Well if the exclusions are for "being a dick", then do you think further isolating me will make me more or less cooperative with the little Stazi community you have going here? If less so, then is not the point only to cause punitive punishment rather than reform? If being a dick and trolling is grounds for exclusion then you might as well wipe 2/3 of the trust list out. BTW being critical of your butt buddies doesn't make it trolling. You are all creating an environment where no one is free to do or say anything unless the collective proscribes it. Sounds like freedom to me!
You're extrapolating bigly and wrongly. You got one exclusion for something you (the alleged dick) did that was considered untrustworthy by a DT1 member. There are still other exclusions likely for other reasons because most of them happened before the "dick move" episode. I doubt any of your excluders care about your "cooperation" since they already consider your judgement to be flawed. But you haven't lost any of the forum "freedoms" either. You can still say the things you want, you can even bring up scam accusations should you need DT action on them. Being so desperate to get into DT just makes you look even less suitable for it. You're right on one thing. Being critical isn't trolling. That's not why I consider you a deranged troll (or QS, or CH, or Thule). The freedom I am referring to is being able to be critical of the default trust priest class without the punitive punishment of exclusion as punishment for doing so. No one is free to speak or be critical of the Default Trust Stazi here any more, your continual slander of me for doing nothing more than speaking critically is just further evidence of it. All of those retards are just convenient tools for you to dismiss legitimate criticisms and pretend it is all the same. The primary difference between myself and them is you don't have the convenient option of just labeling me as a scammer so you have to try to lump me in with "trolls". |
|
|
|
|
Love it. I would like to petition the wizard be replaced with a clown wearing an East German Stazi officer's hat though given the overall trend of the forum over the past 10 years. I think that would be more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
You people sure do love inserting other topics so you can later convolute them. I made it pretty clear the punitive punishment was the exclusion. The "scammer" part was the pathetic attempt to ASSOCIATE me with scammers by comparing me to Quickseller. Learn to read then maybe impugn my words.
Quick question for you ball bags, do you think your exclusions are going to make me more or less of a "dick"?
Except you're the one inserting that "topic" and making the association with QS' scamming behavior, as opposed to his trolling behavior, which is where you two are like twins. I don't think you need to blame the exclusions for making you a dick. You seem to be quite capable of that on your own but whatever makes you feel better. Well if the exclusions are for "being a dick", then do you think further isolating me will make me more or less cooperative with the little Stazi community you have going here? If less so, then is not the point only to cause punitive punishment rather than reform? If being a dick and trolling is grounds for exclusion then you might as well wipe 2/3 of the trust list out. BTW being critical of your butt buddies doesn't make it trolling. You are all creating an environment where no one is free to do or say anything unless the collective proscribes it. Sounds like freedom to me! |
|
|
|
Quickseller is a confirmed con artist.
Bullshit. I have never been credibly accused of trying to steal or misappropriate money. What a clown show. You pretended to be your own escrow and accepted payment for a nonexistent service. That is theft and fraud. Just because it was JUST A LITTLE bit a fraud doesn't make it ok. Go away now. Another note for the rest of the clowns:  There is a literal warning not to expect privacy in your PMs with every message you send... but lets all pretend there isn't |
|
|
|
I appreciate all the kind words guys! You always help me in seeing things from new perspectives while all the same bettering myself both as a user here at bitcointalk but also as a human.
Sure sounds good when you stick your fingers in your ears and go "LA LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!" doesn't it? That's who we need in control of the trust system here, people not even mature enough to listen to criticism of themselves. |
|
|
|
Thank you so much for digging that up. It was a person promoting a scam so there is that, but if anyone wants to exclude me for it - I'm a big fan of informed decisions so feel free, I certainly wouldn't have a meltdown over this. Some other things to look for in my post history: - I may have said favorable things about a site or two that later turned out to be scams.
- I've said many many NSFW and plain mean things to pretty much everyone I came into contact with.
- I've been wrong quite a few times and - gasp - may have failed to admit it once or twice.
- I don't like lemons.
Not a comprehensive list of all wrongdoings but should get you started. Even the people who exclude me don't bother to argue I am a thief. Keep proving how unbiased you are by comparing me to known scammers to argue your extremely weak justification for punitive punishment.
If you were a thief you would have red trust. As it stands, it's your judgement that is questionable. Your attempts to paint this as being called a scammer show that you either don't understand how the trust system works, or deliberately make yourself look like a victim, neither of which does you any favors as far as your trust inclusions are concerned. You people sure do love inserting other topics so you can later convolute them. I made it pretty clear the punitive punishment was the exclusion. The "scammer" part was the pathetic attempt to ASSOCIATE me with scammers by comparing me to Quickseller. Learn to read then maybe impugn my words. Quick question for you ball bags, do you think your exclusions are going to make me more or less of a "dick"? |
|
|
|
Oh, so what, you been sitting on your arse on that keyboard all salty so long all you can even think about is a stupid fucking forum trust setup? FML, did you go to private schools and yale too?  Anyhow, Fuck you, I'm not arguing with a known grade-a asshole. BTW, my list is my list. It may have started with some help, but either way, fuck off asshole. What the fuck are you rambling about now? Let me break it down. You and your buddy Hhampuz are both duplicitous cowards who don't even have the nuts to tell people the truth to their faces as they stab them in the back. No one told you to change your trust list, just pointing out how completely full of shit both of you are. That is all. |
|
|
|
More excuses So what part of this makes you less of a hypocrite in your applications of standards for exclusion? Quickseller is a confirmed con artist. Even the people who exclude me don't bother to argue I am a thief. Keep proving how unbiased you are by comparing me to known scammers to argue your extremely weak justification for punitive punishment. |
|
|
|
Publically posting PMs is a dick move, especially when you do so to force him into a conversation. It has nothing to do with virtue signalling since I honestly don't care what the "DT mob" thinks of me.
I am not going to exclude Suchmoon for something he/she did over 3 years ago. Unlike some people here I don't dig into peoples past, desperately hoping to find something I can bring up. I would exclude him/her if he/she posted it recently. It might sound strange but some people actually change their behaviour when they grow older, which is exactly why I am open to revising my trust ratings/exclusions after a while. You should try it. Whatever excuse you can work out to justify your retaliatory punitive behavior right? One standard for me and another standard for thee. Yes, I am sure you don't care, which just so happens to be why you have pretty much everyone who excludes me on your trust list. Complete coincidence I am sure, clearly no one cares what people on their trust list think. No, you don't go around digging up people's past, you just support those that do. What should I try? I don't go around policing Bitcointalk like some kind of rent a cop like you and most of your trust list do. All I am doing is pointing out your hypocrisy and selective punitive punishment for the well deserved criticism of your butt buddies. I am not forcing Hhampuz to do anything, just exposing how he privately shows one face and then publicly tries to pretend as if I was harassing him which is why he JUST HAD TO exclude and block me. |
|
|
|
With the given situation you are in the red tag Lauda gave to you is justifiable, your account is obviously created to complain about the DT system and it's probably you are one of the members who got tagged by a DT member one way or another. Based from what I have seen DT members are more lenient and understanding to high ranking members or at least the trustworthy ones since they have the balls to complain about it in their own account unlike you who just created an alt account to cover your identity. Keep in mind you are tagged because you are using an alt account that is trolling in the forum and not because you are standing up against them. You aren't even really standing up because you are just hiding in your alt account.
Is that so? Maybe some one should tell that to the 13 cult members excluding me because they don't like my criticism of their pals. I am sure the long list of people on the list no one has ever heard of are far more trustworthy. My crimes are too numerous to count after all. I can't speak for the other 12 cult members but I excluded you after you publically posted a PM between you and Hhampuz. I don't exclude people if I disagree with them or just because I think that they are assholes. I see, so the fact that I posted that message is more of a problem than his duplicity and inability to have a conversation like an adult. Got it. You know what would have prevented that? Him willing to have a conversation about it, instead he chose to hide like a coward rather than explain himself. The message had nothing exceptional in it other than a demonstration of his duplicitous behavior, this is just a pathetic excuse for you to virtue signal to the DT mob. There is no presumption of privacy with personal messages. If this is your standard you should exclude Suchmoon too. I am sure I could find plenty of other examples of people on your trust list that have shared PMs as well, but oh that's right you people only apply these standards to others when it serves your bias. This is just a woefully pathetic pretext for retaliation. |
|
|
|
He's now taken to removing and replacing his trust rating to try and continually damage my trust score. How pathetic.  If I remember right Theymos has explicitly stated before in the past this is abusive of the trust system. |
|
|
|
|
Coinbase has been a banker trojan horse from day 1.
|
|
|
|
|
I do from time to time. I am usually looking for silver coins, which is quite rare now days, but most often I will find mild errors which are often worth at least a few bucks.
|
|
|
|
Hhampuz, it is a waste of time to argue with some who won't be transparent but demands it from others. I would suggest locking this thread and pointing it to a new self moderated one.  Hhampuz is far from transparent. He shows you a nice face then his handlers yank his chain and suddenly he has nothing to say to you and you are blocked with no explanation. Have you ever worked with people at a real job? They are no different. A job is job - The boss says jump, you fucking jump. This thread is such a disaster.  Thanks for the public confirmation Hhampuz is a paid tool who doesn't make his own choices. BTW none of that explains why exactly he can't have any communication at all, but ok. Sounds to me like he is a weak minded person doing what he knows is not right and would rather not be reminded of it. I thought the trust system was a joke with no consequences on people's real lives? Which is it? Speaking of duplicity, you don't really have much room to talk Mr. "oh I just copied some one else's list" lol. So full of shit. |
|
|
|
Hhampuz, it is a waste of time to argue with some who won't be transparent but demands it from others. I would suggest locking this thread and pointing it to a new self moderated one. Hhampuz is far from transparent. He shows you a nice face then his handlers yank his chain and suddenly he has nothing to say to you and you are blocked with no explanation. |
|
|
|
With the given situation you are in the red tag Lauda gave to you is justifiable, your account is obviously created to complain about the DT system and it's probably you are one of the members who got tagged by a DT member one way or another. Based from what I have seen DT members are more lenient and understanding to high ranking members or at least the trustworthy ones since they have the balls to complain about it in their own account unlike you who just created an alt account to cover your identity. Keep in mind you are tagged because you are using an alt account that is trolling in the forum and not because you are standing up against them. You aren't even really standing up because you are just hiding in your alt account.
Is that so? Maybe some one should tell that to the 13 cult members excluding me because they don't like my criticism of their pals. I am sure the long list of people on the list no one has ever heard of are far more trustworthy. My crimes are too numerous to count after all. |
|
|
|
After conducting considerable research (secondary) into the workings of our current global financial system, it is becoming evidently clear that inflation is effectively a form of hidden tax on the public. The relationship between the Government, Central Banks, and Banks effectively increases the money supply of the economy which directly leads to price increases but, the price increase itself is nothing more than a reflection of a decrease in the purchasing power of the currency from the increase in the money supply in the first place. Which means, by borrowing money from Central Banks, the Government is actually taxing the public without their notice. I have uploaded a video explaining the concept in detail for Hindi/Urdu speaking members, you can refer to the link below to learn more, I actually connect the concept with Cryptocurrencies, more notably, with Bitcoin. So if you're interested in the Cryptocurrency space, you'll definitely find it interesting. Video Title: This is why Inflation is a Hidden Tax! (for Hindi/Urdu) 2019 Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfdfTtId5qAI'm curious to know If you think I am on the right track or not. Do you think that inflation is a form of hidden tax? jes if the population isnt working hard enough for the newly inputted currency tokens, then there will be a problem and inflation. its the population's fault not to work hard enough for the money Aren't you the one always ranting and raving about capitalists and bankers? Inflation is the worker's fault now? Just stop talking retard, you have no business trying to tell anyone anything. |
|
|
|
standard, weird, unintelligible conspiracy theory mumbo jumbo
I am a lizard man and the pedo overlord alien Clinton demands you stop exposing the truth about us. Its reptilian. If you are trying to make a joke at least get the lingo down Captain Commie Canuck. Also the Clintons absolutely are involved in child sex trafficking, that is a fact. |
|
|
|
|
That is kind of the catch 22. It is like saying, "oh lets just have a LITTLE BIT of murder." because it some how works out. Now the door is opened and the amount of acceptable murder is up for debate and soon we have concentration camps forming and conveyor belts rolling bodies into incinerators because the base premise has been justified allowing its expansion. There will always be pressure for more and more, the only logical line is none.
|
|
|
|
These are single use, expires June 30th, 2019. Shipping costs still apply. http://shutterfly.com/shopplaywin$25 off or 50% off: AB2Q-2Z5X-R9YM-XGXVA4 Free 20x30 Large Format Print: AB2P-9PYG-M69J-AN4Z9D |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
