MP is a sensationalist and he likes drama and attention. In my view in business and in ecosystems there are no people, there are only ideas. Starting his article mentioning the person behind the idea is simply bad intended from the start. Right after that he starts praising MPEx which again has absolutely nothing related to the main idea and to the main subject of a bigger block size.

After filling half of the article with useless nonsense about MPEx he reverts to a journalistic move in order to divert the attention from the subject which is to reveal something sensational and he chose to reveal that regular users will need 914TB of storage in order to pay for their coffee. I have already answered to this stupid and non-existing issue. We will develop a way of not needing that amount of storage for regular coffee buyers.

Afterwards he starts pushing his view of the blockchain. For a decentralized thing people trying to limit things their way isn't so good. Gavin is only trying to not limit things and to have large open doors for everyone. Keeping a 1MB block limit is a bad intended and limiting move.

In the end of the shit article MP closes with:

Bitcoin security will be insured by the services running on top of it and allowing services to run on top of Bitcoin by increasing the block size limit will definitely insure security no matter what.

lmao

lay off teh pipe dude.

welcome in the real world.

If the minority end up using the 1MB chain, it will become just another altcoin. To my knowledge Gavin doesn't actively engage in destroying altcoins that I'm aware of, unless others know different.
Of course if the minority choose the 20MB, that will become the altcoin.

The answer will be probably like this:

No, I didn't use his service. Ask also the other users , thanks for your post.

says the guy wth -8 trust

hi guys, i just want to know if mtgox is the one responsible about the high price of BTC before
then why couldn't other BTC exchang do the same?

Bizarre that people use these exchanges as a bank account and then bitch when the funds are taken.

Would you trust a currency exchanger at the airport with your life savings? Of course not. You only use them to convert small amounts of fiat.

Same applies to exchanges. Only a fool would put keep large sums on deposit at those places.

Payment history is the worst kind of evidence. Every ponzi in history has paid out without problems.
Until the day they stop paying.

Check my signature for some more rational criteria to judge a cloud mining service.

The notice clearly states that creditors with a foreign address should consult a lawyer familiar with US bankruptcy law. It also says that court staff cannot provide any legal advice.

i checked my balance
and yes, they didnt make payment mee too
i hope they will return..

Lol why am I not surprised. Have none of these companies heard of hedging?

I use it because it is better than other dedicated exchanges sometimes. I rather wonder why people used it to buy mining share, whose value is declining theoretically.