BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
August 07, 2016, 03:19:48 PM |
|
Why do Atheists hate Religion ? they dont need to hate religion if they hate religions they think to war with others and no one need to think same Atheists people or no one need to belive one Religion because of every people have to respect beliefs of others.
Who told you that atheists hate religion ?! Religion, a person who does not recognize God. Atheist, recognizes only the exact sciences. And it is the right of atheists, believe or not believe in God. There is no need to blame atheists, atheists and so bad. Atheists, after death, emptiness. Atheists don't hate religion. Their faith in atheism IS a religion. The exact sciences state that God exists. Cause and effect is one of the basic exact sciences. Universal entropy is one of the exact sciences. Complex universe is so extremely common that no scientist has to make a scientific law about it, because it is easily and universally understood by all people. A universe that has these three exact sciences in it must be an universe that was made by an almighty God. There is no other way. Atheists are deluding themselves with the fictional dream that atheism is real.
|
|
|
|
sirazimuth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3514
Merit: 3613
born once atheist
|
|
August 07, 2016, 07:39:10 PM |
|
Why do Atheists hate Religion ? they dont need to hate religion if they hate religions they think to war with others and no one need to think same Atheists people or no one need to belive one Religion because of every people have to respect beliefs of others.
Who told you that atheists hate religion ?! Religion, a person who does not recognize God. Atheist, recognizes only the exact sciences. And it is the right of atheists, believe or not believe in God. There is no need to blame atheists, atheists and so bad. Atheists, after death, emptiness. Atheists don't hate religion. Their faith in atheism IS a religion. The exact sciences state that God exists. Cause and effect is one of the basic exact sciences. Universal entropy is one of the exact sciences. Complex universe is so extremely common that no scientist has to make a scientific law about it, because it is easily and universally understood by all people. A universe that has these three exact sciences in it must be an universe that was made by an almighty God. There is no other way. Atheists are deluding themselves with the fictional dream that atheism is real. and just how did this almighty god come to be? please enlighten me cue another typical nonsensical word salad in 3...2...
|
Bitcoin...the future of all monetary transactions...and always will be
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
August 07, 2016, 08:55:51 PM |
|
Why do Atheists hate Religion ? they dont need to hate religion if they hate religions they think to war with others and no one need to think same Atheists people or no one need to belive one Religion because of every people have to respect beliefs of others.
Who told you that atheists hate religion ?! Religion, a person who does not recognize God. Atheist, recognizes only the exact sciences. And it is the right of atheists, believe or not believe in God. There is no need to blame atheists, atheists and so bad. Atheists, after death, emptiness. Atheists don't hate religion. Their faith in atheism IS a religion. The exact sciences state that God exists. Cause and effect is one of the basic exact sciences. Universal entropy is one of the exact sciences. Complex universe is so extremely common that no scientist has to make a scientific law about it, because it is easily and universally understood by all people. A universe that has these three exact sciences in it must be an universe that was made by an almighty God. There is no other way. Atheists are deluding themselves with the fictional dream that atheism is real. and just how did this almighty god come to be? please enlighten me cue another typical nonsensical word salad in 3...2... Let me say it simply. God always was. God always is. He has no beginning or end. Your question is really out of line. Why? Because you can't follow the cause and effect of even one electron, while God follows them all - and everything else - completely. So, until you can do this simple, little thing, answers to questions about the sublime nature of God won't be even a little understandable to you. Forget it.
|
|
|
|
dippididodaday
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 441
Merit: 278
It's personal
|
|
August 07, 2016, 10:40:41 PM |
|
Let me say it simply. God always was. God always is. He has no beginning or end. Your question is really out of line. Why? Because you can't follow the cause and effect of even one electron, while God follows them all - and everything else - completely. So, until you can do this simple, little thing, answers to questions about the sublime nature of God won't be even a little understandable to you. Forget it. When I think upon the divine, I have to take myself in consideration. Why? Because I am the start and finish of myself, my own measuring stick if you want. So if God creates everything is must be by divine romance; it must be Goddess and God having divine sex and then the stars follows after that. This is the only way for me to make sense of these things. So Goddess is important in this equition because it is she that nutures star babies inside till the big bang shoot out in all direction moment. lots and lots of star babies. its wonderful!
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
August 08, 2016, 04:50:34 AM |
|
Let me say it simply. God always was. God always is. He has no beginning or end. Your question is really out of line. Why? Because you can't follow the cause and effect of even one electron, while God follows them all - and everything else - completely. So, until you can do this simple, little thing, answers to questions about the sublime nature of God won't be even a little understandable to you. Forget it. When I think upon the divine, I have to take myself in consideration. Why? Because I am the start and finish of myself, my own measuring stick if you want. So if God creates everything is must be by divine romance; it must be Goddess and God having divine sex and then the stars follows after that. This is the only way for me to make sense of these things. So Goddess is important in this equition because it is she that nutures star babies inside till the big bang shoot out in all direction moment. lots and lots of star babies. its wonderful! You quoted me, above, but forgot to read what I said. There is no "must be" regarding God, except if He tells us. Why? Because we don't know even a touch of what God is like without Him telling us. We are countless trillions of times closer to microbes in our abilities than we are to God.
|
|
|
|
sirazimuth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3514
Merit: 3613
born once atheist
|
|
August 08, 2016, 04:51:45 PM |
|
Let me say it simply. God always was. God always is. He has no beginning or end. Your question is really out of line. Why? Because you can't follow the cause and effect of even one electron, while God follows them all - and everything else - completely. So, until you can do this simple, little thing, answers to questions about the sublime nature of God won't be even a little understandable to you. Forget it. When I think upon the divine, I have to take myself in consideration. Why? Because I am the start and finish of myself, my own measuring stick if you want. So if God creates everything is must be by divine romance; it must be Goddess and God having divine sex and then the stars follows after that. This is the only way for me to make sense of these things. So Goddess is important in this equition because it is she that nutures star babies inside till the big bang shoot out in all direction moment. lots and lots of star babies. its wonderful! oookay...
|
Bitcoin...the future of all monetary transactions...and always will be
|
|
|
Moloch
|
|
August 08, 2016, 04:54:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
August 08, 2016, 05:01:12 PM |
|
Yep. The atheists worship Satan, and they don't seem to like it when they show themselves that they do.
|
|
|
|
varyspro
|
|
August 08, 2016, 05:19:05 PM |
|
Yep. The atheists worship Satan, and they don't seem to like it when they show themselves that they do. Who told you such a heresy that atheists are secret Satanists ?! Atheism is the rejection of any belief in immaterial things. In other words, an atheist can believe only in what you can touch, to make hands.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
August 08, 2016, 05:39:20 PM |
|
Yep. The atheists worship Satan, and they don't seem to like it when they show themselves that they do. Who told you such a heresy that atheists are secret Satanists ?! Atheism is the rejection of any belief in immaterial things. In other words, an atheist can believe only in what you can touch, to make hands. Who said it is secret? Either you worship God, or you worship Satan by default. Atheism is an attempted belief in some things and an attempted non-belief in other things. However, atheists can't believe like they talk. They are lying to themselves about what they believe and don't believe.
|
|
|
|
dippididodaday
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 441
Merit: 278
It's personal
|
|
August 08, 2016, 06:01:05 PM |
|
Let me say it simply. God always was. God always is. He has no beginning or end. Your question is really out of line. Why? Because you can't follow the cause and effect of even one electron, while God follows them all - and everything else - completely. So, until you can do this simple, little thing, answers to questions about the sublime nature of God won't be even a little understandable to you. Forget it. When I think upon the divine, I have to take myself in consideration. Why? Because I am the start and finish of myself, my own measuring stick if you want. So if God creates everything is must be by divine romance; it must be Goddess and God having divine sex and then the stars follows after that. This is the only way for me to make sense of these things. So Goddess is important in this equition because it is she that nutures star babies inside till the big bang shoot out in all direction moment. lots and lots of star babies. its wonderful! You quoted me, above, but forgot to read what I said. There is no "must be" regarding God, except if He tells us. Why? Because we don't know even a touch of what God is like without Him telling us. We are countless trillions of times closer to microbes in our abilities than we are to God. Are you sure BADecker?
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
August 08, 2016, 06:16:36 PM |
|
Let me say it simply. God always was. God always is. He has no beginning or end. Your question is really out of line. Why? Because you can't follow the cause and effect of even one electron, while God follows them all - and everything else - completely. So, until you can do this simple, little thing, answers to questions about the sublime nature of God won't be even a little understandable to you. Forget it. When I think upon the divine, I have to take myself in consideration. Why? Because I am the start and finish of myself, my own measuring stick if you want. So if God creates everything is must be by divine romance; it must be Goddess and God having divine sex and then the stars follows after that. This is the only way for me to make sense of these things. So Goddess is important in this equition because it is she that nutures star babies inside till the big bang shoot out in all direction moment. lots and lots of star babies. its wonderful! You quoted me, above, but forgot to read what I said. There is no "must be" regarding God, except if He tells us. Why? Because we don't know even a touch of what God is like without Him telling us. We are countless trillions of times closer to microbes in our abilities than we are to God. Are you sure BADecker? 1 Corinthians 10:12: "So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don’t fall!"Because of this, it isn't my sureness that is important or has the strength. It is God Who is sure.
|
|
|
|
Frodomaga
|
|
August 08, 2016, 08:28:21 PM |
|
Atheists have no interest in religion. It's not a lot different from having no interest in bowling or having no interest knitting. There's a specific part of the brain that determines if you have a 'spiritual' need. Those without this area of the brain never develop an interest in religion, or at best only a mild interest. The science behind this is compelling; anyone can look it up."
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
August 08, 2016, 09:27:50 PM |
|
Atheists have no interest in religion. It's not a lot different from having no interest in bowling or having no interest knitting. There's a specific part of the brain that determines if you have a 'spiritual' need. Those without this area of the brain never develop an interest in religion, or at best only a mild interest. The science behind this is compelling; anyone can look it up."
The difference is, if you have no interest in bowling or knitting, but know about them both, then your personal religion is one that doesn't include an interest in bowling or knitting.
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
|
|
August 08, 2016, 09:44:18 PM |
|
Atheists have no interest in religion. It's not a lot different from having no interest in bowling or having no interest knitting. There's a specific part of the brain that determines if you have a 'spiritual' need. Those without this area of the brain never develop an interest in religion, or at best only a mild interest. The science behind this is compelling; anyone can look it up."
The difference is, if you have no interest in bowling or knitting, but know about them both, then your personal religion is one that doesn't include an interest in bowling or knitting. You never told us how OLD everyone in Heaven is or LOOKS with their hybrid-flex ESP. (Why don't they EVER communicate with us???) OH BY THE WAY:Ancient Egyptian Mythology: (Isis & Osiris) 6,000 BC -- "Virgin Birth" Ancient Egyptian Mythology: 3-day resurrection
Christianity: (invented by recently-Pagan Romans, 0 B.C.E. at the Nicene Council where they made up the "Nicene Creed.") Jesus Christ: "Virgin Birth." Jesus Christ: 3-day resurrection
*YAWN*
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
August 09, 2016, 07:28:22 AM |
|
Atheists have no interest in religion. It's not a lot different from having no interest in bowling or having no interest knitting. There's a specific part of the brain that determines if you have a 'spiritual' need. Those without this area of the brain never develop an interest in religion, or at best only a mild interest. The science behind this is compelling; anyone can look it up."
The difference is, if you have no interest in bowling or knitting, but know about them both, then your personal religion is one that doesn't include an interest in bowling or knitting. You never told us how OLD everyone in Heaven is or LOOKS with their hybrid-flex ESP. (Why don't they EVER communicate with us???) OH BY THE WAY:Ancient Egyptian Mythology: (Isis & Osiris) 6,000 BC -- "Virgin Birth" Ancient Egyptian Mythology: 3-day resurrection
Christianity: (invented by recently-Pagan Romans, 0 B.C.E. at the Nicene Council where they made up the "Nicene Creed.") Jesus Christ: "Virgin Birth." Jesus Christ: 3-day resurrection
*YAWN*
Some of those ancient people were way smarter than we are. They predicted the virgin birth in their mythology, long before it happened.
|
|
|
|
romero121
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1214
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
|
|
August 09, 2016, 06:22:46 PM |
|
Atheists were people who got destructed though they had good faith in god. This failure eventually turns a user to hate god and go unnoticed and focus on enriching atheistic thoughts.
|
|
|
|
dippididodaday
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 441
Merit: 278
It's personal
|
|
August 09, 2016, 08:00:17 PM Last edit: August 09, 2016, 08:21:20 PM by dippididodaday |
|
If GoddessGod is to 'exist' shehe must be modelled unto my human traits. There just is no other way. I cannot think outside of my human 'box' setup. Interestingly, I think this is the way its supposed to be (for me at least). First I recognize all that entails being 'human', ie. start with myself and then derive whatever I want that pertains to GoddessGod. I am my own starting point. From here I see if divinity can fit in somewhere or not. To each his own. In my case I find it extremely difficult to let go of the idea of GoddessGod (although I would have said 'God' previously) since I have been programmed since childhood to believe and think this way. But I definitely revolt 100% against the manipulation, monopolization, monetization and indoctrination of this idea of GoddessGod. In fact my programming since childhood stated that there is this being, being "all powerful" and he is a masculine figure and of the same culture and practice as middle eastern cultures - unequivocally, in short he is 'God'. This I absolutely cannot agree with anymore and never ever again will do. I believe there should be as many references to 'higher powers' or 'no higher power' as there are people on this earth. Divinity or the Undivine should be individualized. This is my belief to tell you the truth. This is why I feel totally comfortable posting in this specific thread too.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
August 09, 2016, 08:37:45 PM |
|
If GoddessGod is to 'exist' shehe must be modelled unto my human traits. There just is no other way. I cannot think outside of my human 'box' setup. Interestingly, I think this is the way its supposed to be (for me at least). First I recognize all that entails being 'human', ie. start with myself and then derive whatever I want that pertains to GoddessGod. I am my own starting point. From here I see if divinity can fit in somewhere or not. To each his own. In my case I find it extremely difficult to let go of the idea of GoddessGod (although I would have said 'God' previously) since I have been programmed since childhood to believe and think this way. But I definitely revolt 100% against the manipulation, monopolization, monetization and indoctrination of this idea of GoddessGod. In fact my programming since childhood stated that there is this being, being "all powerful" and he is a masculine figure and of the same culture and practice as middle eastern cultures - unequivocally, in short he is 'God'. This I absolutely cannot agree with anymore and never ever again will do. I believe there should be as many references to 'higher powers' or 'no higher power' as there are people on this earth. Divinity or the Undivine should be individualized. This is my belief to tell you the truth. This is why I feel totally comfortable posting in this specific thread too. We are all similar, yet we are all different. So, are you the only goddess? The rest of us are what? God made our first parents in His own image. They corrupted themselves by attempting to take on the image of the snake, a reptile. Because of this, we don't know what the image of God is like in ourselves anymore. The machinery of nature didn't just make itself. Like all the machines we make, the machinery of nature had a Maker, as well. If it is you, show us by creating something other than a piece of art. Do some real creating, not just manipulation of what is here a little. Men and women of research haven't been able to grow back a finger on a person who lost one. But if they have, they just barely have. Prove that you are the goddess. Grow an extra arm or two.
|
|
|
|
dippididodaday
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 441
Merit: 278
It's personal
|
|
August 10, 2016, 02:10:23 AM |
|
This is what my goddess machinery with an extra arm or 2 would look like BADecker:
|
|
|
|
|