You still have not grasped the idea of collateral, eh? Basically, in the event, you default the collateral will cover for your loan. Easy enough? It doesn't take a Ph.D. to know this.
Student loans are very safe because they are for students. I can't get rid of my loan even in Bankruptcy. Can you help me out? I can use multiple lenders if that helps spread the risk around. I actually wasn't 100% sure you were scamming until this post right here. Not only does your lack of basic knowledge hint that you aren't very progressed in schooling, but your outright attempt to defraud through misleading people into believing your lies is abysmal, at best. At this point, I have zero doubt you're a scammer. If anyone does give you money, they're just as ridiculous as you and deserve the losses. |
|
|
|
I am constantly searching for people to help managing it. I just can't find anyone.
It's hard because it's a time-intensive process. Do you have a plan to monetize, and if so, pay managers? |
|
|
|
Yeah just run an ico. But make sure your legit or you'll be calledout and never get any money.
similar to an ICO but with shares instead of coins
an ICO doesn't make sense in my case, no benefit from either the investors' perspective or "mine". What's the amount you're looking to raise? May be worth going a private route, depending on how much that is.
well in the ball park of 10-100k. If you have a legitimate business plan and such, you can toss me a PM. I might be interested in it (along with others). |
|
|
|
I have a question..
I see Gravitate is added there in your scammer database.
Currently his case is disputed, so why is he already branded as a scammer?
Also, how would this be open if it has to be reviewed by a centralized party?
1. Gravitate has been removed when the case was resolved 2. If it would not have to be reviewed then everyone could just list themselves as trusted and others as scammers. Also we accept every real submission. List them as being in dispute, then, rather than as a scammer. You can't brand someone using an assumption when it's not proven. |
|
|
|
when will be last day to trade rbies to dogedigital for btc?
There's no date that's been decided, as the two coins will run side by side. Basically, you can hold/use either, neither, or both. And you can sell RBIES at any time. |
|
|
|
CS achieved net +0.40% for 08.01.2017 week.
08.01.2017 Weekly achievement for each investment centers,
Dice : 0.21%
Lending : 0.25%
ICO : 0.00%
Trading : 0.60%
Gross : 0.44%
Net : 0.40% (after maintenance fee)
CS prices for 08.01.2017-15.01.2017
CS Index 0.003439
Sell 0.003404
Buy 0.003474
Please visit our website for other details and sign up for reaching out your CSs and Bitcoins.
We updated our 25% maintanence fee depending on weekly gross profit as
0 - 0.5% - 10%
0.500001% - 1% - 20%
1.0001% + - 25%
This may increase net profit of our investors.
On the note of net profit, do you waterlevel it somehow? For example: Start with 1 BTC: Week 1, +0.5 BTC = 50%, so you take a cut Week 2, +0.5 BTC = 33%, so you take a cut Week 3, -0.9 BTC = -90%, so you don't Week 4, +0.9 BTC = +90%. What happens here? Technically, this is recouping losses, rather than net profit. |
|
|
|
That is one of the reasons OSDB was created.
I like the concept behind it, as it's essentially a WoT. But the issue is most people don't want to use an external resource to check those here. For example, most (myself included) generally won't take someone's "eBay" status and trust them here even though they're new. And there's no way to verify people, either. I could easily use the site to find trusted people and then start faking as if I am that party elsewhere so that when people look me up, I'm "trusted." There will be a feature soon to show on which platforms a specific user is trusted Interesting. That knocks out that issue, then. Also, may be worth making all usernames uppercase and have a notice letting people know to watch for deviations (i.e., Billy turns to BiIly. On some sites, these would be identical). And maybe store information like what their status is. So for Ranlo, it'd show as Legendary, so if there's a deviation in that it's obviously a fake as well. |
|
|
|
I want to run this on more then two sites at the same time. Is that possible?
I'm right now running two instances, one on bitsler and one on primedice but want to add more... However this seems not possible? It doesn't let me login on any other site.
Copy the whole folder and run each instance in its own folder. Tried that, doesn't work! It stops working after two folders aka two instances which I ran from one folder without a problem. I get https://gyazo.com/6a71e1b711beee9fa8837a17cc4a7258i run 4 instance with diffrent folder name and diffrencet dicebot app name rename folder rename dicebot.exe We talked on discord. The error was caused by the sites he was trying to log into that wasn't working correctly in the bot (rollin, bitdice, fortunejack, betking). There's no need to rename the exe if you have each instance running from its own folder. Are you supposed to copy the folder to run multiple instances? I was actually running 4 (all different sites) at once from the same folder, even with the same exe name. I didn't do anything special -- just launched the same app 4 times with no issues. |
|
|
|
That is one of the reasons OSDB was created.
I like the concept behind it, as it's essentially a WoT. But the issue is most people don't want to use an external resource to check those here. For example, most (myself included) generally won't take someone's "eBay" status and trust them here even though they're new. And there's no way to verify people, either. I could easily use the site to find trusted people and then start faking as if I am that party elsewhere so that when people look me up, I'm "trusted." |
|
|
|
Being an Ethical Hacker,I believe the courses are very newbie inclined.You're just covering the surface of the 80 feet deep well.I'm surprised how you have not mentioned anything about Terminal based OS's or writing exploits.PHP is done,it's getting obsolete.If you're only planning to teach PHP with mySql vulnerabilities then the tutorial wouldn't be much help I guess.
I disagree with your thoughts on PHP. It's still the most widely used language, many of the top 100 companies still use it, and it's still actively being developed. While Node and others are also good and have been growing, they each have their own strong suits. |
|
|
|
|
Has anyone here used this service yet, and if so, can you shed some details on your results from it? Far too many people make claims in this arena and are just botting it, which has zero value.
|
|
|
|
Guys i just want to ask if this site is true https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/ and who already tried this if this is true or not.. Because i have already a transaction that low fee or below the default fee and in few minutes the transaction is done.. And i want to clarify if this is real working or not.. you can read in rule viabtc.com you must ready transaction, after transaction you can sending txid in viabtc after sending txid you must donation 10k satoshi/kb standard transaction bitcoin sending only 25K satoshi/kb if you want very fast transaction you can use 90k satoshi/kb Where are you seeing that information? All I see is that the tx must have at least a 0.0001 fee and that they accept optional donations. I see none of these things you're claiming. |
|
|
|
<snip>
This is very cute, having a trust system completely off site of bitcointalk forums, but why not just click on "trust" in everyone's profile and decide whether that person is trusted or not? why do we want to go to your site for doing that? imo a total waste of time and a failed attempt to get some bitcoin as donation.
Yep, that's a derp and a half. This is exactly what our trust system here is for, and it's much easier to use than this digital Rube Goldberg contraption OP is pitching. Also, OP should probably see if that red trust he got from yahoo can somehow be resolved. Not smart to try to start up an escrow service when you're a newbie. The red trust on these forums has zero value, so that's not true at all. You can pay people on the default trust list to neg rep anyone you want. You can also BUY rep by buying a DT account. Trust on these forums is absolutely worthless. You should follow the person's history, not whether or not they ticked off someone by saying something and got neg repped to oblivion even though they did nothing wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Your thread title says you have vouches. Your thread text says you don't. Which is it? It can't be both...
|
|
|
|
Hi folks,
I'm looking for highly knowledgeable people who want to write about tech issues, including tutorials on Whonix, Veracrypt, Bitcoin, TOR etc
I'm paying $50-$100 per original content tutorial.
message me if interested!
Are you also interested in taking on a professional proofreader/editor to ensure everything is perfect? |
|
|
|
We will be posting more details about Jan. 15th upgrades, also some methods for rakeback have come from this new update as well. Stay tuned.
Great news! One week left to go for the update,  . Looking forward to seeing it in action! |
|
|
|
Hey,
so does anyone know any alternative to BankToTheFuture for equity crowdfunding (similar to an ICO but with shares instead of coins),
more suited for startups looking for initial investment and that also accepts BTC/other cryptos?
What's the amount you're looking to raise? May be worth going a private route, depending on how much that is. |
|
|
|
I need to use a mixer/tumbler. Which one is good and has only good feedback. I've seen some have negative feedback and that they scamm..
Here's the issue with mixers: they don't work. There have been multiple studies in the past showing that through simple, automated analytics, you can still track 99%+ of the mixed inputs/outputs and tell where they ended up. Remember, BTC is pseudo-anonymous, not anonymous. All you're doing is adding in a new layer of obfuscation but anyone could break that at any time. You definitely have a point there, but it's pretty stupid for someone to send 0.5BTC for example, and have the "clean" coins sent directly to one of his other wallets. If you make use of a manual fee in combination with a certain delay, plus the fact that you can have that 0.5BTC sent into smaller fractions to the destination addresses, it will practically be impossible to trace them. But yes, there is absolutely nothing that guarantees you that no one will be able to spot them. But it's giving people a safer feeling. Especially when they send the mixed coins to their cold wallets. There are always going to be ways to trace them. And the fundamentals of doing so are ridiculously easy due to how propagation works. I'm not saying it does NOTHING to obfuscate things, but those who are mixing are usually doing so for a reason. And mixing is not going to magically make whatever it is they're doing safe. |
|
|
|
I need to use a mixer/tumbler. Which one is good and has only good feedback. I've seen some have negative feedback and that they scamm..
Here's the issue with mixers: they don't work. There have been multiple studies in the past showing that through simple, automated analytics, you can still track 99%+ of the mixed inputs/outputs and tell where they ended up. Remember, BTC is pseudo-anonymous, not anonymous. All you're doing is adding in a new layer of obfuscation but anyone could break that at any time. |
|
|
|
Thanks, but since i'm no big coder, I won't be able to confirm the integrity of your script. Surely, there should be some options, I can't be the only one in need of this?
Is there at least a way to serve BTC addresses from a .txt files or something?
The best way would be to get someone to do a quick PHP script that pulls the next address (and can even check to see if one has been used so you can cycle them, rather than keep doing fresh ones). It's a fairly simple process and you should be able to learn it in a few mins on Google. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
