[...]
a) we don't have separate tokens for the team (and never have);
b) for us, the team is the same investors (and it has been so from the very beginning).
This may be unusual for you, but it's true. This previous statement seems to contradict the one above? Or was it just me thinking so? [...]
However, now we are allocating tokens to the team and volunteers from tokens intended for early investors - time spent is a more serious investment than money.[...] As evidenced, the statement was "now we are allocating tokens to the team and volunteers" instead of "we haveve allocated token to the team and volunteer" In fact, we do not even request any financing and do not make any business proposal, but inform the community about our project (including the opportunity to purchase tokens before the release of the game at a big discount).
Again, contradictory to the earlier post, In the future, funds received for tokens put up for open sale will be used to support the development. This is not asking for financing? |
|
|
|
Bitcoadvice (OP) has the following websites through which he commits fraud:
1. coinchangers.net
2. coinchanger.live
3. coinchanges.net
4. coin-changer.net
5. coinchanger.net
I can confidently say that he opened and manages all these sites, he is deceiving people, and he is trying to close all new cryptocurrency exchange websites so that as many people as possible use his websites and become victims. That is, all new websites reduce its profits through a fraud scheme. This is interesting, I just took a glance here and there, so I can't be sure I grasp the whole situation, but I believe you have something as an evidence to back up this claim? Otherwise, I think it's... slander. In terms of fake support photos, of course, this is very bad for user relations, I do not deny this. I understand, of course, that this is dishonest, but with all due respect, this does not make the website fake, as the author wrote in the topic. I think it's a stupid marketing ploy, but it's not a scam. The author of the article himself is involved in fraud and thinks that all the business people are like him. Try to understand that if a person replaces photographs of support workers, then he should be called in other words, and not a scammer. If this causes inconvenience to someone, then let them write and ask for real photos, and there is no need to call them a scammer.
What does it make the website and the owner, then? An identity thief? I think there is a law prohibiting people using other people's credential as their own? |
|
|
|
Problem with this alleged ''glitch'' is that now since services like this are not available in bitcointalk forum they will just move to another forum platforms and continue business as usual.
I believe that there will be enough users who will follow things on other platforms, However, this ban will have a bad effect on checking the legality of certain services. I just noticed that this account still has a link to its clearnet site in the website bio on the profile page. I hope theymos uses notifications, so I'll try this way to draw his attention. I think the "sanction" given to mixer accounts will only be putting their account on PM-only mode? Anything related to their platform, unless it got affected by the word-filter, will left as how it be, as long as they did not make any new advertisement? Note that the timeline will be something like this:
- Sometime on Jan 1 (at an arbitrary time, not midnight), the wordfilters will be put into place, the announcement threads will be locked, and mixer-run accounts will be put into PM-only-mode. If any threads/accounts are missed after all of the other ones are affected, please report them. If new wordfilters should be added, please post in a topic in Meta about it.
[...] |
|
|
|
I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.
It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.
Uhh... you do aware that the owner of the site admitted that he "stretched the truth", use fake profile as their customer service, and have fake reviews? And the numbers they gave on their site are most likely "stretched truth" too. Even if the author of this thread did not provide evidence [though the evidence and findings regarding this site are quite abundant, given by many users who pitched in], there is a written statement by the owner of the site admitting his... stretched truth "Stretching the truth" does not mean scam. Of course, fake reviews are not good, but this does not mean that the website is fake. I use this website, however, they work very slowly, but they don’t scam people, unlike Bitcoadvice. But agree that when launching a website, almost everyone uses both exaggerated numbers and paid reviews to somehow promote their website in such a competitive environment. So, dear, there is no need to say that the owner of the website accepted the accusations of the author of the topic, but simply honestly admitted something else. Wait, roll back a bit, what scam does the OP do? And you seemed to forgot to justify the fact that they use fake photo for their live support. What's the good excuse for this? Certainly a project that's built in a good faith, no matter how new they are, will not try to fool people with fake photo? |
|
|
|
I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.
It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.
Uhh... you do aware that the owner of the site admitted that he "stretched the truth", use fake profile as their customer service, and have fake reviews? And the numbers they gave on their site are most likely "stretched truth" too. Even if the author of this thread did not provide evidence [though the evidence and findings regarding this site are quite abundant, given by many users who pitched in], there is a written statement by the owner of the site admitting his... stretched truth |
|
|
|
...instead of something like "2.5% to early investors" and "2.5% to team", or that you said,
If we had planned to do so, we would have written so. Solana, marketing services, and time spent on development are all investments in the game that we are ready to accept in swap for tokens intended for early investors. If you have something that can be useful to us, welcome, you can also become an early investor. LMAO, you're an interesting one, aren't you? You continue on contradicting yourself. First you don't have an allocation for your team, and then you decided to share the early investors pre-sale token with the team because they are "early investors" [paid in time] upon being asked if the tokenomy changed, and after talking in circles, you said that it was the plan from the beginning, and now, when asked why doesn't it show dedicated allocation for team, you said as quoted above. And regarding the team, I assume that means the decision was made by the two full time employees? Or the part-time also has a vote?
I think we'll leave the process of making internal decisions outside the scope of this correspondence. Actually, I'll beg to differ and say that the process of making decision of changing tokenomy shouldn't be internal or even happening at all. You ask for a funding here through token sale, it is very unethical to change your business proposal, the one that people use as one of their consideration to invest in your project by buying your token, unilaterally through your internal team's decision, i.e. because you deemed it fit. It doesn't evoke much confidence at all, does it? If it has to happen, it should be through your community agreement. |
|
|
|
|
I appreciate your effort and the purpose of this thread, and I have no intention to derail it, but isn't there a more efficient way to track our portfolio than using spreadsheet? There are price tracking apps that integrate themselves with rate of certain exchange or to global rate, like BlockFolio... before it got rebranded and met is ultimate fiasco. They also come with feature that give us periodic notification when the token we watch increases or decreases on certain percentage that we can set.
I barely check the one on my phone because I currently only keep my eyes on selected few tokens and I track their price through an exchange so I can know the exact rate of my portfolio, but I am aware that Delta [the one I installed] alert me every time ETH or BTC jumped or dropped certain level.
And then there's TrustWallet that also give us the rough estimate of the total fund we have in our wallet.
|
|
|
|
Forgive me for not being familiar with this chain, but where can I see how much is being hold by each of these top holders and how many of these holders are the team? I also peek at your channel and umm... there aren't much members on it? Those on the channel are all of the holders?
[image snip] No worries! You can look up the token on any Ravencoin Asset Explorer. Here's a popular one: https://rvn.cryptoscope.io/asset/?asset_id=043198f7b74a1745ff1fa7c68ce14babce32a658In regard to the discord, we just launched it a few days ago so people are still filtering in, the token has been distributed to over 20,000 Ravencoin addresses, though some holders may not participate in social as much as others. There are zero holders that are "members of the team" as there is no team. Jackdaw was 100% distributed with no founders reward or tokens set aside. Interesting. How do you plan to set the initial price? Will it be like the old projects that "leave it to the market" where the first person selling the token will set the price? Or will it be predetermined through a system like a vote? |
|
|
|
Now, where do I saw the allocation for the team? Nowhere in your tokenomy, and that's the problem and the question here, because later on, apparently the early investors allocation are now allocated for team, as per your own statement. If you argue that team members are early investors that invest their time, then allocate some fund for them from the very beginning instead of taking it from what's intended for other category. Seems like a bad planning, is it not?
No, it doesn't look like it. This was the plan from the very beginning. You impute to us, your vision of the situation. And regarding changing the tokenomy "if we think it's better for the project", how many people is in this "we", again?
We are developers (2.5 people). We're sure that tokenomics is balanced, but we don't exclude the possibility that we'll see some opportunities to improve it. Oh my gosh, that's relieving to know that it's been your plan from the beginning, that explains a lot, like why the tokenomy said "5% pre-sale to early investors" instead of something like "2.5% to early investors" and "2.5% to team", or that you said, [...]
However, now we are allocating tokens to the team and volunteers from tokens intended for early investors - time spent is a more serious investment than money.
[...]
yeah, that clearly shows you've had that plan in your tokenomy. And regarding the team, I assume that means the decision was made by the two full time employees? Or the part-time also has a vote? |
|
|
|
[...] And the answers to the questions.None, that's why I asked, that's the whole point of my question. There wasn't an allocation for team on your paper [ archived], and then they suddenly share allocation with early investors because... you decided it to be that way? I don't understand where you saw the allocation of tokens for the Team? The team members are early investors like everyone else (they only invest their time). If you buy out all the MAGIO tokens intended for early investors today, there will be no new tokens for the Team. Does it mean other part in the tokenomy also subjected to changes the way you will them?
Let's be honest - if we think it's better for the project, yes, we can change the tokenomics. But I don't see any reason to do that. Tokenomics is fine. You might want to look for the definition of "volunteer".
Thanks, I know it. Quoted in full for reference. Now, where do I saw the allocation for the team? Nowhere in your tokenomy, and that's the problem and the question here, because later on, apparently the early investors allocation are now allocated for team, as per your own statement. If you argue that team members are early investors that invest their time, then allocate some fund for them from the very beginning instead of taking it from what's intended for other category. Seems like a bad planning, is it not? And regarding changing the tokenomy "if we think it's better for the project", how many people is in this "we", again? |
|
|
|
The Van Kush Family [...] This is the Van Kush Family Coat of Arms, in the UK we would have to go to the Lord King Lyon to get Certified, but we are in Texas. [...] I wondered why "Van Kush" rang a bell... this is the same project/group/people behind this old project of someone's wife who will tokenize soap? Why don't you use your old account and what happened with those projects you have in the past? [...] I don't have the Password. But Yes, I am Tokenista. [...] Umm... there is this feature called "forgot your password" that'll help you re-gain access to your account. Or opt-ing to answer security question, in case you set that feature up. |
|
|
|
Well, given that the "merit/smerit" system is precisely what tanked activity on the forum, I'm not really sure why anyone would want to export this confusing monstrosity anywhere else.
ICO spammers are pretty much gone, so there's no need for it anymore, and a simple seniority vs posts ratio would have been sufficient in the first place.
I beg to differ, merit/smerit not only effectively prevent spammers, it also makes account farming and selling rather difficult as simple post ratio no longers enough to raise rank and make it worth more. It was and it still.
Will check with BT mods to ensure is not going to cause a conflict don't want to be the cause of spam like what happened at Reddit
Go ask theymos. |
|
|
|
I am confused. You previously didn't have any allocation for team, and then you do now, where does this token come from, then?
And where do you see the allocated tokens for the Team? None, that's why I asked, that's the whole point of my question. There wasn't an allocation for team on your paper [ archived], and then they suddenly share allocation with early investors because... you decided it to be that way? Does it mean other part in the tokenomy also subjected to changes the way you will them? We are guided by the principle that time is money. Therefore, we believe that team members and volunteers are the same investors as others and do not single them out in a separate category. You might want to look for the definition of "volunteer". |
|
|
|
Oh? So your tokenomy changed?
Tokenomics has not changed. From our point of view, the one who invests his time in working on the project is the same investor as the one who invests Solana. I am confused. You previously didn't have any allocation for team, and then you do now, where does this token come from, then? sounds to me like a project that is not ready for launch at all...
Maybe come back when your project is finished?
Right now it looks like you want funds but have nothing to show for..
It is possible that you've high expectations. We're not planning to launch a top-level game right away. But what we want to do is we will do it if 10 players play it - so be it. P.S. By the way, I noticed that it looks like you specifically registered on the forum to write this to us. I'm touched. Though looks like it, given his first post is on your thread, he's not. He registered ten days before you made this ann. |
|
|
|
[...]
Any veterans please check the twist game and if you are able to verify the results something is problematic with this for sure.
I checked the verification page just now with cache cleared, incognito, and second browser, and yes, it now redirects us to slot's page. Manually "accessing" twist through typing on the address bar also didn't work. BC.Game Support, can you please ask the technical team to look into this matter once again? |
|
|
|
The Van Kush Family This is the Van Kush Family Coat of Arms, in the UK we would have to go to the Lord King Lyon to get Certified, but we are in Texas. [...] I wondered why "Van Kush" rang a bell... this is the same project/group/people behind this old project of someone's wife who will tokenize soap? Why don't you use your old account and what happened with those projects you have in the past?
Van Kush Rewards Token Cryptocurrency based in Dallas, TX  [...] |
|
|
|
Is it acknowledged and/or got permission from the moderator of this forum? I know that technically the forum is "for public" but that doesn't exactly allow people to create a token under their name whenever they want to.
Martti Malmi and them have no Business in a Copyright type Case. They are all about Creative Commons and Everything. And it uses the Merit System he made, Martti Malmi thinks the whole World could Run on a Similar System. How is it related to him? The question I asked above was not about copyright and whether OP got a license to use a copyrighted content [that'll be separate issue that I am currently not interested to get into], it's about whether the claim as the forum's token got fully backed and supported by the moderators of the forum. |
|
|
|
Wait, umm... so there's no token sale and all 50 tokens are distributed freely, either by airdrop or by faucet, correct? And you aimed to be the highest priced token? Do you have plan to achieve this? Given the token are gained for free, I think most will dump it right away at the slightest chance without considering any value, since they get it for free.
Interesting take! You are correct in that all tokens were distributed for free, via airdrop, faucet, or social giveaways around the Ravencoin ecosystem. We're currently working on an exchange listing & trading support within the Ravencoin ecosystem to test your theory. Many of the top holders are active Ravencoin users who see value in the project, but time will tell if they'll quickly sell their holdings or only trade in fractions. Forgive me for not being familiar with this chain, but where can I see how much is being hold by each of these top holders and how many of these holders are the team? I also peek at your channel and umm... there aren't much members on it? Those on the channel are all of the holders?   |
|
|
|
The first thing I did, after I noticed the change of password request, was for me to check areas where my email was logged in, which I confirmed to be only on my old Android device and that of my new iOS and PC, which I have to log out of my old Android device, which I don't make use of again.
To the person who asked if I have funds on my account: That's personal, but the funds that I have there are very little, and it's not worth it for someone to hack and move them out in any way. I disregarded the email since it was not requested by me, and I have not been able to receive any of them again. My activities still remain the same.
And I also think this issue, if it's not from any scan-casino that I might have signed in on, could be on my old browser, where I used to save up my password before backing up to Chrome, and my oldest email, where I have changed all the passwords that were connected to that, as I presume it might have been licked by scammers. There could also be some possibility that the issue is there.
I think it's a known attack by the security team, they send a notification blast about this password change request [you should be able to see it in your notification bar]. Meanwhile, I am advising you to set 2FA, I think it's better be safe than sorry |
|
|
|
|
Is it acknowledged and/or got permission from the moderator of this forum? I know that technically the forum is "for public" but that doesn't exactly allow people to create a token under their name whenever they want to.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
