Some laws have changed in respect to reporting and shareholder status since the offering on Havelock investment.
I'd be interested to know what laws those are that have changed. If anything crowdfunding for equity laws have been relaxed in the US and Canada. It's ok to say "we messed up, we're trying to fix it." My thought exactly. If they aren't updating shareholders directly, they could be more transparent on Havelock. And many companies have blogs with investor updates so not sure what to make of that... |
|
|
|
There are many offered double your bitcoin after 24 hours, days will give you earn bitcoin. These are hyip investment or ponzi scheme. Usually, when you join at first you can earn or double your bitcoin and if you will reinvest, this will scam totally your money. So, let us be careful when joining this kind of ponzi scheme.
I don't understand why you are even telling people to be careful when joining ponzi schemes while you directly should advice people to avoid them at all cost since they are pure scams. Another thing, hyip investments do not exist. You should refer to them as being a scam and nothing else. Even if they offer you 1% per day it's a scam. Just make sure you don't reward these scammers and help them to maintain their nasty practices where they make more victims every day. Even not to try out because you're curious about their site. I hate when people use the word "scam" erroneously. If someone tells you to give them money in RL with a large chance of never getting it back, and then they don't return it, is that a scam? No. HYIPs are the same. Only greedy people that think they will be given billions of dollars a year join them. It's not a scam when you know the outcome. |
|
|
|
Essentially, the online wallet service hold the private keys for you and perform the transaction for you. You only put trust on them and them actually hold the bitcoin for you. In the case if the service goes down, you lose all you bitcoin with it.
Start learning how to generate a paper wallet or purchase a hardware wallet if you are interested to store your bitcoin long term...
This. If you had access to the private keys, you wouldn't need them and would be able to send fee-free. Their money comes by limiting you to their service. |
|
|
|
Hi to everyone, This weekend is a special weekend @ BussyBuddyAds and for this reason we have a special offer: who is buying this weekend any amount of PixelsAds is getting bonus 100 PixelsAds( equivalent of 1 Bitcoin)! Offer available only this weekend applying to any Buying Option: 60 months instalments with minimum 10% deposit, with 10% deposit and the rest in 30 days or paid in Full! Offer available from now 10:15 GMT(London) till 29/01/2017 24:00 GMT(London). Kind Regards, BussyBuddy Team https://BussyBuddy.com/adsI don't understand... 60 month installment, yet it has to be paid in 30 days? Would be 60 months if it's a 60 month installment payment. Please clarify. |
|
|
|
|
The stats aren't bad at all. Have you run any ad campaigns (like your own) in the past? And if so, how well did they perform?
|
|
|
|
Bot to do what? you think it's like trading stuff to use API or bots? of course there is not much profit or any profit at all, I'm also a victim of cloud mining scam services and already learned my lesson. sorry but once you bought your contract there is no way out unless you can sell your hashing power. only services that are not total scam are the one(s) that letting you to trade hashing power.
Trading hashrates is one of ways to keep your investment returned, isn't it? That is extremely difficult to achieve, it takes time and perseverance and being up to date with the market almost always. Many have tried it and failed. I also did it without good results. I would advise against every cloud mining, even against Hashnest , not because it's not legit but because with increasing difficulty , people would never ROI. That's why they are essentially Ponzis. Nobody who buys hash rate is going to ROI unless someone else then buys it from them (at cost or above it). If nobody ever bought hash rate, everyone would lose money. |
|
|
|
|
What is the tool supposed to be doing? Why are people required to send funds to the site to use it? Like just tl;dr the events.
Also, don't want to get into the morality here -- the fact is that things like this help bring to light issues with the system so they can be corrected.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately centralized, dedicated bicoin marketplaces are not that popular,
This seems to be the general consensus. Many sites have tried, all so far have failed to gain traction. But decentralized ones have issues bringing on legal uses. And it sucks, because if they don't gain traction, sellers don't win either. |
|
|
|
Tell me if I'm wrong, miners only can confirm a transaction for it's first confirmation if they find a whole block, so no matter who you give your transaction to accelerate it wont be confirmed unless they are the ones finding a block, basically the first confirmation is the most important one since others will only validate the tx further more and not including them in other blocks as they mining them.
This is entirely true. But requesting the addition is free -- if they mine a block and get you in there, great. If they didn't, you lost nothing. It's safe to say it's worth a few seconds to save potentially hours/days. |
|
|
|
Rates Increased:
Prize: 0.00005 BTC 0.0006 BTC per correction, mark the correction in red bold.
Prize: 0.00015 BTC 0.0002 BTC per sentence rewrites that is better and used.
I just want to point out that I've seen multiple "corrections" here that are actually incorrect. How are you handling those? I only use corrections that are actual errors, better to read, and an actual improvement to the article. Payments are for each correction that is used What I meant was, for example, the following: 14)"This is because in this case harming one person is just a side effect of switching the trolley in the other direction" "because in this case harming" -> "because, in this case, harming" The first comma is erroneous. It should simply be "...because in this case, harming..." There are many more cases throughout the page, as well. I know, and I wouldn't of used that. However it would of pointed out one of the errors, and I would of used "because in this case, harming...." Example: and circumventing indulge towards self-ego, "indulgence" is good. Another example: "So, in the second case, you" | Yes this is incorrect, I'd use "So in the second case, you". The point here is to find errors, better read on, and so on that I may of missed. And I get that "Oh that's definitely right feeling" >Another example: "So, in the second case, you" | Yes this is incorrect, I'd use "So in the second case, you". Technically, both are correct in this case, though the most proper way would likely be to conjoin that sentence with the prior, drop "so," and add a semicolon. That said, I didn't read the document itself so I'm not 100% sure if the conjoining would work. |
|
|
|
Rates Increased:
Prize: 0.00005 BTC 0.0006 BTC per correction, mark the correction in red bold.
Prize: 0.00015 BTC 0.0002 BTC per sentence rewrites that is better and used.
I just want to point out that I've seen multiple "corrections" here that are actually incorrect. How are you handling those? I only use corrections that are actual errors, better to read, and an actual improvement to the article. Payments are for each correction that is used What I meant was, for example, the following: 14)"This is because in this case harming one person is just a side effect of switching the trolley in the other direction" "because in this case harming" -> "because, in this case, harming" The first comma is erroneous. It should simply be "...because in this case, harming..." There are many more cases throughout the page, as well. |
|
|
|
Rates Increased:
Prize: 0.00005 BTC 0.0006 BTC per correction, mark the correction in red bold.
Prize: 0.00015 BTC 0.0002 BTC per sentence rewrites that is better and used.
I just want to point out that I've seen multiple "corrections" here that are actually incorrect. How are you handling those? |
|
|
|
What I know about haobtc is they are a real company seriously into bitcoins. They have some huge farms to mine bitcoins and are too into bitcoin wallets and promotion through online and in person. Good luck for the new app, it will surely bring bitcoin enthusiastic a bit closer.
I'll second this motion. Keep in mind that it does NOT mean they won't run/be "hacked," etc. later on. But they are a trusted and fairly large company. I've entrusted coins to them in the past as well with no issues. |
|
|
|
|
This is a bit more involved than what I usually do. If you come up with more articles, let me know. I'm a professional editor/proofreader (who does this for large clients). That said, I track changes in Word. It would take far too much time for me to go through here and write a sentence with every single correction made.
|
|
|
|
|
The easiest way is to just look at what they offer. Most will offer things like, for example, 10-100% per day gains. If that were possible, you would turn $1 into over $100 trillion (multitudes higher than the total dollar amount in the WORLD) in under a year.
|
|
|
|
iam the operator of a faucet since 2 years now .
and ther is only small income / profit to make with it .
also iam trying to give as much as i can to my users.
but server costs and domain makes profit very small.
kind regards
This is because faucets aren't SUPPOSED to be profitable. You use them to bring in traffic for your real sites. You have to treat it like a business. |
|
|
|
I thought I could maybe make money doing this too but the ad company is do not pay you for trash traffic from exchanges and some need clicks not views. The views will eventually be picked I as spam and you won't get anything for cheating. The ad companies that do pay you will pay very badly because the pay is according to location of the viewer.
This should be obvious, though. Why would anyone pay for traffic that has no use? Would you pay for it? It's common sense, really. |
|
|
|
Is there a problem with the moneypot site , getting no hash found and its taking long time for responses , has anything been changed in the back end  Try logging in and out real quick and see if that clears it up. |
|
|
|
|
Are the links you put up (in the SEO package) direct, do-follow links or are they using forwards? Seems like the latter due to your reporting mechanism.
|
|
|
|
Is starting a bitcoin Faucet worth the input effort and investment? Is the profit earned by running the faucet provides decent income? Has anyone invested in such venture? How was your experience?
You don't do it to profit off the faucet. You use the faucet as a funnel for other businesses. You won't make anything otherwise. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
