yes. criminals 99%

Geeks = hipsters, hackers

Business men = an old men with 100 usd to invest in a bubble and the black market.

Traders = mafia(the exchangers so called brokers) who manipulate the market + their "investors" (the sharks) who buy  PR (propaganda) from different media companies.

Ok. it's good that you are believer.

Please let tell me the names of those who develop the Bitcoin application and the auditors for it...

That's correct. These are real facts not only rumors.

what is Bitcoin if not a speculation itself?

Bitcoin was made by someone who owned a good percentage of the original digits and it was made for fools(without demographic area).  

"you live in Congo? OK! do you have money? yes, I have. Good !!! Give it to me and i will send you some "bitcoin".
You will be like "us", libertarians "  

then... and the "fool" has asked :

"what will I do with it?"   the answer was  "hm...nothing but find others like you, - "fools"- and sell them your bitcoin for more money than I sold it to you"
 
Then, by telling his story, this individual (later transformed in a gang) created demand for some digits on a screen. The dollar-value of his share of the bitcoins appreciates with the other digits.

After that, they created the so called "exchangers/brokers" in order to manipulate the market as they want. It sounds nice(broker, FX) to the people's ears who have some financial information.

It's so funny when you read the so called Bitcoin capitalization : over 2,5 billions USD.

Capitalization means that 2.5 billions USD really exists "somewhere". That many people came with their fiat currency and they bought Bitcoin. Where are the money? Of course, they do not exist at a such level (2,5 billions) and they will never exist.

The share price in relation to earnings and net assets that determines the price if a stock is over or undervalued. Shares represent a fraction of ownership in a business. Now, is BTC like any other commodity or is it a company? If it is a company then each people who buy 1 BTC is shareholder and it must earn a part of the BTC profit
Shares represent a fraction of ownership in a business.  

You see how stupid is this system? OK. You will tell that BTC is a currency. A currency is regulated by a a central authority in order to prevent any scams/abuses .
Example: the USD is guaranteed by the US government: this relies on faith in the ability of the federal government to pay back any debts.

Also, the USD have value because everybody thinks they have value. Who is this earth will trust Bitcoin (a gang)? It has no future as it is.

You will tell me that any gov is a gang and other shits like this. Ok. this is the world where we live but i rather trust any gov from this planet than "the gang".

"Everybody" in your case = 500,000- 1 mil user since 6 years ago. More than that, less than 0.1% from these have used BTC to buy "goods"

Why, because there is no interest from merchants, to accept Bitcoin and those who own BTC, are speculating it. They don't need BTC to buy a PC or a beer or condoms. You can do that with a card or cash.

I don't have fake news.
I didn't say Lake BTC won't cover the loss. I said Lake BTC lost an important amount with Egopay and not only them. Bitfinex and others too....

hashnest  will be closed in max 2-3 weeks for now. they are a ponzi.

don't wonder. most of these people who "invest" in GAW knows that may get nothing. It's like you play in a HYIP(ponzi)...
you can or you cannot earn . it is ok as long you know that it is like a game and you don't "play(invest)" a lot of money.

you will see some of them screaming on forums "GAW is SCAM" in a few months  it will be fun because they are already warned about this shit but they continue to use it.

"cloud mining" services will be closed very soon because they ALL are ponzi.

Yes, free to discuss.

Cloud mining = ponzi

 If they have the spare capacity... Why aren't "they" mining with it and they want to "share"?
Clearly, it's more profitable for them to "rent"(scam) you the capacity than to mine themselves.

all the cloud mining services are Ponzi

Question about cloud mining :

If they have the spare capacity... Why aren't *they* mining with it? Why do they want to "share" the profit?

Clearly, it's more profitable for them to "rent" you the capacity than to mine themselves. So how can YOU achieve ANY profit?

no words about their recent LOSS with Egopay. they lost a lot of money....

"Even if the manufacturer (https://bitcoin.org/) claims that it runs open-source code, how do you tell whether it is actually running what you compiled?" Verbücheln said.

in other words: MANY developers worldwide are working in their free time to a project, in this case, Bitcoin. That's why it's called OPEN SOURCE.

These developers can put anything they want IN the source code.

Verbücheln: ".... that some pieces of open-source code are so large and complex that even a dedicated community of developers may not detect a malicious addition."

according to the bitcoiners and some fanatics from here, you have left "the libertarian principle".  hahaha
Is is not enough? lol

nothing about their Egopay account and the amount lost

tell that to this guy : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=788886.msg10141652#msg10141652

maybe he is troll too...

the people are misled. take a look to the bitcoin propaganda and tell me where you see "high risk investment" and "be careful", Bitcoin is very volatile; now it is 600 usd and in 2 days may be 100 usd because a gang wants that or because a black market is closed by FBI and the drug dealers are cashing the Bitcoin.

of course not. the pose as being a "corporation" but they have NO phone number or address.

These exchangers are fishy, thieves and unregulated. They cannot be if they deal with an anonymous system like Bitcoin.

 They must be reported as unlicensed money transmitter.

Bitinstant's owner is in jail for that. You must be stupid to be fucked by CoinBase and not making a complaint to FINCEN or http://www.dbo.ca.gov/

Coinbase is from San Francisco, CA.

I think he is expecting the Supreme Court to decide whether USA can ban gay marriage.  
He is very interested about that

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102330019