I'm simply trolling you, Guy (Does secret Ashkenazi handshake). If you honestly believe I'm a racist, then you suck at this game.

Now, as to your latent sociopathy and penchant for self-destruction, well, that's another story...

RoadStress raised an interesting point.
Adam Allcock (a.k.a. dogie) posted an invoice + receipt from his lawyer and claimed that it "Receipt for filing court fees and security of funds [like a deposit in the case of loss to help pay the defendant's fees]"

Dogie removed the original image of the invoice + receipt and changed his previous post to remove this description. Now it's only "Receipt for filing court fees..."

disclaimer:
Adam is suing Spondoolies-Tech, so I can't engage him. I am posting the evidence of Adam's edit and wonder what Adam is trying to hide.

One possible explanation:
The invoice + receipt Dogie posted did indeed include his lawyer fees.
The problem here is that the entire payment to the lawyer was titled 'expenses' and therefore he did not pay VAT (as he should have).
Dogie can easily prove that this explanation is wrong by posting another invoice + receipt to his lawyer which is properly titled 'lawyer fees' and include VAT payment as required by the law.
Instead of doing that, he chose to attack Roadstress and me (I removed the 2nd post in which he attacks me). 

Edit:
Adam continue with the smoke screen tactics in the following post:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1471914.msg14843373#msg14843373

Other possible explanation is that Adam's lawyer is working on success fee (percentage of the funds he will be able to win in this lawsuit). It is common practice in many such lawsuits.
In that case, the $8,600 invoice + receipt was indeed for "Receipt for filing court fees and security of funds [like a deposit in the case of loss to help pay the defendant's fees]" as Adam originally claimed.
If this is indeed the case, it explains why Dogie refuse to produce another receipt + invoice, simply because there isn't such an invoice + receipt, just a success fee agreement between Adam and his lawyer.
However, this explanation clearly contradict Adam claim about paying his lawyer's fee in advance.

So, there are three possible scenarios:

(1) Adam's posted invoice + receipt includes his lawyer's fees. If this is true, VAT wasn't paid as it should have been.
(2) There is an agreement between Adam and his lawyer and the lawyer is working on success fee. In this case, Adam lied when he claimed that his lawyer was paid in advance.
(3) Adam is right and there is another receipt + invoice and payment from Adam to his lawyer covering his lawyer fees in advance.

In order to prove that (3) is the right scenario as he claims, Adam needs to post such receipt + invoice. So far Adam refused to post such a receipt + invoice.

Note:
It's highly irregular (read: never heard of) to post security of funds deposit to one's lawyer as Adam claimed.
This is why we asked the court to force Adam to deposit the security of funds directly to the court. The funds were indeed deposited before a liquidator was appointed and now the case is frozen.
Adam's lawyer tried to prevent the security of funds deposit with all sort of arguments initially, but eventually agreed to make the deposit (30,000 ILS which is about $7,925).
In any case Dogie's reply to Tupsu question "How much do you already have paid your lawyer ?" which was "Not yet, no. Lawyer is paid for up front so no changes." isn't true. He or his lawyer had to deposit $7,925 to the court.

Guy

....
@Tupsu: Why do you think this tells us anything about the S9?

BITMAIN will hit the market with S9 eventually but also with S10 and S11 etc. Should i start to collect money as a "preorder" for S10? (sarcasm)

Anybody willing to sell some Sfards SF-100 miners?
I like the combo option mining SHA and Scrypt together, I still see potential.
Would like to run 3, but every offer is welcome...

What batch is it? Batch one was 300+ Mh/s and 1100 Watts while batch 2 was 400+Mh/s and 1400 Watts... Here's a profitability calculation for batch 2.

How much does this worth nowadays?

Hmm. I'm hoping this is just trolling.  Perhaps I contributed with terrible phrasing, let me clarify.

I just picked up 162 chip S7s (mix of batch 2 and 3) with PSUs from a private sale for .85 BTC per unit. You can order 135 chip S7s from Bitmain's website for 1.1 BTC including shipping and fees.

I honestly didn't think anyone on this forum would be so out of touch with these miners that they wouldn't understand what I was communicating without me spelling out every detail.

In the event that it wasn't my phrasing you were challenging, but that 162 chip S7s exist...

Batch 1 - 162 BM1385 (600M) - 4.86 TH/s
Batch 2 - 162 BM1385 (575M) - 4.66 TH/s
Batch 3 - 162 BM1385 (600M) - 4.86 TH/s
Batch 4 - 162 BM1385 (575M) - 4.66 TH/s
Batch 5 - 162 BM1385 (600M) - 4.86 TH/s
Batch 6 - 162 BM1385 (600M) - 4.05 TH/s
Batch 7 - 162 BM1385 (626M) - 5.06 TH/s

Batch 8 through Current - 135 BM1385 (700M) - 4.73 TH/s

....  You can get them new with warranty in 5 days for ~1.1 BTC shipped off bitmain's website.

I'm not here to trash you're post, I'm actually interested in filling in a few gaps with another S7 or 2. That said, I just grabbed 5 162 chip S7s with PSU for 0.85 BTC a pop.  You can get them new with warranty in 5 days for ~1.1 BTC shipped off bitmain's website.

They received $2.25M from BTCS, that's a significant amount.

To our valued customers ,

As of May 4, 2016 Spondoolies-tech has ceased operations.

It has been a great privilege to serve the Bitcoin mining community and especially our customers. We deeply appreciate the support and faith that you have placed in us and wish you success in your future endeavors.

Sincerely,

Guy Corem CEO
Spondoolies-tech

To expensive. Ms

1BTC

Thank you Tupsu.
Tupsu I know you did a lot with running multiple blades with one controller and if I remember correctly you mentioned the October firmware is the most recent you can run more than three with. Is that correct?