|
1422
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: thebitcoinquiz.com is an alt of puzzel.me
|
on: June 05, 2015, 04:14:01 PM
|
The first post of puzzle.me is also matching your handle. How do you plan on explaining that?
@thebitcoinquiz.com: Can't you just agree now that you are an alt of puzzel.me? Lol, he got no choice left now, right? Will love to see what he got now to defend himself. Yet another story? Do you have a choice? Why are you keep calling yourself a scammer? Are you thinking this can be taken as proof to claim you are not alt of puzzel.me? Then you are wrong! |
|
|
|
|
1425
|
Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here
|
on: June 05, 2015, 04:01:11 PM
|
sort of new at this don't call me noob pls
now after i added my adress here , should I go to bitcoin core wallet and to the "sign message" tab then basically put my adress + the message and that's all ?
Yes exactly. You will see the a small dropdown menu next to your address and click sign message. Sign a message and post signature and address and signed message and request someone to quote it for you. Done sorry really if im bothering you but i still can't understand on the first textbox i write "Bitcoin adress" the third => signature gets generated once I write the adress + the message on the second big Textbox well my question here .. what should I write exactly on the second big textbox ? :x Please look it. |
|
|
|
|
1426
|
Other / Meta / Re: Nominate (insert name here) to the default trust list
|
on: June 05, 2015, 03:57:04 PM
|
And for anyone else wanting to use the Johnie rep against me, here is his message which he sent to me.  I being the stubborn asshole that I am, aptly turned his offer down cuz I was fucking annoyed at him!!, then I changed my mind but then HE changed his mind and swore his undying opposition against me. I'm cool with that. People can see that even the most 'trusted' guy can have such a blatantly wrong judgement. Its only human. This can easily be faked. Also please avoid posting 4 times in a row for your signature payout.
lol. Stop acting as if you manage all the signature campaigns on the forum. Lets focus more on making the topic more readable rather than just having "money in your mind", and imo breaking the post and posting 4 times in a row makes things more readable. There is no need for a split in his posts. He is replying to one post in two (or more) posts and it is not long. One post for replying is enough. |
|
|
|
|
1429
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: thebitcoinquiz.com is an alt of puzzel.me
|
on: June 05, 2015, 03:38:27 PM
|
there are many proven alts of puzzle.me like cryptocause the guy who has positive feedback even after he was proven as alt of puzzle.me
he has a clean account with positive feedback so he can scam anyone with his positive trust
quickseller already posted proofs about him, relation between puzzle.me and cryptocause
there are 2-3 more alts of him
I ain't Puzzel.me's alt. If you can check that meta post you will find that I posted over there only that its thebitcoinquiz.com who is his alt not me but I didn't have any proofs at that time. I contacted MZ in PM and showed him a few proofs but later I thought it isn't worth, you can ask MZ about this. I knew that thebitcoinquiz was holding this account when I got accused of being puzzel's alt which am not. It wasn't proofs. He sent me a few messages between him and thebitcoinquiz.com. I believe he faked it because he is a liar. In those PMs he sent me is that bitcoinquiz.com did say puzzel.me was under his control. Remember, I am saying this by looking at those PMs he sent me. I haven't verfied it by logging into his account or in other ways. Idk who the actual person behind puzzel.me is
Another lie.  First of all, that post was made 7 months back and the owner of Puzzel.me is my classmate and he has most probably done that because of some personal issues Angry
I know his present account on here too.
Also for Quickseller, The loan needs to be repayed on 16th.
 Why did Quickseller add negative trust saying I am an alt of Puzzel.me? I don't even know what/who is puzzel.me?
but earlier I had some troubles with this guy and he intentionally posted my address to destroy my account, and so now as it has been proven the thebitcoinquiz.com is puzzel.me so it proves that I am innocent and the negative rating should be taken off my profile. QS now u know thebitcoinquiz.com is real puzzel.me so please remove my neg trust. Also if you think am an alt of thebitcoinquiz.com  , then why would I have stated that thebitcoinquiz is puzzel's alt in my Meta post, why would I destroy a close to Sr. Member account seeing one of my account already destroyed? This will be dumb and am not dumb. And if you still think am his alt then show that am his alt, show that any of my transaction is linked with him (signed by both of us) or provide a solid proof that am him, If you do this I will suck you Dick  I am not an alt, I am original Cryptoforcause It is quite sure puzzel.me didn't impersonate you rather you impersonated him which is very unlikely. See dates. My user- I am The Best
My Bitcoin Addy- 1BtBqWDJ28o1pWYiqtX1oUcBKpU1d86XSC
Please pay me for my reviews.
https://archive.is/Szcn0Loan amount required: 0.005BTC
110% - 150% Collateral (if you want a sure deal): None but If you need- My BCT Account
Term length: 24 hours
Interest: You Say
Bitcoin address: 1BtBqWDJ28o1pWYiqtX1oUcBKpU1d86XSC
Reason: Need 0.005 quick as am short of 0.005 for buying a domain. And withdrawal from an exchange hasn't been processed since 2 hours. Will return in 24 hours as the ticket I filed says I will get my BTC in 24 hours
https://archive.is/5EPbW |
|
|
|
|
1430
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why do islam hates people?
|
on: June 05, 2015, 03:09:59 PM
|
ISIS and other such organisations do kill Muslims but you are right. They ain't Muslims.
They consider themselves to be Muslims. What makes your authority on declaring them 'not Muslim' any different from them declaring you 'not Muslim' because you don't interpret the instructions the same way they do? Many of the so-called Muslims attacks aren't even from Muslims and they just can't describe in Islam in their own way. For example, there is a verse which was released *at the time of war* which says kill people who spread mischieves and who come to attack you unless they are in peace with you. They just exclude the words after but and tell "look here, Qur'an tells to kill non-Muslims" etc... and they attack many innocents including Muslims. This is not the way even if they are claiming. Claiming but not following doesn't make one a follower. It is obvious they are doing it for their own gains especially political gains and non-Muslims are definitely involved. They are doing far different than what Islam actually tells. FYI, I am not the only one with the view "ISIS and other such groups are contradicting Islam", there are many others too. The problem is they are targeting people with less to no knowledge in Islam and/or people who are very poor and/or people who like to do these sort of bad things. They just brainwash people which is very hard to eradicate. Once brainwashers who tells to kill innocents with disinformation are eradicated, this problem is easily solved.
Meanwhile, I have found this interesting analysis of "Games Muslims Play." It would seem that every one of these logical errors has been presented in this discussion by Muslim advocates.
xhttp://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Games-Muslims-Play.htm#islamnotviolent
Games Muslims Play
Given Islam's violent history and the unfavorable contrast of its oppressive practices against 21st century values, Muslims are hard-pressed to repackage their faith in the modern age. Some of its leading apologists have come to rely on tricks involving semantics and half-truths that are, in turn, repeated by novices and even those outside the faith.
This is a document (which we hope to improve on and expand over time) that exposes some of these games and helps truth-seekers find their way through the maze of disingenuous (often blatantly false) claims about Islam and its history.
“If Islam were a violent religion, then all Muslims would be violent.”
“Other religions kill, too.”
Muhammad preached 'no compulsion in religion' (Qur'an: 2:256)
The Crusades
“Muhammad never killed anyone.”
The Qur'an Teaches that all Life is Sacred (Qur'an 5:32)
"Muslims only kill in self-defense.”
The million dollar wager that "Holy War" isn't in the Qur'an.
"Verses of violence are taken out of context."
"Islam must be true, because it is the world’s fastest growing religion."
"The Qur'an can only be understood in Arabic."
I said you that website spreads disinformation. Anyway, it's your choice whether to believe that disinformation or not and you are free to do so. It's very bad when people deliberately do such things. Once brainwashers who tells to kill innocents with disinformation are eradicated, this problem is easily solved.
Except for the fact that the Koran has numerous explicit texts which these 'not Muslims' are easily able to work from. Besides, let's not ignore the elephant in the room or, rather, the rape of a small child. How can any organised religion claim to be empowering and honouring and non-violent if the one person at its very core married a six year-old little girl and, if he didn't do before he certainly did later, raped her at age 9. You cannot possibly defend somebody who raped a 9 year-old little girl and you certainly cannot hold them up as being the exalted human that Islam requires you repeatedly declare him to be. Your prophet marries and rapes a small child and your religion approves of this. Don't cite 'cultural differences' at me, either. It is indefensible and to pretend 'things were different then' is a reasonable way to compartmentalise the appalling nature of the crime, is to absolutely ignore the reality that at no point in the history of our species is an adult raping a small child justifiable or excusable. Rape and sex at will is different. Also the exact age is unknown, however, it is said to be between 9 amd 12. It is also known that sex was after she reached puberty. Please don't mix rape here. |
|
|
|
|
1431
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why do people hate islam?
|
on: June 05, 2015, 02:51:53 PM
|
There is no compulsion in Islam. People are free to accept or reject Islam.
I doubt it. People are free to accept Islam, but they can't reject it. In almost all of the Muslim nations, apostasy is punishable by death. Even in progressive nations such as Egypt and Malaysia, Muslim converts to other religions are immediately handed the death sentence. Turkey might be a notable exception to this. Well, there is not any rule in Islam which tells to kill a person if he/she converts from Islam to other religion. You are absolutely right about this. Nobody can coerce another into converting to Islam. The choice is entirely theirs. If a Christian decides that he wants to remain alive rather than remain a Christian, that is his choice.  Keep spreading FUD! You have been attacking Islam for long to achieve your primary goal. How's it going? Did anybody accept Christianity? I sympathize with you. I don't like people picking on my religion, either. My question is your sincerity. Since I don't know you personally, how do I know you are sincere? The thing that throws a lot of doubt on your sincerity is, all the words right in the Quran and Hadiths that contradict the peaceful things that you are saying. If you are truly peaceful, continue to be so. But if you are trying to trick others into believing you are peaceful when you are not... well, that's the thing that I am trying to show people about. That you might NOT be peaceful. That you might be trying to trick people. You seem to be firm in your peace beliefs, right in the face of the strong evidence that shows Islam to be violent. How can anyone be convinced of your sincerity this way? It looks like you are trying to hide the truth from people. Are you? Or are you simply stubborn (as we all are)?  I have said many times that there are grammars and Arabic to English conversations are sometimes wrong. The verses you quote from the disinformation-spreading website(aka religionofpeace.com) are out of context verses or have different meaning. They are twisting... I know you won't believe this and won't like to investigate. No offence. Good luck! From "the maze of disingenuous (often blatantly false) claims about Islam and its history." http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Games-Muslims-Play.htm#islamnotviolent“If Islam were a violent religion, then all Muslims would be violent.” “Other religions kill, too.” Muhammad preached 'no compulsion in religion' (Qur'an: 2:256)The Crusades “Muhammad never killed anyone.” The Qur'an Teaches that all Life is Sacred (Qur'an 5:32) "Muslims only kill in self-defense.” The million dollar wager that "Holy War" isn't in the Qur'an. "Verses of violence are taken out of context.""Islam must be true, because it is the world’s fastest growing religion." "The Qur'an can only be understood in Arabic."What does that do? I said you that website spreads disinformation. Anyway, it's your choice whether to believe that disinformation or not and you are free to do so. It's very bad when people deliberately do such things. |
|
|
|
|
1433
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why do islam hates people?
|
on: June 05, 2015, 11:33:16 AM
|
ISIS and other such organisations do kill Muslims but you are right. They ain't Muslims.
They consider themselves to be Muslims. What makes your authority on declaring them 'not Muslim' any different from them declaring you 'not Muslim' because you don't interpret the instructions the same way they do? Many of the so-called Muslims attacks aren't even from Muslims and they just can't describe in Islam in their own way. For example, there is a verse which was released *at the time of war* which says kill people who spread mischieves and who come to attack you unless they are in peace with you. They just exclude the words after but and tell "look here, Qur'an tells to kill non-Muslims" etc... and they attack many innocents including Muslims. This is not the way even if they are claiming. Claiming but not following doesn't make one a follower. It is obvious they are doing it for their own gains especially political gains and non-Muslims are definitely involved. They are doing far different than what Islam actually tells. FYI, I am not the only one with the view "ISIS and other such groups are contradicting Islam", there are many others too. The problem is they are targeting people with less to no knowledge in Islam and/or people who are very poor and/or people who like to do these sort of bad things. They just brainwash people which is very hard to eradicate. Once brainwashers who tells to kill innocents with disinformation are eradicated, this problem is easily solved. |
|
|
|
|
1435
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why do people hate islam?
|
on: June 05, 2015, 11:09:12 AM
|
There is no compulsion in Islam. People are free to accept or reject Islam.
I doubt it. People are free to accept Islam, but they can't reject it. In almost all of the Muslim nations, apostasy is punishable by death. Even in progressive nations such as Egypt and Malaysia, Muslim converts to other religions are immediately handed the death sentence. Turkey might be a notable exception to this. Well, there is not any rule in Islam which tells to kill a person if he/she converts from Islam to other religion. You are absolutely right about this. Nobody can coerce another into converting to Islam. The choice is entirely theirs. If a Christian decides that he wants to remain alive rather than remain a Christian, that is his choice. Keep spreading FUD! You have been attacking Islam for long to achieve your primary goal. How's it going? Did anybody accept Christianity? I sympathize with you. I don't like people picking on my religion, either. My question is your sincerity. Since I don't know you personally, how do I know you are sincere? The thing that throws a lot of doubt on your sincerity is, all the words right in the Quran and Hadiths that contradict the peaceful things that you are saying. If you are truly peaceful, continue to be so. But if you are trying to trick others into believing you are peaceful when you are not... well, that's the thing that I am trying to show people about. That you might NOT be peaceful. That you might be trying to trick people. You seem to be firm in your peace beliefs, right in the face of the strong evidence that shows Islam to be violent. How can anyone be convinced of your sincerity this way? It looks like you are trying to hide the truth from people. Are you? Or are you simply stubborn (as we all are)? I have said many times that there are grammars and Arabic to English conversations are sometimes wrong. The verses you quote from the disinformation-spreading website(aka religionofpeace.com) are out of context verses or have different meaning. They are twisting... I know you won't believe this and won't like to investigate. No offence. Good luck! |
|
|
|
|
1436
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why do islam hates people?
|
on: June 05, 2015, 11:05:28 AM
|
-snip-
The Mipsterz don't realize it yet, but they are secret agents infiltrating Islam. When the standard Islamites try to do violence against them, all they need to do is flip over to their Muslim training and take out the standard Islamites who are attacking them. The religion of peace never attacks members of its own to pieces...  ISIS and other such organisations do kill Muslims but you are right. They ain't Muslims. |
|
|
|
|
1437
|
Other / Meta / Re: Amph, the useless user!
|
on: June 05, 2015, 11:01:34 AM
|
2012, probably. The Inpts campaigns were by no means the first, it was one of the earliest ones (and the largest at that time).
Butterfly Labs had a signature campaign back in early 2012.
Is there any links to these? I'd be interested to compare them to the campaigns today. Can't find the thread for the BFL campagin, but https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=198934.0 is the thread for TF's sig campaign in 2013. |
|
|
|
|
1438
|
Other / Meta / Re: Nominate (insert name here) to the default trust list
|
on: June 05, 2015, 10:57:58 AM
|
More people should be added to the default trust list (level 1), just my opinion.
Who? Only people who constantly watch their trust list should be added to trust depth 1. Is there any user who does this and whose judgements can be trusted? Blazedout419 or devthedev could be potential candidates. Blazedout419's sent feedbacks are good and has a custom trust list. Adding him to trust depth 1 is debatable. devthedev is using default trust list. So there is no point to add him to trust depth 1. |
|
|
|
|
1440
|
Other / Meta / Re: Nominate (insert name here) to the default trust list
|
on: June 05, 2015, 09:55:24 AM
|
More people should be added to the default trust list (level 1), just my opinion.
Who? Only people who constantly watch their trust list should be added to trust depth 1. Is there any user who does this and whose judgements can be trusted? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
