I hate memes, please somebody make them illegal
EU: Did someone said memes? OI! You got a loicense for dat meme? |
|
|
|
It seems to me if you were genuine about this project you would put more effort into introducing it here. |
|
|
|
|
IMO we should boycott Thailand among our community until Elwar is free, and spread the word that American tourists risk the death penalty going there.
|
|
|
|
the West promotes tolerance in their society only and spreading hate and war in other regions of world. You are exploiting Africans from years and using their resources and when they raise their voice against you people you call them intolerant and same is happening in different oil rich countries. What about venezuela North Korea, kim jong is extremist ?
"The West" is not protected from criticism. "The West" does not wag their finger at you telling you that you are Westophobic when you criticize its flaws. "The West" doesn't throw people off of roof tops for being gay, or stone women for being unfaithful. "The West" does not seek to kill people who abandon its Western values. "The West" is not a religion. I assume you are Arab based on your name, excuse me if I am wrong there, but as an Arab you have some cantaloupe sized balls talking to a Westernerer about exploiting Africans. Do you have any knowledge of the ancient (and modern) slave trade run by Islam out of Africa? Every crime you point at the West for Islam has 3 more skeletons in its own closet it is trying to hide. Perhaps instead of pointing your finger out and making excuses you should start looking inward, because the excuses and "whataboutisms" aren't enough any more. |
|
|
|
In no way shape or form do I find it reasonable to trade their potential safety and well being for letting every tom dick and retard that can be born and fill out a form own really stupid nasty hardware giving people who demonize inanimate objects the illusion of safety. I fixed your argument so it appropriately represents that of gun owners. You think you have a right to make yourself and your family "safe" by disarming other people. You think your rights extend to taking the rights of others. Gun owners simply want to be able to protect their own families, and "feeling" safe because guns are restricted doesn't stop a criminal. The only way to truly be safe is to protect yourself, and here it is a right regardless of your irrational fear of inanimate objects. |
|
|
|
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. It must be nice to be able to remove people criticizing your retardation to another separate thread whenever you like... I always love how criticism of the left seems to always be off topic around here and segregated to a new zombie stub of a thread to shelter fragile egos. |
|
|
|
and that is why you Americans are killing thousands around the world on the name of freedom, putting sanctions on countries trying to show your power on weak countries. Than God save the world where you people are living to preach freedom of speech
First of all America is not a religion, it is a nation state. Like I said if Islam wants to make this a game of might makes right they will get the contest of strength they so desire. I would prefer Islam had an internal reformation process, but even the reformers within Islam fear the extremists and can make no progress. I wish Muslims could live in peace, but they do not let others live in peace while they cry oppression in the same breath. Islam exploits tolerance, therefore it will receive intolerance until this is resolved, it is like physics. It has nothing to do with judgement or hate. You can blame everyone else all you like it does not change the fact that Islam is causing many of its own problems attributed to the rest of the world. I am free to say all these things here, if I was in your nation how long do you think I would be free or alive if I said these words in public? i admit that some Muslims are extremist and we causing many problems for Muslims as well but that’s what I am saying you can not blame whole community for this. And if you were living in my country I assure you no one will harm you for these remarks. We are also trying to eliminate this intolerance and this proves that it’s not a problem with Islam, it’s the problem with some people I don't hate all Muslims, but I tell you what I sure as fuck don't trust them to do the right thing either. As they say here in the USA "talk is cheap". You can talk about reformation within Islam all day, but I see the results of the tumor growing within Islam every day in the form of new bodies. As I said before, it is like a law of physics. It is irrelevant how many Muslims are involved because eventually no one is going to care because the extremists are too much of a threat. The West tried tolerance, but this tolerance was only exploited. A counter reaction is inevitable because Islam refuses to control its own house. This is not a threat but an observation of bodies in motion like a boulder rolling down a mountain. Eventually it will hit the bottom, and I assure you Islam is not going to like what it finds in that valley as suddenly the entire Western world says "fuck tolerance" in unison. |
|
|
|
Usually Altcoin related sales should be done in the Altcoin section's (like Marketplace). Regular sections are meant for just Bitcoin. However, this rule was never really strictly enforced from what I remember. I've removed people accepting only USD in Digital Goods, since well, this is Bitcointalk, not USDTalk. With collectible Altcoin items I feel like it's even more iffy, since you wouldn't want to break up the (already small) collectible section.
I always assumed that accepting an Altcoin is fine, as long as you are open for payment in Bitcoin as well.
My question is that, can auctions be hosted in the collectible section and NOT be in BTC. Because I have tried to host auctions and not take BTC and I was told I couldn't but it seems special people get special privileges Special people do get special privileges KY. Don’t get minty about it If Bitcoin is not accepted as payment or it is not related to Bitcoin or crypto in any way it has no business being here. This has been the standard forever. People wonder why there are complaints of nepotism with jamokes like you on the default trust. |
|
|
|
I think DT's are handling feedback's carefully since guests are able to see warning. All of drama has been created by couple of users. Overall trust or feedback's are working fine. Problem is, people's are not bothering to read neutral feedback and that's the reason why most of DT members do not bother to leave neutral feedback. Neutral feedback is appropriate on specific case those are really not related with scams. But which feedback's will appropriate like bounty cheaters with multiple accounts? Because it's not related with scam and neutral feedback will not reflect on profile.
So in summary users are being lazy and getting ripped off, trust police are leaving red to overcompensate, and anyone in their paths should bare the cost of all of this corner cutting? As I have been saying for some time now, we need an objective standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws for leaving negative ratings. The trust system has effectively become a social credit score system, and if you are spamming negative ratings all you are doing is causing inflation in the meaning of being marked a scammer and teaching users that the red ratings don't always mean something. You are literally creating signal noise and training users to ignore negative ratings by using them excessively. Furthermore there are many users that build their own reputation COMPLETELY off of the fact that they cycle thru lots of users and mark them as scammers, correctly or not. This is not only a serious conflict of interest that needs to be restricted, it is a MAJOR security flaw because once a small handful of sufficiently influential users get in the DT1 list they can push out anyone who dares call out their fraudulent behavior systematically. This is a huge exploit via over use of the negative ratings that has never been addressed. It has literally got to the point where for some users there is zero repercussion for leaving excessive or poorly documented negative ratings. The genuine users get steamrolled and don't come back, and the scammers are back in seconds with a bought account. |
|
|
|
and that is why you Americans are killing thousands around the world on the name of freedom, putting sanctions on countries trying to show your power on weak countries. Than God save the world where you people are living to preach freedom of speech
First of all America is not a religion, it is a nation state. Like I said if Islam wants to make this a game of might makes right they will get the contest of strength they so desire. I would prefer Islam had an internal reformation process, but even the reformers within Islam fear the extremists and can make no progress. I wish Muslims could live in peace, but they do not let others live in peace while they cry oppression in the same breath. Islam exploits tolerance, therefore it will receive intolerance until this is resolved, it is like physics. It has nothing to do with judgement or hate. You can blame everyone else all you like it does not change the fact that Islam is causing many of its own problems attributed to the rest of the world. I am free to say all these things here, if I was in your nation how long do you think I would be free or alive if I said these words in public? |
|
|
|
Freedom of speech does not mean one can play with the sentiments of others or to pass remarks which can hurt there. There are around 2 billion Muslims living in this world and world is blaming 2 billion people because of few extremists and oppressors. Around 70 to 80 million people died in world war 2 just because of single person "Hitler" so should we blame Christianity or Germany for this, obviously no because you can not generalize whole population.
Yes that is EXACTLY what freedom of speech means, and this is exactly why Islam is not compatible with Western values or freedom in general. Islam is a globalist totalitarian supremacist political system under the guise of a religion. Even if 10% of Muslims are extremists, that is still 200 million radical Islamists committing acts of terror and violence. That number is unrealistically low as evidenced by these stats as well as many others. Shariah law is not compatible with freedom, period. As far as WW2, last I checked this was not a religious war, and Hitler and the Nazis were not particularly fond of Christians either. He did however get along quite well with Islam. Islam needs to clean its own house, because the West is waking up to the taqiyya and if you refuse to clean your own house we will do it for you on our terms not yours. History shows how tolerant Christianity is, until one day they are oppressed too much, then they will spend every waking moment dedicated to obliterating their enemies. No one wants that. Stop pretending Islam does not have a problem, because the world knows it does, and either the real true Muslims can work to repair it or wait until the world starts striking back without mercy. If the only thing Islam respects is strength then their cups will overflow with it until they are washed away in a torrent of blood. The times for making excuses for Islam has passed. The time for reformation is now. I want people to have freedom of religion and to worship God how they choose, I will not however stand silent while this vile violent supremacist ideology is given the protective cloak of religion to protect it from criticism. Islam itself deserves criticism. this comment of your is showing your hate for Muslims and islam and you are talking about peace. This clearly shows your tolerance. I don't really care what you think. I know who and what I am. Your finger wagging bullshit is meaningless. I am not some castrated European you are used to dealing with, I am an American, we don't tolerate enemies of freedom. Your condemnation means nothing to me when I see Islam murdering Christians, apostates, and homosexuals by the hundreds every month then claiming to be the religion of peace out of the other side of their mouth. I am not ashamed of what I said, you however should be ashamed of yourself before God for supporting such a violent tyrannical ideology rather than reforming it. |
|
|
|
Hmmm, okay. I posted a screenshot for a reason but anyway Let's try one more time in simple manner.
Murders rate Per million in India = 34.24
India has more than 1.2 Billion population. Let's say 1.2 billion for now, which means 1200 Million.
Now Let's multiply.
1200 * 34.24 = and you have your answer which is pretty close to murder rate.
For fun you can try this with US's population as well.
Hope this is helpful.
Yes lets get simpler... perhaps you should look up " per capita". You too Nutilduhh. |
|
|
|
I pressured several people to remove inappropriate, unconstructive ratings amongst each other. So are you finally admitting you moderate trust ratings instead of trying to pretend you don't while working privately behind closed doors to manipulate and pressure people using your authority here to achieve the outcome which serves you personally by making administration simpler for you rather than being fair and equitable? It is almost like you are ignoring the real causes of these problems and they have happened before... No matter, there is no need for objective standards, you are Theymos, you ARE the law. Go anarchy. I don’t think any kind of standards could be enforced if anarchy was implemented in the trust system. If anything, the current implementation of the trust system is very close to anarchy, with very few exceptions, and this is not going very well. The anarchy comment was facetious. I don't think anarchy is viable for anything except small groups with high levels of trust. I was alluding to the fact that Theymos persists with these delusions of maintaining some kind of anarchist policies around here when he is literally doing the exact opposite. Anarchy means without rulers, not without rules, and the rules are completely arbitrary and arbitrarily enforced, and he is essentially a dictator so... pretending anarchy is anywhere in this is a joke. If anything I would categorize the form of government Theymos is fostering on the forum as some where between and Oligopoly and Democracy aka mob rule, and then a Dictatorship when he deems it convenient. We need OBJECTIVE standards for negative rating users, such as proof of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws. The free for all itself is a security risk, as once some group or entity has control of a sufficient number of highly ranked accounts it can then use that leverage to force compliance with anything it chooses, including staying quiet about theft or other genuinely fraudulent activity. This is not just a bad system but a HUGE security hole. |
|
|
|
I pressured several people to remove inappropriate, unconstructive ratings amongst each other. So are you finally admitting you moderate trust ratings instead of trying to pretend you don't while working privately behind closed doors to manipulate and pressure people using your authority here to achieve the outcome which serves you personally by making administration simpler for you rather than being fair and equitable? It is almost like you are ignoring the real causes of these problems and they have happened before... No matter, there is no need for objective standards, you are Theymos, you ARE the law. Go anarchy. |
|
|
|
First thing first, It's not about India vs USA. Which I am sure you and me both agree. Having said that I want to correct you here, hope you don't mind, and if you think I am wrong, then please let me know so that I can correct myself. Posting screenshot of data which you provided, its for other users who don't want to click on the given link. With due respect, You posted link and didn't even care to look at your source or what does it say and mean? The 3x murder rate you are quoting is a record of the country which has a population of more than 1.2 billion people. It's not rocket science why India has more (3x) murder rate in comparison to America. But again, it's just common sense. Please compare the Gun crime ranking. USA -1 India-105 With due respect, you criticized my source without actually reading it yourself, what does it say or mean? The stats I linked are already adjusted per-capita, so your argument is null. No this is not about the USA vs India, it is about the costs and benefits of gun ownership and the right to self defense. Everyone loves comparing the rest of the world to the US relating to "gun crimes" but then they cry about how it is not a contest when the stats work the OTHER way. Comparing the gun crime ranking is like comparing the automotive death rate of the Amish vs the general car driving population. No shit they have less gun crime, because they don't have any access to guns to enjoy their benefits or their faults. Since cars kill so many people we should ban them. Since so many people drown in pools we should ban them too! Some people overeat we should ban food! Do you see how your logic breaks down when extended to its logical conclusions? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
