Ah that laser costs 15k as a unit
For the quality of work it can do it seems like a nice investment.
It's a very nice investment if you can sell one piece of artwork for 14k  . i think 14K is a huge amount for that ...  |
|
|
|
mine cloud is a ponzi so it is like a game. who wants to play must know the risk...you can earn but you can lose too. simple The game is over. Every single customer that bought a contract lost money. Everyone. everybody? hm...strange. normally some should earn something....otherwise the "game" is not working |
|
|
|
why are you visiting HYIP websites if you are not interested to play ? Do you think the people who are playing in them do not know the risk? These sites are misleading people and are stealing players' money. I don't know if they know the risk however that doesn't change the fact that they are scamming. I was looking into it because Williamj was asking me to endorse the ponzis many of these "people/players" know what they are doing but they want to appear innocents Of course 99% know the risk ! Agree. I know the risk. However, because of the profit.. I invested in it. I am sure, most of the investors know the risk too. of course, they all the know the risks... the "investors" are not so innocent |
|
|
|
|
well, it was one of the biggest BTC exchangers...many of you have used it...
|
|
|
|
Coinbase isn't licensed, correct, because they're still awaiting regulators to iron out the wrinkles of the Bit-License. They launched ahead of regulators, because that's what most tech startups do. It's nothing new. Run the business, add license and approvals later. That said, they are fully licensed as a money tranmitter in the following states: https://www.coinbase.com/legal/licensesIt's just a matter of time before New York and California pass their licensing requirements.No this is not true. As it stands now, coinbase is operating in states that it either has a license to operate in or that, in it's legal opinion does not need a license. As of now neither CA nor NY require licenses to operate a bitcoin exchange a lot of ppl are getting confuse from the bit license for exchanges and the license as a money transmitter, they still dont have the bit license, thats why they are operating in a gray area. I thought the bit license thing only applied to New York since it was their brain child. Is that not correct? no, it is not correct. The BITlicense does NOT exist yet. it can be from tomorrow but it is not today. I repeat, make a search on internet: "bitcoin unlicensed money transmitter". you will find things like this "2 year prison term for bitcoin unlicensed money transmitter ". So, New York is not so grey area. People are in jail for bitcoin exchanges. |
|
|
|
paycoin is a scam, gaw miners used their market reputation to promote this coin while it is nothing more then a copy paste coin without any innovation, this is a big scam
I am not using any miner, neither Gaw and neither paycoin BUT, scam is something else then a " copy paste coin". that means all the Altcoin is scam because it is copy paste from BTC... Not really. Litecoin first coin to use a different algorithm, Peercoin was the first one to implement an entirely different proof, proof of stake. Burst for example uses POC, or proof of capacity. Darkcoin uses masternodes and mixing implementations, not ALL altcoins are copy paste. copy+paste can be "same" idea. you don't have to copy everything to be a "clone". What I want to say is that even you copy a business(any business), it doesn't mean you are a scam. The word "scam" has other meaning. |
|
|
|
Value is not a good measurement of how BTC is doing. Right now it's value is simply the playground of a bunch of speculators.
If you look for alternatives you should look at the technical differences. Where BTC has been quite stagnant on that front, some altcoins have faired way better. Take a look at NXT for example, tons of projects are being build on that. There are plenty of others too. SYS is building a decentralised exchange. Vericoin has a very cool wallet. HYPER is aimed at gamers and pays 5%/month interest for PoS. And some countrycoins are doing well, most notably NLG and Sterlingcoin.
People here say that BTC is the one and only. Very understandable. But does anyone stop to remember MSN? Or MySpace? BTC needs to keep reïnventing itself or it will be replaced by something better. It's the blockchain technology that really is the breakthrough, not BTC itself.
you are rare piece here. you think by using your brain ! If I would be miner, I would start looking to ALTcoins. BTC is useless now for any miner. They cannot make any profit |
|
|
|
the way is like that: approval, license and the business. you cannot make the business and then license It is also a felony to engage in money transmission without a license in any state that requires a license to operate. Coinbase did business without ANY license since 2 years ago. Why are you on this forum anyway? You seem to be spending a significant part of your (free?) time to attack anything bitcoin related. If you have a genuine concern about Coinbase or any other, the solution is simple and it has been suggested to you:
As a law abiding citizen you ought to report them. Do it and move on.
If you know someone is committing a felony, it is your responsibility to report that to authorities. So do it already and move on. Never. I like it when I know what I am doing wont be reported. Thats pretty much the idea behind Bitcoin if you read the whitepaper. If you want a currency that is fully regulated, make an altcoin and let the rest of us live free this is my point too. Is it not BTC about anonymity and freedom? Why do the people want regulated exchanges who will report them to their gov? it's a non-sense. It's seems that the BTC community is not quite a community... First, "we don't want regulations" and then "wow, Coinbase will be regulated, so cool. I want to be reported ! " If you want regulation, chose some other form of so called investment. Bitcoin is/was all about free unregulated markets. right? |
|
|
|
That would not help with this attack, as the keys are compromised during the signing whether it happens online or offline. If you have a system running a compromised version of ECDSA, there's nothing you can really do to protect the private key of an address that's been used to sign a transaction. That being said, the attacker first has to get you to use a compromised version.
Which definitely can't be defined as 'easily'. The hack would be rather hard to deploy, especially on a larger base. large scale = any online wallet can be compromised in this way. When it's about computer, you can not be ever sure. Anyway, why would someone keep a large amount of funds in BTC by having the fear that he can wake up in a morning and see : balance ZERO. Stop trying to spread FUD dude. It's already been established, it's near impossible to hack cold storage, unless that attacker somehow installed the compromised version of ECDSA on the cold offline wallet. Can't be done, only in theory. who established ? Carlos Rienzi, head of Security at Xapo: https://blog.xapo.com/xapo-responds-to-coindesk-article-on-susceptibility-to-backdoor-attack/Your myth has been debunked. BUSTED!  final words : "we believe that our deep cold storage architecture offers the highest levels of bitcoin storage security available by any bitcoin company."why do you show me ADVERTING? |
|
|
|
I know Bitcoin is not a scam and will not disappear. Having said that the large price fluctuations are clearly manipulated by cyber attacks and negative media attention.
and by black markets or exchanges who are falling from time to time. |
|
|
|
That would not help with this attack, as the keys are compromised during the signing whether it happens online or offline. If you have a system running a compromised version of ECDSA, there's nothing you can really do to protect the private key of an address that's been used to sign a transaction. That being said, the attacker first has to get you to use a compromised version.
Which definitely can't be defined as 'easily'. The hack would be rather hard to deploy, especially on a larger base. large scale = any online wallet can be compromised in this way. When it's about computer, you can not be ever sure. Anyway, why would someone keep a large amount of funds in BTC by having the fear that he can wake up in a morning and see : balance ZERO. Stop trying to spread FUD dude. It's already been established, it's near impossible to hack cold storage, unless that attacker somehow installed the compromised version of ECDSA on the cold offline wallet. Can't be done, only in theory. who established ? |
|
|
|
|
what payment processor are they using?
|
|
|
|
see if hustlertube.com was updated as well and maybe Spankwire too... thanks |
|
|
|
it's normal to receive it back. Bitcoin has many, many place who can launder it... and you agreed with them. So, let's not complain about any hack |
|
|
|
there were business where billions were invested and they collapse. yes, bitcoin may fail. remember that the whole BTC is based on few fishy exchangers and black market you should go tell microsoft and dell and newegg and overstock and richard brandson this amazing discovery you have made Indeed. Perhaps tell Paypal and Expedia and Mozilla and Wikimedia and NYSE and BBVA and DoCoMo that their acceptance and investments were all for not. Bitcoin's dead fellas, and it's not coming back.  I like this interview. See from 1:35. it is for you hehe http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2015-01-16/bitcoin-battered-fortune-reversed-in-74-decline |
|
|
|
paycoin is a scam, gaw miners used their market reputation to promote this coin while it is nothing more then a copy paste coin without any innovation, this is a big scam
I am not using any miner, neither Gaw and neither paycoin BUT, scam is something else then a " copy paste coin". that means all the Altcoin is scam because it is copy paste from BTC... |
|
|
|
there were business where billions were invested and they collapse. yes, bitcoin may fail. remember that the whole BTC is based on few fishy exchangers and black market |
|
|
|
They would just make average Joe more difficult to access outside world, the experts will always find a way as long as encrypted package can be sent
Actually the higher level officers need access to outside internet to get some insider government info which they seldom can acquire domestically
good remark. average "Joe" won't bother to find ways to access XxX.com. he will see that it doesn't work and he will find other "games" to play in... also, it will be very hard for the BTC traders (this is a BTC forum so it's about bitcoin) to access the exchange websites which are outside from China. What will be the result ? |
|
|
|
Coinbase isn't licensed, correct, because they're still awaiting regulators to iron out the wrinkles of the Bit-License. They launched ahead of regulators, because that's what most tech startups do. It's nothing new. Run the business, add license and approvals later. That said, they are fully licensed as a money tranmitter in the following states: https://www.coinbase.com/legal/licensesIt's just a matter of time before New York and California pass their licensing requirements. the way is like that: approval, license and the business. you cannot make the business and then license It is also a felony to engage in money transmission without a license in any state that requires a license to operate. Coinbase did business without ANY license since 2 years ago. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
