Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[Call_Me_Bambi]

Can someone help me with the command line for dwarfpool.
I am mining only eth and I'm located in EU.
Should i write this: EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal (my ETH wallet) -epsw x -allcoins -1
Is this correct?

Update:

Just did a test mine on Dwarfpool with the setting given below [using Claymore 9.8] and it works OK. I used the example given in the readme file.

Code:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal 0xd7236c7bB066725C33DAE910A947aE40D565B66E -epsw x -allcoins 1

[Call_Me_Bambi]

Vulnerability discovered in Claymore miner versions earlier than 10.2, opening Claymore up to a remote attack hack. I don't know if this has been confirmed or not but there is a notice of it here (see post #4605) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=472510.4600

[Victorio]

I have a 7 GPU rig made up of (5) GTX 1060's and (2) RX470's.  My RX470's are giving me very low hashrates.  They fluctuate between 12 mh/s and 18 mh/s.  Here is my configuration.  Any thoughts?

Did you define manually the Ethereum and Siacoin mining intensity?
GTX1060 can withstand -dcri (Siacoin) up to 40-50 without significant drop in hashrate, while RX470 start to hash ETH slower beginning with -dcri 20-25. Maybe your miner has set automatically a 40-45 intensity, that keeps down ETH hashrate on RX470.
I suggest you to run 2 Claymore instances: one for GTX1060, another for RX470 and adjust Siacoin intensity. Define -di (GPU index) for each instance.

[thx333]

Can someone help me with the command line for dwarfpool.
I am mining only eth and I'm located in EU.
Should i write this: EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal (my ETH wallet) -epsw x -allcoins -1
Is this correct?

Update:

Just did a test mine on Dwarfpool with the setting given below [using Claymore 9.8] and it works OK. I used the example given in the readme file.

Code:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal 0xd7236c7bB066725C33DAE910A947aE40D565B66E -epsw x -allcoins 1

Always for Europe, Claymoure 10.0
Is it right this line? Or too simple?

Code:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal mywallet/worker/mail -mode 1

[Call_Me_Bambi]

Can someone help me with the command line for dwarfpool.
I am mining only eth and I'm located in EU.
Should i write this: EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal (my ETH wallet) -epsw x -allcoins -1
Is this correct?

Update:

Just did a test mine on Dwarfpool with the setting given below [using Claymore 9.8] and it works OK. I used the example given in the readme file.

Code:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal 0xd7236c7bB066725C33DAE910A947aE40D565B66E -epsw x -allcoins 1

Always for Europe, Claymoure 10.0
Is it right this line? Or too simple?

Code:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal mywallet/worker/mail -mode 1

You are missing "-epsw x"
Nanopool has a config generator for the Claymore miner, just click on "Quick Start" and it will create one for you. This is what I get and it works, just put in your details into the grenerator.

Code:

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal 0xd7236c7bB066725C33DAE910A947aE40D565B66E.UserName/Email@Email.com -epsw x -mode 1

[thx333]

You are missing "-epsw x"
Nanopool has a config generator for the Claymore miner, just click on "Quick Start" and it will create one for you. This is what I get and it works, just put in your details into the grenerator.

Thanks
EDIT
Found in nanopool site

However in nanoool site the  example is:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal YOUR_ETH_ADDRESS/YOUR_WORKER_NAME/YOUR_EMAIL -mode 1

[Flickspeed]

Hi, Is there something wrong with the late teamviewer versions alongside the most recent windows 10 version? Claymore becomes stuck at "start building OpenCL program for GPU 0..."  if I am logged on with teamviewer. If I am not logged on it starts mining as normal. Once I logon GPU 0 Hangs in open cl and miner continue with the rest of the cards. Thats ofcourse because I have  -wd 0 and -r -1. Otherwise everything works very well until you connect with teamviewer. Is there any setting to be changed?

bump, this is really bugging me on 2 different miners with latest version of windows (1709 fall 2017 update) I am still uncertain if its windows, teamviewer or claymore miner at fault.

[Raimy]

Is is just me or is Clamore's Ethereum miner been crashing more than usual lately? I suspect is has something to do with the larger DAG files needed, as I can run the same program on another coin such as Expanse and get several days of up-time, but while mining Ethereum I am lucky to get 48 hours before the program hangs trying to restart itself.

I already tried lowering my clocks, increasing voltage, using -ethi 5 and 6 but it doesn't seem to help. My temperatures are quite cool now with winter approaching and all my PSUs are either Evga or Corsair running at only 80% efficiency, so I don't think it is any of those things.

[thx333]

Is is just me or is Clamore's Ethereum miner been crashing more than usual lately? I suspect is has something to do with the larger DAG files needed, as I can run the same program on another coin such as Expanse and get several days of up-time, but while mining Ethereum I am lucky to get 48 hours before the program hangs trying to restart itself.

I already tried lowering my clocks, increasing voltage, using -ethi 5 and 6 but it doesn't seem to help. My temperatures are quite cool now with winter approaching and all my PSUs are either Evga or Corsair running at only 80% efficiency, so I don't think it is any of those things.

Your Claymore version?

[fapar]

Is is just me or is Clamore's Ethereum miner been crashing more than usual lately? I suspect is has something to do with the larger DAG files needed, as I can run the same program on another coin such as Expanse and get several days of up-time, but while mining Ethereum I am lucky to get 48 hours before the program hangs trying to restart itself.

I already tried lowering my clocks, increasing voltage, using -ethi 5 and 6 but it doesn't seem to help. My temperatures are quite cool now with winter approaching and all my PSUs are either Evga or Corsair running at only 80% efficiency, so I don't think it is any of those things.

At the moment the size of the DAG file for a 127 epoch EXP is 1.99 GB. Which is very small and potica with the original ETH DAG file are excluded.

[dandyqb]

https://scontent.fmnl13-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/24131080_10156052898027975_2108634044659047292_n.jpg?oh=eb8d1a74fcf78ff5da6b2219680d15f4&oe=5A90C526

why i always encounter this error on ver 10.2, never on previous versions, both of my 2 rigs encounter this, plz help,thanks

[Dowper]

Have seen some people mention -eqlim 288 or something like that.. what does that do?

Wow, this increased my 270X GPUs to 19MH, and RX470s and RX570s with 0.2MH.

[rigomortis]

I think there might be something wrong with 10.2.  I have 2 identical rigs.  One running 9.8 and super stable.  The other rig is on 10.2 and windows gets really sluggish after 3hrs of mining. I couldn't even move any windows around and afterburner becomes unresponsive.  I am going to switch my 10.2 over to 9.8 and see if that will make a difference.

[dandyqb]

I think there might be something wrong with 10.2.  I have 2 identical rigs.  One running 9.8 and super stable.  The other rig is on 10.2 and windows gets really sluggish after 3hrs of mining. I couldn't even move any windows around and afterburner becomes unresponsive.  I am going to switch my 10.2 over to 9.8 and see if that will make a difference.

have you tried the 10.1?

[rigomortis]

I think there might be something wrong with 10.2.  I have 2 identical rigs.  One running 9.8 and super stable.  The other rig is on 10.2 and windows gets really sluggish after 3hrs of mining. I couldn't even move any windows around and afterburner becomes unresponsive.  I am going to switch my 10.2 over to 9.8 and see if that will make a difference.

have you tried the 10.1?

no.. why?  are you having similar issue? is 10.2 the culprit? this is the only difference in my 2 rigs.  Both have the exact same hardware

[dandyqb]

I think there might be something wrong with 10.2.  I have 2 identical rigs.  One running 9.8 and super stable.  The other rig is on 10.2 and windows gets really sluggish after 3hrs of mining. I couldn't even move any windows around and afterburner becomes unresponsive.  I am going to switch my 10.2 over to 9.8 and see if that will make a difference.

have you tried the 10.1?

no.. why?  are you having similar issue? is 10.2 the culprit? this is the only difference in my 2 rigs.  Both have the exact same hardware

my problem with 10.2 is the "Temperature control thread hangs, need to restart the miner!" error, both on my 2 rigs, never encounter this error on previous versions...

[rigomortis]

I think there might be something wrong with 10.2.  I have 2 identical rigs.  One running 9.8 and super stable.  The other rig is on 10.2 and windows gets really sluggish after 3hrs of mining. I couldn't even move any windows around and afterburner becomes unresponsive.  I am going to switch my 10.2 over to 9.8 and see if that will make a difference.

have you tried the 10.1?

no.. why?  are you having similar issue? is 10.2 the culprit? this is the only difference in my 2 rigs.  Both have the exact same hardware

my problem with 10.2 is the "Temperature control thread hangs, need to restart the miner!" error, both on my 2 rigs, never encounter this error on previous versions...

don't fix what's not broken right?  I mean.. is there really any performance increase from say 9.8 to 10.2?  not that i could tell in terms of hash rates.

[leonix007]

Hi everyone - first time posting to the forum but been reading the threads for quite a number of months.  I'm hoping someone can help me out.

I have a 7 GPU rig made up of (5) GTX 1060's and (2) RX470's.  My RX470's are giving me very low hashrates.  They fluctuate between 12 mh/s and 18 mh/s.  Here is my configuration.  Any thoughts?


AMD RX470 Strix Gaming 4GB - Hynix Chips

Windows 10 1709 all updates applied
swap file 20GB
Dual Miner 10.2 ETH+SIA
AMD 17.11.4 drivers +DAG Patch (Previously had blockchain, no change in speed)
Compute mode on
MSI Afterburner V4.4

Any thoughts on what I can change to get more consistent and higher rates? 

Note: My 1060 are consistent at 23 mh/s

you need to mod your GPU Bios in order to achieve better hashrate for AMD RX470, see threads below

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1954245.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1882656.new#new

it should reach at least 27-29mh/s

[Wahyu0907]

Very stable using claymore

[peroz]

How is it possible, that going from ETH single mining to ETH+DCR dual, my ETH hashrate increased as well? I have 3x rx570 and 1x rx460, and am getting 99,3Mh ETH and 1650Mh DCR. -dcri 5,30,30,30.