No, it doesn't. The DAG is too large for a 970 to produce those numbers. I have owned a 970, The statement is false.


My rigs with 4 x 1070 are making a total of $2.5 per day, dunno from where did you get those figures. You will not even break even with free electricity. As for the price, It seems fair but could be lower. Do keep in mind people will assume US market rates here so if you are outside of US this might be a good deal for you.


Would you mind finding me one with specs like the OP posted?  

The answer is quite a simple one TBH, Ask yourself, have you got your investment back? If Yes, Then sell them. If not Did you make more than 70% of the invested amount back? If yes, Sell them and call it a good lesson. If you haven't made more than 40% of your Money Back then are you willing to take the risk of the market going up? If yes then keep mining, else sell your miners and cut your losses. It's that simple nothing rocket science here

Awesome development! Theymos cares about the community after all. This can be improved tho, just like you mentioned in the "Enhanced newbie restrictions & requirements" thread i.e 10 Merits to wear the signature. Now that the first step has been taken I believe the next step should be strict action against managers who are accepting higher ranked members who haven't earned any merit and going about their daily shitposting. These managers should be the immediate next target for the staff members and theymos.

A team should be made to investigate these managers and warn them for their wrongdoings. They will have a couple of weeks to adjust their policies, Failure to do so should result in a permanent ban.


It's kind of an overkill TBH Loyce. What we need to do now is have strict rules for running the bounty campaigns. Make it official that bounty managers should only accept people who have earned at least X amount of merit. Failure to do so will result in a ban. Something like this should be a good start point. We will see immediate results if something like this gets implemented.

Unfortunately, not for an ICO. I have designed logos for other businesses which can be seen in my imgur gallery linked above. I wanted to keep the thread light* so decided to link the gallery instead of posting them here. Also, IMO 'rank' shouldn't be a factor in providing a service, you can be a mod and do things you are good at. You shouldn't shy away from things just because of your rank.

BUMP

No this won't be a nightmare at all, It's about just adding a few new variables and some if-else statements. Shouldn't take more than a week to develop this. But since theymos is busy this may take a while to build. Sigh! Only if community development was allowed.

Hey, beggars can't be choosers.

I have a suggestion that I would like to make. How does a Rank Based sMerit Distribution for merit sources sound? E.g Right now merit sources receive a chunk of sMerits and they can distribute however they like. But what if they received sMerit in the following manner.

50 sMerits which can be distributed to only Newbies
50 sMerits which can be distributed to only Jr.Members and so on.

This should stop the people who are 'crying' over not receiving enough merit and pointing fingers towards bias distribution. I haven't gone through this thread, This may have been suggested before if it is I will delete this post right away.

No experienced manager will do that... You might wanna change the rule and discuss things privately. Unless you aren't looking for a good manager. Good luck!

Just completed the first Animated thread here! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5028116.

Accepting New Orders!

Just completed the first Animated thread here! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5021008.0

Accepting New Orders!

Cool


Hmm, So if i understand this correctly Phoenix will work something like this.

1) Early burners would get Phoenix plus the 'promised' ash.
2) People will keep burning cryptos till the last phoenix is given out.
3) The 'Promised' ashs in the meanwhile will keep evolving into 'Phoenixes'.

Will these 'evolved' Phoenixes generate new 'ashs'? Have you thought of something to make this a continuous process instead of it stopping at one stage?

First of all, this wasn't pointed at you. I was referring to other people who would want to burn up their coins. Second, I do like the idea of 'reduction in supply', I have studied economics myself. Anyway if you feel like I overstepped, Apologies. I am not one of those assholes who would feel belittled by apologizing. Anyway moving on.

Got it, But what happens when the Last Phoenix is given out? How will the burning work then? Bitcoin has 'fees' which will reward the miners, What will the 'burners' have?

But that is because of the capitalist nature of the society. In a society where 'profit' means everything, you will breed people who will only care about the 'money'. But what happens when the tables are turned? Something like the Soviet Union. People were hungry for Power cuz 'money' was guaranteed at that time. Make a 'moneyless Decentralized' society and reward those who come up with brilliant ideas and solutions, I bet people will even come up with cures for cancer too. There was an interesting video on this topic by Kurzgesagt https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvskMHn0sqQ I will recommend you to check it out.

Changing the topic a bit here But this isn't true 'burning' IMO. What happens when we master the art of quantum computing in the next 5-10 decades? A quantum computer will be able to crack these 'Burn' addresses and retrieve the bitcoins. What you are doing here is basically donating your bitcoins to person/entity who will avail these bitcoins in the future. Consider it a sort of smart contract  

That's a big 'if'. BTW what kind $ per KW/h do you have and how many cards are you looking to buy? If you are planning to mine ETH only then why not go for the asics? given that you have access to cheap energy.

TBH it will be hard for you to get your hands on these models at those mentioned prices. Most farm owners would have already cleared their stock like a few months ago. Bump the prices up by $20 for each and you might get lucky.

The 5% monthly does sound real, but there is no way to guarantee it. Unless they have told you that there is a risk of losing all of your money, You shouldn't invest with them. Cuz trading comes with a risk. Nothing is guaranteed while you are trading. No matter how good you are. Also, 20% a month is most likely a scam, cuz even virgin coins don't carry a premium of 20% above the market price.

I will recommend you to stay away from both. Since you have already lost money with bitconnect. Just keep this in mind, There isn't an easy way to make X% per month while doing nothing. Only a real Business can give you results like that.


Did he show you the farm pictures?

How will you make sure some dude hasn't copied the seed of the wallet? You will need a trust system like nothing we have seen before for this to work. As for your idea, I think it can be done, Floating/Underwater cities will be a thing in the future. I am also sure Floating/Underwater countries will pop up in the future as well. The United States of bitcoin could be the first one if it can gain traction. I wonder what kind of investment will be required for something like this to be done in the international waters.

Hmm, Only if we can get access to one of satoshi's wallet 

I don't agree with the idea of having a mascot. Have you seen a mascot for Paypal? or a Bank? Bitcoin is a serious thing and shouldn't be affiliated with things like 'Mr.Bit' etc. There are plenty of 'Bitcoin' logos you can use for the purposes of advertising etc, I don't see why can't you use those Unless you are targetting 6 years old and less. Anyway, you can still find plenty of bitcoin mascots by doing a quick google search. Look over at Shutterstock, they have got a few of them or even better hire someone from Fiverr to make one for you.

This still would require the 'time' check, The day the merit system was introduced and the user's registration date should be checked against each other. If the account was registered after the merit-system was implemented and has less than 100 activity, the plugin shouldn't filter them but then again the bounty hunters will get away who don't hesitate to create another account after getting banned. So it defeats the purpose of the plugin altogether while just showing the date when the user registered could be a better thing here. If someone sticks out the Reader could click the 'Read-Anyway' button.

Awesome! Thanks!