Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 10:01:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ... 192 »
1701  Local / Hardware/Mining (Italiano) / Re: [HOT ITALIAN BASED MINING FARM] 3X Neptune >= ++9TH/s Perchè no?? SebJu escrow! on: December 10, 2013, 04:32:14 PM
Con questa direi che abbiamo capito il livello.

Buona fortuna ragazzi, secondo me ci scappa anche un set di pentole in acciaio 18/10 ai primi che telefonano!
Win.
EOT;

(End of Thread).
1702  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 10, 2013, 04:29:13 PM
https://twitter.com/alanmeckler/status/394828862133006338
#HashFAST Technologies is exhibiting at http://www.insidebitcoins.com  in LasVegas in December.  #bitcoin #virtualcurrencies $MBIS
(22 of October)

If they are "exhibiting" (sorry, i lack a better term), when is that since that they are not on the list? With BFL at 1pm? This is starting to be stressful...
1703  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 10, 2013, 03:45:32 PM
Regardless, if that is not the case, then I imagine there will be a mob of people waiting to pummel them with questions.  So I think either way today we will get some updates.
Nice tough, thanks for sharing.

BFL's Josh talk is at 1:30PM and there doesn't appear to be anyone from HF on that list, tough:
http://www.mediabistro.com/insidebitcoins/agenda.asp

However, they are a sponsor: http://www.mediabistro.com/insidebitcoins/sponsors.asp (along with BFL and Cloud Hashing)
1704  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 10, 2013, 03:16:59 PM
So far radio silence kind of feels like the capsule actually blew up rather than leaking oxygen.
Apollo 1. This is us before burning alive in that capsule: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/Apollo_1_crew_during_water_egress_training%2C_June_1966.jpg

Don't worry guys, they are just shipping everything to Canada where on the 13th they will start shipping, as promised.

USD refunds for everyone! Enjoy!
1705  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: CoinTerra announces its first ASIC - Hash-Rate greater than 500 GH/s on: December 10, 2013, 02:34:47 PM
This guy says terraminer IV is already out in the wild?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=365416.0
BS, don't even lose time reading that link.
1706  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 10, 2013, 12:08:22 PM
There are some reports of denied refunds after weeks of waiting for answers.
1707  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 11:03:15 PM
http://bitcoin.sipa.be/speed-lin.png
The tree days estimate has something to say.
1708  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 09:50:48 PM
yeah, but they assemble a board and then silence?
Still trying to get those damn capacitors in place, i guess.
1709  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 09:27:16 PM
They have no reasons not to scream to the world the hashrate once that they have that number, unless that number is too bad or they don't have that number yet.
1710  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 08:32:50 PM
There were no Sierras in batch 1.
https://hashfast.com/order-chain/
Just ask josh to change the case of your batch 1 BJ to sierra and he will do so... As long as you have more than 3, i guess.

Twitt something hf... this waiting is worse than the last 2 weeks. Have you burned everything?
1711  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 08:18:24 PM
First batch Sierra are exactly the same of BJ, it only changes the case. My sierra where supposed to ship 20 of October, 2013.

(twitter HF... write something... anything...)

So the first batch Sierras were 400GH not 1.2TH?
No, since that i had more than one BJ i converted them to sierras.
It's just another case...
1712  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 08:04:35 PM
First batch Sierra are exactly the same of BJ, it only changes the case. My sierra where supposed to ship 20 of October, 2013.

(twitter HF... write something... anything...)
1713  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 07:53:32 PM
How exactly lying to a customer is not a crime?

Anyway, 2 days without updates.
1714  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 05:08:41 PM
I guess you didnt see that post from hashfast_cl. Can't dig it up at the moment.
Np, i have time to lose atm, i will be happy to search for it...

Ok, can't find anything but this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=262052.msg3316933#msg3316933
1715  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 05:02:40 PM
Anyway, hashfast still no word on what mining controller is coming with the Baby Jet? Or is this another woopsie item?
I told you already, back in the early days they said that the controller of the BJ would be a RPi (raspberry pi).
1716  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 04:56:21 PM
Anyway the real problem with BTC refunds is that even if they where to happen, HF would buy KNC miners on the market, rebrand them and ship them by the end of the year instead of admitting to be over their deadline and issue BTC refunds.

So even if HF was legit, they are not gonna happen.

(and at that point you would be screwed because your MPP would be delivered in 2015, but that's another story).
1717  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 04:43:32 PM
The only problem with your saying is that..... you trust their words.
I haven't trusted a single word of them since when they delayed the october delivery with no proof of anything. No, i don't trust them. I'm just trying to point out the reasons people expects BTC refunds. You can't call them stupid for that. You can bet that it's gonna be really funny if they delay and forget to refund the BTC equivalent.
1718  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 04:35:43 PM
No they cant refund everyone with the same amount of btc..... its not feasible. Gee.... stupid as stupid does.
The only problem in your thinking is that they repeated several times that they would refund the same amount of BTC if they failed to ship (remember when that user went to visit them and he repeated that john said so, repeatedly?)
1719  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 09, 2013, 03:59:34 PM
They had one whole day to test it, and i expected some screaming results from their twitter account by now... Makes me wonder... USD refunds for everyone!
1720  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 08, 2013, 09:33:42 PM
"Direct BTC Transfers utilize the exchange rate posted on bitstamp.net."
They where using MtGox rate when i ordered. On a completely unrelated note, how do you know that the address belongs to Bitstamp?
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ... 192 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!