Just the other day i received like more than 10 security updates on my WinXP install...
|
|
|
I wouldn't mind keeping things more informal; i wasn't planning on spending an amount big enough to make it feel like serious busyness anyway (just one or two BTC), and i wouldn't really hold it against you if you took longer than i expected to return the money. But if you still don't wanna take on the responsibility, even with little amounts and without a hard deadline, i understand; i too tend to feel somewhat uneasy with putting myself in the position of having others counting on me for important stuff.
|
|
|
Can i send you a little bit of money and you add it to your investment process, and after you made more money you return it plus a fraction of the profits proportional to the amount i contributed, taking away a percentage of the profits to yourself if you want of course?
|
|
|
So we should add this to the spec for the new forum software: - No zero-day exploits and/or architecture which makes it easy and fast to patch such exploits
Didn't they fix the forum in not much more than a day or so? Anyway, you can never know whether you don't have a zero-day or if you just haven't found it yet.
|
|
|
I mean the minerd executable itself
|
|
|
Btw, wouldn't it be possible to have a single executable that got all versions inside and that would choose automaticly which one to use by checking what system it's running on (overridable with a command line option) ?
|
|
|
Guys, try the new Tenebrix-minerd (now with modified scrypt) from my GIT (default branch) It does build (Ubuntu and win tested), but since I have no lintel stuff, my testing is limited Intel users on windows are of especial interest.Please compare performance with http://www.wuala.com/jbw9/pub/Bitcoin/Tenebrix/miner/win/ Should i replace the executable name in the bat file or does it pick the best one automaticly?
|
|
|
How often do zeroday exploits get used to attack other forum backends and how fast are their developers at providing a fix after that?
|
|
|
Do people trust tacotime to run binaries from him on their machines? (i suck at remembering people's names, so i dunno if i saw him elsewhere doing things that would've earned my trust)
|
|
|
I'm a tad late for the party, but 'grats for the winner.
|
|
|
What is the ETA for providing a Win32 binary with Intel optimizations?
|
|
|
Is 'Gox gonna bail out the clients this time?
|
|
|
How about making the official miner instead of paying directly the owner pay to the laundrytumbler to increase the plausible denialbility(sp?) for people receiving payments from the service?
|
|
|
... nuclear industry is killing everything ...
If i'm not mistaken, coal plants put out more radioactivity than nuclear plants; and the deathcount attributed to energy sources other than nuclear are way bigger...
|
|
|
1. I'm on a pool.
2. I guess, but i haven't looked into it yet
3.i don't think there is any GUI based miner, but the text based one that comes with it is relativelly friendly, just answer a few questions and it runs.
|
|
|
So would non-parallelizable PoW make it so only the fastest machine would always find new blocks ('cause all the others are lagging behind in doing the exact same calculation), while parallelizable PoW provides a chance, even if small, for even the slowest machines to find blocks? Or are there non-par PoWs that allow for slower machines to still somtimes get to the right conclusion first?
|
|
|
Damn, yet again i came in a bit too late :/
|
|
|
|