Newar
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001
https://gliph.me/hUF
|
 |
January 27, 2015, 04:51:50 AM |
|
[...]
talked to support and was basically told tough luck buy another one (i have the backup key but it seems having another trezor is the only way to recover coins from the seed)
[...]
IIRC it was mentioned that you can restore using http://bip32.org/ (save the HTML and use it on a offline computer). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AussieHash
|
|
January 27, 2015, 05:21:30 AM |
|
i had a trezor for a few weeks before the provided lanyard broke off at the plastic lip on the trezor no idea where it ended up.. retraced my steps for the few hours before it went missing but it was no where to be found seems like a factory defect if the provided lanyard breaks just having it on a ring with a vehicle and house key if it is not meant to be used as a lanyard that clip on the trezor and the lanyard should not be provided or it should be admitted that this was a defect wish i had bought it on amazon not bitcoin as my bank would easily side with me on a refund or replacement  Lets say there have been 5000 units sold, I recall seeing only 1 report of a broken trezor pin that holds the lanyard https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=122438.msg9599519#msg9599519And maybe 1-2 earlier reports of the actual lanyard itself breaking talked to support and was basically told tough luck buy another one (i have the backup key but it seems having another trezor is the only way to recover coins from the seed)
You can restore your bitcoin manually with a BIP32/39/44 compatible wallet or script, (and if you have no passphrase on your account(s) you can also restore your mnemonic onto a btchip HW1/Ledger nano for use with with electrum 2 ( provided you can clone it yourself from github, and install cython/pyusb etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
grau
|
|
January 27, 2015, 06:01:52 PM |
|
You likely noticed significant improvement of performce while myTREZOR retrieves balances.
The reason is an upgrade of the back end. Have fun.
|
|
|
|
|
binford
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
January 27, 2015, 06:53:53 PM |
|
You likely noticed significant improvement of performce while myTREZOR retrieves balances.
The reason is an upgrade of the back end. Have fun.
TY very much! |
|
|
|
|
|
fonsie
|
|
January 27, 2015, 07:17:44 PM |
|
You likely noticed significant improvement of performce while myTREZOR retrieves balances.
The reason is an upgrade of the back end. Have fun.
The speed wasn't the biggest problem, the fact that it almost never worked when needed however was. |
I decided to no longer use a signature, because people were trolling me about it.
|
|
|
molecular
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
|
|
January 27, 2015, 09:46:10 PM |
|
You likely noticed significant improvement of performce while myTREZOR retrieves balances.
The reason is an upgrade of the back end. Have fun.
Thank you very much! |
PGP key molecular F9B70769 fingerprint 9CDD C0D3 20F8 279F 6BE0 3F39 FC49 2362 F9B7 0769
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
January 27, 2015, 10:21:27 PM |
|
You likely noticed significant improvement of performce while myTREZOR retrieves balances.
The reason is an upgrade of the back end. Have fun.
The speed wasn't the biggest problem, the fact that it almost never worked when needed however was. Either you must be very unlucky or I very lucky because I use my trezor several times a day since release and mytrezor.com has only failed me twice in all that time. Which was pretty annoying ill grant but quite a bit less of a problem than what you described. |
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited? |
|
|
|
DevonMiner
|
|
January 27, 2015, 10:25:25 PM |
|
The speed wasn't the biggest problem, the fact that it almost never worked when needed however was.
Spot on .. it was a pain in the a$$, but has been more responsive of late. |
|
|
|
|
dsattler
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 27, 2015, 10:52:28 PM |
|
You likely noticed significant improvement of performce while myTREZOR retrieves balances.
The reason is an upgrade of the back end. Have fun.
The speed wasn't the biggest problem, the fact that it almost never worked when needed however was. Either you must be very unlucky or I very lucky because I use my trezor several times a day since release and mytrezor.com has only failed me twice in all that time. Which was pretty annoying ill grant but quite a bit less of a problem than what you described. You can count me to the lucky ones as well, because my trezor worked out of the box without a flaw... |
Bitcointalk member since 2013! 
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2348
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
January 27, 2015, 11:11:48 PM |
|
You likely noticed significant improvement of performce while myTREZOR retrieves balances.
The reason is an upgrade of the back end. Have fun.
The speed wasn't the biggest problem, the fact that it almost never worked when needed however was. Either you must be very unlucky or I very lucky because I use my trezor several times a day since release and mytrezor.com has only failed me twice in all that time. Which was pretty annoying ill grant but quite a bit less of a problem than what you described. You can count me to the lucky ones as well, because my trezor worked out of the box without a flaw... Pretty sure that it is platform dependent, luck is not a factor. Most likely the JS execution of your browser is the major determinant. |
|
|
|
dsattler
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 27, 2015, 11:18:23 PM |
|
You likely noticed significant improvement of performce while myTREZOR retrieves balances.
The reason is an upgrade of the back end. Have fun.
The speed wasn't the biggest problem, the fact that it almost never worked when needed however was. Either you must be very unlucky or I very lucky because I use my trezor several times a day since release and mytrezor.com has only failed me twice in all that time. Which was pretty annoying ill grant but quite a bit less of a problem than what you described. You can count me to the lucky ones as well, because my trezor worked out of the box without a flaw... Pretty sure that it is platform dependent, luck is not a factor. Most likely the JS execution of your browser is the major determinant. I'm using a chrome browser in privacy mode. |
Bitcointalk member since 2013!
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
January 28, 2015, 01:19:20 AM |
|
You likely noticed significant improvement of performce while myTREZOR retrieves balances.
The reason is an upgrade of the back end. Have fun.
The speed wasn't the biggest problem, the fact that it almost never worked when needed however was. Either you must be very unlucky or I very lucky because I use my trezor several times a day since release and mytrezor.com has only failed me twice in all that time. Which was pretty annoying ill grant but quite a bit less of a problem than what you described. You can count me to the lucky ones as well, because my trezor worked out of the box without a flaw... Pretty sure that it is platform dependent, luck is not a factor. Most likely the JS execution of your browser is the major determinant. I'm using a chrome browser in privacy mode. Firefox here |
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited? |
|
|
|
fonsie
|
|
January 28, 2015, 04:50:16 PM |
|
I encountered the problem myself only a few times, not anything life threatening I was stating the actual problem, wich has been complained about numerous times in this very thread, why do you think they are switching away from the current backend... mytrezor.com is down again...
Yeah, it was down for few minutes; current backend is driving me nuts. It's failing more and more often and I'll celebrate when I'll "rm -rf" it! We implemented heavy automatic checks and watchdog, so at least it can recover itself after few minutes of downtime. In meantime we're working hard on replacing current backend by opensource Insight block explorer, but it requires significant refactoring of network API in myTREZOR. |
I decided to no longer use a signature, because people were trolling me about it.
|
|
|
|
kkurtmann
|
|
January 29, 2015, 12:49:51 AM |
|
would satoshilabs be willing to sell me a First Edition metal Trezor for 1.0 BTC ?
|
|
|
|
|
chrisrico
|
|
January 29, 2015, 12:50:09 AM |
|
why do you think they are switching away from the current backend...
Slush is one of the founders of Satoshi Labs, so I think he would know what they're working on... would satoshilabs be willing to sell me a first edition metal Trezor for 1.0 BTC ?
They've stated repeatedly that they have no plans of ever offering the metal Trezors again. |
|
|
|
|
|
kkurtmann
|
|
January 29, 2015, 12:53:49 AM |
|
why do you think they are switching away from the current backend...
Slush is one of the founders of Satoshi Labs, so I think he would know what they're working on... would satoshilabs be willing to sell me a first edition metal Trezor for 1.0 BTC ?
They've stated repeatedly that they have no plans of ever offering the metal Trezors again. I know that but they have extras to give out when they fail which is mostly never, so I assume they have plenty left and I made an offer. |
|
|
|
binford
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
January 29, 2015, 03:55:05 AM |
|
would satoshilabs be willing to sell me a First Edition metal Trezor for 1.0 BTC ?
try at least tree fiddy |
|
|
|
|
|
grau
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:39:57 AM
Last edit: January 29, 2015, 06:59:16 AM by grau |
|
You likely noticed significant improvement of performce while myTREZOR retrieves balances.
The reason is an upgrade of the back end. Have fun.
I waited some time to be able to claim increased stability too. There was not a single minute of disruption in service for nearly two weeks now and counting. The Bits of Proof back end is serving thousands of users, lots simultanously and is retrieveing hundreds of transactions out of tens of millions in matter of seconds or less with a criteria that is not a simple query but a scan depending on previous hits. This is not a negligible accomplishment, best illustrated by the fact that it is not yet matched by any other implementation, not even for single user use. I aopologize for any disruption, but have to emphasize that this software had uptimes north of 95% in its worst weeks and is still improving. |
|
|
|
|
|
kkurtmann
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:47:35 AM |
|
would satoshilabs be willing to sell me a First Edition metal Trezor for 1.0 BTC ?
try at least tree fiddy wait a week |
|
|
|
2586
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 13
|
|
January 29, 2015, 07:03:15 AM
Last edit: January 29, 2015, 07:14:34 AM by 2586 |
|
What's the deal with this?: Trezor Code no Longer LGPLv3, but now more restrictive Microsoft Reference Source LicenseI bought my Trezor with the understanding that all of the code running on it was open source (Free/Libre/etc), and would continue to be. If the code is going to be under a restrictive license going forward, I am no longer interested in owning a Trezor; I request that SatoshiLabs allow me to return mine for a refund, in order to make up for the bait-and-switch. |
|
|
|
|
|
