That is why many members are skeptical to believe any kinds of accusation to any establishment unless they had shown a solid evidence but at the same time never look down on new accounts because some newly created account have a legit case where they are really got scam by a casino since they have a solid evidence in hand. Aside from online casino players are all around the world and many of them are not a member of this forum.
True, he can just whine or share his disappointment but he should not bad mouth or accused a a platform of being a scam when the platform only did what they believe is the right thing according to the TOS.
Absolutely, I agree with you. I don't want to blame OP in any way, but he expects the casino to respect the contract they made when he placed his bet. So it's also up to him to read the contract in question, which in this case is the terms and conditions of the platform. If you don't want any unpleasant surprises, you should read the conditions before accepting them. In the worst case scenario, if a problem arises during a slot game or bet that is not covered by the terms and conditions, you are within your rights to make a claim and may be entitled to a refund or free bets as compensation. Crying scam when a reputable online betting and casino operator complies with the terms and conditions to the letter, seems pointless to me, as no one is forcing anyone to place bets. Furthermore, the problem described by OP is common to many different platforms. |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2 and we are the 7th of March.
I already verified 1Burek87Lx48SR97fN8HJvGwTEBQMxjWpH as my first address.
1C9RAQeix6RDfnSKWQeSvJecCWgSTnpGma is my second address and I want to stake this address as a backup.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Burek87Lx48SR97fN8HJvGwTEBQMxjWpH
IDW80iA9DrDLz+2vHOz4d/oPuygdHo+dQhLULzq+PtDlJ/ZbJyQC6nq+2WseHAMKelRngtpBi9FbK6CP8B4BA/8=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2 and we are the 7th of March.
1C9RAQeix6RDfnSKWQeSvJecCWgSTnpGma is my second address.
I already verified 1Burek87Lx48SR97fN8HJvGwTEBQMxjWpH as my first address.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1C9RAQeix6RDfnSKWQeSvJecCWgSTnpGma
IEwBGuVdHxosEfyNVJM4vUygjvq67VTev26oecXUqyNlH9lbVqUNIiat0BoNbNIFSpCA4GeRBrLcUj/43HzuDgc=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Thank you  |
|
|
|
Congrats to the lucky winners ! Thank you OP for the giveaway. Haha Real-Duke, two giveaways in 3 days, you should maybe try your luck at the national lottery  |
|
|
|
As per the this article from Bitcoin Magazine, I've learned that Terawulf launched a nuclear powered mining operation. 0.02 usd per kw/h with a 5 years stability (regarding the price) “The Nautilus nuclear-powered mining facility benefits from what is arguably the lowest cost power in the sector, just $0.02/kWh for a term of five years,” Prager commented. Only 1.9 Eh/s for now, but I think that we will see more and more nuclear powered mining farms in the near future. What could be the disadvantages ? Ecological, cheap and stable power is litteraly the ultimate dream for mining farm's owners. |
|
|
|
Voici une traduction de cet article de Bitcoin Magazine : Terawulf a annoncé qu'environ la moitié de sa mine Nautilus, alimentée par l'énergie nucléaire, est entrée en service. L'installation minière, une coentreprise avec Cumulus Coin, LLC, tire son énergie entièrement de la centrale nucléaire Susquehanna de 2,5 GW en Pennsylvanie.
L'exploitation complète s'élèvera à 50 MW et 1,9 EH/s, avec une option pour Terawulf d'ajouter 50 MW supplémentaires de capacité de minage de bitcoins, "que la société prévoit de déployer dans des phases futures", selon un communiqué de presse.
Paul Prager, président-directeur général de TeraWulf, a déclaré que "depuis la récente mise sous tension de l'installation Nautilus au début du mois, environ 16 000 mineurs appartenant à TeraWulf, représentant 1,9 EH/s de capacité d'auto-minage, sont sur place et sont mis en ligne quotidiennement".
"L'installation minière à propulsion nucléaire Nautilus bénéficie de ce qui est sans doute le coût de l'énergie le plus bas du secteur, à savoir seulement 0,02 $/kWh pour une durée de cinq ans", a ajouté M. Prager.
Magdalena Gronowska, consultante en exploitation minière et cofondatrice de Citadel 256, a précédemment décrit dans un article pour Bitcoin Magazine comment l'énergie nucléaire peut révolutionner l'exploitation minière de Bitcoin.
"Le nucléaire est une source d'énergie sans carbone, fiable et bon marché", a-t-elle déclaré au magazine. "Il n'est pas parfait dans la mesure où il émet des déchets nucléaires, mais chaque source d'énergie a des compromis entre l'empreinte environnementale, la fiabilité et les coûts d'investissement et d'exploitation... Nous avons besoin d'un mélange diversifié de production d'énergie, pour répondre à la fois à la charge de base et à la charge de pointe, alors que nous passons à une économie à faible émission de carbone."
Bon, 1.9 Eh/s c'est pas énorme objectivement, mais c'est un pas de plus vers du mining à très faible émission de CO2, et la stabilité du prix par kw/h à moyen terme me fait rêver ! |
|
|
|
Si on se focalise sur BTC, je reste convaincu que le marché de la fausse vente d'armes représente plus de volume BTC que les ventes d'armes réelles. Il suffit d'aller sur le darknet, et vous trouverez en moins de 20 minutes des sites d'arnaqueurs qui te proposent des 9mm, .45, ak47 etc.. payables uniquement en BTC (même pas en Monero... Ils font même pas semblant ) En regardant leurs adresses BTC sur un explorer, je suis toujours halluciné du nombre d'idiots qui posent des 2000-3000 USD en BTC après avoir cliqué sur une miniature d'AK47, rentré une adresse de livraison + email et strictement rien d'autre. Le plus drôle c'est que 8 transactions sur 10 proviennent directement d'un hot wallet de CEX, ils sont complètement cons. C'est assez désespérant, certains autobuys sont là depuis 2017-2018 et continuent d'attirer du pigeon. Heureusement, le passage aux adresses en onion v3 a tué pas mal de sites minables, beaucoup sont toujours référencés en adresses v2 et donc inaccessibles, mais c'est une question de temps avant qu'ils s'actualisent tous. C'est tellement gros, que je suspecte même pas ces sites d'être des honeypots, des clients de ce genre ne peuvent qu'être que des demeurés sous-organisés, et ne doivent intéresser personne. |
|
|
|
Here is my Submission.
Recipe:
Flour ,Baking, Water
Soabean oil
Sugar/Molasses
Egg
Here are the photos The links were not working   |
|
|
|
A short time ago I had an experience that I did not like with a casino that I will not name for very obvious reasons, but when I asked for help with a problem that I had, they did not give it to me, they told me that I had to comply with the KYC so that the problem could be solved, the truth seemed to me an abuse, but each casino has its way of doing things and that is something that is respected, but it is not fair, it is a lot like exchanges, they force you to have the kyc and forced stuff is not very good.
I understand what you're saying but at the same time, it's up to the user to read the terms and conditions before signing up, or at least before making any deposits. If the terms of use do not specify anything, you are in theory within your good rights to refuse any Compliance or KYC measures, but there are only few websites that do not cover themselves with this. Personally, when it comes to casino and betting, being KYC reassures me. If a casino doesn't ask me for any KYC, any verification or any justification, I will always have doubts about the real seriousness of the casino in question, always a fear that it will make an exit scam. It is like a big red flag for me. Afterwards, in general, most regulators let you withdraw cryptos without KYC to get your funds back, isn't that the case for you? The rare cases where they impose it (in most markets/regulations) to withdraw only cryptos, is when there is a suspicion of money laundering, terrorist financing, money dumping etc.. But overall, in most regulated markets, KYC is as much a security as a constraint for the end user, at least from my point of view. |
|
|
|
There is tons of good stuff out there on youtube. I realize it can be tough in the beginning when you don't even know what words to google. Here is a good video on SMD PCB soldering to get you started; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyDRHI4YeMIMaybe make a new thread about your learning project, and hit me up if you have any questions. Tips, tricks, tools, supplies, whatever questions you have. Then maybe you can make that how-to video! also: the fastest way to learn is to just get started. goof it up a couple times. overcome analysis paralysis. Thank you for your answer, and for the link you shared. You're absolutely right, once I get started I'm sure I'll progress little by little, but as you say, I'm currently at the stage where I need to demystify the basics so I can start getting into the nitty gritty things. I won't hesitate to post my questions in a new thread if I get stuck somewhere. I'll stop polluting your topic here and will continue to follow it, good luck and keep up the good work |
|
|
|
If you are worried about Bitcoin, you should say something about the spam that started polluting the mempool since Feb 6, AND those behind it...
Excuse me for being off topic, but I wonder: I think we all agree here that Ordinals is an abomination for Bitcoin. But am I the only one who thinks that there is a possibility that this is orchestrated by owners of big mining pools? Who are the winners besides these people? Look at the fees on recent blocks: 0.25 BTC, 0.21 BTC, 0.28 BTC...  I know in the past there were bigger fees, like block 500500 with 9.993 BTC of fees 5 years ago. But now I don't see how they can go down until this NFT delirium stops. I feel like we are entering a mempool bottleneck, and I have a feeling that the only winners are those who mine multiple blocks a day. I'd love to hear the point of view from people involved in pools, I imagine your perspective must be more fair and more realistic than mine. |
|
|
|
Ah ben on est pareils ! Bon après, vu que le trading ne m'intéresse pas, je n'ai jamais pris le temps de me former, donc forcément...
Le minage ça m'attire depuis pas mal de temps, faut que je trouve un moyen de m'y mettre, juste par curiosité... mais quna d on voit le prix de l'élec (en France/Europe) déjà ça refroidit un peu.
Tout pareil. Après ça m'arrive quand même d'avoir de gros moments de doute, mais en réalité je pense que je doute moins de Bitcoin que de moi-même.  Je me sens moins seul Je partage tout à fait ton ressenti, je suis aussi plus dans le doute quant à moi-même que par rapport à BTC, c'est d'ailleurs ce qui est frustrant dans cette affaire. C'est surement le seul domaine dans lequel je refuse de suivre mon instinct et où je m'oblige à garder des délais de réflexion longs. Pour le mining, autant en Europe de l'Est c'est encore lucratif (et encore ça varie fortement d'un pays à l'autre) mais en France c'est clair l'électricité est une punition tarifaire.. En France il n'y aura que du mining de "hobby" à faire je pense, si tu t'intéresses à SHA256 en tout cas, avec genre des Gekko, des Terminus, ou alors des demis ASICs. Genre se limiter à une hashboard par ASIC pour pas être à 1,5 ou 3 kw/h par ASIC. Sinon faut se chauffer ou chauffer son chauffe-eau avec, pour rentabiliser le truc. Dans tous les cas c'est à pertes si tu n'as pas à de l'électricité peu chère : tu as pas un proche qui bosse chez EDF ? Si tu es pas du genre BTC maxi, tu pourrais peut être envisager XMR avec l'algo RandomX, en achetant des CPU d'échantillon pour ingénieur (je sais pas trop comment appeler ça en français..), tu peux avoir de gros hashrates et solve quelques blocks avec un peu de chance, et ça reste du mining bricolable, assez intéressant techniquement parlant. Ces CPUs sont vraiment pas chers quand tu arrives à en trouver, une ou deux fois par an j'en achète à Shenzhen, et c'est encore rentable pour le moment. |
|
|
|
Finding best casino is very hard for me
I want to play with small amount but i am not getting a best casino
requirements:
1. minimum withdraw amount should be less than 10$ or 10$
2. no wager requirement before withdrawing
2. no min deposit amount
4. provably fair or live casino
As others have already told you, I also confirm that from my point of view, a casino offering : -no wager requirement before withdrawing -no min deposit amount would probably be a casino that would have a very high risk of exit scam, and would be out of any protection for the customer/end user. This would therefore involve a very risky business for both parties and I can't see a configuration where it would be beneficial overall. Better to find the casino that most closely matches what you are looking for, and then adapt a bit to their rules and options. Too much risk on top of the fact that gambling is already risky, it seems excessively unwise to me. |
|
|
|
|
I think that privacy coins will have a better chance of having their moment of glory in the next bullrun than AIs. I agree with you, although I don't rule out that I'm wrong, AI related coins seem to be in a current hype that may fade away even before 2025 or 2024 Q4. Who knows ?
After that it's always hard to guess and predict what the prices will be. Who could have predicted what Dogecoin would do what he did if we went back to 2018 for example?
Personally, I don't put anything related to AI in my portfolio, I have a feeling people won't be focused on it for a long time yet, but I will continue to watch the market more or less closely.
|
|
|
|
|
I insist once again, but I am convinced that your Easy Mining service is going to be the thing which will kill you in the hashrate rental business in the long term.
It is becoming more and more complicated to have a stable and continuous rental, the auction price is always pulled extremely high by these Easy Mining rentals, and I won't be surprised when someone opens a platform with a more fluid service.
1. Your customers who pay for Easy Mining packages pay an exorbitant price per Eh/s, it's borderline dishonest but let's move on.
2. The customers who rent hashrate take a back seat. You get paid a pretty high fee for the service, and it's very difficult not to be able to have a profitable PPS if you want a pretty continuous hashrate
Your only chance at the moment, is that MRR is even more overpriced than you are. But we all know that abusing your monopoly can lead to disaster.
|
|
|
|
Bon en ce qui me concerne, j'ai jamais été fort pour trouver des pseudos. Donc là en fait c'est la version contractée (que j'utilise le plus couramment) d'un ancien pseudo (mon premier, en fait) qui faisait 3 lettres + "2" + 3 lettres. Ça ne veut rien dire ? Bon ok, deux indices supplémentaires. 1. L'explication traîne quelque part sur Internet (ça fait quelques années que j'ai pas vérifié). 2. J'ai +/- deux passions dans la vie. L'informatique c'est la 2ème (dont Bitcoin est un gros sous-ensemble), et le pseudo a plutôt à voir avec la première (parce qu'à l'époque, je passais pas autant ma vie la tête dans mes écrans  ). Punaise j'ai toujours pensé que tu étais un passionné d'aviation et que c'était en hommage au Boeing F2B... Moi qui te pensais fanatique de biplans |
|
|
|
Great DIY project. I'm totally new to fabricating my own boards, but I fix asic miners and have a bunch of spare BM1397 chips I've extracted.
Is there a tutorial of how to make these boards?
Anyone interested in starting a telegram channel for this?
thx
Check out the “Building” section down at the bottom of the readme; https://github.com/skot/bitaxe#buildingIf you have any other questions, you can ask for help in the “discussion” section on GitHub. Would you accept to film the whole process if you have some time to spend on it ? I would send you some funds with pleasure to cover the time spent doing it. if not, any good youtube recommandation to start from 0 ? I never did anything related to soldering and to PCBs until now. The only experience I have with soldering is replacing the burnt 6 pins of my hashboards, I am a little bit lost to be honest.. I am thinking for a while to start with the project of building a bitaxe and would like to be prepared as much as possible. Anyway, thank you this project! |
|
|
|
Congratulations to Real-Duke !!!  OMG! I just found the Tx in my wallet and didn't have a clue why somebody sent it to me Many thanks @iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2 you made my day! Sorry but I'm all out of Merit in the moment but will follow as soon as I have some. I'm sincerely glad that you enjoyed the giveaway and thank you for participating! |
|
|
|
Username : iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2 BTC ady : bc1qhp4x3mnw0yvxsmwtfyxnj903y57mh8sfjcepce Thank you OP and good luck to everyone  |
|
|
|
"... they don't mention about KYC ..." - I do not understand - we talk about having no KYC everywhere, here in posts, all over the site - literally everywhere - did I misunderstand what you are asking for ? I am very much on the operator and developer team of the site - the only reason I used an AFF link in the signature was so i could track which clicks came from here. I have now removed it making it a naked link (honestly i did not even consider it would make me look less genuine), it makes no difference to me so it is gone - I am not a 3rd party to this. To be clear, we do NOT require KYC - we will NEVER require KYC - this is the ethos we have decided, and this is what we will stick to I'm just answering a question from a friend in the forum actually I don't mind your referral link, if it's to track traffic from this forum, I think we have the answer now, your quick response is worth appreciating, it's enough for me to see the quality of your site from the response you quickly answer the questions and doubts of people in this forum.  Actually having an affiliate link on signature space is allowed and pretty normal that other casino is doing to track the number of clicks from the forum. Questioning it is a bit absurd since he is not spamming the link on his post. I’m more concerned on how we can verify how genuine this casino to be affiliated to the physical casino since they don’t have license or any legal proof that will make them an official partner. I ask myself exactly the same question. This is always the problem when there is neither license nor regulation, I have a lot of trouble to take the first step to deposit on a site without license. No licence = a lot of question raised from my side. Anyway the design of the site is not bad, I'm always admiring to see visually clean KYC free sites, I was used to see so little credible things when I was looking for gambling games / bets without KYC that yours seems indeed more professional than many others. Will followup your work OP |
|
|
|
Cool contest!
I'll take part too. Meet my pie with chicken and mushrooms, green onions and potatoes.
Well done ! Bitcoin goes always very well with onions Good luck to all participants! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
