|
1401
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: thebitcoinquiz.com is an alt of puzzel.me
|
on: June 05, 2015, 06:38:05 PM
|
The first post of puzzle.me is also matching your handle. How do you plan on explaining that?
You know, I know over 6 people(some are well known here) who had the same idea of bitcoin quiz in their mind. And I've explained about it before. The first post of puzzle.me is also matching your handle. How do you plan on explaining that?
@thebitcoinquiz.com: Can't you just agree now that you are an alt of puzzel.me? No. I cant cause I am not. I started to control the account after november/december 2014, and since then it hasn't been involved in any scam. And so why cant QS agree that he mistook me and rushed his decisions and by mistake accused me of being someone else's alt? Ill really have respect for him if he starts looking at this case from a neutral view and don't accuse me of doing wrong things based on assumptions. And if you(qs) feel I sent you PMs to you from different accounts then report them to Badbear and ask him if I am the one who is pming you from multiple accounts, cause I have just pmed you from this account. And just for the record, I have never ever accessed cryptforcause's account. Thanks QS is talking about the post I am quoting not that idea of yours. This post was made on January 2015 which is after November/December 2014. Hey! Want to enroll!
Post Count: 31
Activity: 31
Rank : Jr. Member
Address : 1LWjNBMVeAJcfqMfYvLXeGoPYVBMwf85zp
Please confirm my enrolment.
If my rank gets upgraded during this post period so will be paid according to my new rank?
And so yes? I own 1LWjNBMVeAJcfqMfYvLXeGoPYVBMwf85zp . So what's the problem in here ? It was posted from my true account. And I am allowed to use it whenever I want. Sorry, I really didn't get that what's the problem in using this address? And I know that address is linked with the address I used in other account, and that address used in other account was used after november/december 2014 I.e after I bought those accounts and I suppose this address was active at that time and I just posted it in January. Sorry, if I am missing your point bit I really don't understand what did you try to say/accuse/tell. Which walllet are you using? how is that even relevant? Right now I use blockchain all the time. Earlier I have used multibit and blockchain and I remember importing some addresses from multibit to blockchain. But I cant exactly claim which all addresses did import. Have you ever mixed your coins or used Blockchain.info shared send? If you have used it, how many times? |
|
|
|
|
1402
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Should Gavin resign from developement of Bitcoin? [POLL]
|
on: June 05, 2015, 06:35:51 PM
|
Hey Morons! 20 MB Gavinshittles does not scale! Offchain transactions do scale all you want! Fire the Gavin already! He's ruining it!
Saying this is more than being idiot. It's like having a mental problem. "Gavin doesn't like descentralization" they say and their answer is offchain transactions? Satoshi made Bitcoin with block support way bigger than 20MB, we are just getting ready if the number of transactions increases. I support 100% the new block max size. What has changed since he determined that the 1 MB limit was necessary? The Bitcoin network is still pretty vulnerable to spam attacks, and many people running full nodes still couldn't handle consistent 20 MB blocks very well. The situation is basically the same. Also: - Satoshi is not God. He would be disappointed at how many people are using his words to end discussion rather than start it. Satoshi didn't create the world's first decentralized money so that we would all be forever bound by his own indomitable will. - He said that in a short comment 5 years ago. At that time, I believed the same thing he did. But things change and new info becomes available. I wouldn't be surprised if he changed his mind as I did. And he's not around to debate it anyway, so you should more-or-less ignore the few sentences he wrote about this so far in the past. - His first priority was obviously decentralization, not scaling. "... secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter what. It's time we had the same thing for money." |
|
|
|
|
1403
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: thebitcoinquiz.com is an alt of puzzel.me
|
on: June 05, 2015, 06:25:48 PM
|
The first post of puzzle.me is also matching your handle. How do you plan on explaining that?
You know, I know over 6 people(some are well known here) who had the same idea of bitcoin quiz in their mind. And I've explained about it before. The first post of puzzle.me is also matching your handle. How do you plan on explaining that?
@thebitcoinquiz.com: Can't you just agree now that you are an alt of puzzel.me? No. I cant cause I am not. I started to control the account after november/december 2014, and since then it hasn't been involved in any scam. And so why cant QS agree that he mistook me and rushed his decisions and by mistake accused me of being someone else's alt? Ill really have respect for him if he starts looking at this case from a neutral view and don't accuse me of doing wrong things based on assumptions. And if you(qs) feel I sent you PMs to you from different accounts then report them to Badbear and ask him if I am the one who is pming you from multiple accounts, cause I have just pmed you from this account. And just for the record, I have never ever accessed cryptforcause's account. Thanks QS is talking about the post I am quoting not that idea of yours. This post was made on January 2015 which is after November/December 2014. Hey! Want to enroll!
Post Count: 31
Activity: 31
Rank : Jr. Member
Address : 1LWjNBMVeAJcfqMfYvLXeGoPYVBMwf85zp
Please confirm my enrolment.
If my rank gets upgraded during this post period so will be paid according to my new rank?
And so yes? I own 1LWjNBMVeAJcfqMfYvLXeGoPYVBMwf85zp . So what's the problem in here ? It was posted from my true account. And I am allowed to use it whenever I want. Sorry, I really didn't get that what's the problem in using this address? And I know that address is linked with the address I used in other account, and that address used in other account was used after november/december 2014 I.e after I bought those accounts and I suppose this address was active at that time and I just posted it in January. Sorry, if I am missing your point bit I really don't understand what did you try to say/accuse/tell. Which walllet are you using? |
|
|
|
|
1404
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: How does a blockchain prevent spoofed transactions?
|
on: June 05, 2015, 06:21:26 PM
|
Full nodes are run by many users not just miners. In other words, every user who runs Bitcoin core and has opened outbound connections are running full nodes. See https://getaddr.bitnodes.io. So if a node checks the new block and rejects it, that would prevent propagation of it, right? So if (I'm just guessing here) a typical miner connects to 10 nodes when mining, and those nodes are responsible for broadcasting the new block out to everyone else, then only those 10 nodes would really need to ID the false transactions and fail to pass the invalid block along? Thanks for explaining guys! A full node stick with it's own rules and no matter all other nodes accept a block which violated a rule, this node will reject it. FYI, Bitcoin core is not the only full node. |
|
|
|
|
1406
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CloudThink.IO removed management pictures after being caught with stealing
|
on: June 05, 2015, 06:14:41 PM
|
im support & trust mirjangka because he is good guy
People thought Bernie Madoff was a good guy too. Then it was discovered that he was running a 50 billion dollar ponzi. The guy is ripping people off by running a ponzi cloud mining company (has it even been determined that there is an actual company?). Do you really want to be a part of that? Part of Scam ? No ,, im only support & trust him xD Supporting/promoting makes you part of that scam. |
|
|
|
|
1407
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: How does a blockchain prevent spoofed transactions?
|
on: June 05, 2015, 06:12:14 PM
|
-snip- If you want to spend from an address, you need it's private key. If you don't have private key of an address, then the best you can do is to create an unsigned raw transaction but it can't be broadcasted until you sign it which you can't as you don't have private key.
Every miner validate inputs used in transactions. If you used a non-existing input and even if you sign that transaction, it will be rejected.
I think the idea is that the miner is placing the fakt TX in a block. Thank you! Thanks, this is what I was looking for, at least partly. So a miner can insert garbage into a block, but the rest of the network reviews the blocks transactions for validity. So that block would be rejected by the rest of the network if it had any invalid transactions, correct?
Doesn't this take a significant amount of computational resources for every miner to verify that every transaction in each new block is valid? Or is there a shortcut to verifying each send address is real and had the funds?
Full nodes are run by many users not just miners. In other words, every Bitcoin core which has opened outbound inbound connections are full nodes. See https://getaddr.bitnodes.io. |
|
|
|
|
1408
|
Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here
|
on: June 05, 2015, 06:09:21 PM
|
1JAeGo4ijJoRw4nEd5xtDhV7WqtYZe717T Lets put this here in case of future trades:) if you can quote please  thanks Can someone quote mine too please? Also is there anyone here who is willing to accept a pm from me containing my address? That's another way I could recover my account. 1MkPr5qEaU5A7fuLx8cpqYfQSanQZptfBS You can send PM to DefaultTrust - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=122551. It is controlled by theymos. That will be more easier for recovering. |
|
|
|
|
1410
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: How does a blockchain prevent spoofed transactions?
|
on: June 05, 2015, 05:52:18 PM
|
|
If you want to spend from an address, you need it's private key. If you don't have private key of an address, then the best you can do is to create an unsigned raw transaction but it can't be broadcasted until you sign it which you can't as you don't have private key.
Every miner validate inputs used in transactions. If you used a non-existing input and even if you sign that transaction, it will be rejected.
|
|
|
|
|
1412
|
Other / Meta / Re: Nominate (insert name here) to the default trust list
|
on: June 05, 2015, 05:42:39 PM
|
This can easily be faked.Also please avoid posting 4 times in a row for your signature payout.
lol. Stop acting as if you manage all the signature campaigns on the forum. Lets focus more on making the topic more readable rather than just having "money in your mind", and imo breaking the post and posting 4 times in a row makes things more readable. There is no need for a split in his posts. He is replying to one post in two (or more) posts and it is not long. One post for replying is enough. Oh cut the crap you!You are now saying I am faking an inbox message that I received ? Seriously how dumb can you people be ? or how dumb do you think I am ? If I had to lie I'd rather device a story that would be more than just a photoshop hoax. Stop doubting anything and everything someone says and similarly stop believing everything you see as well. I dont have to prove anything to anyone this message is IN my INBOX have a moderator / admin / owner check it if its that important to you, if not, then simply ask Johnie himself. (I even notified rather humorously on a thread of his as well) Last I remember you & I had decent interactions with each other, since when did you start attacking me ? Or put to put in another way, since when did you become such a tool ? Also, it is my account, I can make 1000 posts as long as its substantial and as long as I deem it is necessary to do so. I just said it can easily be faked and that rating Johnie left is still there. I still have no problem with you. There was a discussion earlier about this type posts. Your replies don't meet the criteria to split them into two or more posts. it's better to avoid it to avoid a probable ban. So you're saying if I make multiple posts I'd be gagged ? lol that would be a censorship issue. My posts are substantial and they're not worthless. But I stopped all my renders just for you so I can quill this 'that can be faked' bullshit which you started & recorded this screencap. (wait for upload) http://youtu.be/D_9MhESKvJYProbably. https://archive.is/d9Xip |
|
|
|
|
1413
|
Other / Meta / Re: Nominate (insert name here) to the default trust list
|
on: June 05, 2015, 05:24:01 PM
|
This can easily be faked.Also please avoid posting 4 times in a row for your signature payout.
lol. Stop acting as if you manage all the signature campaigns on the forum. Lets focus more on making the topic more readable rather than just having "money in your mind", and imo breaking the post and posting 4 times in a row makes things more readable. There is no need for a split in his posts. He is replying to one post in two (or more) posts and it is not long. One post for replying is enough. Oh cut the crap you!You are now saying I am faking an inbox message that I received ? Seriously how dumb can you people be ? or how dumb do you think I am ? If I had to lie I'd rather device a story that would be more than just a photoshop hoax. Stop doubting anything and everything someone says and similarly stop believing everything you see as well. I dont have to prove anything to anyone this message is IN my INBOX have a moderator / admin / owner check it if its that important to you, if not, then simply ask Johnie himself. (I even notified rather humorously on a thread of his as well) Last I remember you & I had decent interactions with each other, since when did you start attacking me ? Or put to put in another way, since when did you become such a tool ? Also, it is my account, I can make 1000 posts as long as its substantial and as long as I deem it is necessary to do so. I just said it can easily be faked and that rating Johnie left is still there. I still have no problem with you. There was a discussion earlier about this type posts. Your replies don't meet the criteria to split them into two or more posts. it's better to avoid it to avoid a probable ban. |
|
|
|
|
1414
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: thebitcoinquiz.com is an alt of puzzel.me
|
on: June 05, 2015, 05:18:55 PM
|
The first post of puzzle.me is also matching your handle. How do you plan on explaining that?
You know, I know over 6 people(some are well known here) who had the same idea of bitcoin quiz in their mind. And I've explained about it before. The first post of puzzle.me is also matching your handle. How do you plan on explaining that?
@thebitcoinquiz.com: Can't you just agree now that you are an alt of puzzel.me? No. I cant cause I am not. I started to control the account after november/december 2014, and since then it hasn't been involved in any scam. And so why cant QS agree that he mistook me and rushed his decisions and by mistake accused me of being someone else's alt? Ill really have respect for him if he starts looking at this case from a neutral view and don't accuse me of doing wrong things based on assumptions. And if you(qs) feel I sent you PMs to you from different accounts then report them to Badbear and ask him if I am the one who is pming you from multiple accounts, cause I have just pmed you from this account. And just for the record, I have never ever accessed cryptforcause's account. Thanks QS is talking about the post I am quoting not that idea of yours. This post was made on January 2015 which is after November/December 2014. Hey! Want to enroll!
Post Count: 31
Activity: 31
Rank : Jr. Member
Address: 1LWjNBMVeAJcfqMfYvLXeGoPYVBMwf85zp
Please confirm my enrolment.
If my rank gets upgraded during this post period so will be paid according to my new rank?
|
|
|
|
|
1415
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why do islam hates people?
|
on: June 05, 2015, 05:14:55 PM
|
ISIS and other such organisations do kill Muslims but you are right. They ain't Muslims.
They consider themselves to be Muslims. What makes your authority on declaring them 'not Muslim' any different from them declaring you 'not Muslim' because you don't interpret the instructions the same way they do? Many of the so-called Muslims attacks aren't even from Muslims and they just can't describe in Islam in their own way. For example, there is a verse which was released *at the time of war* which says kill people who spread mischieves and who come to attack you unless they are in peace with you. They just exclude the words after but and tell "look here, Qur'an tells to kill non-Muslims" etc... and they attack many innocents including Muslims. This is not the way even if they are claiming. Claiming but not following doesn't make one a follower. It is obvious they are doing it for their own gains especially political gains and non-Muslims are definitely involved. They are doing far different than what Islam actually tells. FYI, I am not the only one with the view "ISIS and other such groups are contradicting Islam", there are many others too. The problem is they are targeting people with less to no knowledge in Islam and/or people who are very poor and/or people who like to do these sort of bad things. They just brainwash people which is very hard to eradicate. Once brainwashers who tells to kill innocents with disinformation are eradicated, this problem is easily solved.
Meanwhile, I have found this interesting analysis of "Games Muslims Play." It would seem that every one of these logical errors has been presented in this discussion by Muslim advocates.
xhttp://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Games-Muslims-Play.htm#islamnotviolent
Games Muslims Play
Given Islam's violent history and the unfavorable contrast of its oppressive practices against 21st century values, Muslims are hard-pressed to repackage their faith in the modern age. Some of its leading apologists have come to rely on tricks involving semantics and half-truths that are, in turn, repeated by novices and even those outside the faith.
This is a document (which we hope to improve on and expand over time) that exposes some of these games and helps truth-seekers find their way through the maze of disingenuous (often blatantly false) claims about Islam and its history.
“If Islam were a violent religion, then all Muslims would be violent.”
“Other religions kill, too.”
Muhammad preached 'no compulsion in religion' (Qur'an: 2:256)
The Crusades
“Muhammad never killed anyone.”
The Qur'an Teaches that all Life is Sacred (Qur'an 5:32)
"Muslims only kill in self-defense.”
The million dollar wager that "Holy War" isn't in the Qur'an.
"Verses of violence are taken out of context."
"Islam must be true, because it is the world’s fastest growing religion."
"The Qur'an can only be understood in Arabic."
I said you that website spreads disinformation. Anyway, it's your choice whether to believe that disinformation or not and you are free to do so. .... I understand your point of view, however when one defends dogmatic beliefs, the defenses will fall into well defined categories because, well, they are defenses of dogmatic beliefs. The above list is certainly a good rendering of the commonly heard defenses of Islamic beliefs, including those which you propagate. Actually it is not a good list. - "Muhammad never killed anyone.” Wrong. - "Muslims only kill in self-defense.” Wrong. Swahabas fought for self-defense and that was the common argument. This is twisting. That argument can't be used to tell Muslims only kill in self-defense because there are bad people in Muslims too. - "The Qur'an can only be understood in Arabic." Wrong. The common argument is translations from Arabic is often mistranslated. Qur'an can also be understood in other languages but when it is translated, sometimes mistakes are there. Changing that sentence to Qur'an can be understood better in Arabic. |
|
|
|
|
1416
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why do islam hates people?
|
on: June 05, 2015, 05:06:36 PM
|
Rape and sex at will is different. Also the exact age is unknown, however, it is said to be between 9 amd 12. It is also known that sex was after she reached puberty. Please don't mix rape here.
Now you're just being an apologist and you are also ignoring the commonly accepted fact in Islam that he married Aisha when she was 6 years old and had sex with her at 9. That it has to be said he waited until she was 9 years old before he 'consummated' the marriage, as though that somehow makes it any less repugnant, is still a tacit acknowledgement that he is a child rapist. An adult having sex with a child is raping them because a child is incapable of informed consent, even if a child has been conditioned to believe that it is something they want to happen it is still an adult abusing their position of trust to care for and nurture a child in order to satisfy their own selfish and grotesque sexual urges. Child rape is about power and control and no sexual act by an adult to a child can be described as anything else other than a gross abuse of the significant power the adult has over a child. Stop trying to down-play the reality that your religion celebrates a middle-aged man who had sex with a little girl who was 9 years old. Stop trying to down-play the reality that your religion celebrates a middle-aged man who had sex with a little girl who was 9 years old. There, I have written it twice so you know not to simply ignore what I am saying to you. A hand-wavy, "yeah, well, she was probably at least 11 or 12 so, you know, totallyokbecausehewastheultimateprophetright? You are missing two points - Sex is not rape if it both is willing to do. - A human is a child when he/she is under the age puberty. Once a female child is mature, she can give birth to a child. I understand you are talking in general but it is not a fact. |
|
|
|
|
1417
|
Other / Meta / Re: question about activity
|
on: June 05, 2015, 04:57:51 PM
|
if an account has been inactive for a while like 8 weeks, if it starts posting again can it get the 56 activity it could have got in the time or only 14?
It doesn't work like that, and for good reason. If it did work like that everybody could create 10+ accounts and then just let them sit for a year or so and start posting again and become a Sr. Member or similar instantly. You have to post during every 2 week period to get the activity increase. That was my interpretation of it at least. Each post is worth 1 activity, up to a cap of 14 which is reset every ~2 weeks. There is no banking of points or potential mentioned anywhere.Gratz on the rank. One thing that has always confused me is that I seem to have equal Activity and Post counts. Not sure why but I guess I'm lucky to be 1:1.
That happens when you post very consistently, but less than once per day on average. Most people get 14 activity points every 2 weeks because they post a lot. But if you post less than 14 times in a fortnight (but at least once), then you get only [the number of posts in that fortnight], and the remainder is "banked": you can get it by posting at any time in the future. So every time you post, your activity will also increase by 1 until you're used all of your banked activity. You have 1274 banked activity points, more than all but 113 users. A lot of people wish they were you. For fun, here are users with a lot of "unused" activity. Such users often write especially high-quality posts. +---------------------------------------+----------+--------+---------------------+
| realName | activity | banked | banked-activity |
+---------------------------------------+----------+--------+---------------------+
| A-Bolt | 453 | 1274 | 821 |
| teknohog | 376 | 1190 | 814 |
| paci | 427 | 1176 | 749 |
| Schleicher | 519 | 1260 | 741 |
| Bitsky | 518 | 1246 | 728 |
| toffoo | 379 | 1106 | 727 |
| fellowtraveler | 439 | 1134 | 695 |
| btcsec | 419 | 1106 | 687 |
| panic | 349 | 1036 | 687 |
| Tritonio | 588 | 1274 | 686 |
| ufasoft | 400 | 1078 | 678 |
| Vitalik Buterin | 330 | 1008 | 678 |
| minimalB | 545 | 1218 | 673 |
| vapourminer | 377 | 1050 | 673 |
| Grix | 484 | 1148 | 664 |
| Dusty | 697 | 1358 | 661 |
| Bees Brothers | 405 | 1064 | 659 |
| slothbag | 363 | 1022 | 659 |
| bzzard | 396 | 1050 | 654 |
| Andreas Schildbach | 510 | 1162 | 652 |
| Hawkix | 510 | 1148 | 638 |
| sgravina | 414 | 1050 | 636 |
| bracek | 524 | 1148 | 624 |
| dunand | 548 | 1148 | 600 |
| qdi | 563 | 1148 | 585 |
| BigBobo | 565 | 1148 | 583 |
| BookLover | 534 | 1106 | 572 |
| damnek | 540 | 1106 | 566 |
| eliale | 532 | 1092 | 560 |
| yossarian | 492 | 1050 | 558 |
| The00Dustin | 733 | 1288 | 555 |
| runlinux | 567 | 1120 | 553 |
| David M | 476 | 1022 | 546 |
| apetersson | 666 | 1204 | 538 |
| forrestv | 472 | 1008 | 536 |
| Bimmerhead | 824 | 1358 | 534 |
| luv2drnkbr | 733 | 1260 | 527 |
| randomguy7 | 524 | 1036 | 512 |
| spndr7 | 882 | 1386 | 504 |
| idev | 723 | 1218 | 495 |
| asdf | 527 | 1022 | 495 |
| server | 810 | 1302 | 492 |
| meanig | 527 | 1008 | 481 |
| Keninishna | 546 | 1022 | 476 |
| pooler | 590 | 1064 | 474 |
| kwukduck | 1001 | 1470 | 469 |
| Krak | 589 | 1050 | 461 |
| maxll | 605 | 1050 | 445 |
| barbarousrelic | 675 | 1120 | 445 |
| Fireball | 671 | 1092 | 421 |
| naypalm | 870 | 1274 | 404 |
| pafu | 718 | 1120 | 402 |
| Shawshank | 688 | 1078 | 390 |
| imanikin | 690 | 1078 | 388 |
| EPiSKiNG | 735 | 1120 | 385 |
| SgtMoth | 696 | 1078 | 382 |
| arsenische | 907 | 1288 | 381 |
| nrd525 | 925 | 1302 | 377 |
| hashman | 900 | 1246 | 346 |
| Trader Steve | 690 | 1022 | 332 |
| World | 731 | 1050 | 319 |
| chmod755 | 866 | 1162 | 296 |
| phatsphere | 734 | 1022 | 288 |
| Dexter770221 | 934 | 1218 | 284 |
| coinotron | 839 | 1106 | 267 |
| jago25_98 | 860 | 1120 | 260 |
| BrightAnarchist | 853 | 1106 | 253 |
| smracer | 913 | 1162 | 249 |
| amincd | 761 | 1008 | 247 |
| abracadabra | 944 | 1190 | 246 |
| Seal | 765 | 1008 | 243 |
| TTBit | 1123 | 1358 | 235 |
| aistto | 969 | 1190 | 221 |
| Soros Shorts | 1045 | 1260 | 215 |
| Komonec | 836 | 1050 | 214 |
| somenick | 1005 | 1218 | 213 |
| Grinder | 1202 | 1414 | 212 |
| silverfuture | 825 | 1036 | 211 |
| flix | 957 | 1162 | 205 |
| MiningBuddy | 1015 | 1218 | 203 |
| ShadowAlexey | 850 | 1050 | 200 |
| jimbobway | 1299 | 1498 | 199 |
| Mageant | 999 | 1190 | 191 |
| weex | 959 | 1148 | 189 |
| MemoryDealers | 939 | 1106 | 167 |
| SolarSilver | 907 | 1064 | 157 |
| Mjbmonetarymetals | 924 | 1078 | 154 |
| Epoch | 899 | 1050 | 151 |
| wknight | 889 | 1036 | 147 |
| Raize | 1286 | 1428 | 142 |
| Jay_Pal | 1091 | 1232 | 141 |
| xchrix | 871 | 1008 | 137 |
| zefir | 914 | 1050 | 136 |
| Jan | 1041 | 1176 | 135 |
| rebuilder | 1253 | 1386 | 133 |
| starik69 | 920 | 1036 | 116 |
| daybyter | 965 | 1078 | 113 |
| dancupid | 952 | 1064 | 112 |
|
|
|
|
|
1418
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why do islam hates people?
|
on: June 05, 2015, 04:51:30 PM
|
For example, there is a verse which was released *at the time of war* which says kill people who spread mischieves and who come to attack you unless they are in peace with you. Yeah, *at the time of war*, they are *at the time of war* right now, don't you know? No, they are not. The war they are doing is not allowed by Islam and in fact, I don't know whether it should be called a war. They are just killing many innocents and Islam always has said don't compel anyone to become Muslim and don't hurt people who are in peace with you. Most of the people they killed haven't done anything wrong to them. |
|
|
|
|
1419
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: thebitcoinquiz.com is an alt of puzzel.me
|
on: June 05, 2015, 04:47:42 PM
|
Did puzzel.me scam anyone?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=785003.0He seems to own over 50% of the forum accounts here.
False. To me it appears puzzel.me tried to scam by blackmailing a member. Anyways, attempting to scam and being a scammer is almost the same thing and this user has been creating numerous accounts on this forum.
Having dealt with stellar, he seemed to be genuine but the amount was really small to say anything.
I have dealt with cryptoforcause, thebitcoinquiz.com and stellar. Didn't know they were one person!  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
