BUMP!

I totally disagree with you here. I have been on to many forums and i have seen stickies being sold out for more than $500 per week, there is an actual market for this stuff. Also there isn't a hard and fast rule that the stickies always need to be about 'bringing knowledge'. Anyway i don't see my idea being implemented as theymos has banned icos to buy adspace here, so i don't see why he will allow stickies to be sold out.

nah! i think he is in love with Emilia Clarke

True.

Well a warning can be placed just like the investor based game section. Also one slot per ico.

I disagree with this, why not then remove the section of ICOs altogether?

Agreed.

if they really want to spend their btc's on "Promotions" why not spend it the right way? Through Signature campaigns and so on? I have a suggestion for theymos, may be start selling sticky posts for X amount of BTCs for each week, So these icos can bid and stay on top for X amount of days, without doing anything shady. It will increase the forum revenue and if they are caught again doing this shit, they will be banned along with their IPs being suspended.

LMAO!!! Lowlifes these days! God they are stupid! All these accounts didn't thought for once that an account name 'ANNBumping_needed' will really need boosting? LOL! They need to be banned straight away instead of just receiving the negative trust.

Well i partially agree with you here, they might get away with the excuse that they were trying to find out who really needed that 'Boosting' and expose them but who will judge their intentions? I don't think more than 60 members contacted the buyer just because they were looking out for the community.  

Just like mocacinno said, you do a bit of research first, if you are not sure, you can hit the owners up on their contact emails and check if they are down with escrow or not. If you are not 100% sure always go with the escrow route. Also try finding products you are looking for from bitcointalk's marketplace almost all of legit sellers will accept escrow. In short you need to be smart while using bitcoins.

They definitely deserve the red for sure, these people are getting smarter and smarter everyday, who would have thought a market would emerge for this.. I think they should be left with negative trust and be warned, if they continue then they need to get their ip's banned cuz these motherfuckers will come back with other accounts for sure. Also these ICOs should get negative trust too. They are obviously buying services from these lowlife scumbags..

I know, but there isn't a consensus, anyone can bid higher and get faster confirmations. Its like a pay to play system. Where if you have money to burn you can get a benefit of quick confirmations.

That's a big question here, if a consensus is created to send only 0.05 cents with each transaction, will they stop mining? or start to exclude the payments.

Makes sense. Well my idea isn't viable then, their is a limitation that we need to factor in.

I don't know if you are being sarcastic or just trolling.. If you really think fiat isn't stable right now. I think you need a medical check up mate.

Well what's better than Google? It has an api for currency exchange rates. That can be used.

Duh! One doesn't have to be a Sherlock to figure out who these people will be. I think they will come to terms if the users push them to.

Thank you  

Lets remove that ambiguity and make it clear? Don't you agree with that?  

Well this is the point where bitcoin becomes a tool for the elites and less of a payment system for the masses.

Not sure about this part. Miners may decline to accept all the payments, what will happen then? They may argue that they want atleast 30Sat/byte etcs.. Have to think about this part..

Here is the link : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0

You can move the thread too, see at the bottom left corner below the thread, there is a option called 'move topic' you can use that instead of opening a new thread.

So fellow bitcointalk members, we have seen many people complain about 'high fees'. The problem here is that those users only take fiat into consideration, never thinking that it only costs 50k Satoshis for a transaction of an average size.

I was thinking of a solution for this, now i am not a technical person, so i need your input on this, if this is even possible or not. Can the core developers link the fee to say 0.05 cents in fiat terms? So if bitcoin is at 9k it will cost 0.00000555 btc to send a transaction, if bitcoin drops to 8k it will cost 0.00000625 btc to send a transaction and so on. Keeping the transaction fees to 0.05 cents at all times. If the transaction size is greater than 226 bytes and less than 500 bytes it will cost 10 cents and so on.

Is this possible via a soft fork? Should even this be implemented? Or will it work in the long run, i would like to hear your opinions on this.

You mean users like Quickseller? 

Well you can startout by helping users in the beginner and meta section, you can watch out for scams in the altcoin/ service announcement section, you can help out users who need technical help and so on. Once you start doing that, Your post quality will improve automatically. 

Exactly people need to understand this, the fees will always increase in fiat terms, let's say it costs 10 cents to send a payment on dash network, or 0.001 dash. It will cost the same 0.001 dash if the price reaches 9k per dash. But in Fiat it will seem like 10x more. So technically no coin has solved this issue so far..

Wrong! That is segwitx2. Segwit is to optimize the code,  remove out the junk data from the transaction and place it in a separate block, you are mixing two different things. You need to learn more about segwit. 

Well it's look like a scam to me, if they can't honor their faucet players, they don't deserve the real players. I would like to see your emails, just to see the both sides of the story. I understand the rule of withdrawal, one must deposit but nullifying it is definitely wrong.  You may move this thread to the 'scam accusation' section to get better support.

Nothing special, people start using crypto currencies. I don't think Yuan will take over. Instead of pegging it against dollar people will value it against 'real' goods like an egg for a Satoshi and so on.

Well segwit has already technically reduced the fee in half and there is a plan to implement the lightning network in the future so saying bitcoin hasn't made any progress in terms of solving this issue is totally wrong. You can use 30 to 50 sat/byte and use transaction accelerators to get fast confirmations. Also people need to stop associating bitcoin as a perfect solution. Think of bitcoin as the first computer, it wasn't fast but it was the first step towards the right direction.

I can't think of a single reason why this thread is in the project development section  anyway please move it to bitcoin discussion or off topic.

Never , there is something called incognito mode and 'Do not track' feature. I like to use those instead.

Do you have any source to prove this?

Well i don't think Amazon will be interested in robbing your home.

For me i don't care about big corporations, i am just another number in their database, what I am worried about is individuals who can target me for their own benefits. Well i know it sounds hypocritical but there isn't much we can do against them. Except take certain measures which again aren't that useful in the first place.