|
Letter of guarantee failed to verify. Are you sure you used their real site?
|
|
|
|
|
Desktop wallets: Electrum, Armory and Bitcoin Core. I think Multibit HD use unused address for change but I am not sure about it.
In fact, al most all of the HD wallets use new address to receive change unless you change default settings or you manually choose change address.
|
|
|
|
For verifying Electrum Bitcoin wallet, you need Animazing's PGP public key for executables and ThomasV's PGP public key for sources. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1094700.0. Edit: The Electrum site used to link to the checksums. The electrum-ltc.org site has a link to checksums next to the download.
I was using this to verify my downloads. Is this even the correct method?
Yes. Anyway, the checksums are nowhere to be found on the current Eelctrum website. How to I go about verifying the download? Something with the gpg key I am guessing? Not sure how to do that though.
I'm on Linux. Thanks for any assistance with the matter.
Electrum Bitcoin wallet executables/sources are PGP signed. You can download signatures from download page. I think you are mistaken in one thing, i.e. Electrum Litecoin wallet is not developed by the same developer of Electrum Bitcoin wallet. |
|
|
|
I get email notification from freebitco*in payment
but while I check blockchain*info account , my balance not update till now more than 48 hours ago
any problem at blockchain?
Did you check whether your address received that transaction or not? Use Blocktrail.com, btc.blockr.io and Blockchain.info and see if that transaction shows up. |
|
|
|
-snip-
{...} but his only accusation on me is that he says I defrauded a known liar, and he's using the liar's word for it as "evidence".
-snip-
Yes, TF is an untrustworthy person but at that time, you admitted to withdrew coins which were earned using bots and you named your bot "b0t" which makes me think you really know the rules. I also don't want to rehash my views/opinions here but you use "liar's word" every time which is not true. If you don't want to rehash then you're going to have to avoid writing these kinds of half-truths which are as good as lies in that they mislead. What I admitted to was experminting with a bot using TF's approval and knowledge, he even helped me with it. Then him booting me and making up various and arbitary amounts that he said I owed him. I never figured out if/whether I owed him anything because he wasn't reasonable to talk to about it. He just said "pay back X" but everytime X was a different amount and often it was more than I had ever even owned at the time. TF and I walked away from this 3 years ago and that was that but then QS comes along, with zero knowledge of the situation, and makes TF's false accusations his accusations. And we all know that he did this not realizing that (1) I would make a stink and fight back on this nonsense (2) it would actually cost him reptuation points because he's siding with a known liar. Now, 4 months later, I'm still dealing with it and you tell me what I should do MZ? When someone falsely comes after you quoting some lies of a discredited person, are you going to roll over and delete your account? Or are you going to stand up and say that what's going on is wrong and that you're being attacked? I'm under attack from this dude for like 4 months now, he only last week made some threat against me. I don't know what I'm supposed to do. I don't want to discuss about this in this thread but I like to discuss about that in your old thread which will be the appropriate place to discuss. I think QS should change negative feedback to neutral but I don't know if there was an incident of changing negative feedback on scammer's/thief's* profile to neutral. * Mentioning scammer/theif as QS thinks you are. I have now sent him an email. I did write to him last time he had QS on his list, but only once, and then he responded. And it actually went well because he was able to convince QS to change his ratings to neutrals---presumably he was able to show him the reason in not blindly echoing tradefortress. But as soon as QS was removed from his list he changed the ratings back to negatives and even opened a new account and trolled me with that. As recently as last week he was making a threat against my---saying that "I would be stopped or else!". In any case, now that TC has added him again, I'd like to speak with TC about getting QSs lies changed back to neutral---as he did last time.
Okay. Pm blocked? Is that doable in this forum? He's online right now, and I'm not sure how can you approach him. Maybe quote some of his posts?
-snip- Serious questions, no trolling: Did he block you for harassing him about QS? -snip- That's what I thought. If writing to him once, receiving a reply, him replying that all is solved, I write back with "thank you for your intervention" is some kind of harrassment, then you guys are from another planet than me. Xetsr's post and my "thought" were before you told about your 2 PMs. I(we) didn't tell those two PMs were harassment. |
|
|
|
Loan Amount: 0.35
Reason: Private
Collateral: Antminer S1+eobot account
BTC Address: 1GHKVqVXaheNFiRLSAoyAdraK8ns3u6Jza
Term Length: 4 week
Repay: 0.4
Denied. Why? I don't mine and Eobot looks like a ponzi. So both of them are useless for me. |
|
|
|
-snip-
{...} but his only accusation on me is that he says I defrauded a known liar, and he's using the liar's word for it as "evidence".
-snip-
Yes, TF is an untrustworthy person but at that time, you admitted to withdrew coins which were earned using bots and you named your bot "b0t" which makes me think you really know the rules. I also don't want to rehash my views/opinions here but you use "liar's word" every time which is not true. I have now sent him an email. I did write to him last time he had QS on his list, but only once, and then he responded. And it actually went well because he was able to convince QS to change his ratings to neutrals---presumably he was able to show him the reason in not blindly echoing tradefortress. But as soon as QS was removed from his list he changed the ratings back to negatives and even opened a new account and trolled me with that. As recently as last week he was making a threat against my---saying that "I would be stopped or else!". In any case, now that TC has added him again, I'd like to speak with TC about getting QSs lies changed back to neutral---as he did last time.
Okay. Pm blocked? Is that doable in this forum? He's online right now, and I'm not sure how can you approach him. Maybe quote some of his posts?
-snip- Serious questions, no trolling: Did he block you for harassing him about QS? -snip- That's what I thought. |
|
|
|
tomatocage1@gmail.com is his email. Send him one or two emails. I highly recommend you not to message him a lot. He may have blocked you for sending a lot of messages. Did you do it last time when QS left you a negative trust feedback?
|
|
|
|
Loan Amount: 0.35
Reason: Private
Collateral: Antminer S1+eobot account
BTC Address: 1GHKVqVXaheNFiRLSAoyAdraK8ns3u6Jza
Term Length: 4 week
Repay: 0.4
Denied. |
|
|
|
 okey. i want to tell you about this. ISLAM not HATE cristiant people, atheis, and the other. but, in this positions, like a road there is many limb, and THEY ARE is unmissing understand about what the mean in AL-Qur'an and HAdist from My Prophet Muhammad abseloutely. The Pillars of ISlam there is no Jihad make a warfare, bombardment, and etc. understand about this not of all Muslim like that.. we love peace, and we not problemity about a deferrent you are, and what your religion, we not problemity with that. we can life side by side. even, there is cristiant and islam have merried. its okey.. life is choice. we can to choice but after we control by the choice we have choose right? and Islam hate too the people like make damage with name of "ISLAM" cause ISLAM not lesson about that. even in Al-Qur'an there is verse about "NOT MAKE DAMAGE IN THE EARTH" even, The Prophet make a model the very perfect for we, if we should not with each other haveing warfare, if we can pacification with other, why not? they just the people not understand what te mean about JIHAD. JIHAD is not like that. Islam is very beautyfull for me, and for the people understand about it. thanks, i just tell what i fell, i hope this benefit for us. sorry i dont wanna make hostility.  Your comment is welcome. No hostility. Don't let the salafi movement speak for you. I agree whole heartedly but must point out. 1. In the Western world, assertions of well intentioned Muslims to the contrary, the word "JIHAD" is completely hijacked and refers strictly to terrorist acts. That can't be changed. 2. In the Western world, the phrase "Allah Akbar" has increasingly been associated with terrorist acts. So these bad guys really are trying to hijack your religion. Complete denial of this, as some here have done, is not a step forward. http://www.shutterstock.com/s/ostrich+head+in+sand/search.htmlRight! The honest, more-truthful-Islamic Muslims are trying to hijack Islam from those who are far weaker in the Islamic faith... the ones who are peaceful. You can't be a strong Muslim unless you accept ALL the tenets of the Islamic faith... even the violence directives. EDIT: Perhaps if Muslims edited the violence directives out of the Quran and the Hadiths, then peaceful Muslims could be the TRUE Muslims. I don't agree with what you've said. Codes of behavior intended to last for thousands of years must contain advise on behavior during both good, and bad times. That includes how one should act when violence is required, such as repelling invaders. I also do not agree that the weaker are the ones who are peaceful. The pen is mightier than the sword. The pen is NOT mightier than the sword. It is the allegiance of those wielding the swords to the one who is wielding the pen that makes the pen SEEM mightier at times. Perhaps Islamic written violence directives are indeed interpreted by the majority of Muslims as defensive directives, only. However, because of the clear wording, and because there are Arabic language professionals who show that the clear wording means aggressive violence at times rather than simply defensive, then those who set up non-violent Islamic codes of behavior for Muslims over hundreds of years, have been turning Muslims from the pure Islamic faith for hundreds of years. This means that we have at least a dualistic Islam. If you as a Muslim want to get out of the duplicity of your religion, edit the violence directives out of your written word. Well, I don't know what to say to "you". They are twisting according to their likes. They maybe Arabic language professionals but they are liars who twist things to fit their own needs. Well, ignore if you want and/or keep spreading disinformation. They are not twisting according to the language. Rather, it is the Islam "professionals" who have twisted the Arabic language to mean something it generally does not. In other words, Islam has converted Arabic into another form of Arabic, a dialect of Arabic, so to speak. Then Muslims use the two dialects interchangeably, at will, not even realizing that they are doing it. You are wrong. To say it simple, if there were an Arab-speaking person who was fluent in Arabic - like it was his native, birth language - and he didn't have the least bit of knowledge of Islam, and he read the violence directives in the Quran and the Hadiths for the first time, he would be shocked that this religion called Islam had so many violence directives in it.
No, he won't. So, if he went to the teachers of Islam, and they taught him that the violence directives were not really directives, but at worst were simply defensive in nature to protect Muslims from attack by their enemies, he would have a change of understanding of the Arabic language, even if he didn't recognize the dual nature of the two "dialects," regular Arabic and Islamic Arabic. You see, people who twists things who you call as "Arabic language professionals" deny/ignore grammars and all to make those verses support their actions. I have started studying Arabic before I learned a lot about Islam and the translations were not having any problems if you don't have grammar mistakes. In Arabic, there are lot of important grammars such as "va", "al" etc... which those people ignore. For example, 'Jihad' in pure linguistic sense, it does not mean 'holy war' like they claim. In pure linguistic meaning, word for "holy war" is "al-harb". |
|
|
|
this android application very useful for android user
but, are balance from blockchain can synchronize well, my bro?
Yes. |
|
|
|
From my understanding of reading Badbears post a little while ago is that activity is no longer updated every hour but when that person logs in again because it was too taxing for the system to keep up I might have the log in bit wrong but its not every hour any longer
Logging in is for inactive users. For active users, it is 1 hour but I guess there are slight delays these days. |
|
|
|
Thank you
can you explain better why i only need backup the phrase when 'everybody' in the internet says i must backup the entire database (private keys, etc etc) or i risk losing some funds? thank you in advance
Because breadwallet is an hierarchical deterministic(HD) wallet. Unlike normal wallets, HD wallets have extended private/public key. All the private/public keys are generated from that extended private/public key. So, you only have to backup your extended private key. No, you don't have to. The image is talking about cold storage(paper wallets, probably). Assuming you understand how transaction works, you will have to mention an address to receive 'change'. When you spend from paper wallet manually -- if you forgot to add a change address, change will be used as fees resulting in loss of that Bitcoins. However, in these wallets, here, breadwallet, it will automatically choose a change address to receive change. Therefore, you don't need to worry about change and you only need to spend Bitcoins you want to spend. |
|
|
|
okey. i want to tell you about this. ISLAM not HATE cristiant people, atheis, and the other. but, in this positions, like a road there is many limb, and THEY ARE is unmissing understand about what the mean in AL-Qur'an and HAdist from My Prophet Muhammad abseloutely. The Pillars of ISlam there is no Jihad make a warfare, bombardment, and etc. understand about this not of all Muslim like that.. we love peace, and we not problemity about a deferrent you are, and what your religion, we not problemity with that. we can life side by side. even, there is cristiant and islam have merried. its okey.. life is choice. we can to choice but after we control by the choice we have choose right? and Islam hate too the people like make damage with name of "ISLAM" cause ISLAM not lesson about that. even in Al-Qur'an there is verse about "NOT MAKE DAMAGE IN THE EARTH" even, The Prophet make a model the very perfect for we, if we should not with each other haveing warfare, if we can pacification with other, why not? they just the people not understand what te mean about JIHAD. JIHAD is not like that. Islam is very beautyfull for me, and for the people understand about it. thanks, i just tell what i fell, i hope this benefit for us. sorry i dont wanna make hostility. Your comment is welcome. No hostility. Don't let the salafi movement speak for you. I agree whole heartedly but must point out. 1. In the Western world, assertions of well intentioned Muslims to the contrary, the word "JIHAD" is completely hijacked and refers strictly to terrorist acts. That can't be changed. 2. In the Western world, the phrase "Allah Akbar" has increasingly been associated with terrorist acts. So these bad guys really are trying to hijack your religion. Complete denial of this, as some here have done, is not a step forward. http://www.shutterstock.com/s/ostrich+head+in+sand/search.htmlRight! The honest, more-truthful-Islamic Muslims are trying to hijack Islam from those who are far weaker in the Islamic faith... the ones who are peaceful. You can't be a strong Muslim unless you accept ALL the tenets of the Islamic faith... even the violence directives. EDIT: Perhaps if Muslims edited the violence directives out of the Quran and the Hadiths, then peaceful Muslims could be the TRUE Muslims. I don't agree with what you've said. Codes of behavior intended to last for thousands of years must contain advise on behavior during both good, and bad times. That includes how one should act when violence is required, such as repelling invaders. I also do not agree that the weaker are the ones who are peaceful. The pen is mightier than the sword. The pen is NOT mightier than the sword. It is the allegiance of those wielding the swords to the one who is wielding the pen that makes the pen SEEM mightier at times. Perhaps Islamic written violence directives are indeed interpreted by the majority of Muslims as defensive directives, only. However, because of the clear wording, and because there are Arabic language professionals who show that the clear wording means aggressive violence at times rather than simply defensive, then those who set up non-violent Islamic codes of behavior for Muslims over hundreds of years, have been turning Muslims from the pure Islamic faith for hundreds of years. This means that we have at least a dualistic Islam. If you as a Muslim want to get out of the duplicity of your religion, edit the violence directives out of your written word. Well, I don't know what to say to "you". They are twisting according to their likes. They maybe Arabic language professionals but they are liars who twist things to fit their own needs. Well, ignore if you want and/or keep spreading disinformation. |
|
|
|
Secure... but unspendable. Or how should one access coins on a multisignature address when one party cant give their key for releasing them? What is secure with that? Its like losing your wallet password and brainwallet too.
Please stop spreading FUD! Bitcoins stored in a 2FA wallet can be fully recovered from the seed, and spent. How do we achieve this? Here is the trick: The public key of the cosigner service is not needed, because it is derived deterministically from the seed. You can test it by yourself, it works. Ok, thats something important to know. So when the service dies, but you still have your brainwallet, you will be able to recover your funds? It is not brainwallet, it is hierarchical deterministic seed. I mean without the service could you create the multisig addresses again at all? I would not know what to do just in the case.
Yes. Is it your service? If not, why didnt you implement 2FA normally? Not being able to log into the account or send transactions without 2FA should have been sufficient i guess. Why not going that route? The service costs money for each transaction on top. Because of that i doubt many will use it.
Which service are you talking about? Please clarify. |
|
|
|
Nice information, would still like to hear more from you on this.
It would be great if you update your OP with a list of escrows that you find the most trustworthy ones.
As I have mentioned previously, I am not comfortable endorsing any particular escrow. It is up to individual users to decide if it is prudent to trust a specific person or not. It is inevitable that someone that I trust will eventually run away with money they are entrusted with, and I would not want to bear that moral responsibility. One example of this is that I have used madaik in the past as escrow, and as of ~3 months ago, I would have trusted with with large amounts of my money. Up until ~3 months ago, he probably would be on such a list that you are describing, however he somewhat recently ran away with over $5,000 worth of bitcoin that he was entrusted with (at least, probably more) Or maybe you can link to Marco's 'escrow services' list' thread? When it becomes out-of-date, remove it. |
|
|
|
are this software can running well at os linux android?
It is running well for Windows, OS X and linux but not for android. You can't mine using an android phone. However, you can connect miner(s) to android phone and mine using it but it won't be effective. |
|
|
|
Lol, what the heck, dude. One paragraph...
The opposite reaction is therefore, not real.
... vs. other paragraph Newton's Third Law is about action and reaction, cause and effect. You're not even trying anymore. Go lay down or something. electrons, electrolytes, chemicals, all working in the brain = reality = action free will = illusion = reaction For every ACTION there is an equal and opposite REACTION. Reaction opposite action. Illusion opposite reality. Free will opposite brain activity. Let's see if we can clear this up concisely. For every ACTION, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Do you know what an ACTION is? Actions are verbs, not nouns. Here's a list to help you, since now I'm in a listing mood. Things BADecker things are actions, but aren't:- Electrons
- Electrolytes
- Chemicals
- Reality
- Illusion
- Free will
Therefore, because none of the things you are talking about are ACTIONS, Newton's Third Law cannot be invoked to prove they have an opposite. Here I thought your problem was of science illiteracy, and it turns out, it's just regular illiteracy. Solomon says in the Bible O.T., that if you laugh at someone's trouble, the same thing will happen to you. I wouldn't have laughed, anyway. But Solomon gives me all the more reason not to laugh. From http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/action?s=t: -meanings-
I don't see "action" listed as a verb anywhere in the definition. Since the word "action" is a noun, and it is being compared to "reaction," another noun, Newtons Third Law is talking about "things," which are not verbs. I think jaysabi was not talking about the word 'action' and what he really meant was 'actions s' are verbs and not nouns. Eg:- breathe, run etc... |
|
|
|
Something not cool is going on , I cannot check how much posts and how much is my payment for some reasons , anyone else have the same error as below or I should panic ?
Error while checking signature please try again
Profile uid : 375981
Staring Post Number : 452
Pay per post : 0.00110000
New Posts : 81
Excluded Posts : 9
Final Posts : 72
Payment Address : 3KfPAawFK8qG8KmRBHfkyNtvJwSLwHDJam
Final payment : 0.0792
|
|
|
|
I always had this question and now I want actually to know if it's possible to get the private keys of Coinbase accounts or Bit-x.com accounts and export them to import to another wallet .
You can't. Or simply the ability to sign messages using the adresses given on those accounts ?  You can using Coinbase but not with BIT-X. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.msg11915241#msg11915241. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
