Hi guys
First of all I am a girl who like sports betting.
And now Mr/Miss Bitcoin Supremo will mysteriously disappear from this thread  Perhaps BitcoinSupremo should have used another alt account that didn't switch gender before stating that they desire to beat up gay men for free.  Do we know about when BitcoinSupremo made the "transition?" Not really, yes I am very concerned on who to love and it so should be for all, God created Adam and Eve and not Adam and Steve.Good night now, too tired to continue with this argument.
John 8:7 ...He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone... |
|
|
|
Although I agree with the idea being silly on a Bitcoin forum the idea of our fingerprints being sensitive is also a silly one. You leave your fingerprints all over where you go on a daily basis. Yet you are not worried about it are you? Its an extreme example but there has already been examples of those with Bitcoin being targeted for their fingerprints. Using your fingerprint for anything is a stupid way to access anything and only belongs in james bond movies and teenagers phones.
I totally agree. I am sure it is possible to lift someone's fingerprint and create some kind of prosthesis with a 3D printer. Although fingerprints have an advantage since they are unique to each individual, (even identical twins have different fingerprints,) I don't think it is feasible to start expecting people to wear gloves everywhere they go as a way to keep their fingerprints "secure." Using a fingerprint as a way to access accounts is about as secure as writing your password on a sticky and sticking it on your computer monitor. |
|
|
|
Well if you are into it a little rough it seems like OP got a connect for ya bud.. fuck tinder or grinder bitcointalk is where the hookups are at.
Meh, I'm in my 50's. I'm way past the expiration date for online hookups. In gay years, I'm just an old troll. The only thing most gay men would be after is my wallet, at this point. Also, I'm liable to break my hip or something if it is too rough.  I'll stick with the man that I have. Besides, my partner already believes that I spend too much time on Bitcointalk with all of you nerds. If he caught wind that I was trying to hookup on this forum, I am certain that things would get rather "rough" rather quickly.  |
|
|
|
By the way, I think the wig/perm Taylor is sporting in that pic is gawd awful. shh...you would still smash! Only if I was extremely intoxicated. After all, I am a gold star gay man. Haven't touched pussy since pussy gave birth to me. |
|
|
|
ok, alts don't matter when BTC is at the front. Tran actions have capped out in BTC and its holding back adoption.
More efficient asics don't mean anything as the whole market gets them and they change nothing in relation to fees for support or attack vector
I don't see any evidence that increased transaction capacity for crytocurrency necessarily leads to increased adoption. If that were the case, I would think many more people would have supported the BCH fork and then went on to support the BCH-SV fork. It appears that the only time those two forks can hope to get anywhere near their capacity is when they do a stress test. Also, a reorg bribe would probably be much cheaper and have a greater chance of working on those two coins since their average hash rate is pale in comparison to BTC. You would probably only need to bribe one large ASIC farm to go forward with a reorg of either of those chains. Also, as darosior stated above, when segwit was implemented, it already increased the block capacity, basically because the segwit signatures are kept in a separate location. I don't see why the Bitcoin Core team cannot increase the block capacity even further through optimizations or perhaps moving other data to separate locations. Furthermore, since they will probably do this as a soft fork, if people don't like the new improvements, they are free to use the older software and still be able to participate in the network. |
|
|
|
And it's likely that nothing is going on. Which is why I understand why you're upset about being stalked by some138... But, if I were you I'd start pretending it's really Taylor Swift, and enjoy it.
The profile states some138 is a male. Therefore, I doubt that it is actually Taylor Swift since I am pretty certain that she identifies herself as a female. However, who knows these days. By the way, I think the wig/perm Taylor is sporting in that pic is gawd awful. |
|
|
|
Does this not force you to have larger blocks to get enough fees to defend this case?
With larger blocks there is no incentive for people to increase their fee to get confirmed faster since there is ample space in each block. Also, you are making the assumption that bigger blocks are going to increase the number of transactions by an equal amount. Chances are good that the amount of fee a miner could get from a 512 mega WU block will be lower than what they would get with a 4 mega WU block. You left out the "more incentive for people to increase use" on chain. Lets say 4 x X vs X, so thats 4 times as much at 1/2 say half the amount, would I believe give double the rewards. Most altcoins already have implemented increased block space. However, the only alt that I know that comes close to the level of BTC transactions is ETH. The only reason ETH has more transactions is because it has a use case to pump out shit tokens for a bazillion ICOs. I don't see how increasing block space will somehow magically make people want to transact more on the BTC chain. Besides, it will be 9 years before the block reward will be 1.5625 bitcoins. We have no idea what the market value of a Bitcoin will be then. However, with a limited supply, I suspect that the block reward alone will be worth the while for miners anyway, especially since I am sure they will develop even more efficient ASICs in 9 years time. |
|
|
|
Does this not force you to have larger blocks to get enough fees to defend this case?
With larger blocks there is no incentive for people to increase their fee to get confirmed faster since there is ample space in each block. Also, you are making the assumption that bigger blocks are going to increase the number of transactions by an equal amount. Chances are good that the amount of fee a miner could get from a 512 mega WU block will be lower than what they would get with a 4 mega WU block. |
|
|
|
DISCLAIMER: NASTYFANS SEATS ARE NOT SECURITIES AND NASTYFANS GIVES NO PROMISE OF PROFIT Did that just pop up when he last edited the thread a couple days ago?  This is how the line was worded on 4 Dec 2017. WARNING: NASTYFANS GIVES NO PROMISE OF PROFIT http://archive.vn/dFH2m |
|
|
|
he can see it
Good, personally I don't have a problem with "mysterious newbies" having access to see my IP address, they probably need it "when handling the new account recoveries system". As for my own understanding, if my account locked from being "suspected to be compromised" do I only need to send them an email which I used on my account and "provide some evidence that I owned that email, that would unlock my account right? Yes, I believe if you send them an e-mail from the e-mail that you used to create the account, that would be proof. You can also stake a bitcoin address on this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.0. Basically you sign a message with a bitcoin address that you control and in the future, you can sign another message using this same Bitcoin address. For privacy, use an address that you have not used and will not use for BTC payments. |
|
|
|
|
Oh gee, in addition to leaving a PM, I posted in the bounty thread and it is now on my watch list. I think that I will just unwatch and wait for the bounty manager to respond to my PM. I may direct the bounty manager to this thread to give us his perspective on this situation.
|
|
|
|
Why was I mentioned in that list?
It appears that some people/bots wanted to join the telegram or stakes portion of this bounty campaign and did not have valid bitcointalk account(s). So they just picked a user and stuck the information in the form. It appears some participants just used a random user ID, since LoyceV states there are over 2000 participants that have user ids that haven't even been generated yet. The bots can't participate in the twitter or facebook campaign without having an actual account here, because they are required to post their reports here. At least these bots are spamming telegram and stake rather than bitcointalk. no you aren't important any more
Just like you, I bet they didn't abuse your name since everybody knows you're a cunt.  Either that or they know they would get caught.. like I would fuck about with pajeet bounties.. although you on the other hand young man! I'm a poor boy myself. I wonder how many pennies I can earn if I sign up for various bounty campaigns using other people's credentials. I guess it would add up. I never have used telegram though, personally. Is it easy to just spam telegram with plagiarized and insubstantial content? |
|
|
|
If you're bored, try asking the bounty manager to change the address to one you control  Too late since I PM'd the bounty manager to state that it is not me. Maybe next time. However, I'm not certain that I want to lower myself to participating in any fashion in a Eth token, or any other token. It looks like even tether is a shit token. |
|
|
|
I wonder why they picked little old me? I wonder if I should actually be flattered. They might want to use your Legendary status to get more stakes. Rest assured, any decent manager would know that 'reputable members' won't spend their time bounty hunting or using altcoin sig which is not guaranteed when they'll get paid. Well I have a history of getting involved in plenty of shitcoins. I still am active in a couple. However, most of these bounties are involved in shit tokens. I have been loath to get involved in tokens since the Dao burned me. My butt still hurts bad from that one. |
|
|
|
I'm just hoping this person doesn't use the same token address and/or telegram address and register for a signature campaign and start posting bullshit. I don't want my account linked to some bounty cheater's account. I wonder why they picked little old me? I wonder if I should actually be flattered. |
|
|
|
I just read this post from someone; WTF  Thanks for letting me know. I never registered for this campaign. I have posted in the bounty thread and let the campaign manager know by PM. This really sucks! How does this happen? I never registered for this bounty campaign and now my account is listed on the spreadsheet. There may be others. You may want to see if your account appears as registered for this campaign. This really pisses me off. I don't think my account was hacked though. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OIWy_8Bj22aTH1s_Pat9TFzMe1IWJDl0xa5spVZldT4/edit#gid=761123474 |
|
|
|
WTF Thanks for letting me know. I never registered for this campaign. I have posted in the bounty thread and let the campaign manager know by PM. This really sucks! |
|
|
|
|
Hello, I have been notified that my account appears on this bounty campaign spreadsheet and I never registered for it. How do we rectify this situation?
|
|
|
|
|
@OP Usually the only form of collateral people will accept here is an amount of a high volume altcoin worth at least 120% of what you are asking for in Bitcoin. I believe control of domains can usually be returned back to the control of the person borrowing, so does not work good as a form of collateral.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
