TerraMaster
|
 |
June 18, 2015, 05:18:03 PM |
|
Ive got my first contract 450MB only , but now I'm certain my host is ONline...  Hey that's great news to hear!! I may fire back up my Hoster' lol that's a start. Thanks for reporting that. You are the first I am aware of seeing a contract  Are you still at 1 SC/GB/month?
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
Taek (OP)
|
 |
June 18, 2015, 08:49:54 PM |
|
Wow things sure have died down in here. Guess like me we all are waiting for the next version release.  Showing 34 Host. One day soon this needs to show 34,000 and up! Keep it moving devs. It is working!  We're hoping to have something tomorrow. Might be Monday. Siafund support added to siac (not UI), and then a bunch of minor fixes to siad, including wallet stuff. Nothing major at this point.
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
 |
June 18, 2015, 08:54:25 PM |
|
Ive got my first contract 450MB only , but now I'm certain my host is ONline...  Hey that's great news to hear!! I may fire back up my Hoster' lol that's a start. Thanks for reporting that. You are the first I am aware of seeing a contract  Are you still at 1 SC/GB/month? It is on the rate of 5 SC /GB / month
|
|
|
|
Moebius327
|
 |
June 18, 2015, 09:23:19 PM |
|
Is there a way to choose where to store hosted files? Will this be included in future releases? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 18, 2015, 09:51:50 PM |
|
Ive got my first contract 450MB only , but now I'm certain my host is ONline...  Hey that's great news to hear!! I may fire back up my Hoster' lol that's a start. Thanks for reporting that. You are the first I am aware of seeing a contract  Are you still at 1 SC/GB/month? It is on the rate of 5 SC /GB / month Hey that's pretty good. Is still showing a contract? and what is KS to be earned, if you don't mind sharing lol, I do understand if not  Just trying to do a little analysis in regards to the market value of SC vs. potential income and cost of storage based on current market price... so much to consider here lol
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 18, 2015, 09:55:48 PM |
|
Is there a way to choose where to store hosted files? Will this be included in future releases? Thanks!
Good question. I think right now SIA has to bee looking at the hard drive space available on the drive its installed on. So, what I have been wondering, is if I have external storage in any way shape or form, can I point to that and designate that space/drive to be used for SIA and away from OS drive.
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
 |
June 18, 2015, 10:29:07 PM |
|
Ive got my first contract 450MB only , but now I'm certain my host is ONline...  Hey that's great news to hear!! I may fire back up my Hoster' lol that's a start. Thanks for reporting that. You are the first I am aware of seeing a contract  Are you still at 1 SC/GB/month? It is on the rate of 5 SC /GB / month Hey that's pretty good. Is still showing a contract? and what is KS to be earned, if you don't mind sharing lol, I do understand if not  Just trying to do a little analysis in regards to the market value of SC vs. potential income and cost of storage based on current market price... so much to consider here lol NP , mate , but it shows only zeros to be earned 
|
|
|
|
Taek (OP)
|
 |
June 19, 2015, 12:07:55 AM |
|
NP , mate , but it shows only zeros to be earned  hmmm interesting  Probably because you're storing less than a GB. 5 S / GB / Mo @ 10mb = 0.00005 KS to be earned, which will probably be reported as 0. Hang tight though in a few weeks we've got updates coming that should make it easier/more attractive to upload stuff.
|
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 19, 2015, 12:33:55 AM |
|
NP , mate , but it shows only zeros to be earned  hmmm interesting  Probably because you're storing less than a GB. 5 S / GB / Mo @ 10mb = 0.00005 KS to be earned, which will probably be reported as 0. Hang tight though in a few weeks we've got updates coming that should make it easier/more attractive to upload stuff. That makes sense! THX for the updates
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
cwrmyy888
Member

Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 19, 2015, 01:01:57 AM |
|
Why don't update GPU miners? Make A and N as efficient, so that the SIA more dispersed.
|
|
|
|
cwrmyy888
Member

Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 19, 2015, 01:40:10 AM |
|
Why don't update GPU miners? Make A and N as efficient, so that the SIA more dispersed.
You assume it's that simple - like someone can just change a magic number and do that. Why don't you, in that case? I just make a suggestion. Why are you so excited?
|
|
|
|
DreamSpace
|
 |
June 19, 2015, 08:17:43 AM |
|
pool mining and or optimized amd-mining would be awesome
Well, lazy but dead simple pool mining, or complex but scalable and nice for long term pool mining?  The latter takes time. don't know what you mean with lazy, but dead pool mining, but it could be as simple as possible, the main issue is, it should work. it would be a good compromise for amd miners to get a least some siacoins without a optimized miner and also the pool operator could earn some fees and it would be good for a healty sia-network.
|
|
|
|
|
Vampire_sumy
Member

Offline
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 19, 2015, 02:05:08 PM |
|
Good news, if each of sellers vote with 0.05 btc we can win the race 
|
|
|
|
zork
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1487
Merit: 1008
|
 |
June 19, 2015, 02:50:06 PM |
|
vote only successful miners? 
|
|
|
|
danbhfd
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 19, 2015, 02:57:43 PM |
|
Is there a way to choose where to store hosted files? Will this be included in future releases? Thanks!
I am sure something like this will be in future updates. It would be cool to be able to get the wallet working on a Raspberry Pi with multiple external USB Drives hosting the storage. Would save money on electric and wouldn't tie up your main computer. I've never tried it, but I would assume you could merge all the external drives into one LVM. You could pretty much go crazy with storage and Linux. Linux makes me feel warm and fuzzy.
|
|
|
|
TerraMaster
|
 |
June 19, 2015, 03:03:34 PM |
|
Going to be probably another 7 weeks or so before software is even ready for an exchange for SIA. And I certainly would rather see it start on a better exchange, and no one should have to pay to have SIA listed. The exchanges should be lining up to add it  no voting needed. C-Cex has listed about as many shitcoins as there can possibly be. And bogus ICO's for those shitcoins... IDK. Like to see SIA on Poloniex or Bittrex to start. A top shelf coin deserves a top shelf exchange 
|
BTC:1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
rutzap
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 19, 2015, 03:29:58 PM |
|
Is there a way to choose where to store hosted files? Will this be included in future releases? Thanks!
I am sure something like this will be in future updates. It would be cool to be able to get the wallet working on a Raspberry Pi with multiple external USB Drives hosting the storage. Would save money on electric and wouldn't tie up your main computer. I've never tried it, but I would assume you could merge all the external drives into one LVM. You could pretty much go crazy with storage and Linux. Linux makes me feel warm and fuzzy. I am to understand that Windows 10, which is due to come out in a month or so, will run on a RPi 2. The RPi foundation has been collaborating with Microsoft to ensure this is going to happen. This means that what you're saying, having a RPi with several usb drives attached is possible, if Sia allows you to specify where to store the data. I believe at this point it's not really possible.
|
|
|
|
ol92
|
 |
June 19, 2015, 03:30:32 PM Last edit: June 19, 2015, 03:42:52 PM by ol92 |
|
Beware of c-cex : they are not very good with non bitcoin protocol coins. I had bought some vnl there (vanillacoin), but they messed up with the wallet and pass the loss to us the customers, blaming the dev. I don't know whether this is only their fault or if the first versions of the wallet were really buggy, but their reaction toward customers was disappointing.
|
|
|
|
Hix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1971
Merit: 1036
|
 |
June 19, 2015, 03:41:46 PM |
|
Going to be probably another 7 weeks or so before software is even ready for an exchange for SIA. And I certainly would rather see it start on a better exchange, and no one should have to pay to have SIA listed. The exchanges should be lining up to add it  no voting needed. C-Cex has listed about as many shitcoins as there can possibly be. And bogus ICO's for those shitcoins... IDK. Like to see SIA on Poloniex or Bittrex to start. A top shelf coin deserves a top shelf exchange  I agree with it. We need Poloniex or maybe cryptsy.
|
|
|
|
|