Offering everyone the opportunity to test the most accurate risk-free Bitcoin/crypto price Prediction method in Cryptocurrency space. I want my method to be proven to people first before they can start trading with their money, based on my instruction. I will probably do this with you for two to three weeks before you start trading Bitcoin/crypto with your funds. After the testing, I'm going suggest you start with amount you can afford to risk, once you are pretty confident in your understanding of my method, you can gradually increase the amount you use for trading. If you are satisfied with my method, you can donate parts of your profits to a Bitcoin address I will be providing. If interested, send "Interested" to me on Telegram & I may add you to my Group. Telegram: https://t.me/Goodfruitexchange*Note that when I said this is the most accurate method in crypto space, I mean it 100% |
|
|
|
|
It doesn't matter what stage of development the Child in the womb is just as it doesn't matter if a 2 year old or adult Human should be considered more human or a living being. It's even more important to protect the human in its vulnerable and weak stage of life, and the worst is killing it deliberately at the stage it can't defend itself.
The unborn children are innocent living humans who do not deserve to be killed no matter what. The CREATOR is highly displeased with those who murder the innocent.
When faced with the challenge of whether to save the Mother or the child first, for whatever reason, the answer should be to first save the one who needs it most. Do not sacrifice one for the other unless with their consent. Let's put an end to Child Sacrifice aka Abortion
|
|
|
|
I think holding strongly to a particular ideology without considering the good part of others is kind of extremism.
I hear that, it taps into a primal part of people that doesn't really want to offer solutions or make anything better, but is just looking for a fight. But it doesn't want that all out chaos, it wants to retain some safety as an individual in the thick of it, so camouflages itself with political ideology & jargon. You know what I would like to see, I would like to see a website or bunch of services with a universal automatic translation feature where users could set a fluency & input typos would be strictly flagged for editing etc.. So like social media for the whole earth to use at the same time. It could be quietly revolutionary. I am sure it is technologically feasible & could be a huge commercial success but might also meet initial resistance based on legal or political concerns, which again could really be just some kind of ancient paranoid prejudice. It might help with one peculiar problem that all who dream of a more inclusive & better integrated global society still face: the language barrier. Lack of understanding of ideas could be part of the problem. Rigid people may mean no harm but are just being careful of what can cause them problems... They could try to resist what they do not understand as a defensive mechanism. It's important to allow people find faults or issues with something you are offering them as solutions to their problems. Good solutions will be faultless or without issues and No good person will reject good/faultless solutions. if someone rejects good solution or calls it evil & the evil good, then you consider him/her as corrupt mind who should be avoided to prevent a situation where evil spreads and corrupt a healthy population. People will likely surrender if they find no fault in an idea. If after finding no fault in the solution you are offering them and it's still rejected then you and others know who the problem is. In regards to the language barrier, I believe that is beneficial when the whole is becoming evil as it can slow the evil down & prevent the whole from getting quickly corrupted and destroy itself. So, preventing easy communication can be one of the ways to slow down the full corruption of the whole. What so you think that the world goes through stages of being good & evil? Sounds a bit superstitious to me Ucy. What if the idea of evil was only invented to give evil people an excuse for imposing themselves on those they had singled out as evil? What if they are scapegoating, creating fall-guys, abusing & undermining the force of law & order & carrying out unjust persecution against people they secretly hate on a prejudicial partisan basis so seek to stigmatise? For my part I would argue that the false dichotomy of communism vs capitalism is evil, because (not without irony) of the falsification of the dualism. They are interdependent aspects of one complex whole & to convince the uninitiated that their apparent differences are down to separateness & conflict goes against the constructive scheme of things. I think most people think & act as individuals to transcend the irrational apathetic parts of themselves to try & keep up with the organic world around them. Not the decisions of other people, but the motions of the solar system & phenomena in the universe etc.. There is nothing superstitious about the belief in the existence of evil (or bad). It's existence is a fact which is recognized by most people & can be seen in nature as a force that create problems and lowers the quality of existence. You remind me of my former life as an atheist trying to rationalize evil to make meaning out of things that are difficult to understand. I later realized my mistakes and things have been wonderful for me ever since. There is a CREATOR whose purpose is to bring things into existence and keep them free of errors. The purpose in summary is to keep things very good and to destroy evil All sounds a wee bit jewish to me Ucy  I think it's childish & half baked. You see it states explicitly in the Abrahamic holy books time & again that the supreme deity is 'the truth' & that is about the only statement of fact around it I can identify. The almighty supreme agency is 'the truth' because anything opposed to the truth has to be by definition a falsehood, fabrication, delusion or lie. And however enjoyable that opposition to the truth may be, that lie, it will always get found out & discarded for something more useful, i.e. the truth. Truth is not a judge or a creator, though, these are merely the subjective experiences of those who have entertained lies with an unconscious awareness meanwhile of the overpowering presence of the truth, which is everywhere and cannot be contained or explained. The difficulty with wanting to serve good & destroy evil is of course that you are probably going to be required to hurt & oppress others that you perceive to act on the behalf of this superstitious force. At which point their innocent loved ones may understandably declare you to be evil, & the vicious cycle continues For the record I would only ever identify religiously as a Taoist, as to me that is the only form of religion which always bears in mind the ungraspable nature of the infinite. What exactly is Jewish, childish and half baked? The belief in evil or the existence of a CREATOR? I hope you stick to the topic. Well Ucy both of those things seem like that to me. And the topic is not good vs evil, as I said I consider that stupid. I don't care about fairy stories & horror movies, I care about history lessons & relentless false narratives & the dualistic deception of communism vs capitalism as destroying the authentic socio-political tendencies of real human beings. It doesn't have to become an oversimplified theological debate. It is a serious issue. The belief in evil & the existence of an almighty creator who created everything presumably including evil but who now wants to destroy evil is wrong headed to me. It is the kind of bullshit that kept medieval peasants in the dark & now neoconservative reactionary forces are trying to put the masses on the same footing using another, similar dualism. Breed communists to think of themselves as good and their capitalist enemies as evil & vice versa. It is almost so simple a formula as to be demeaning & commonly overlooked. But it occupies the educational space, it is doctrine, it pervades the daily life of dominant culture through the media & so while I respect your stance in terms of basically staying out of it & sticking to what works for you personally, eventually it will interfere with your life too. Alright. You are already sounding defeated with unnecessary emotions and vulgar. If I continue with you that will make me come down to this low level and make me feel inferior |
|
|
|
|
I remember some weeks ago Russia attempts to pay her debt was rejected and she ended up paying through an organization that ended up seizing it. I think this is the kind of things you go through when you move against the evil system. And I won't be surprised if the intention is to make things look like Russia is unable to pay her debt whereas her economy is doing pretty well, better than before.
Do not forget that Russia has over $100 billions in foreign reserve that was stolen/seized in the name of sanctions. That she will recover through force once she is done with special op in Ukraine & the Pro Russia region Donbas
|
|
|
|
I think holding strongly to a particular ideology without considering the good part of others is kind of extremism.
I hear that, it taps into a primal part of people that doesn't really want to offer solutions or make anything better, but is just looking for a fight. But it doesn't want that all out chaos, it wants to retain some safety as an individual in the thick of it, so camouflages itself with political ideology & jargon. You know what I would like to see, I would like to see a website or bunch of services with a universal automatic translation feature where users could set a fluency & input typos would be strictly flagged for editing etc.. So like social media for the whole earth to use at the same time. It could be quietly revolutionary. I am sure it is technologically feasible & could be a huge commercial success but might also meet initial resistance based on legal or political concerns, which again could really be just some kind of ancient paranoid prejudice. It might help with one peculiar problem that all who dream of a more inclusive & better integrated global society still face: the language barrier. Lack of understanding of ideas could be part of the problem. Rigid people may mean no harm but are just being careful of what can cause them problems... They could try to resist what they do not understand as a defensive mechanism. It's important to allow people find faults or issues with something you are offering them as solutions to their problems. Good solutions will be faultless or without issues and No good person will reject good/faultless solutions. if someone rejects good solution or calls it evil & the evil good, then you consider him/her as corrupt mind who should be avoided to prevent a situation where evil spreads and corrupt a healthy population. People will likely surrender if they find no fault in an idea. If after finding no fault in the solution you are offering them and it's still rejected then you and others know who the problem is. In regards to the language barrier, I believe that is beneficial when the whole is becoming evil as it can slow the evil down & prevent the whole from getting quickly corrupted and destroy itself. So, preventing easy communication can be one of the ways to slow down the full corruption of the whole. What so you think that the world goes through stages of being good & evil? Sounds a bit superstitious to me Ucy. What if the idea of evil was only invented to give evil people an excuse for imposing themselves on those they had singled out as evil? What if they are scapegoating, creating fall-guys, abusing & undermining the force of law & order & carrying out unjust persecution against people they secretly hate on a prejudicial partisan basis so seek to stigmatise? For my part I would argue that the false dichotomy of communism vs capitalism is evil, because (not without irony) of the falsification of the dualism. They are interdependent aspects of one complex whole & to convince the uninitiated that their apparent differences are down to separateness & conflict goes against the constructive scheme of things. I think most people think & act as individuals to transcend the irrational apathetic parts of themselves to try & keep up with the organic world around them. Not the decisions of other people, but the motions of the solar system & phenomena in the universe etc.. There is nothing superstitious about the belief in the existence of evil (or bad). It's existence is a fact which is recognized by most people & can be seen in nature as a force that create problems and lowers the quality of existence. You remind me of my former life as an atheist trying to rationalize evil to make meaning out of things that are difficult to understand. I later realized my mistakes and things have been wonderful for me ever since. There is a CREATOR whose purpose is to bring things into existence and keep them free of errors. The purpose in summary is to keep things very good and to destroy evil All sounds a wee bit jewish to me Ucy I think it's childish & half baked. You see it states explicitly in the Abrahamic holy books time & again that the supreme deity is 'the truth' & that is about the only statement of fact around it I can identify. The almighty supreme agency is 'the truth' because anything opposed to the truth has to be by definition a falsehood, fabrication, delusion or lie. And however enjoyable that opposition to the truth may be, that lie, it will always get found out & discarded for something more useful, i.e. the truth. Truth is not a judge or a creator, though, these are merely the subjective experiences of those who have entertained lies with an unconscious awareness meanwhile of the overpowering presence of the truth, which is everywhere and cannot be contained or explained. The difficulty with wanting to serve good & destroy evil is of course that you are probably going to be required to hurt & oppress others that you perceive to act on the behalf of this superstitious force. At which point their innocent loved ones may understandably declare you to be evil, & the vicious cycle continues For the record I would only ever identify religiously as a Taoist, as to me that is the only form of religion which always bears in mind the ungraspable nature of the infinite. What exactly is Jewish, childish and half baked? The belief in evil or the existence of a CREATOR? I hope you stick to the topic. |
|
|
|
I think holding strongly to a particular ideology without considering the good part of others is kind of extremism.
I hear that, it taps into a primal part of people that doesn't really want to offer solutions or make anything better, but is just looking for a fight. But it doesn't want that all out chaos, it wants to retain some safety as an individual in the thick of it, so camouflages itself with political ideology & jargon. You know what I would like to see, I would like to see a website or bunch of services with a universal automatic translation feature where users could set a fluency & input typos would be strictly flagged for editing etc.. So like social media for the whole earth to use at the same time. It could be quietly revolutionary. I am sure it is technologically feasible & could be a huge commercial success but might also meet initial resistance based on legal or political concerns, which again could really be just some kind of ancient paranoid prejudice. It might help with one peculiar problem that all who dream of a more inclusive & better integrated global society still face: the language barrier. Lack of understanding of ideas could be part of the problem. Rigid people may mean no harm but are just being careful of what can cause them problems... They could try to resist what they do not understand as a defensive mechanism. It's important to allow people find faults or issues with something you are offering them as solutions to their problems. Good solutions will be faultless or without issues and No good person will reject good/faultless solutions. if someone rejects good solution or calls it evil & the evil good, then you consider him/her as corrupt mind who should be avoided to prevent a situation where evil spreads and corrupt a healthy population. People will likely surrender if they find no fault in an idea. If after finding no fault in the solution you are offering them and it's still rejected then you and others know who the problem is. In regards to the language barrier, I believe that is beneficial when the whole is becoming evil as it can slow the evil down & prevent the whole from getting quickly corrupted and destroy itself. So, preventing easy communication can be one of the ways to slow down the full corruption of the whole. What so you think that the world goes through stages of being good & evil? Sounds a bit superstitious to me Ucy. What if the idea of evil was only invented to give evil people an excuse for imposing themselves on those they had singled out as evil? What if they are scapegoating, creating fall-guys, abusing & undermining the force of law & order & carrying out unjust persecution against people they secretly hate on a prejudicial partisan basis so seek to stigmatise? For my part I would argue that the false dichotomy of communism vs capitalism is evil, because (not without irony) of the falsification of the dualism. They are interdependent aspects of one complex whole & to convince the uninitiated that their apparent differences are down to separateness & conflict goes against the constructive scheme of things. I think most people think & act as individuals to transcend the irrational apathetic parts of themselves to try & keep up with the organic world around them. Not the decisions of other people, but the motions of the solar system & phenomena in the universe etc.. There is nothing superstitious about the belief in the existence of evil (or bad). It's existence is a fact which is recognized by most people & can be seen in nature as a force that create problems and lowers the quality of existence. You remind me of my former life as an atheist trying to rationalize evil to make meaning out of things that are difficult to understand. I later realized my mistakes and things have been wonderful for me ever since. There is a CREATOR whose purpose is to bring things into existence and keep them free of errors. The purpose in summary is to keep things very good and to destroy evil |
|
|
|
I think holding strongly to a particular ideology without considering the good part of others is kind of extremism.
I hear that, it taps into a primal part of people that doesn't really want to offer solutions or make anything better, but is just looking for a fight. But it doesn't want that all out chaos, it wants to retain some safety as an individual in the thick of it, so camouflages itself with political ideology & jargon. You know what I would like to see, I would like to see a website or bunch of services with a universal automatic translation feature where users could set a fluency & input typos would be strictly flagged for editing etc.. So like social media for the whole earth to use at the same time. It could be quietly revolutionary. I am sure it is technologically feasible & could be a huge commercial success but might also meet initial resistance based on legal or political concerns, which again could really be just some kind of ancient paranoid prejudice. It might help with one peculiar problem that all who dream of a more inclusive & better integrated global society still face: the language barrier. Lack of understanding of ideas could be part of the problem. Rigid people may mean no harm but are just being careful of what can cause them problems... They could try to resist what they do not understand as a defensive mechanism. It's important to allow people find faults or issues with something you are offering them as solutions to their problems. Good solutions will be faultless or without issues and No good person will reject good/faultless solutions. if someone rejects good solution or calls it evil & the evil good, then you consider him/her as corrupt mind who should be avoided to prevent a situation where evil spreads and corrupt a healthy population. People will likely surrender if they find no fault in an idea. If after finding no fault in the solution you are offering them and it's still rejected then you and others know who the problem is. In regards to the language barrier, I believe that is beneficial when the whole is becoming evil as it can slow the evil down & prevent the whole from getting quickly corrupted and destroy itself. So, preventing easy communication can be one of the ways to slow down the full corruption of the whole. |
|
|
|
In an ideal World where evil is non-existent, no one owns Anything but Everything is owned by all. You can live wherever you want, take whatever you need or eat whatever you find without wronging anyone... This can only be possible in a world where nothing good is scare, where our imagined needs (or our good wishes) are met in sub seconds, everything is good, no one can cross boundaries to wrong anyone/anything, understanding is abundant, everyone is happy, joy is constant and we exist as One
In such World, it will likely be impossible to feel separate from everyone else because they are Single Consciousness, have thesame mind and feelings. Individualism could be more of a vice than a virtue. One of its few benefits could be to prevent the extinct of the whole in lawless situation.
..... Some people seem to take these things so seriously & give them such violent passion that it strikes me that something deeper is going on behind the rhetorical theory. To be at once a sovereign individual & a part of a shared identity is the basic situation human beings have always been in & the 'communism vs capitalism' mythic tragedy can be confusing & detrimental to that, especially for the young. Glad to have connected with a Sr. member here though, thanks Ucy I'm not rigid when it comes to unproven ideologies or economic systems. My approach is to adopt or create solutions that is peculiar to my situation without bothering too much what others believe is true. My solution tends include parts of the different ideologies that are fair and reasonable that even the communist, capitalist or socialist, etc will hardly find fault in. I think holding strongly to a particular ideology without considering the good part of others is kind of extremism. I prefer to be open minded & only adopt what works for me without issues. Thanks too |
|
|
|
What is the main problem you want to solve with this? What makes you think more problems won't be created trying to solve the problem.
Do you have examples of assets that do not or will not lose value?
Your idea is very interesting though
Good question. In my opinion, the main problem is that everyone is trying to solve the new decentralized financial system within the framework of the old proven monetary system. This mistake is made by everyone who is trying to come up with another stable coin by tying it to the dollar or another Fiat. Satoshi proposed another solution for the development of a new decentralized economy and everyone together undertook to link Bitcoin to the Dollar, everyone began to print their own stable coins without understanding the basics of the value of decentralized finance, this is the same as the treasury began to print dollar No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, etc. as much as necessary and we will do. I solved this problem with my project by creating an example of an asset that under no circumstances can be devalued because it is not tied to Fiat, which means it cannot be reset. Give me some time to go through your work and understand exactly what it's about. Are you a programmer? Central means controlled specifically by someone. The World Bank is a Decentralized Bank with no center, managed simultaneously by all its co–owners, wherever they are. This bank, accumulating the financial asset of its owners, brings profit to everyone. Its main advantage is that it cannot be bankrupted. Decentralization has no center.A truly Decentralized Bank with no center should be very difficult to centralize. There are several things that disqualify World Bank from being considered a Decentrized Bank, eg Privacy/Anonimity of owners, barrier of entry etc If you explain why it is necessary to centralize a decentralized bank, then I will try to answer. If you think that your anonymity is at risk in this bank, then it seems to me that everyone is responsible for the anonymity of their wallet address, there is no verification in this bank.I mean those who control a decentralized system should be anonymous, or their privacy should be well protected otherwise a bad actor who wants to centralize the system could easily hunt them down and get them to surrender control & do whatever he wants them to do. I developed a project that not only anonymize participants but regularly randomize them to make such takeover almost impossible, yet the participants can be punished when they try to hurt the system while being anonymous. Anonymity needs to be guaranteed to participants to prevent a takeover and centralization a decentralized system. |
|
|
|
You don't need to learn the technical side of trading to be a successful trader. If you could find the right person who can make you successful consistently by simply telling you the right time to buy, will you be willing to share part of your profits with such person if you succeed all the time with zero risk? If yes, then let me know on this thread.
Hi! Are you talking about trust management? What % of the profits do you take? Trust management? Whatever % you believe is right. |
|
|
|
|
In an ideal World where evil is non-existent, no one owns Anything but Everything is owned by all. You can live wherever you want, take whatever you need or eat whatever you find without wronging anyone... This can only be possible in a world where nothing good is scare, where our imagined needs (or our good wishes) are met in sub seconds, everything is good, no one can cross boundaries to wrong anyone/anything, understanding is abundant, everyone is happy, joy is constant and we exist as One
In such World, it will likely be impossible to feel separate from everyone else because they are Single Consciousness, have thesame mind and feelings. Individualism could be more of a vice than a virtue. One of its few benefits could be to prevent the extinction of the whole in lawless situation.
|
|
|
|
What is the main problem you want to solve with this? What makes you think more problems won't be created trying to solve the problem.
Do you have examples of assets that do not or will not lose value?
Your idea is very interesting though
Good question. In my opinion, the main problem is that everyone is trying to solve the new decentralized financial system within the framework of the old proven monetary system. This mistake is made by everyone who is trying to come up with another stable coin by tying it to the dollar or another Fiat. Satoshi proposed another solution for the development of a new decentralized economy and everyone together undertook to link Bitcoin to the Dollar, everyone began to print their own stable coins without understanding the basics of the value of decentralized finance, this is the same as the treasury began to print dollar No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, etc. as much as necessary and we will do. I solved this problem with my project by creating an example of an asset that under no circumstances can be devalued because it is not tied to Fiat, which means it cannot be reset. Give me some time to go through your work and understand exactly what it's about. Are you a programmer? Central means controlled specifically by someone. The World Bank is a Decentralized Bank with no center, managed simultaneously by all its co–owners, wherever they are. This bank, accumulating the financial asset of its owners, brings profit to everyone. Its main advantage is that it cannot be bankrupted. Decentralization has no center.A truly Decentralized Bank with no center should be very difficult to centralize. There are several things that disqualify World Bank from being considered a Decentrized Bank, eg Privacy/Anonimity of owners, barrier of entry etc |
|
|
|
I need some personal guidance as a beginner in forex and other type of trading and would like some basic stuff answered throughout the day,i know 10$ its not much but I'm also not asking for a deep dive course explanation for that price too i understand (unless you would like to help on that level for that price) if interested please contact me on telegram for more details,thanks ; ) .
telegram = haverclint67
You don't need to learn the technical side of trading to be a successful trader. If you could find the right person who can make you successful consistently by simply telling you the right time to buy, will you be willing to share part of your profits with such person if you succeed all the time with zero risk? If yes, then let me know on this thread. |
|
|
|
The so called Wall street no longer have that kind of power. It has been given to Russia for the time being until the "Red King" comes back.
Money is worthless if you don't have control over the world and its resources..
Russia is currently above the rest economically because they have real control over much of the world. They don't fully realize yet.
Don't worry my friends from USA and other. Everything is for our own good. In two to three years you will understand.
My advice: Any Western Nation that want to be above after Russia should ally with Russia
It's also, "Money is worthless if no one wants to transact in that currency". That's why the Federal Reserve doesn't know what to do, between saving the Dollar or saving the economy. Saving the Dollar would mean there is no "soft landing" for the economy. Saving the economy would mean hyperinflation for the Dollar. Plus between deflationary policy and an inflationary policy, it's easier to manage the system under and inflationary policy. I guess you are right. If for example you control the World but people refuse to transact in your currency I would probably advise you to tie your currency to all natural resources. If someone owns a piece of land, he/she automatically own its value equivalent in your currency. If he wants to buy 2 goats, he sells part of the land for the goats ... the former goat owner now owns a part of the land and automatically its equivalent value in your currency. That is probably a kind of bartering, which I actually prefer... I prefer Trade by Barter |
|
|
|
|
I think if you earn honestly, you could survive on small amounts of money in the right society where people live humble life. It doesn't matter which country you live in.
It important to earn honestly otherwise whatever amount that come from dishonesty(evil work or works not deserving your pay) will be wasted... It's cursed money. That's how our CREATOR designed things. You may be spared if you are doing it in ignorance, with good intentions (for example to help others or to help the needy).
I notice how Philippinos help themselves like you wrote. It actually makes me happy. That is where I would want my money to go to especially if they are using it for good things or using it the right way.
|
|
|
|
|
The so called Wall street no longer have that kind of power. It has been given to Russia for the time being until the "Red King" comes back.
Money is worthless if you don't have control over the world and its resources..
Russia is currently above the rest economically because they have real control over much of the world. They don't fully realize yet.
Don't worry my friends from USA and others. Everything is for our own good. In two to three years you will understand.
My advice: Any Western Nation that wants to be above others after Russia should ally with Russia
|
|
|
|
|
The issue is that typical whales have lost control. The control now resides in the hands of one person who can determine where it moves next. It could easily surpass 40,000 in 2weeks with or without the whales.
Bitcoin has one single whale for now. He is here with us
|
|
|
|
|
I will likely boycott all Russia's Gambling sites for the sake of discouraging gambling which is evil but I wouldn't boycott Good Betting sites from Russia.. . We don't reject good things. Only fools do.
My main issue with 1xBit is the revealing dresses worn by women they advertise on their site. Private body parts should be private(for husband esp) not public.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably the kind of experience I went through while preparing for difficult exams, or writing exams I'm not well prepared for. The risk of losing is too much. It's a gamble.
It's important to reduce risk as much as possible or only engage in risk-free bet.
With gambling you are attracting what the world would call "negative energy" (it's actually evil spirit) that encourages reckless behavior
|
|
|
|
|
LN is more suitable for small/micro transactions. One of the problems is that people would rather use altcoins that are easy to understand, implement and use for small transactions. I wish Bitcoin solved the small transaction issue without necessarily creating another layer that is quite different from the parent. It's more like trying to convince your human community that a squirrel is your child whereas you are human.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
