Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 10:01:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 ... 118 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ETH price soaring. Are you going to move some BTC into ETH?  (Read 198763 times)
Its About Sharing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000


Antifragile


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 10:30:02 PM
 #921

That article is interesting regarding Ethereums price and how it can help fund the company for quite a few years.
I would imagine companies invested and investing into Ethereum know this, so perhaps they are "funding" Ethereum
so to speak by buying the Ether, with this intention...

Well a similar thing happened with Bitcoin, maybe not quite as direct but companies like Circle, Xapo, Coinbase really started the whole Bitcoin "bubble" and interest back then, that's a fact.

Wasn't the 2013 bubble start before any of those companies had traction or even started?
I thought Gox problems and the Chinese started the bubble, well along with regular interest.

BTC = Black Swan.
BTC = Antifragile - "Some things benefit from shocks; they thrive and grow when exposed to volatility, randomness, disorder, and stressors and love adventure, risk, and uncertainty. Robust is not the opposite of fragile.
1714514484
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714514484

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714514484
Reply with quote  #2

1714514484
Report to moderator
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a SourceForge forum.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714514484
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714514484

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714514484
Reply with quote  #2

1714514484
Report to moderator
1714514484
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714514484

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714514484
Reply with quote  #2

1714514484
Report to moderator
1714514484
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714514484

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714514484
Reply with quote  #2

1714514484
Report to moderator
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2348


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 10:49:06 PM
 #922

That article is interesting regarding Ethereums price and how it can help fund the company for quite a few years.
I would imagine companies invested and investing into Ethereum know this, so perhaps they are "funding" Ethereum
so to speak by buying the Ether, with this intention...

Well a similar thing happened with Bitcoin, maybe not quite as direct but companies like Circle, Xapo, Coinbase really started the whole Bitcoin "bubble" and interest back then, that's a fact.

Wasn't the 2013 bubble start before any of those companies had traction or even started?
I thought Gox problems and the Chinese started the bubble, well along with regular interest.

The 2013 waves up was clearly the result of the late-2012 halving ... as much as everyone wants to deny it, overshoot and a positive feedback between price-rising and perception-of-future-price demand explains the rest.

fullzero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1009



View Profile
March 23, 2016, 11:04:00 PM
 #923

That article is interesting regarding Ethereums price and how it can help fund the company for quite a few years.
I would imagine companies invested and investing into Ethereum know this, so perhaps they are "funding" Ethereum
so to speak by buying the Ether, with this intention...

Well a similar thing happened with Bitcoin, maybe not quite as direct but companies like Circle, Xapo, Coinbase really started the whole Bitcoin "bubble" and interest back then, that's a fact.

Wasn't the 2013 bubble start before any of those companies had traction or even started?
I thought Gox problems and the Chinese started the bubble, well along with regular interest.

The 2013 waves up was clearly the result of the late-2012 halving ... as much as everyone wants to deny it, overshoot and a positive feedback between price-rising and perception-of-future-price demand explains the rest.

The price didn't move concurrently with first halving; it much more closely matched the shipment of gen1 avalons.  It is impossible to separate the influence of first halving from the influence of asic miners.
yefi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511



View Profile
March 24, 2016, 01:54:44 AM
 #924

The price didn't move concurrently with first halving; it much more closely matched the shipment of gen1 avalons.  It is impossible to separate the influence of first halving from the influence of asic miners.

Concurrency - or Fisher-Price relationships for ages 1-3.
fullzero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1009



View Profile
March 24, 2016, 02:24:11 AM
 #925

The price didn't move concurrently with first halving; it much more closely matched the shipment of gen1 avalons.  It is impossible to separate the influence of first halving from the influence of asic miners.

Concurrency - or Fisher-Price relationships for ages 1-3.

FMP ( for most people )
Show them an exchange rate between two unknowns as a number, and ask them if it will go up or down; they will tell you they don't know. 

Show them a chart depicting the last 6 hrs showing a drop and ask them again; they will tell you it will go down. 

Show them a chart depecting the last month showing an uptrend; they will tell you it will go up. 

chart droppers think everyone is chattel

Schopenhauer said; Everyone takes the limit of their own field of vision as the limit of the world.  He didn't realize why Socrates was wise.
yefi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511



View Profile
March 24, 2016, 05:42:42 AM
 #926

FMP ( for most people )
Show them an exchange rate between two unknowns as a number, and ask them if it will go up or down; they will tell you they don't know. 

Show them a chart depicting the last 6 hrs showing a drop and ask them again; they will tell you it will go down. 

Show them a chart depecting the last month showing an uptrend; they will tell you it will go up. 

chart droppers think everyone is chattel

Schopenhauer said; Everyone takes the limit of their own field of vision as the limit of the world.  He didn't realize why Socrates was wise.

Cause and effect do not need to be concurrent. The symptoms of syphilis can present decades after a person is infected, for example. The transmission of force can be swift or it can be slow.

I'm not sure why Schopenhauer is making us a visit, or what "chart droppers think everyone is chattel" is meant to signify.
fullzero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1009



View Profile
March 24, 2016, 11:50:05 AM
 #927

FMP ( for most people )
Show them an exchange rate between two unknowns as a number, and ask them if it will go up or down; they will tell you they don't know. 

Show them a chart depicting the last 6 hrs showing a drop and ask them again; they will tell you it will go down. 

Show them a chart depecting the last month showing an uptrend; they will tell you it will go up. 

chart droppers think everyone is chattel

Schopenhauer said; Everyone takes the limit of their own field of vision as the limit of the world.  He didn't realize why Socrates was wise.

Cause and effect do not need to be concurrent. The symptoms of syphilis can present decades after a person is infected, for example. The transmission of force can be swift or it can be slow.


That is why I said;

It is impossible to separate the influence of first halving from the influence of asic miners.

If you think about your response to this; hopefully you will understand the rest of my last post.
BitUsher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1034


View Profile
March 24, 2016, 03:55:58 PM
 #928

Does anyone know when Bitfinex will introduce ETH shorting and margins?
yefi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511



View Profile
March 24, 2016, 05:54:18 PM
 #929

That is why I said;

It is impossible to separate the influence of first halving from the influence of asic miners.

If you think about your response to this; hopefully you will understand the rest of my last post.


You; must; enlighten; me; for; I; am; so; very; dim.
Egenen
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 268
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 25, 2016, 08:51:02 AM
 #930

That article is interesting regarding Ethereums price and how it can help fund the company for quite a few years.
I would imagine companies invested and investing into Ethereum know this, so perhaps they are "funding" Ethereum
so to speak by buying the Ether, with this intention...

Well a similar thing happened with Bitcoin, maybe not quite as direct but companies like Circle, Xapo, Coinbase really started the whole Bitcoin "bubble" and interest back then, that's a fact.

Wasn't the 2013 bubble start before any of those companies had traction or even started?
I thought Gox problems and the Chinese started the bubble, well along with regular interest.

The 2013 waves up was clearly the result of the late-2012 halving ... as much as everyone wants to deny it, overshoot and a positive feedback between price-rising and perception-of-future-price demand explains the rest.

The effect of halving this time will be less than 4 years ago. As the existing coins are much more.

gise87
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 25, 2016, 05:52:24 PM
 #931

What do you guys think is the target for ETH for 2017? I think we'll hit 0.1 BTC

Full automated trading bot 24/7: ZEBRA Altcoin Bot
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2348


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
March 26, 2016, 01:14:16 AM
 #932

That article is interesting regarding Ethereums price and how it can help fund the company for quite a few years.
I would imagine companies invested and investing into Ethereum know this, so perhaps they are "funding" Ethereum
so to speak by buying the Ether, with this intention...

Well a similar thing happened with Bitcoin, maybe not quite as direct but companies like Circle, Xapo, Coinbase really started the whole Bitcoin "bubble" and interest back then, that's a fact.

Wasn't the 2013 bubble start before any of those companies had traction or even started?
I thought Gox problems and the Chinese started the bubble, well along with regular interest.

The 2013 waves up was clearly the result of the late-2012 halving ... as much as everyone wants to deny it, overshoot and a positive feedback between price-rising and perception-of-future-price demand explains the rest.

The effect of halving this time will be less than 4 years ago. As the existing coins are much more.

... there's too many other variables in play to say this definitively. Mostly it depends how much the current supply of new coins is affecting price on the margin, miners do a lot more dumping of new coins these days than they did in 2012 is my impression.

fricircled
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 201
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 26, 2016, 05:26:52 AM
 #933

What do you guys think is the target for ETH for 2017? I think we'll hit 0.1 BTC

It depend on the further developments of the coin. If it has, then it will go to 0.1 or 0.5 of bitcoin. If not, it will be 0.
Westant
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 355
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 26, 2016, 06:15:02 AM
 #934

What do you guys think is the target for ETH for 2017? I think we'll hit 0.1 BTC

It will be between 0.01 to 0.1.
parmatiya
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 26, 2016, 02:54:59 PM
 #935

What do you guys think is the target for ETH for 2017? I think we'll hit 0.1 BTC

It will be between 0.01 to 0.1.

That is a very large range. I think it will be between 0.05 to 0.1. It might even go higher than 0.2.

vinaha
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 26, 2016, 04:13:18 PM
 #936

That article is interesting regarding Ethereums price and how it can help fund the company for quite a few years.
I would imagine companies invested and investing into Ethereum know this, so perhaps they are "funding" Ethereum
so to speak by buying the Ether, with this intention...

Well a similar thing happened with Bitcoin, maybe not quite as direct but companies like Circle, Xapo, Coinbase really started the whole Bitcoin "bubble" and interest back then, that's a fact.

Wasn't the 2013 bubble start before any of those companies had traction or even started?
I thought Gox problems and the Chinese started the bubble, well along with regular interest.

The 2013 waves up was clearly the result of the late-2012 halving ... as much as everyone wants to deny it, overshoot and a positive feedback between price-rising and perception-of-future-price demand explains the rest.

The price didn't move concurrently with first halving; it much more closely matched the shipment of gen1 avalons.  It is impossible to separate the influence of first halving from the influence of asic miners.


Good observation. However the majority of miners of the first ASICs were hodling what they mined, thus starving the market about as much as a halving would. It's still the same thing fundamentally. It wasn't until people needed to pay their electricity bills that they would mine and dump.
I was one of the first ASIC miners. I still have everything I mined.
zaph3t
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


SynqCrypto Team


View Profile WWW
March 26, 2016, 04:24:08 PM
 #937

What do you guys think is the target for ETH for 2017? I think we'll hit 0.1 BTC
ETH will go higher for sure especially when they fully switch to POS mode then yes people will be holding more and more
so the price will hit hight maybe up to 0.2 and beyond.

yefi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511



View Profile
March 27, 2016, 04:56:24 AM
 #938

Good observation. However the majority of miners of the first ASICs were hodling what they mined, thus starving the market about as much as a halving would. It's still the same thing fundamentally. It wasn't until people needed to pay their electricity bills that they would mine and dump.
I was one of the first ASIC miners. I still have everything I mined.


The price increasing was the encouragement for miners to hold. I just checked the first bubble after the halving, and hashrate increased by about x3 from when the first ASIC shipped, whereas price increased by about x14. GPU mining would therefore have been at least four and a half times more profitable.

Btw, I guess you sold your account then?
Kwiksave
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 102
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 27, 2016, 07:34:51 AM
 #939

What do you guys think is the target for ETH for 2017? I think we'll hit 0.1 BTC
ETH will go higher for sure especially when they fully switch to POS mode then yes people will be holding more and more
so the price will hit hight maybe up to 0.2 and beyond.

The cost of PoS is lower than PoW. So people will tend to sell the coins. The price might go lower because of that.
fullzero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1009



View Profile
March 27, 2016, 12:26:00 PM
 #940

That article is interesting regarding Ethereums price and how it can help fund the company for quite a few years.
I would imagine companies invested and investing into Ethereum know this, so perhaps they are "funding" Ethereum
so to speak by buying the Ether, with this intention...

Well a similar thing happened with Bitcoin, maybe not quite as direct but companies like Circle, Xapo, Coinbase really started the whole Bitcoin "bubble" and interest back then, that's a fact.

Wasn't the 2013 bubble start before any of those companies had traction or even started?
I thought Gox problems and the Chinese started the bubble, well along with regular interest.

The 2013 waves up was clearly the result of the late-2012 halving ... as much as everyone wants to deny it, overshoot and a positive feedback between price-rising and perception-of-future-price demand explains the rest.

The price didn't move concurrently with first halving; it much more closely matched the shipment of gen1 avalons.  It is impossible to separate the influence of first halving from the influence of asic miners.


Good observation. However the majority of miners of the first ASICs were hodling what they mined, thus starving the market about as much as a halving would. It's still the same thing fundamentally. It wasn't until people needed to pay their electricity bills that they would mine and dump.
I was one of the first ASIC miners. I still have everything I mined.


Almost everyone I know who ordered an Avalon, spent a lot on subsequent batches of avalons.  Same with am blades and usb erupters.  I did not notice a holding sentiment until it became clear BFL would not deliver most orders in 2013.  For most this was in July 2013 a year after pre ordering. 
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 ... 118 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!