|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 09, 2015, 08:55:16 PM |
|
Everyone seeing confirmed coin payouts lately? all my miners are really at it today showing high amounts of blocks found, I know that's not accurate all, but never seen it this bad. mining on 5 rigs. I continually restart miners when I see it happening. Not sure if even though we see bogus blocks found that if somewhere in there, there is real blocks being found? Dev did you say you were going to release a more efficient miner today?  Yeah. On my gpu it's running about 6x as fast. Also we fixed the crashing and the fast-block stuff. (at least, mostly fixed it). So, sometime tonight once we've cleaned everything up a bit you can expect a release that addresses many of the problems people were having. Super! will be watching for a release download  Just keep chipping away at it lol, I will run new miner on 5 rigs
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
Eliovp
Legendary

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1294
Huh?
|
 |
June 09, 2015, 08:57:06 PM |
|
Everyone seeing confirmed coin payouts lately? all my miners are really at it today showing high amounts of blocks found, I know that's not accurate all, but never seen it this bad. mining on 5 rigs. I continually restart miners when I see it happening. Not sure if even though we see bogus blocks found that if somewhere in there, there is real blocks being found? Dev did you say you were going to release a more efficient miner today?  Yeah. On my gpu it's running about 6x as fast. Also we fixed the crashing and the fast-block stuff. (at least, mostly fixed it). So, sometime tonight once we've cleaned everything up a bit you can expect a release that addresses many of the problems people were having. After pulled gpuminer git and compile Give this Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Rebuild 'siad' 
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
 |
June 09, 2015, 09:37:24 PM |
|
no please, don't make me install go! :-) new wallet binaries?
|
|
|
|
|
|
traderman
Legendary

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
 |
June 09, 2015, 10:16:53 PM |
|
I got the gpu miner to run, but my system becomes unusable and freezes up.
|
|
|
|
|
Hix
Legendary

Activity: 1985
Merit: 1036
|
 |
June 09, 2015, 10:40:27 PM |
|
Everyone seeing confirmed coin payouts lately? all my miners are really at it today showing high amounts of blocks found, I know that's not accurate all, but never seen it this bad. mining on 5 rigs. I continually restart miners when I see it happening. Not sure if even though we see bogus blocks found that if somewhere in there, there is real blocks being found? Dev did you say you were going to release a more efficient miner today?  Yeah. On my gpu it's running about 6x as fast. Also we fixed the crashing and the fast-block stuff. (at least, mostly fixed it). So, sometime tonight once we've cleaned everything up a bit you can expect a release that addresses many of the problems people were having. After pulled gpuminer git and compile Give this Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Rebuild 'siad'  hmm)) how to compile it on ubuntu?
|
|
|
|
|
|
riskyfire
|
 |
June 09, 2015, 11:07:40 PM |
|
I got this error with the wallet on win 32 and win 64?
sia.exe Entry Point Not Found
The procedure entry point SetCurrentProcessExplicitAppUserModelID could not be located in the dynamic link library shell32.dll
|
|
|
|
nemo1618
Newbie

Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 09, 2015, 11:24:19 PM |
|
I got this error with the wallet on win 32 and win 64?
sia.exe Entry Point Not Found
The procedure entry point SetCurrentProcessExplicitAppUserModelID could not be located in the dynamic link library shell32.dll
sounds like your windows resources may have been corrupted. Try running "sfc /scannow" from an administrative command prompt, then run Sia again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 09, 2015, 11:41:29 PM |
|
Waiting on that new GPU miner release  lol throw us a bone 
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
bitspill
Legendary

Activity: 2088
Merit: 1015
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 12:49:38 AM Last edit: June 10, 2015, 01:49:50 AM by bitspill |
|
So there are at least 2 people claim they are mining at x10 times faster than the rest of us... Wanna sell us your config ?  I was talking to wolf0 on irc and he said the secret it to replace all of the 5's with 7's Seriously though they aren't making simple config changes but rather rewritting the entire miner itself.
|
|
|
|
|
dailey123
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 01:31:07 AM |
|
for 1 LTC i will keep post this news on other forums and keep replying using different accounts too promote this
LMFPjfdeeEiLfkz7yYxWJFmZygGk8VaiJv
|
|
|
|
|
Rabinovitch
Legendary

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1076
A humble Siberian miner
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 02:03:27 AM |
|
How to compile v1.0.1 for Windows? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
nemo1618
Newbie

Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 03:11:52 AM |
|
for 1 LTC i will keep post this news on other forums and keep replying using different accounts too promote this
Please don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
robinson5
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 03:39:32 AM |
|
oh god I wonder that all the time. someone needs to put the total coinbase yield on a website somewhere so we can can on CMC for visibility. apart from that... 300000 in first block. 10,000 in last decreasing block. 10 minutes per block. 144 blocks/day. 300000-10000 = total range of block subsidy = 290000 290000/2 = average block subsidy in 290000 blocks = 145000 sia/block on average for 290000 blocks 290000 blocks = 2900000 minutes = 48333 hours = 2014 days = 5.5 years = you'll be here a while so for 5.5 years, we'll have an average block subsidy of 145000 sia/block. after 5.5 years, the subsity is 10k30k sia. after 5.5 years, there will be 42,050,000,000 sia in existence. after 5.5 years, there will be a yearly infaltion of 10k30k sia * 144 blocks * 365 days = 525.6 million 1.5768 billion this 525.6 million1.5768 billion will begin at a 3.75% yearly inflation of 42,050,000,000 coins. this will decrease to 525.600,600/42,575,600,0001,576,800,000/43626800000 = 3.571% yearly inflation this is about a 1.24%4.77% decrease in inflation yearly forever. please let me know if im wrong. EDIT: I was wrong, and the post has been butchered accordingly  So why is there no exchange yet?
B/C we are not smart men  I would much rather see this on the exchange after the difficulty increases and after some stabilizing of price for storage. Otherwise it may become stuck in some flat undervalued rate or the target of some pump and dump scheme before it even gets its footing. Some of the best coins started with trading threads rather than direct to exchange. Agree, steady as she goes. I am in know hurry with this coin and storage concept. Let it develop and flow at its own pace. Little by little it will smoothen out around the edges. I think it will grow and get a lot of interest. Devs just need to stay out in front and keep it alive and capture the market. Always someone else looking on, that would copy the idea. True, but still, now is the time to let influential people know that this exists. If you have someone you respect in the cryptosphere that gives you understanding, now is the time to tell them, even if we are not in an exchange. Thanks for all the stats! And if anyone wants to know the inflation rate per year paste this into google and it will give you a graph: y=(1.5768/(42.05+1.5768(x-1)))*100 For the first year (x=1) the inflation is about 3.75%, 10th year it is about 2.8%, and 50th year about 1.32%.
|
|
|
|
|
brooklynbtc
Sr. Member
  

Activity: 336
Merit: 250
AKA jefdiesel
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 03:39:43 AM |
|
for 1 LTC i will keep post this news on other forums and keep replying using different accounts too promote this
Please don't. Ha at least LTC has some use still
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary

Activity: 3234
Merit: 1100
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 03:50:29 AM |
|
for 1 LTC i will keep post this news on other forums and keep replying using different accounts too promote this
Please don't. hehehe ... sia will be its own promoter ... once things get running on a more efficient basis - there will be a lot more interest ANYWAY ... so agree ... please dont ...  ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary

Activity: 3234
Merit: 1100
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 03:51:13 AM |
|
How to compile v1.0.1 for Windows?  Shit, I wish I knew how to compile Sia at all, and I'm a developer. come on wolf ... now ur playing  ... will try testing sia today with the first machine - 4 x gigabyte 280x oc ... IF i can get the thing running of course ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
|
Taek (OP)
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 03:56:59 AM |
|
Thanks for all the stats! And if anyone wants to know the inflation rate per year paste this into google and it will give you a graph: y=(1.5768/(42.05+1.5768(x-1)))*100
For the first year (x=1) the inflation is about 3.75%, 10th year it is about 2.8%, and 50th year about 1.32%.
I'm pretty sure that's wrong. For the first year, inflation is much closer to 90%. Maybe my math is off, but I wrote this program: http://play.golang.org/p/m8czRAW0u2Output: Inflation Rate of Sia Inflation at Year 1: 90.39% Inflation at Year 2: 39.37% Inflation at Year 3: 21.44% Inflation at Year 4: 11.50% Inflation at Year 5: 4.39% Inflation at Year 6: 3.44% Inflation at Year 7: 3.32% Inflation at Year 8: 3.22% Inflation at Year 9: 3.12% Inflation at Year 10: 3.02% Inflation at Year 11: 2.93% Inflation at Year 12: 2.85% Inflation at Year 13: 2.77% Inflation at Year 14: 2.70% Inflation at Year 15: 2.62% Inflation at Year 16: 2.56% Inflation at Year 17: 2.49% Inflation at Year 18: 2.43% Inflation at Year 19: 2.38% Inflation at Year 20: 2.32% Inflation at Year 21: 2.27% Inflation at Year 22: 2.22% Inflation at Year 23: 2.17% Inflation at Year 24: 2.12% Inflation at Year 25: 2.08% Inflation at Year 26: 2.04% Inflation at Year 27: 2.00% Inflation at Year 28: 1.96% Inflation at Year 29: 1.92% Inflation at Year 30: 1.88% Inflation at Year 31: 1.85% Inflation at Year 32: 1.81% Inflation at Year 33: 1.78% Inflation at Year 34: 1.75% Inflation at Year 35: 1.72% Inflation at Year 36: 1.69% Inflation at Year 37: 1.66% Inflation at Year 38: 1.64%
|
|
|
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 10, 2015, 04:12:40 AM |
|
Thanks for all the stats! And if anyone wants to know the inflation rate per year paste this into google and it will give you a graph: y=(1.5768/(42.05+1.5768(x-1)))*100
For the first year (x=1) the inflation is about 3.75%, 10th year it is about 2.8%, and 50th year about 1.32%.
I'm pretty sure that's wrong. For the first year, inflation is much closer to 90%. Maybe my math is off, but I wrote this program: http://play.golang.org/p/m8czRAW0u2Output: Inflation Rate of Sia Inflation at Year 1: 90.39% Inflation at Year 2: 39.37% Inflation at Year 3: 21.44% Inflation at Year 4: 11.50% Inflation at Year 5: 4.39% Inflation at Year 6: 3.44% Inflation at Year 7: 3.32% Inflation at Year 8: 3.22% Inflation at Year 9: 3.12% Inflation at Year 10: 3.02% Inflation at Year 11: 2.93% Inflation at Year 12: 2.85% Inflation at Year 13: 2.77% Inflation at Year 14: 2.70% Inflation at Year 15: 2.62% Inflation at Year 16: 2.56% Inflation at Year 17: 2.49% Inflation at Year 18: 2.43% Inflation at Year 19: 2.38% Inflation at Year 20: 2.32% Inflation at Year 21: 2.27% Inflation at Year 22: 2.22% Inflation at Year 23: 2.17% Inflation at Year 24: 2.12% Inflation at Year 25: 2.08% Inflation at Year 26: 2.04% Inflation at Year 27: 2.00% Inflation at Year 28: 1.96% Inflation at Year 29: 1.92% Inflation at Year 30: 1.88% Inflation at Year 31: 1.85% Inflation at Year 32: 1.81% Inflation at Year 33: 1.78% Inflation at Year 34: 1.75% Inflation at Year 35: 1.72% Inflation at Year 36: 1.69% Inflation at Year 37: 1.66% Inflation at Year 38: 1.64%
Wow I love this  get em straightened out
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
|