|
Excuse pour la traduction google horrible. Je pense que la déclaration ci-dessous est plus proche.
"Quand te parle mOgliE ne parle que merde."
(Oxstone = mOgliE)
|
|
|
|
|
Accusations aside, I feel like this user has been an overall constructive addition to the forum and may be worth a second chance. Perhaps Hhampuz can weigh in on this since he effectively represents the damaged party.
|
|
|
|
Allons, allons, on se calme un peu. Sinon, je casse tous mes fragments de Bitcoin et je paye des cours de français à Tecshare et je lui demande de rappliquer ici  . Quand mOgliE ne parle rien mais la merde tombe. |
|
|
|
IS ORANGE MAN BAD? SHOULD WE PROTEST? IMPEACH CHEETO HITLER! Get your very own NPC set including grey lycra mask and grey XX-L t-shirt with some of the greatest NPC's hits phrases on it. Trigger your friends, your family, or even the general public.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEMASK + GREY XX-L SHIRT WITH RANDOM PHRASE:  CUSTOM PHRASE OF YOUR CHOICE ON SHIRT: +  GREY LYCRA ARM COVERING: + Price includes shipping within the USA, Litecoin equivalent also accepted.     |
|
|
|
I would 'feel' like voting with my feet and getting the hell out of country before having a kid.
In fact, I DID do exactly that. Forced vaccination programs in 'the land of the free' are on the near-term horizon and they are, I feel, enough of a probability and enough of a threat to get out.
When Trump showed his true colors on a number of issues, and especially the vaccine issue, and showed that he had no interest in or inclination towards going against the wishes of his masters in spite of all his campaign trail bullshit, I bailed. Trump('s minders) used almost pure data analytics for his talking points and PR campaigns and these bear no relationship to his policies or priorities. Trump's owners are the driving force behind the vaccination programs and the gun confiscation programs. 5G is another. There are 'certain reasons' for these priorities.
People assume, for no valid reason, that vaccines are the same everywhere. They are not. In some 'regions' making people stupid and sterile is a priority. In other 'regions' getting half the kids taking prescription pharmaceuticals is a priority since these populations have wealth to extract and it will be easier to sell communism when everyone has a need that they cannot meet without state help. Namely un-affordable health care...but that only works on people who are sick.
I've put a lot of hard-core research (meaning reading dense scientific studies) and thought into the subject of vaccinations, but there also an element of 'gut instinct' on my part. My 'gut instinct' has paid off for me in the past.
In this situation though, we're not talking about a country that has gone rogue and is attempting eugneics on its people We're talking about a country of compassionate people and laws. One that is attempting to protect the population through the use of vaccines. The only reason someone shoud be given an exemption is for medical reason, and ONLY medical reasons relating to the side effects that it could cause to you in particular. You sure about that? The USA was the birthplace of the modern eugenics movement and the government has been repeatedly documented as being involved. |
|
|
|
I would suggest creating a new account - you are not your brother and you should not pretend to have the same like/relationships/habits he had. Eventually you may be caught and then all the time you and your deceased brother spent here would be wasted. TECHY (above) would go into a bank and pretend to be a dead relative to get the money. In your case, you are looking for privilege, not money, and I would encourage you to be honest, and let YOUR values and YOUR morals come through in your account. If the guy intended to use the account for nefarious reasons you wagging your finger at him and using this as an opportunity to start drama with me won't do anything but sooth your OCD. There is nothing inherently illicit about using a profile you didn't create as long as you are not using it to defraud people. If his intent was to defraud do you really believe he needs advice on how to do so? All I am doing is making his choice clear. Either prove your story is legit with documents or just quietly and honorably use the account. Your poopooing and hypocritical moralizing won't change the situation. |
|
|
|
|
Sorry to hear that. Unless you are willing to dox yourself so people can see for sure this is true, I would suggest just using the account and not making an issue of it. If you can't prove it then the accounts reputation will be trashed as soon as you ID it because people will assume it is hacked.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not a general opponent to valid forks based on consensus, but I am certainly opposed to hijacking type political type forks, which IMO BCH does clearly qualify for. It is debatable if he deserves these tags, but one of crypto's main weaknesses is the ability to run these politically motivated forks based on popularity. This is not what forks are intended for. Forks are intended as a way for the general user base to "vote with their feet" so to speak in support of a fork that makes significant, required, and substantial improvements to the networks protocol. What BCH is, is essentially an altcoin rebranded as a fork. If he had just called it an altcoin I personally would be 100% supporting him right now. This is one of the main weaknesses of the general open source crypto protocol as it exists now, at any moment events can be manipulated to split the community in two and cleave off not only market share, but brand name recognition, and infrastructure. I find this inherently deceitful.
|
|
|
|
Yes, actually that shows that the system worked properly in your case. You were able to talk yourself out of this even though...
But why do I have to explain myself if I didn't break any forum rules or scammed anybody? In our trust was added 2 years ago that we know each other and are closely related because I knew it has to be clear to other members. Talked about this openly multiple times on the forum also. This is something I can't understand. You explained yourself and you got out of the pickle. Not pleasant but not the end of the world. And the reason for suspicions was quite obvious - the two accounts had very clear symptoms of being alts and sent merits and trust ratings to each other. Forum rules have nothing to with the trust system, I'm sure you know that. And this being a Bitcoin forum I'm sure you can understand why users here think that private keys are private and sharing an address or a wallet is a big red flag. What about when there is a popularity contest stacked on top of a similar situation, and those making accusations don't care to hear any defenses because it provides them an opportunity to punish people for calling out their own behavior? This is why I have been persistently advocating a standard of evidence of theft, contractual violation, or violation of applicable laws, because literally anyone can be picked out of a hat and have their activities scrutinized in such a leading way as to create "evidence" of some nefarious activity when there is none. There also seems to be a very troubling "hive mind" type mentality going on among the default trust. People should be making choices based on the information they have personally reviewed, not what their buddies are doing and saying. This is cultivating a dual tier system of rules, one of a standard of general suspicion for the general user base, and one of overwhelming preponderance of evidence for those who are on and play to the desires of the default trust. This environment of arbitrary suspicion and punishment is caustic to this community and needs to end. This was part of the goal of the most recent trust system changes, but unfortunately a small group of people believe they have a right to dictate their own set of arbitrary standards upon the overall community. |
|
|
|
I was asking a question. I keep forgetting that you can't really hold a conversation without melting down. Carry on.
I don't even bother trying anymore. It's not like he can seriously deny abusing the trust network. I was asking a question as well. I keep forgetting that you can't really hold a conversation without shitting your pants. Man projection is fun and easy! Just keep repeating your baseless projections, maybe some one will believe you and forget all your years of documented trust system abuse. |
|
|
|
I am a 51 yr old mother of 6 children. My oldest is 29, my youngest is 6. All of my children have been vaccinated, but I chose to vaccinate them when they were around 4 years old. The reason is because of how they have been preserved . Honestly , I'm not positive that they still do this , but in the past the amount of Mercury used to preserve just one shot given to a child contains the maximum allowable amount of Mercury for an adult. And children generally get 4 to 6 shots at each sitting. This means that they have been exposed to up to 6 times the amount of Mercury that is consider safe for an adult.
I have known at least 4 children who were clearly injured for life due to the vaccination they received . It's scary. I think that it would be safer to give fewer shots at a time and start the cycles later in life.
ANTI-VAXER!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!! |
|
|
|
What are you trying to say, that these are the same statements? Trying to help Vod save face before he catches himself in another provable falsehood are we?
So if you like something, you do all you can to stop liking it? You are a very negative person techy; it's not good for your health. I don't need to save face, but thanks.  Not even sure what you are babbling about, good try at forming a cohesive thought though. Nice save not responding to my question by just moving on as usual BTW. Are you accusing me of fabricating that original quote or did you make it? EDIT: Future Vod - "Man Brings "Emotional Support Clown" To Meeting Where He Was Laid Off" |
|
|
|
You denying you said that now Vod? Be careful... it is logged even if there is a short window for you to edit after your post before it shows as "edited". Are you accusing me of making that up?
What exactly are you trying to say there? You seem to have copied that text from the Maggiordomo notification but it's there in the post as well: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183844.msg52456799#msg52456799What do you think Vod edited? What are you trying to say, that these are the same statements? Trying to help Vod save face before he catches himself in another provable falsehood are we? You add everyone after they add you.You exclude everyone after they exclude you.Of course, maybe you do have valid reasons Well shit. I added people. Serves me right for thinking I can use the trust system like everyone else. Case closed! I am sure your documentation of my "lies" is equally as convincing.
You add everyone after they add you. You exclude everyone after they exclude you. If you add someone and they don't reciprocate, you un-add them.  Of course, maybe you do have valid reasons for this mounting abuse, but I can't see it... So I guess we have different definitions of trust abuse. The world is a wonderful, diverse place. |
|
|
|
BTW, I like your edit here Vod: You add everyone after they add you.You exclude everyone after they exclude you.Of course, maybe you do have valid reasons You like my imaginary edits, eh? You denying you said that now Vod? Be careful... it is logged even if there is a short window for you to edit after your post before it shows as "edited". Are you accusing me of making that up? |
|
|
|
I find it interesting this level of scrutiny is not applied to you or your finger pointing friends.
So unless I can catch ALL the scammers in the world, I shouldn't catch any? You're still a trust abuser even if profiles you dislike also do it.... You gonna catch yourself Vod? If you don't like my point, simply reply to the point you wish I had made. BTW still waiting for those lies Vod. BTW, I like your edit here Vod: You add everyone after they add you.You exclude everyone after they exclude you.Of course, maybe you do have valid reasons Was that pathetic attempt at sarcasm a bit too truthful to sound convincing enough towards impugning my character? Wouldn't want anyone stopping to consider valid reasons now would we? |
|
|
|
Well shit. I added people. Serves me right for thinking I can use the trust system like everyone else. Case closed! I am sure your documentation of my "lies" is equally as convincing.
You add everyone after they add you. You exclude everyone after they exclude you. If you add someone and they don't reciprocate, you un-add them. Of course, maybe you do have valid reasons for this mounting abuse, but I can't see it... So I guess we have different definitions of trust abuse. The world is a wonderful, diverse place. You add everyone after they add you. - Demonstrably false. See Hhampuz You exclude everyone after they exclude you. - Demonstrably false. See The Pharmacist. If you add someone and they don't reciprocate, you un-add them. - Demonstrably false. See Loyce & others. Even if this were true, I find it interesting this level of scrutiny is not applied to you or your finger pointing friends. If I cared to gin up my own critical examination of your trust system activity using the exact same arguments, you would fail all of these same tests. These aren't purposeful lies are they Vod? Speaking of lies, please do quote these lies I have perpetrated. It is almost like a conclusion has been made first and you are trying to build arguments around it rather than building arguments based on evidence. |
|
|
|
My "lies" and "trust abuse" are only documented in your minds in the form of suspicions and posted accusation
https://bpip.org/r/dt1changes.aspxIt exists there too... weird. :/ Well shit. I added people. Serves me right for thinking I can use the trust system like everyone else. Case closed! I am sure your documentation of my "lies" is equally as convincing. |
|
|
|
You never did tell me who I am coordinating with, myself? Theymos?
lol - you never did ask. There's no way to have a conversation with you, is there? Your goal is simply to disrupt business here. I'm a simple moral person who does not like coordinated trust abuse or confirmed, documented liars. Vod complaining about abuse of the trust system is hilarious. The guy is a serial liar and documented abuser of the trust and merit systems. He’s basically as big of a piece of shit as one can possibly be on this forum.
So exposing scammers like you makes me worse than you are? Try again, bozo. You literally just quoted me asking... Of course this is just you mirroring my words in a sad attempt to make this seem as if this is a mutual thing rather than a years long harassment campaign on your part. Funny how you can never provide documentation for these "lies". You are right about one thing though, you are simple. Moral, not in the least. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
