brooklynbtc
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
AKA jefdiesel
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 03:39:43 AM |
|
for 1 LTC i will keep post this news on other forums and keep replying using different accounts too promote this
Please don't. Ha at least LTC has some use still
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 03:50:29 AM |
|
for 1 LTC i will keep post this news on other forums and keep replying using different accounts too promote this
Please don't. hehehe ... sia will be its own promoter ... once things get running on a more efficient basis - there will be a lot more interest ANYWAY ... so agree ... please dont ...  ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 03:51:13 AM |
|
How to compile v1.0.1 for Windows?  Shit, I wish I knew how to compile Sia at all, and I'm a developer. come on wolf ... now ur playing  ... will try testing sia today with the first machine - 4 x gigabyte 280x oc ... IF i can get the thing running of course ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
Taek (OP)
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 03:56:59 AM |
|
Thanks for all the stats! And if anyone wants to know the inflation rate per year paste this into google and it will give you a graph: y=(1.5768/(42.05+1.5768(x-1)))*100
For the first year (x=1) the inflation is about 3.75%, 10th year it is about 2.8%, and 50th year about 1.32%.
I'm pretty sure that's wrong. For the first year, inflation is much closer to 90%. Maybe my math is off, but I wrote this program: http://play.golang.org/p/m8czRAW0u2Output: Inflation Rate of Sia Inflation at Year 1: 90.39% Inflation at Year 2: 39.37% Inflation at Year 3: 21.44% Inflation at Year 4: 11.50% Inflation at Year 5: 4.39% Inflation at Year 6: 3.44% Inflation at Year 7: 3.32% Inflation at Year 8: 3.22% Inflation at Year 9: 3.12% Inflation at Year 10: 3.02% Inflation at Year 11: 2.93% Inflation at Year 12: 2.85% Inflation at Year 13: 2.77% Inflation at Year 14: 2.70% Inflation at Year 15: 2.62% Inflation at Year 16: 2.56% Inflation at Year 17: 2.49% Inflation at Year 18: 2.43% Inflation at Year 19: 2.38% Inflation at Year 20: 2.32% Inflation at Year 21: 2.27% Inflation at Year 22: 2.22% Inflation at Year 23: 2.17% Inflation at Year 24: 2.12% Inflation at Year 25: 2.08% Inflation at Year 26: 2.04% Inflation at Year 27: 2.00% Inflation at Year 28: 1.96% Inflation at Year 29: 1.92% Inflation at Year 30: 1.88% Inflation at Year 31: 1.85% Inflation at Year 32: 1.81% Inflation at Year 33: 1.78% Inflation at Year 34: 1.75% Inflation at Year 35: 1.72% Inflation at Year 36: 1.69% Inflation at Year 37: 1.66% Inflation at Year 38: 1.64%
|
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 04:12:40 AM |
|
Thanks for all the stats! And if anyone wants to know the inflation rate per year paste this into google and it will give you a graph: y=(1.5768/(42.05+1.5768(x-1)))*100
For the first year (x=1) the inflation is about 3.75%, 10th year it is about 2.8%, and 50th year about 1.32%.
I'm pretty sure that's wrong. For the first year, inflation is much closer to 90%. Maybe my math is off, but I wrote this program: http://play.golang.org/p/m8czRAW0u2Output: Inflation Rate of Sia Inflation at Year 1: 90.39% Inflation at Year 2: 39.37% Inflation at Year 3: 21.44% Inflation at Year 4: 11.50% Inflation at Year 5: 4.39% Inflation at Year 6: 3.44% Inflation at Year 7: 3.32% Inflation at Year 8: 3.22% Inflation at Year 9: 3.12% Inflation at Year 10: 3.02% Inflation at Year 11: 2.93% Inflation at Year 12: 2.85% Inflation at Year 13: 2.77% Inflation at Year 14: 2.70% Inflation at Year 15: 2.62% Inflation at Year 16: 2.56% Inflation at Year 17: 2.49% Inflation at Year 18: 2.43% Inflation at Year 19: 2.38% Inflation at Year 20: 2.32% Inflation at Year 21: 2.27% Inflation at Year 22: 2.22% Inflation at Year 23: 2.17% Inflation at Year 24: 2.12% Inflation at Year 25: 2.08% Inflation at Year 26: 2.04% Inflation at Year 27: 2.00% Inflation at Year 28: 1.96% Inflation at Year 29: 1.92% Inflation at Year 30: 1.88% Inflation at Year 31: 1.85% Inflation at Year 32: 1.81% Inflation at Year 33: 1.78% Inflation at Year 34: 1.75% Inflation at Year 35: 1.72% Inflation at Year 36: 1.69% Inflation at Year 37: 1.66% Inflation at Year 38: 1.64%
Wow I love this  get em straightened out
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 04:20:32 AM |
|
Just an observation: I am running 5 rigs. For about 4 hours maybe more I quit seeing high count bogus blocks Mined. All seemed normal again. But then a couple of hours ago it started the high bogus blocks again. My point is, its across the board. Seems when one starts the rest are as well and visa versa, when one is hashing normally or seems to be, all the others are also. no bogus looking blocks counts. Its like a switch is being turned on then back off IDK lol Just wondering is it in the GPU mining SW or something deeper within the blockchain (or wallet etc.) or something? ok, just an observation 
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
atavacron
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 04:32:55 AM |
|
Everyone seeing confirmed coin payouts lately? all my miners are really at it today showing high amounts of blocks found, I know that's not accurate all, but never seen it this bad. mining on 5 rigs. I continually restart miners when I see it happening. Not sure if even though we see bogus blocks found that if somewhere in there, there is real blocks being found? Dev did you say you were going to release a more efficient miner today?  Yeah. On my gpu it's running about 6x as fast. Also we fixed the crashing and the fast-block stuff. (at least, mostly fixed it). So, sometime tonight once we've cleaned everything up a bit you can expect a release that addresses many of the problems people were having. After pulled gpuminer git and compile Give this Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Rebuild 'siad'  hmm)) how to compile it on ubuntu? Hix, did you find a fix to the the issue? I am having zero luck compiling "siad" on Ubuntu 14.04.
|
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 04:39:39 AM |
|
Just an observation: I am running 5 rigs. For about 4 hours maybe more I quit seeing high count bogus blocks Mined. All seemed normal again. But then a couple of hours ago it started the high bogus blocks again. My point is, its across the board. Seems when one starts the rest are as well and visa versa, when one is hashing normally or seems to be, all the others are also. no bogus looking blocks counts. Its like a switch is being turned on then back off IDK lol Just wondering is it in the GPU mining SW or something deeper within the blockchain (or wallet etc.) or something? ok, just an observation  I'm pretty sure it's siad derping hard - try with the new protocol and see if it still happens. lol yes I am hoping that's all it is 
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
Hix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1971
Merit: 1036
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 04:45:41 AM |
|
Everyone seeing confirmed coin payouts lately? all my miners are really at it today showing high amounts of blocks found, I know that's not accurate all, but never seen it this bad. mining on 5 rigs. I continually restart miners when I see it happening. Not sure if even though we see bogus blocks found that if somewhere in there, there is real blocks being found? Dev did you say you were going to release a more efficient miner today?  Yeah. On my gpu it's running about 6x as fast. Also we fixed the crashing and the fast-block stuff. (at least, mostly fixed it). So, sometime tonight once we've cleaned everything up a bit you can expect a release that addresses many of the problems people were having. After pulled gpuminer git and compile Give this Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Rebuild 'siad'  hmm)) how to compile it on ubuntu? Hix, did you find a fix to the the issue? I am having zero luck compiling "siad" on Ubunut 14.04. No, i have broken my mind with this GOO 
|
|
|
|
cwrmyy888
Member

Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 04:52:14 AM |
|
1KS=1000 coin ?
right ?
|
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 04:56:39 AM |
|
1KS=1000 coin ?
right ?
Yes, it better be! 
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
mrnxtuser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 04:58:42 AM |
|
Has anyone actually uploaded files??? I've uploaded a couple but it needs to clear 6000 blocks first before it uploads?
|
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 05:09:43 AM |
|
Has anyone actually uploaded files??? I've uploaded a couple but it needs to clear 6000 blocks first before it uploads?
No, but that for sure has to be a bug I would think, at least as you described it. We're only at block 2923, gonna be a while lol...  Going to have to give it a whirl, try it out. First I have to get ports forwarded by my ISP. 
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
mrnxtuser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 05:14:06 AM |
|
Has anyone actually uploaded files??? I've uploaded a couple but it needs to clear 6000 blocks first before it uploads?
No, but that for sure has to be a bug I would think, at least as you described it. We're only at block 2923, gonna be a while lol...  Going to have to give it a whirl, try it out. First I have to get ports forwarded by my ISP.  This is what it looks like... Anyone want to try download? LOL it's just a song I swear. https://i.imgur.com/bcZQhfP.png
|
|
|
|
Rabinovitch
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1076
A humble Siberian miner
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 05:14:13 AM |
|
Wow, I see the "Sia-GPU-Miner-v1.0.1-linux64" folder inside "Sia-GPU-Miner-v1.0.1-win64.zip" archive! It's a kind of maaagiiiic.... 
|
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 05:14:39 AM |
|
Uploading a word doc now, let ya know if it works or gives message
EDIT:5999 blocks remaining.. hmmm could be because not many on the actual network yet, or ported correctly? just guessing. But your right! like I said gonna be a while lol
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
cwrmyy888
Member

Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 05:16:13 AM |
|
1KS=1000 coin ?
right ?
Yes, it better be!  1000KS= 1 million coins??? Thousands of units?
|
|
|
|
cwrmyy888
Member

Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 05:19:03 AM |
|
Sia-GPU-Miner Often collapse !!!!
Do you have any good solution?
Thank you
Yeah, we've got parts of it fixed in the dev branch. We're fixing a few other parts, and trying to push up the hashrate a bit so we're not sooooo far behind the proprietary miners. Expect a new release for linux+windows in the next 18 hours or so. man ! Has a new version? Always collapse depressing thank you !
|
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 05:19:41 AM |
|
1KS=1000 coin ?
right ?
Yes, it better be!  1000KS= 1 million coins??? Thousands of units? Exactly
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
mrnxtuser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 05:21:54 AM |
|
Uploading a word doc now, let ya know if it works or gives message
EDIT:5999 blocks remaining.. hmmm could be because not many on the actual network yet, or ported correctly? just guessing. But your right! like I said gonna be a while lol
Yeah it's gonna take awhile hahaha. I just want to spread my European and Aussie Hardstyle goodness. WHERE ALL MY PARTY LOVERS AT? https://i.imgur.com/EEZ5INe.png
|
|
|
|
|