin-QT. I then sent the payout to Coinbase but made a math error and left .00000004btc behind. That transaction has not been processed. When I checked the transaction on blockchain.info this error appeared: Got error 157 'Unknown error code' from NDBCLUSTER
So, I had been assuming it was somehow relating to my math error. I see it isn't.
That is regarding Blockchain.info not your wallet or transaction. FYI, Blockchain.info is currently under maintenance. BTW, your transaction will probably get rejected. |
|
|
|
|
1332
|
Other / Beginners & Help / Re: How to send a fake bitcoin transaction ?
|
on: June 07, 2015, 04:05:30 PM
|
i think i find a way to do it in testnet network (just like bitcoin but for research ans testing) He want to confirm the transactions just like miners do but in a different way, I assume. Even though he said he don't want to confirm transactions, it looks like he want confirm transactions.
not confirming the transaction cause i should be a miner to do, just checking if it's a valid transaction.you insert the transaction hash(tx hash) and the appli. should say yes it's valid or no it's not valid. Uh, my friend! You could say this earlier. Why even come with a title and discussion about "fake transaction"?  See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_rules#.22tx.22_messages |
|
|
|
|
1333
|
Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Now Blockchain.info problems?
|
on: June 07, 2015, 04:00:32 PM
|
Hello HelpMySituation
I realy don't see your point of making from this a end of the world panic
The blockchain is working now but anyway
You need coins to HOSPITAL YOUR MOTHER but you play casino
This is not good at all
Are you spamming? Blockchain.info is under maintenance atm. |
|
|
|
|
1335
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
|
on: June 07, 2015, 03:49:28 PM
|
So go ahead and demonstrate what you have done that actually *matters* in the last ten years. (yes - I have a post to show what I have done but I am going to wait for you to show me first as I somehow doubt you have done anything of any significance at all apart from trolling on forums) you see unlike some people I don't have time to keep posting to raise my status to legendary because in real life I actually don't have much free time to keep arguing about nonsense plus I've got much better stuff to do with my free time than trolling . Go thru my post history and please show me one instance that I was trolling a thread?!? It seems you've come short and are relying on " I'm a troll argument" well good for you hopes that makes you happy. I am lazy to look through your post history atm but by looking posts in *this* thread, it seems like you have some problem in reading or interpreting posts and thus it *looks like* you are trolling. |
|
|
|
|
1336
|
Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here
|
on: June 07, 2015, 03:46:43 PM
|
My address 19q1PPJuYFtstpdSDtkvnWtNLSv7HpDy8P
Please quote
Quoted! The following is mine: 1JGkHMjNXiJqeKDh87EkQMsZvZBK1SiWTP  -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This address is owned by 19CA0DF, bitcointalk profile : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=509067Signed on: 07/06/2015, Sunday -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1JGkHMjNXiJqeKDh87EkQMsZvZBK1SiWTP ILaw9Sa3+poFUYNrDDLvgHHCbxxc+KvXOsG/33ToKE9lf2J90tHF8bfQCEKTtiX8ZrXMBv7LW52S07oRn4Z9sTc= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
|
|
|
|
1337
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
|
on: June 07, 2015, 03:43:21 PM
|
I know. The size of the blocks earlier were not big like now and still a limit was put to prevent spam and DOS attacks. In fact, number of transactions were much lesser than it is today. You think this has changed now? NO! We should not only consider about scaling[ but stability and decentralization too.
The current way of proposing by Gavin actually says about him asking miners and companies to adopt new fork which is essentially hurting decentralization.
You're contradicting yourself , Show me my contradiction. If you are telling the bolder lines are contradicting, yes, they are but the lines means two different things. You should read carefully before jumping. No offence. bitcoin mining as is right now is CENTRALIZED in China that is a fact that you can't ignore. Again raising block size limit won't make bitcoin inaccessible in China or Africa , it would make only MINING harder due to connection restriction, which is nobody's fault. The network has grown over past several years, you can't keep using the same old tricks and praying that everything would be fine.
Also you can't just keep setting up shacks in remote locations with cheap power and poor internet connection just because you want to mine bitcoin and dump it to profit from it. As a matter of fact those mega-farms couldn't careless about mining being centralized in a single location . All they care is ROI and profit.
It's not just about miners but full nodes too. It amazes me people keep defending these mega-farms and at the same time they bring up decentralization , it's oxymoron . There's saying that goes as " you can't patch stupid " it fits perfectly here.
People *outside* China are also pointing their miners to Chinese pools. Also Chinese pools aren't huge to call mining is away from decentralization. If Bitcoin does't scale up it would just collapse, then who cares about stability and decentralization when it's already collapsed because of not being able to scale up. Get your priority straight .
I didn't say Bitcoin shouldn't scale up, instead, I said we should observer the problems and/or to increase it limit to a reasonable size like 8MB but not by 2000% and not in the current way of Gavin's proposal, i.e. asking miners, companies and such if consensus is not reached. Simply they either need to relocated to somewhere else or slowly die while dragging the rest of community with them.
When they have indicated that a more modest increase in max. block size (such as the 8MB that Gavin has stated he would accept) would be acceptable then why do you keep trying to turn this "storm in a teacup" into some sort of Others vs. China battle? If China ends up abandoning Bitcoin then I really don't see how that would be any sort of victory for Bitcoin at all. China is not the only country in the world with bandwidth issues so I guess next you want to get rid of any developing countries as well and after a while pretty much Bitcoin will just be USA coin. To that I say - no thanks. No but it's one of the few countries in the world with restricted internet access (GFW) . Now name me how many other countries are in that category? No it won't be a USA coin, as a matter of fact everybody can access the Blockchain and send/received transactions even in China or Africa or even moon but mining of it becomes more difficult because it's not like before anymore where all you needed was cheap hardware along with cheap power equals to profit. Lets get this straight, being able to accessing the network is not the same as being able to mine on it. You keep bundling these two together to benefit your flawed argument. Like I said, it's not only about mining but full nodes too. Bitcoin will *never* scale up to Visa or Mastercard and anyone who thinks so is really "kidding themselves".
In the world of "remittance" Bitcoin can be king but in the world of general transactions it is never going to get there.
When will you guys realise that "normal people" actually *want* reversible transactions and the safety of their banks. They are *never* going to want to lose their money to scammers who want to take advantage of irreversible payments.
It is so funny that Bitcoin fanatics just seem to forget all about "customers" (probably because most of them are scammers trying to steal their customers money).
I see you're coming from the camp of " it can't never scale up " but I want the Bitcoin somehow magically becomes main stream so I can keep profit from mining on it good luck with that  well if you're not bitcoin enthusiastic then why the heck you spending your time here in BCT ??!!! what are your motives for being here? No offence but do you have any problem in reading? CIYAM said "Bitcoin will *never* scale up to Visa or Mastercard" and not "it can't never scale up". |
|
|
|
|
1340
|
Other / Beginners & Help / Re: if I disconnect my pc will my BTC be safe
|
on: June 07, 2015, 03:07:31 PM
|
Don't compare Blockchain.info. Bitcoins lost through Blockchain.info is very big and no, many of them were *not* due to users' faults.
if you are referring to the reusing of the "R values" by blockchain.info . i have to say, it could be easily avoided if the simple rule of "always use every address once" was followed, it could have been prevented. -snip- Reusing addresses are alright except it compromises privacy. Reused 'R values' were exposed due to Blockchain.info wallet's bug, not user's fault. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
