Among all those teams, only Tottenham, Juventus and Barcelona seem to have significant advantages against their competitors. Atalanta, with their first season in Champions League still have a lucky match with Valencia, but it is hard to say they can win against Valencia. For the rest pairs, any team can win and it is so hard to predict which teams will win.

If I have to choose, I will choose PSG, Manchester City, Valencia, Liverpool, Bayern, Juventus, Tottenham, and Barcelona.

To be survived in crypto market, the vital thing you have to learn is FUD. What is FUD?
Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt.

Don't trade if you don't afford to lose your money.
Don't use margin trade (that is more popular recent months) if you don't afford to lose your money fastly, in a blink of eyes, due to shady manipulations from whales and exchanges.
Don't trade with assets you don't have enough knowledge (after indepth investigations).
It's better to avoid trading with too young assets (less than four years old).

It is an interesting match, a debut as a coach of Napoli for Genaro Gattuso. Years since the first season as a coach, The Rhino has not yet shown that he can be a good coach. I admired what he did as a midfielder in the past, in AC Milan, and I wish he can do the same with new role (coach). The pressure on Gattuso is huge when he took the position of Carlo Ancelotti.

All three posts and your post history look good but rules are rules. You have to wait for a next round. Good luck, my friend.

Done. Thank you for creating that bot and letting me know about this. Please give me details if you update your bots to other versions.

1 merit for Junior member rank and 10 merits for member rank. They are two nearest ranks for you, but you have to make good posts and earn 1 to 10 merits, according to each rank, and have enough activities (that is easy, just make enough posts and enough time in the forum - 14 activities is the max cap for each 14 days).

Nowadays, you will get almost nothing if you join campaigns, bounties of ICOs, IEOs, or whatever derivatives from them. Instead, you should concentrate on learning forum rules (read pinned topics on each board, sub board), and raise your awareness on crypto and bitcoin. Chances are always there, but you have to prepare enough to take them at the right time.

Focusing on campaigns, bounties when you started here is a bad choice, IMO.

At starts, you will likely feel unhappy, unfair, something like that but don't give up, then you will feel happy later.

Rejected that post and your post history should be impoved.
That post looks good but your post history does not. Rejected.
Won for that post and your good post history. Please keep up your good works, my friend.

The excellent performance of Ciro Immobile this season has played important roles for the third position of Lazio, currently. Lazio team deserve their position but the question is with their very limited squad and a big gap between the squad and substitutes, will they be able to maintain their good performance for rest matches of this season and keep their third position at the end of this season. I don't know, honestly.

If it is your case, it means you paid small amount of BTC for the Copper membership as a fee for an evil IP.
You have not yet worn the Copper membership but you can decide to wear it or not. If you want to wear it, please follow the guide from theymos.
As the others pointed out, just don't break rules.

Agree with you, babo. I updated OP with grey glow effects for dead projects. I will check all scripts listed in OP and update if finding other dead projects later.
Automatic URL shortener for bitcointalk posts

Binance is a big one and a good choice, at the moment. That exchange does not require KYC with total max cap withdrawal from 2 BTC and below.
I have some notes for two market sites above:

• https://coinmarketcap.com/rankings/exchanges/liquidity/: using liquidity for exchange ranking is better, because it helps viewers to have more neutral overview over exchanges and eliminate incorrect stats from fake volume.
• https://www.coingecko.com/en/exchanges: Paying attention on Trust score of each exchange and doing search in Scam accusation sub board in the forum.

Furthermore, when you choose an exchange, the must thing to do is looking at their customer supports. Both history and current support status. If supports of one exchange shows signals of changing from good supports in the past to worse supports recently, I do believe that you have to seriously consider not using that exchange. The kind of negative changes of supports does not equal to the probability that exchange will collapse or shutdown soon, but it is never a good signal. I see many exchanges change from good to bad supports, then weeks or months later they shut down their services or scam exited.

It is definitely difficult at beginnings. Everyone do feel it challenging at their beginnings, but if they manage to go through the very first challenging phase, they will do become more familiar with merit system, and know which kind of posts can help them to earn merits. Then, they will feel very more comfortable with merit system and challenges to rank up.

Unfortunately, from the mid-ranks (Senior member and above) the challenges are significant bigger and such huge challenges can drain out their desire to rank up. This stage, ones who can maintain their habits will do successfully rank up.

You created this account in December last year, and by now has released only 9 posts totally. 3 of 9 posts released this year, one in May, and 2 in December.

Most of your posts is one line and if they are longer than one line, just a few words in the second line. Quality of post is not defined by length but most of time, one line posts are mostly low quality. To make a quality posts in short versions, you need to be very knowledgeable and good writing skills. It is not easy but it is a thing to consider for users who want to make good posts.

Most of time I see one line posts, they are released by spammers.

Since 2018, what did you contribute to prevent signature ads removed globally?
Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.

Iasenko built up his Hero member rank by himself, from scratch when merit system started. He is as same as Coolcryptovator, self-earned enough merits to become Legendary members.

Thanks for correcting me. Maybe when I saw you as a staff, you were a Full member. I did not know you before that day so maybe I missed your first day as a staff and correspondent rank (member as you disclosed).

You have not yet become a Legendary, Coolcryptovator.

Fortunately and impressively, you have earned enough merits for the rank (1000+) and you have passed through the most difficult challenge to hit that rank. I congratulate you for the potential Legendary rank. You made good contributions to the forum, over a very long period since the day you were here. You deserved it, bro.

Carlo Ancelloti is a professional, experienced and excellent coach. I feel a deeply regret for Napoli and Carlo as well. He will surely come back later, impressively as same as what J. Mourinho has with Tottenham recently.
G. Gattuso was a great player but as a coach, he has performed terribly so far. I don't think he can bring any positive changes to Napoli if he becomes a new coach of the club.

Yesterday, it was a trusted feedback (with default trust) and I brought it to Meta because there is no reference for that feedback (yesterday) and the reason for the feedback looks abnormal and inappropriate (especially without reference). The case now solved and things have become clear for all of us.

Good luck, Match365.

You have beaten me out. When I was ranked up to the Senior member rank, you were still a Full member, but now you have move further than the Hero member rank. I admired your achievement so much. You earned them (merit, rank, and reputation). Congratulations for your meaningful and sweet 2nd anniversary in the forum.

Hi Match365,

I thought you should make deal with the one who left negative trust feedback on your account. As first impression, and for people who are not really understand the trust flag system of the forum, a negative trust feedback is not good for your company. Even the negative trust feedback on your account is incorrect.
Inappropriate negative trusts and feedback. Please avoid.. I wish that your incorrect negative trust feedback will be solved fastly. It's good for you as well as for the forum.

I see this negative rating that is inappropriate in my opinion. See it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2694164

The appropriate trust feedback is neutral, in my opinion.

It is terrible to leave negative trust feedback like that, especially leave it on account that runs their good company (so far) in the forum.

There is a good guide from LoyceV: LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system

---

That case closed and as the others proposed to move the thread to Reputation, but I am not going to move it. Personally, this issue is fitted with Meta, and might cause more guides on how to use Trust feedback more correctly (in particular, with disagreement in language or language-related problems).

I planned to open the thread one week, then I am going to lock it. Thank you.