What's your opinion of gun control?

[BADecker]

I strongly agree that the use and possession of weapons should be regulated. not everyone can be accountable for his actions.
social inequality will happen if the weapons are not controlled centrally and integrated.

I strongly agree that the use and possession of weapons should be regulated. Not everyone can be accountable for his actions... especially the regulators and the enforcers.

Let the weapons be controlled by the common people... each of them, personally and individually... so that those who would regulate freedom out of existence will be regulated by all the people, who are all in authority over their own lives.

[bitcoFx]

this not control can civil war

[BADecker]

Everybody knows that gun control is fun control.

Are you tired of having fun? Then get rid of your gun.

Wanna have more fun? Get another gun, or two, right now... and lots of ammo for all your guns.

[Berns]

Before the limit, the conditions for the use of weapons, better to let the statistics of how many crimes in States where the limited conditions for the acquisition of arms and where vacant possession.

[TicTacTic]

Attempts to tighten gun control has never led to anything. In the world where you have freedom people have the right to arms. Protect your family and life can only be man himself.

[BADecker]

The War on Guns: Arming Yourself Against Gun Control Lies

An accomplished economist, Dr. Lott is one of the most published scholars who studies crime and any connections crime has (or has not, as the case may be) with firearms. I am familiar with the author's previous publications, and consider this to be his best book yet.

The topic addressed in this book is chiefly the messaging having to do with firearms policy, so the author's two obvious goals are to first characterize those policies and effects and then to pierce through the often heated rhetoric about how those policies or effects are characterized to the public. This is not a dry recitation of research facts – it is a forthright description of the 'stuff' of public discourse on guns, crime, and safety, made accessible to readers and fully supported in the reference lists, notes and appendices for whose who wish to check Lott's work. Because of the author's dual goals, both the research and illustrative examples from media (the "messaging" part) are included in the copious notes and citations. This work is timely as well, and I appreciate having a comprehensive inventory of topics which percolate to the top of public debate during this political season.

Read more at https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/10/no_author/arm/.

[EnacDomains]

ban all guns like japan..

[TheButterZone]

ban all guns like japan..

LMFAO^

*Lazy Mother Fucking Argument Observed!

[Golftech]

time like this especially in our country i think controlling guns are needed as many criminality are happening glad that the president is doing good action to stop some of it with his rally against drugs those irresponsible gun holders are being track since drug addicts and pushers are holding it without license or using it the other way.

[TheButterZone]

time like this especially in our country i think controlling guns are needed as many criminality are happening glad that the president is doing good action to stop some of it with his rally against drugs those irresponsible gun holders are being track since drug addicts and pushers are holding it without license or using it the other way.

Huh?

[dreamer81]

In denmark guns are illegal unless you have been a member of a shooting range for 2 years. Then you can seek permission from the authorities and the foreman of the shooting range. Then MAYBE they will allow you to take your firearms with you home. But the law says that it has to be locked up in a vault.

If a murdere/thief/criminal/robber gains access to your house at night, and you shoot him - guess what - YOU go to prison for life. Here in denmark prison for life meens 16 years, with parol after 12 years.

A contrast to the american way. We dont have mass shootings here because it's hard to get a gun. Of course guns can be aquired illegal ways, but the price for a simple gun is around 10000 USD

[Perle]

In denmark guns are illegal unless you have been a member of a shooting range for 2 years. Then you can seek permission from the authorities and the foreman of the shooting range. Then MAYBE they will allow you to take your firearms with you home. But the law says that it has to be locked up in a vault.

If a murdere/thief/criminal/robber gains access to your house at night, and you shoot him - guess what - YOU go to prison for life. Here in denmark prison for life meens 16 years, with parol after 12 years.

A contrast to the american way. We dont have mass shootings here because it's hard to get a gun. Of course guns can be aquired illegal ways, but the price for a simple gun is around 10000 USD

First live in America a lot more people than in Denmark. The second most common murder weapon is a knife. A gun can help you defend against a knife. And commit mass executions of mentally abnormal people. After the terrorist attacks in America, the aircraft is not prohibited.

[TheButterZone]

A contrast to the american way. We dont have mass shootings here because it's hard to get a gun.

No more sociopathic grave-shitting, aka "Whatever It Takes" to justify "gun control", please.

[TicTacTic]

I wonder if we compare the statistics of people who have suffered from weapons with the number of people who escaped with weapons?

[SCCFX]

this control in big country big city
much people can hand gun and in value die because killing gun is high
is not control i think is very danger

[Dizaster2015]

Threat is unaccounted weapons From legal weapons do not kill anyone. Strengthening gun control is an attempt to steal people's freedom.

[yuiyuga]

Everyone is saying on this topic. Not a single fact in defense of the gain control does not lead. Probably - I do not want people to be able to defend themselves.

[birareru1988]

I know that in all countries where allowed to have weapons, dramatically decreased the crime rate. It is a fact. If you shot 100 people that defended 1000. Isn't that an argument in favor of arms?

[ethereumhunter]

i think gun control is necessary for being apply for every citizen because gun is really dangerous and not every people can have a gun with easy, its should need highly procedure to keep in the house or taking on the car.

its true that we should defend our self if something bad happen to us, but is it gun really important for us to help us to defend us? maybe in the city with highly crime its allowed, but in small city i think its not need to be allow, only few people that could have the gun and not every people can have the gun.

[dimonchik13]

The human control is carried out during the acquisition of weapons. Why should it then to control at home or in the car? Rules for the use of weapons tested over the years, why to go there?