[$XVG] VERGE [POW][MultiAlgo][TOR/i2P][no premine/ico!]

[cryptofarmer]

Wow
what happened?
someone attack our blockchain?

blockexploer's last block is 287024   https://www.blockexperts.com/xvg
suprnova's current block is 284094  https://doged.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool
bittrex's WALLET STATUS is Inactve,and BLOCK HEIGHT is 286910  https://bittrex.com/Status

DEV,need fix it?

suprnova is fixing it now. no worries.

www.mining-dutch.nl is still mining, what is the problem here ?
Is the chain forked, can we still mine this coin ?

And what about Ccex?

Some clearity would be nice.

mining-dutch.nl looks fine. what is the problem?

what is wrong with c-cex?

Ok good,
Because Suprnova and Bittrex are down there seems to be something wrong with the chain, so I thought maybe there are some forks.
Then Eventualy mined coins can be useless.
That's why I ask.
What is the problem.?

[1714629259]

1714629259

[1714629259]

1714629259

[andronick83]

mining-dutch.nl looks fine. what is the problem?

http://mining-dutch.nl/index.php "XVG Difficulty 315"
https://www.mastermining.net/verge/index.php?page=statistics "Difficulty 2005"

magic..

[Dogedarkdev]

mining-dutch.nl looks fine. what is the problem?

http://mining-dutch.nl/index.php "XVG Difficulty 315"
https://www.mastermining.net/verge/index.php?page=statistics "Difficulty 2005"

magic..

the other pools look fine, suprnova, and mining-dutch are working ok. i will write to mastermining. luckily no one is mining there anyway

edit: also ill add mining-dutch.nl to our OP. not sure how i forgot.

[cryptofarmer]

mining-dutch.nl looks fine. what is the problem?

http://mining-dutch.nl/index.php "XVG Difficulty 315"
https://www.mastermining.net/verge/index.php?page=statistics "Difficulty 2005"

magic..

the other pools look fine, suprnova, and mining-dutch are working ok. i will write to mastermining. luckily no one is mining there anyway

edit: also ill add mining-dutch.nl to our OP. not sure how i forgot.

Thanks for adding our pool to the OP

[Dogedarkdev]

mining-dutch.nl looks fine. what is the problem?

http://mining-dutch.nl/index.php "XVG Difficulty 315"
https://www.mastermining.net/verge/index.php?page=statistics "Difficulty 2005"

magic..

the other pools look fine, suprnova, and mining-dutch are working ok. i will write to mastermining. luckily no one is mining there anyway

edit: also ill add mining-dutch.nl to our OP. not sure how i forgot.

Thanks for adding our pool to the OP

added to OP and website. sorry for the delay, slipped my mind =\

[andronick83]

https://xvg.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=dashboard "Difficulty 24"
But "4,644.01% Of Expected Shares" without new blocks..
This difficulty wrong

[Dogedarkdev]

https://xvg.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=dashboard "Difficulty 24"
But "4,644.01% Of Expected Shares" without new blocks..
This difficulty wrong

it is right. and it just went up.

[A_McGriff]

Do we not want to include Sha 256 now? Do we include them later?

I would vote for this option were it available:

Scrypt, x11, Sha256, prime, neoscrypt, x17


I'm including Prime but i don't really understand it as well as the others. I know it hunts for special Cunningham chains but i don't really know how it works in mining or if it is more efficient or secure for us. If you guys think its essential ill vote for it but right now its the only one im not clear on yet everyone loves it.

But i would vote for what i mentioned above: Scrypt, x11, Sha256, prime, neoscrypt, x17 (three asic friendly algos and three people friendly algos).

----------

The goal is to secure the network and get this tech in the hands of as many people as possible and proliferate Verge.

The social importance of what is happening here right now, maybe only the bitcoin community is aware of, but right now, whats happening here is huge for humanity.

Let our choice in algos reflect that.

[Dogedarkdev]

Do we not want to include Sha 256 now? Do we include them later?

I would vote for this option were it available:

Scrypt, x11, Sha256, prime, neoscrypt, x17


I'm including Prime but i don't really understand it as well as the others. I know it hunts for special Cunningham chains but i don't really know how it works in mining or if it is more efficient or secure for us. If you guys think its essential ill vote for it but right now its the only one im not clear on yet everyone loves it.

But i would vote for what i mentioned above: Scrypt, x11, Sha256, prime, neoscrypt, x17 (three asic friendly algos and three people friendly algos).

----------

The goal is to secure the network and get this tech in the hands of as many people as possible and proliferate Verge.

The social importance of what is happening here right now, maybe only the bitcoin community is aware of, but right now, whats happening here is huge for humanity.

Let our choice in algos reflect that.

yeah i agree, however, i think its best to stay away from sha256, only because how many farms use it.. if a sha256 farm pointed at us, it could hog our chain all over again.

[myriadcoin]

Do we not want to include Sha 256 now? Do we include them later?

I would vote for this option were it available:

Scrypt, x11, Sha256, prime, neoscrypt, x17


I'm including Prime but i don't really understand it as well as the others. I know it hunts for special Cunningham chains but i don't really know how it works in mining or if it is more efficient or secure for us. If you guys think its essential ill vote for it but right now its the only one im not clear on yet everyone loves it.

But i would vote for what i mentioned above: Scrypt, x11, Sha256, prime, neoscrypt, x17 (three asic friendly algos and three people friendly algos).

----------

The goal is to secure the network and get this tech in the hands of as many people as possible and proliferate Verge.

The social importance of what is happening here right now, maybe only the bitcoin community is aware of, but right now, whats happening here is huge for humanity.

Let our choice in algos reflect that.

yeah i agree, however, i think its best to stay away from sha256, only because how many farms use it.. if a sha256 farm pointed at us, it could hog our chain all over again.

I'm not a sha256d miner so I have no vested interested. I understand what you're saying, but I think this is an eventual risk for all algos, and that since sha256d is already going through it, it'll be the first to come out the other end. Eventually the improvements to sha256d ASICs over time will slow down. At that point, the profits from selling ASICs will start to catch up to the profits from mining them. Then you will see the Bitcoin network become more decentralised. That's why I consider sha256d to be an obvious choice— it's the most mature.

The whole point of multi-algo is that it mitigates the amount that the sha256d farms can hog the chain.

I'm liking the direction this discussion is going.

[bitLeap]

Do we not want to include Sha 256 now? Do we include them later?

I would vote for this option were it available:

Scrypt, x11, Sha256, prime, neoscrypt, x17


I'm including Prime but i don't really understand it as well as the others. I know it hunts for special Cunningham chains but i don't really know how it works in mining or if it is more efficient or secure for us. If you guys think its essential ill vote for it but right now its the only one im not clear on yet everyone loves it.

But i would vote for what i mentioned above: Scrypt, x11, Sha256, prime, neoscrypt, x17 (three asic friendly algos and three people friendly algos).

----------

The goal is to secure the network and get this tech in the hands of as many people as possible and proliferate Verge.

The social importance of what is happening here right now, maybe only the bitcoin community is aware of, but right now, whats happening here is huge for humanity.

Let our choice in algos reflect that.

Wow I think there's way too many big farms algos there the whole point is to decentralize mining.

Btw dev I hope the Prime Verge adds is Prime Constellations just like in Riecoin it's much more meaningful and very user friendly for decentralized mining.

[Rabid Parrots]

So, when we go multi algo, if we are struck again by the Hashinator, would the beefed up GPU/CPU miners on the Blake or x11 algos contribute to mining the same block or are they all completely separate somehow?

I know nothing about this stuff.

[myriadcoin]

So, when we go multi algo, if we are struck again by the Hashinator, would the beefed up GPU/CPU miners on the Blake or x11 algos contribute to mining the same block or are they all completely separate somehow?

I know nothing about this stuff.

All algorithms compete to find the next block. If the difficulty of one algorithm is too high, then another algorithm will probably find the next block. So basically, if scrypt gets struck by Hashinator, the GPU/CPU algorithms will find the next blocks until the scrypt difficulty readjusts.

[TheSignsGuy]

Just a little reminder of how importance diligence can be in regard to security and privacy.

Looks like they are trying to sneak it in.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-starts-pushing-windows-10-as-a-recommended-update/

[Dogedarkdev]

Just a little reminder of how importance diligence can be in regard to security and privacy.

Looks like they are trying to sneak it in.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-starts-pushing-windows-10-as-a-recommended-update/

yeah they've been pushing telemetry into windows 8. funny part is people think that you can disable it in the windows 10 upgrade still, not realizing that 0 is the same value as 1 unless, you've purchased it. (enterprise edition)

[p75formula]

Just a little reminder of how importance diligence can be in regard to security and privacy.

Looks like they are trying to sneak it in.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-starts-pushing-windows-10-as-a-recommended-update/

I used to often say FU Apple but more recently I find myself uttering FU windows. Don't like having how I use my pc dictated to me.

[Rabid Parrots]

Just a little reminder of how importance diligence can be in regard to security and privacy.

Looks like they are trying to sneak it in.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-starts-pushing-windows-10-as-a-recommended-update/

I used to often say FU Apple but more recently I find myself uttering FU windows. Don't like having how I use my pc dictated to me.

Don't worry, guys. Pretty soon, a new coin will come along that is an entire DECENTRALIZED operating system using the BLOCKCHAIN to <indecipherable technical jargon> and <buzzwords> your computer. Don't worry about that 75% premine. That's for bounties.

[A_McGriff]

Do we not want to include Sha 256 now? Do we include them later?

I would vote for this option were it available:

Scrypt, x11, Sha256, prime, neoscrypt, x17


I'm including Prime but i don't really understand it as well as the others. I know it hunts for special Cunningham chains but i don't really know how it works in mining or if it is more efficient or secure for us. If you guys think its essential ill vote for it but right now its the only one im not clear on yet everyone loves it.

But i would vote for what i mentioned above: Scrypt, x11, Sha256, prime, neoscrypt, x17 (three asic friendly algos and three people friendly algos).

----------

The goal is to secure the network and get this tech in the hands of as many people as possible and proliferate Verge.

The social importance of what is happening here right now, maybe only the bitcoin community is aware of, but right now, whats happening here is huge for humanity.

Let our choice in algos reflect that.

yeah i agree, however, i think its best to stay away from sha256, only because how many farms use it.. if a sha256 farm pointed at us, it could hog our chain all over again.

Ok cool, thats what i wanted to know, scratch sha256  

[fosco333]

those voting 'wait, lets add more options...' should say they voted on that and post which algos they wanted otherwise it's pointless doesn't add to the discussion.

[CryptocurrencyNetwork]

So, when we go multi algo, if we are struck again by the Hashinator, would the beefed up GPU/CPU miners on the Blake or x11 algos contribute to mining the same block or are they all completely separate somehow?

I know nothing about this stuff.

All algorithms compete to find the next block. If the difficulty of one algorithm is too high, then another algorithm will probably find the next block. So basically, if scrypt gets struck by Hashinator, the GPU/CPU algorithms will find the next blocks until the scrypt difficulty readjusts.

The hashinator, lmao - I like it