1401
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: November 17, 2013, 08:21:22 PM
|
This is just fucking mental...
I have only 2 explanations:
1. Someone knows Senate will be gentle
2: Someone want the price as higher as possible for dumping on it if Senate would not be gentle.
I don't think the Chinese (or the Europeans or anyone else for that matter) really care much about what the Senate does Everybody cares about it as the outcome of it will have an impact on the price. Good or bad. There will be no outcome, it's simply a hearing to shape future lawmaking. Maybe. They are going to want to regulate it, of course. Everyone knows this, it's what these government agencies do. For the children. The debate will be if they can, or should, regulate. My take is that these guys know the US is in dire straits as far as overspending and debt, and regulating the hell out of Bitcoin business will be simply shooting themselves in the foot.
|
|
|
1404
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: What effect will Monday's US Congressional hearing have on price?
|
on: November 16, 2013, 07:54:38 PM
|
It looks like it may coincide with a temporary top and subsequent trading range for a while. I dont think the hearing will have much effect on price unless there is an all out assault on digital currencies.
Agreed Congressional hearings are always meh anyway. Political theater. Ever see one with Bernanke? Senator XYZ: Mr. Bernanke, [5 minute grandstanding on related political issue] blah blah blah, what do you think? Bernanke: Yes, [5 minute speech on economics using academic terminology that neither makes any sense nor answers the question] blah blah, thank you. Rinse and repeat for a few hours. It will be a chance for the public to hear more about Bitcoin, which is a good thing.
|
|
|
1407
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: We're WAY too CONFIDENT about the current BTC Price. See picture in topic.
|
on: November 16, 2013, 07:30:47 PM
|
The volume is pathetic compared to April. I don't like it. When the volume goes nuts, the whales will sell into it. Until people take the bait, the price will probably continue to rise.
I don't trust BTC China. Big players within the Government over there are doing a power-grab IMO. Why else would their central banks not say a peep yet? Once it sells off and the elite over there get theirs, the horror stories for the average person will justify the need to step in and regulate the exchanges.
A bit conspiratorial IMO. Possible of course, but probably not. Chinese like bitcoin for likely the same reason everyone else does. Ron Paul once said that freedom is popular. He is right. The community was many times younger before the April crash. We had one exchange that constantly lagged out and got DDOSed, and the price was constantly at their whim. The market was very wary that a poorly coded TRADING CARD engine was Bitcoin's Achilles heel. Not any more. The free market is quick at correcting these problems.
|
|
|
1408
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: November 16, 2013, 06:33:24 AM
|
Just watch, there will be a ton of holders and early-early adopters waiting for 500. It could take us weeks, maybe months to get past that point. There will be enough coins for all who want to get in around that price.
Early adopters, each and every of them, have sold loads already, their "buy and hold" advice policy is for those poor noobs so they don't ruin their party and chance to sell some more higher. Mind you, it was tempting to not sell all or most earlier after acquitring their coins so cheap so hats of to them for not doing it but they're still full of shit They're not going to sell their coins just because you want more.
|
|
|
1411
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: November 15, 2013, 11:54:19 PM
|
Another leg down on Stamp, momentum drying up as selling pressure increases.
"Captain, I don't like the look of the mist."
Well that was fun. Grabbed some coins @ $396. The bull rush to buy back at ~$400 was obvious. China could have led us lower but they more or less shrugged it off. We could go lower this weekend, but the psychology of the new Bitcoiners may prevent it. Watch the tape. Read the tape. It tells a story. When it's time to cross the road, look both ways and walk. Don't hesitate.
|
|
|
1416
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Why doesn't anyone use CampBX?
|
on: November 15, 2013, 07:46:48 PM
|
Even if the volume is low, you can just "buy market" and still get coins $30-$40 under Mt. Gox and $20-$25 under Bitstamp.
Have to admit that instant ACH to Coinbase was much easier though, and since it has gone up so quickly, probably resulted in a lower price. (By "instant" I mean that they give you the current price immediately even though it takes a week for your money to get there.)
Coinbase is indeed very easy. Once CampBX implements ACH deposits I'll be the first to buy those cheap coins. The gap will close almost instantly.
|
|
|
1417
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mike Hearn, Foundation's Law & Policy Chair, is pushing blacklists right now
|
on: November 15, 2013, 07:39:57 PM
|
The protocol needs to be designed to autonomously resist and reject regulatory attacks the same way it's designed to resist technical attacks. If that leads to them trying to make bitcoin illegal, good. Let them show their hand. It would be a sign of weakness. It means they are afraid and we're on the right path.
This is the exact reason they won't ban it. They'll show their tyrannical hand to the ordinary folks who still believe the US is a free country. Our elections depend on this. Also people on Wall St will be making money hand over fist. And we know who they own.
|
|
|
1419
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mike Hearn, Foundation's Law & Policy Chair, is pushing blacklists right now
|
on: November 15, 2013, 06:16:58 PM
|
We could choose to not engage with government, but what would happen? Countries around the world would try banning it's use and eventually it may be seen as simply a tool for crime. I think it is much wiser to develop our own approach to address their concerns and shape future regulation.
You don't know any of this for sure. Your crystal ball about how governments will react is no better than anyone elses. And by "our own approach" you mean the Foundation's approach behind closed doors.
|
|
|
|