Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 07:41:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 ... 352 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitmain's Released Antminer S9, World's First 16nm Miner Ready to Order  (Read 530803 times)
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
June 16, 2016, 05:58:12 AM
 #701

How do you make a payment in BTC in less than an HOUR?

The entire network has not found a block in

Network:     66m (416434)

please explain

I have a payment thats been status ? for 3 hours now and mid setting on confirmation time.

same as anyone else... wait for blocks to be found :/

So over an hour to Bitmain i lost my BTC now??
It will confirm once blocks come through and things stabilise, your BTC is not lost.


S9 review:

At 650 mhz default frequency, temps at chip reached over 100c when it started mining, is this normal? But PCB temps hovered around 60-64c. So, I put fans at 100% but chips temp still within the 99c-101c range.

Adjusted the freq to 625 mhz, and cranked up fans 100%, now chip temps 88-94c, PCB 56-62c.

I noticed that the 3rd board run hotter than the rest.

Is the chip temp normal at that high temps when mining?

Appreciate any feedback - thanks!

that pict on the left is surely distracting...lol

SP20 chips , which are probably the same type of silicon, were fine until 115C, showed warning at 120C and were program to throttle at 125C, from which i surmise that 100C chip temp is just fine and dandy.
All temperatures are arbitrary based on the sensor location, its not a great idea to compare meltTemps between miners.

1714117285
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714117285

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714117285
Reply with quote  #2

1714117285
Report to moderator
1714117285
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714117285

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714117285
Reply with quote  #2

1714117285
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714117285
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714117285

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714117285
Reply with quote  #2

1714117285
Report to moderator
jtoomim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 818
Merit: 1006


View Profile WWW
June 16, 2016, 06:44:34 AM
 #702

Toomim Bros received five Batch 1 S9s today. ... two ("m6" and "m8") gave low hashrates when run at 650 MHz, around 8 TH/s each....
to keep on topic: I wonder if the hash rate issues jtoomim is experiencing are heat related? It seems possible as the hash rates came up when the clock rate was decreased.
Unlikely, as the intake air temperatures have been between 8°C and 20°C while we saw problems. I can't be sure, but it almost seemed like we were having more trouble with the unit at night (8-10°C intake) than during the day.

Probably that, or core voltage as too low. Might have had some under-spec chips on those boards.
This sounds more plausible to me. In particular, I suspect an issue during the startup routine for the ASICs. The hashrate stays pretty stable over time as long as I don't restart cgminer, but restarting cgminer even with the same settings can cause the rig to gain or lose a few TH/s. I suspect that some of the strings might be having an issue during startup, causing about half of the ASICs on a hashboard to not hash.

Hosting bitcoin miners for $65 to $80/kW/month on clean, cheap hydro power.
http://Toom.im
SaBit
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 16, 2016, 06:57:20 AM
 #703

Seems like I got a dud. First hour it ran fine hashing away at 14  -   then overnight it averaged just over 13.

Rebooted this morning and its hovering around 13.5  --

PCB Temps 50,52,48  chips  81,82,88
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
June 16, 2016, 08:10:51 AM
 #704


All temperatures are arbitrary based on the sensor location, its not a great idea to compare meltTemps between miners.


 Absolutely!

 SP20 sensors were on the CHIP, thus the high "rated" temps - Antminer sensors IME have been board-level, and need to stay a LOT lower for the actual silicon to not overheat.

 Personally I VASTLY prefer the sensor to be on the chip, as there are way too many variables involved in "board-level" sensors that can distort their readings badly.

I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
mishra1994u
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 16, 2016, 08:13:50 AM
 #705

I'm waiting for the halving and hopefully they put these bad boys on HashNest. Even at low electricity their HashNest s7 math for me makes their cloud mining 13% more profitable even though I have $.07/kwh. Pretty crazy, huh? I just want to keep watching the price drop on these...but then again difficulty is probably going up at an equal rate or maybe even more 
yxt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3528
Merit: 1116



View Profile
June 16, 2016, 09:11:17 AM
 #706

60% of my S9 B1 not perform as specified Sad
Hashrate is under 13.3TH/s

BTCKano Pool██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██
██
██
██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
   ██
   ██
   ██
   ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
   ██
   ██
   ██
   ██
HagssFIN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2422
Merit: 1706


Electrical engineer. Mining since 2014.


View Profile WWW
June 16, 2016, 11:09:54 AM
 #707

60% of my S9 B1 not perform as specified Sad
Hashrate is under 13.3TH/s
Maybe this is one reason as well, that B2 is 12,93Th/s ?
Varying chip quality?

notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 16, 2016, 11:42:45 AM
 #708

60% of my S9 B1 not perform as specified Sad
Hashrate is under 13.3TH/s

Can you post a image of the status screen so it's a little easier to see?   What does hashrate look like on each blade? (A status screen will help a lot of questions here).   Also are you getting number from miner itself or pool? 
yxt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3528
Merit: 1116



View Profile
June 16, 2016, 12:01:59 PM
 #709

see below...
the other 2 units are over 13.3 but no unit reach the advertised 14TH/s






BTCKano Pool██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██
██
██
██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
   ██
   ██
   ██
   ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
   ██
   ██
   ██
   ██
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 16, 2016, 12:39:27 PM
 #710

see below...
the other 2 units are over 13.3 but no unit reach the advertised 14TH/s

(picture above)

You are right out of curiosity what PSU's are you using?  Also have you tried another pool just to see what it does? (Pool should not make a difference as Kano works but just being through)

Just wondering on those things as that would be heck of a bad luck to get so many under.   
not.you
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1726
Merit: 1018


View Profile
June 16, 2016, 12:59:37 PM
 #711

Being able to see the individual blades' performance opens up the possibility of combining good or bad performing blades into a single unit and then clocking the unit appropriately for the blades (presumably voiding the warranty in the process though).

@yxt have you tried downclocking at all to see what happens to the blades that are not performing as well?



Also out of curiosity, has anyone from batch 2 or 3 received a shipping notification?  I am curious if batch 3 really is going to ship before batch 2.
Tupsu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003



View Profile
June 16, 2016, 01:09:45 PM
 #712

why you guys worry about dust on the machines? I've got dust on my machines and simply take out the fans, use brush and vacuum the dust that block the heat sink and put it back both fan once a month/two

I only use the air compressor and a vacuum cleaner.
Erumara
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100

I mine because math


View Profile
June 16, 2016, 01:11:33 PM
 #713

Being able to see the individual blades' performance opens up the possibility of combining good or bad performing blades into a single unit and then clocking the unit appropriately for the blades (presumably voiding the warranty in the process though).

@yxt have you tried downclocking at all to see what happens to the blades that are not performing as well?



Also out of curiosity, has anyone from batch 2 or 3 received a shipping notification?  I am curious if batch 3 really is going to ship before batch 2.

Got my batch 3 tracking number this morning, indeed I will be receiving my batch 3 on the 20th when the batch 2's start shipping. IMO totally worth the extra $100, time will tell.

Always hashing for the community. Oh, and dollars.
QuadrigaCX -Your North American Exchange- https://www.quadrigacx.com/?ref=h0een92jnww3mhxsekv3mqau -Get Verified Today!
yslyung
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002


Mine Mine Mine


View Profile
June 16, 2016, 01:17:09 PM
 #714

just got my notification from bmt, b3 shipping, should be here in a couple of days.
NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3612
Merit: 2506


Evil beware: We have waffles!


View Profile
June 16, 2016, 01:19:23 PM
 #715

Being able to see the individual blades' performance opens up the possibility of combining good or bad performing blades into a single unit and then clocking the unit appropriately for the blades (presumably voiding the warranty in the process though).

@yxt have you tried downclocking at all to see what happens to the blades that are not performing as well?



Also out of curiosity, has anyone from batch 2 or 3 received a shipping notification?  I am curious if batch 3 really is going to ship before batch 2.
Got notice last night from Bitmain that my b3 has shipped. Literally about 7hrs after they confirmed payment.  Shocked

- For bitcoin to succeed the community must police itself -    My info useful? Donations welcome! 1FuzzyWc2J8TMqeUQZ8yjE43Rwr7K3cxs9
 -Sole remaining active developer of cgminer, Kano's repo is here
-Support Sidehacks miner development. Donations to:   1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
Legacy2005
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 16, 2016, 01:24:16 PM
 #716

My s9 seems to run hot. Pcb 68-72 and chips 98-102.

What are others seeing for normal temps for batch 1s.
HagssFIN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2422
Merit: 1706


Electrical engineer. Mining since 2014.


View Profile WWW
June 16, 2016, 01:27:16 PM
 #717

Kind of weird strategy from Bitmain to ship Batch 3 before Batch 2..
Can't really enjoy it as Batch 2 -buyer..

NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3612
Merit: 2506


Evil beware: We have waffles!


View Profile
June 16, 2016, 01:30:20 PM
 #718

My s9 seems to run hot. Pcb 68-72 and chips 98-102.

What are others seeing for normal temps for batch 1s.
ref: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1493601.msg15229543#msg15229543

- For bitcoin to succeed the community must police itself -    My info useful? Donations welcome! 1FuzzyWc2J8TMqeUQZ8yjE43Rwr7K3cxs9
 -Sole remaining active developer of cgminer, Kano's repo is here
-Support Sidehacks miner development. Donations to:   1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
PassThePopcorn
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 465
Merit: 309


View Profile
June 16, 2016, 01:34:11 PM
 #719

Kind of weird strategy from Bitmain to ship Batch 3 before Batch 2..
Can't really enjoy it as Batch 2 -buyer..
Not really, Batch 2 buyers paid less than Batch 3. More than likely they finished production early and are offering to ship immediately for an extra $100 or you save $100 and they begin shipping on June 20th how the original listings terms stated.
HagssFIN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2422
Merit: 1706


Electrical engineer. Mining since 2014.


View Profile WWW
June 16, 2016, 01:37:58 PM
 #720

Kind of weird strategy from Bitmain to ship Batch 3 before Batch 2..
Can't really enjoy it as Batch 2 -buyer..
Not really, Batch 2 buyers paid less than Batch 3. More than likely they finished production early and are offering to ship immediately for an extra $100 or you save $100 and they begin shipping on June 20th how the original listings terms stated.
Yes, it could just be all about money.
So it basically could be the same production batch, but those who are willing to pay more are on the VIP list a.k.a. Batch 3 .

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 ... 352 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!