Certainly a must read Satoshi explains everything in the whitepaper, wallets, nodes pow... I read it several times already and I always learn more each time I read. I made a quick summary on pow based on the whitepaper, take a read later https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3317586.0 |
|
|
|
i cannot find the 870 amount, there are over 100 posts, which one is it?
It was distributed among those addresses he mentioned in the first post. 870bitcoin wasn't all that money in that time, back in 2014. It was a pretty high amount of money, but not as near as it is today. Anyway, that was a very honest act from joehoe |
|
|
|
What are the most important things to consider before pursuing a career in blockchain and cryptography development industry?
Welcome to the forum. I joined for the same reasons about 2years and a half ago. I suggest that you begin with the free book Mastering Bitcoin, by Andreas Antonopoulos. You can read it for free at github. https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook |
|
|
|
I am not defending fiulpro. The whole thing is very complicated, too many details in his story. I would remove him from the campaign as well if I were the manager. But this user might be a complete newbie and not a scammer. Maybe he is really holding his btc in that custodial wallet Zebpay and he doesn't understand anything about how bitcoin works. Please do not upload any documents to the forum and do not send them to anybody random asking you to do so anywhere. This is a classic privacy mistake people do trying to defend themselves here.
I agree. In my opinion you shouldn't even send any documents to anyone, even the campaign manager. My suggestion to fiulpro: Study about bitcoin, understand how it works, and come back to the forum. Try to be useful here and you will get some earning from signatures campaigns. I think CryptopreneurBrainboss should really remove him from the campaign, as a newbie like that should not represent any brand. Additionally, I would also remove the red trust, and he looks harmless imo. Just move it to neutral. My 2 cents. |
|
|
|
|
Também não acho haver necessidade de critério de mérito
Afinal o pessoal vem fazer arte. Não dá pra spammar arte. Talvez até de mas aí ngm vai meritar
|
|
|
|
They all allege that the token issuers took advantage of the market’s lack of understanding and awareness of how cryptocurrencies worked. And they sold these alleged illegal securities to US citizens. From this phrase, do I understand that they allege these companies because some users are unaware of how these tokens work? Or their ignorance or delusion that they are illegal securities? The law does not protect the dupes. I think that as there are so many scams out there, and those companies like Bitmex, binance, etc know (or at least should know) that some of them are scams, they could be responsible. It is a lawsuit, they have not been condemned yet. These kind of lawsuit are more often than most people think in financial markets. For example, the biggest company in Brazil, a stated owened oil company Petrobras, is under a legal lawsuit because the CEO knew about corruption and did nothing to stop. Investors are demanding money, because companies stocks crashed and the CEO lied about corruption. The investors said that if the CEO said there was corruption, they wouldn't have bought... something like that. |
|
|
|
|
Many of those books are free for download on github or other more trusted sources, like mastering bitcoin can be downloaded from github.
Isn't google drive unsafe for download? We don't know exactly what may be in those files.
|
|
|
|
Tem que analisar se a quantidade disponibilizada para a compra e venda são limites definidos pela Binance para cada usuário ou é uma limitação do proveniente do ofertante. Outra possibilidade é que o limite aumente conforme a utilização do cliente.
Deve ser limitação da conta sem kyc Você mostrou agora outros limites, bem mais folgados. Deve se feito kyc já né. |
|
|
|
P.S: Citei todas as funcionalidades vísiveis dos sites, sem deixar nada de fora (até onde eu sei).
Você esqueceu de mencionar os global charts (capitalzação, dominancia de bitcoin, etc.) https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/Dai entrei no https://coinlib.io/global-crypto-charts, e não aparece no brave. Provavelmente o ad-block deu pau. Não vou nem tentar desativar pra ver, não gosto desse procedimento. Pra mim os graficos mais importantes estão ali e a pagina esta bugada. Nem vi o que tem. Prefiro usar o CMC que não pede pra desativar meu adblock e não bug no browser. Sobre as funcionalidades extras que o coinlib tem: Essas funcionalidades extras, tirando uma ou outra que parece interessante (como o grafico de ranking), não mudam muita coisa. Pode ter mais funcionalidades mas é uma cópia do original ne, e nem sao funcionalidades importantes na minha opiniao. Dai fui olhar com calma o Coinlib, já vi que o ranking é diferente um pouco. Qual será mais confiável? Valeu, mas continuo usando o CMC. Não é a toa que é o #500 e o coinlbi deve estar pra lá de 10.000-100.000 Edit: Falando em funcionalidades extras inuteis, CMC tem um block explorer de uma porrada de moeda e acho que o coinlib não tem. Não que seja grande coisa, mas enfim... Pra mim o importante são as funcionalidades básicas estarem funcionando e isso o CMC faz muito bem. Eu por exemplo depois dessa dos charts do coinlib no brave, dificil eu voltar no site. Edit 2: Entrei novamente no site para ver o tal gráfico de rank da moeda, que me pareceu muito itneressante. Entrei numa token que eu gosto de acompanhar, ERC-20, e não tem o gráfico dela x Eth. Tá dificil competir com o CMC mesmo kkk isso é básico po. Mais uma funcionalidade que o CMC tem e a coinlib nao. Mas vi o gráfico de performance, muito bom. CMC da binance vai copiar. kkk |
|
|
|
|
Sinceramente, eu acho o Coinmarketcap o melhor site relacionado a preços e excahnges de criptomoedas internacional.
Localmente, no Brasil, eu uso o bitvalor.com.
Fico triste do coinmarketcap ter sido comprado pela Binance. Em um mercado com maior regulacao, isso nao seria permitido...
Pelo menos é uma empresa de qualidade que adquiriu. Espero que o CMC continue sendo um portal de qualidade.
Me desculpem os idealistas, mas CMC é mil vezes melhor do que qualquer outro desses portais ai.. coingecko, coinlib etc....
carrega rapido, tem charts com informacoes super varias, um monte de informacoes de excahnges, dados historicos....
|
|
|
|
Now let's take another example: did you take a look at nullius?  He is the best example. Not to mention anymore that he also had a topic on a similar matter - Suggestion: Raise merit requirements at the lower and highest ranks (@theymos). Let's remember some of his words from that time: Starting with 17 merits awarded to some of my old Jr. Member posts by people who remember them, I reached the Hero threshold of 500 merits within 27 days, 8 hours, 16 minutes, 22 seconds of active posting. All in all, from the moment that theymos announced the merit system, it took me 32 days, 9 hours, 14 minutes, 51 seconds to go from zero to Hero Meanwhile, nullius has 1517 merits and 1260 posts. Posts, not activity! His activity is 280. Nullius deserves a rank by his name. He writes very well. He put so much effort in his posts. It is a privilege to have a member such as him in this forum. He has knowledge, will to share, time, patience... He can't be an example for anything. Not including theymos and satoshi, there are only 83 members who have earned 1000 merit ever, in the >2 years since merit was introduced. That's not even 1 new legendary a week. I don't think that's an unreasonable position. Increasing the limit to 3,000 would give a grand total of 5 legendary members on the entire forum (again, not including theymos). I don't see the benefit of doing that. The merit system was supposed to prevent spammers from ranking up, not create a new rank which is only obtainable by <0.001% of the forum. I agree with this. You can create a new rank for those 3000k merited members, or members who are here for a long time (i.e, very high activity). But to become a legendary you need 1000 merits, which was done only by 83 members in this forum is already very unobtainable. Maybe there should a badge or something for each 1000 earned merits. |
|
|
|
Everything about my cryptocurrency is decentralized.
How does YOUR cryptocurrency is decentralized? I think you don't know what decentralized means. Do you know that bitcoin is not satoshi's cryptocurrency, right? Bitcoin is almost a public good, a commonweal. There was no ICO, for example. Your cryptocurrency just looks like something private that you own. As you described. Of my total supply these percentages is for
2% Developers
3% Commission fees
5% Costs like servers etc.
70% is for mining You own the mining as well? You are going to decide what to do with the money, how much you are going to spend on mining, who will mine, etc... This doesn't look decentralized at all. |
|
|
|
That's a good point even though I have no idea what "contabilize" means I think I have created a new word mixing Portuguese and English lol. Just made a correction TL/DR: Airdropped merit were not "merited", even in official bitcointalk statistics. in my opinion, there should be other name or other way to contabilize consider it in BPIP statistics.
|
|
|
|
According to the BPIP badges, yeah I dropped from 20th to 50th place but those are just stats, the badges does not make you more or less important, it's just for fun. Besides this is an free-will\self-funded project, so I do respect all the work, time and money invested in it and if those guys decided to put up the top Merited users the way they are now, it's their decision, I'm thankful I can do what I do using their data.
I agree, it is for fun, it doesn't make me or anyone less important, its free, etc... I am just trying to contribute, and I know ibminer, Vod, and everyone else who is involved in this project is very perfectionist. Ofc it is their decision, just trying to show another point of view, which could impact their decision. |
|
|
|
Hello, I see there is a discussion and the calculation of merited user changed, to consider the airdropped merit in the "merited" ranking. I agree with this statement I have to assume that the forum (theymos) merited accounts initially for a reason, and so I feel it makes sense to be included.
But there is something wrong in my opinion. If you go to the page https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=topusersat you will see " Top-merited users, all-time" Theymos is not considering airdropped merit as "merited". If you scroll down the list, all airdropped merit is just ignored in the "Top-merited users" official forum stats. However, when we go to BPIP website there are users with 0 earned merit, but they are counted as "merited". In the official forum "top-merited" stats, I am about 40th top merited users, but in BPIP I am 140. It makes a huge difference from official stats and third party BPIP stats. TL/DR: Airdropped merit were not "merited", even in official bitcointalk statistics. in my opinion, there should be other name or other way to contabilize consider it in BPIP statistics. |
|
|
|
Interessante... como isso funciona? Olhei aqui e fala:
Aparece a bitcointoyou como "anunciante"? Muito interessante a parceria com a binance, e realmente dá uma puta moral pra bitcointoyou. O limite realmente está pequeno como observado pelo TryNinja. Parabens bitcointoyou. |
|
|
|
I have some USDT in my account.
Now I wanna swap all of that for Bitcoin so I can start trading Bitcoin pairs.
If I open a trade with BTC/USDT and I buy bitcoin, yeah I'll have bitcoin in my account (because I bought it), but at some point I have to close the trade and that would mean that I sell that bitcoin (which means that I would be swapping it back for USDT).
How do I have all bitcoin in my account without any open trade?
JH
I can see you are new at this. I suggest that, if you have just a few dollares, to exchange your coins outside an exchange. There are many KYC free services, where you can anonymously trade your coins, like https://instaswap.io/ or https://simpleswap.io/ or easyrabbit, and so on. You just follow the website isntructions, send USDT to their wallet and they will send BTC to your wallet. Vetry simple. |
|
|
|
I have gone through the guidelines and also learnt about the different wallets that we have, but how can i earn income from this forum
It is not easy to earn money, and this place is no different now. You can try to participate in bounties of altcoins, which may pay well or not. Or you can try to join any BTC paid service in the Service Board. But to earn you have to contribute to the forum. Unless you make good posts, which people will like and merit, you won't rank up. So I would read more than write, study, and then try to rank up here. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
