mettalmag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:35:06 AM |
|
I use numeric system twall.001 and etc, but all the shares rejected dunno why, trying different ports now
Can't say I have much rejected shares with dwarfpool. Is your latency on accepted shares good? ok so so far no rejected shares on port 3337, lets wait 10 more minutes, as far as I know dwarfpool doesn't support ssl right ?
At this point, last I saw it doesn't support SSL. Even so, I'm still getting considerably more from dwarfpool than flypool (didn't use to be that way). I was on coinmine.pl now I have to switch to dwarfpool I think its better, update: after switching diff port to 3337 I got zero rejected shares, but I don't understand the difference between mining difficulties
|
|
|
|
ghostfaceuk
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:42:45 AM |
|
I use numeric system twall.001 and etc, but all the shares rejected dunno why, trying different ports now
Can't say I have much rejected shares with dwarfpool. Is your latency on accepted shares good? ok so so far no rejected shares on port 3337, lets wait 10 more minutes, as far as I know dwarfpool doesn't support ssl right ?
At this point, last I saw it doesn't support SSL. Even so, I'm still getting considerably more from dwarfpool than flypool (didn't use to be that way). I was on coinmine.pl now I have to switch to dwarfpool I think its better, update: after switching diff port to 3337 I got zero rejected shares, but I don't understand the difference between mining difficulties I've been with Dwarfpool for nearly 24hrs now, using the :3333 port and have been getting what I would expect for 410h/s which is about 0./04 - 0.05 ZEC a day. http://http://imgur.com/a/LIUfQ
|
|
|
|
mettalmag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:47:11 AM |
|
I use numeric system twall.001 and etc, but all the shares rejected dunno why, trying different ports now
Can't say I have much rejected shares with dwarfpool. Is your latency on accepted shares good? ok so so far no rejected shares on port 3337, lets wait 10 more minutes, as far as I know dwarfpool doesn't support ssl right ?
At this point, last I saw it doesn't support SSL. Even so, I'm still getting considerably more from dwarfpool than flypool (didn't use to be that way). I was on coinmine.pl now I have to switch to dwarfpool I think its better, update: after switching diff port to 3337 I got zero rejected shares, but I don't understand the difference between mining difficulties I've been with Dwarfpool for nearly 24hrs now, using the :3333 port and have been getting what I would expect for 410h/s which is about 0./04 - 0.05 ZEC a day. http://http://imgur.com/a/LIUfQafter more than 10 minutes I got 35 shares and 0 rejected on port 3337 I'll try to switch 15 more rigs and see
|
|
|
|
ghostfaceuk
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:48:55 AM |
|
I use numeric system twall.001 and etc, but all the shares rejected dunno why, trying different ports now
Can't say I have much rejected shares with dwarfpool. Is your latency on accepted shares good? ok so so far no rejected shares on port 3337, lets wait 10 more minutes, as far as I know dwarfpool doesn't support ssl right ?
At this point, last I saw it doesn't support SSL. Even so, I'm still getting considerably more from dwarfpool than flypool (didn't use to be that way). I was on coinmine.pl now I have to switch to dwarfpool I think its better, update: after switching diff port to 3337 I got zero rejected shares, but I don't understand the difference between mining difficulties I've been with Dwarfpool for nearly 24hrs now, using the :3333 port and have been getting what I would expect for 410h/s which is about 0./04 - 0.05 ZEC a day. http://http://imgur.com/a/LIUfQafter more than 10 minutes I got 35 shares and 0 rejected on port 3337 I'll try to switch 15 more rigs and see Hope youve got everything sorted now and those rejects stay low or removed completely
|
|
|
|
Hotmetal
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:56:10 AM |
|
after more than 10 minutes I got 35 shares and 0 rejected on port 3337 I'll try to switch 15 more rigs and see
Aren't you managing all those rigs in an automated manner? Sounds like you're doing things manually.
|
|
|
|
mettalmag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:57:48 AM |
|
after more than 10 minutes I got 35 shares and 0 rejected on port 3337 I'll try to switch 15 more rigs and see
Aren't you managing all those rigs in an automated manner? Sounds like you're doing things manually. I'm doing it manually, till now all of them were on 9.0 and on coinmine.pl atm I updated 12 rigs to 9.1 and switched them to dwarfpool
|
|
|
|
yslyung
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002
Mine Mine Mine
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:07:39 AM |
|
I'm also getting more at dwarf. much better that fly pool.
it's definitely v9-9.1 issue with regards to spikes & instability.
let's see if next version fixes it.
|
|
|
|
aidia
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:09:49 AM |
|
What kind of hashes should I except with r9 270x 2gb?
|
|
|
|
mettalmag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:12:55 AM |
|
I'm also getting more at dwarf. much better that fly pool.
it's definitely v9-9.1 issue with regards to spikes & instability.
let's see if next version fixes it.
I switched 1/5 of all my rigs lets see what happens, also I'm confused about different difficulties on dwarfpool Main-Port (vardiff): 3333 Stratum-Port (diff=8): 3334 for CPU Stratum-Port (diff=128): 3335 for videocards Stratum-Port (diff=512): 3336 for rigs Stratum-Port (diff=1024): 3337 for big rigs
|
|
|
|
beIbox
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:36:50 AM |
|
I have 0.4% / 24h rejected shares at flypool
|
|
|
|
e46btc
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:43:47 AM |
|
I'm also getting more at dwarf. much better that fly pool.
it's definitely v9-9.1 issue with regards to spikes & instability.
let's see if next version fixes it.
I switched 1/5 of all my rigs lets see what happens, also I'm confused about different difficulties on dwarfpool Main-Port (vardiff): 3333 Stratum-Port (diff=8): 3334 for CPU Stratum-Port (diff=128): 3335 for videocards Stratum-Port (diff=512): 3336 for rigs Stratum-Port (diff=1024): 3337 for big rigs 3333 works fine. BTW Dwarfpool shows actual hashrate and it is almost 10% higher than Flypool. Dwarf also the honest one for long time on ETH.
|
|
|
|
kiffner
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:45:23 AM |
|
What kind of hashes should I except with r9 270x 2gb?
This are actualy prety good.. 135 - 140 sols - v9.1. Good ratio w/sol.. Specialy if undervolted
|
|
|
|
mettalmag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:46:45 AM |
|
I'm also getting more at dwarf. much better that fly pool.
it's definitely v9-9.1 issue with regards to spikes & instability.
let's see if next version fixes it.
I switched 1/5 of all my rigs lets see what happens, also I'm confused about different difficulties on dwarfpool Main-Port (vardiff): 3333 Stratum-Port (diff=8): 3334 for CPU Stratum-Port (diff=128): 3335 for videocards Stratum-Port (diff=512): 3336 for rigs Stratum-Port (diff=1024): 3337 for big rigs 3333 works fine. BTW Dwarfpool shows actual hashrate and it is almost 10% higher than Flypool. Dwarf also the honest one for long time on ETH. on eth we were using dwarfpool without any issues here are the stats of last hour after switching some of my rigs to dwarfpool on zec: I can't get what Shares with diff means :/
|
|
|
|
osnwt
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:48:32 AM |
|
how can I enable worker names in case of dwarfpool i'm confused Use only numbers as worker name, for example -zwal t1RjQjDbPQ9Syp97DHFyzvgZhcjgLTMwhaq.1 When I tried to use something like t1RjQjDbPQ9Syp97DHFyzvgZhcjgLTMwhaq.a1 in past, when setting up ETH mining, I got errors until I discovered that only numbers worked. Not for DwarfPool: 1. rig01 1610.76 16-12-12, 12:24:58 (1 minute ago) 1240 158720 517 66176 2. rig02 1374.81 16-12-12, 12:25:02 (1 minute ago) 1020 130560 429 54912 3. rig03 1535.46 16-12-12, 12:24:59 (1 minute ago) 1190 152320 492 62976
It worked for Ethereum as well @ DwarfPool. I was on coinmine.pl now I have to switch to dwarfpool I think its better, update: after switching diff port to 3337 I got zero rejected shares, but I don't understand the difference between mining difficulties
It controls the share rate of your rig. If you have lot of "easy" shares, it only adds load to pool and your Internet link. If you have "difficult" shares, they come with big time intervals and hashrate shown will have high variance. So using vardiff the pool adapts to the hashrate of your rig making share rate optimal. You may want to choose easier shares for a single reason: if your internet uplink is not ideal and sometimes loses shares, then you lose more in case of "difficult" share (you may mine a minute and share is lost thus all minute is lost). In that case I would choose easier ones so one lost share does not cost me few percents. If your uplink is good, use vardiff port. PS.Statistically, losses should not depend on share rate if probability of lost share is the same. But in reality we have a TCP connection that may be lost. So the sooner you find it's lost, the better. In case of lot of easy shares you find that soon and lose few seconds of mining. In case of rare shares (let's say 1 per 5 minutes) losses are higher.
|
|
|
|
mettalmag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:53:56 AM |
|
how can I enable worker names in case of dwarfpool i'm confused Use only numbers as worker name, for example -zwal t1RjQjDbPQ9Syp97DHFyzvgZhcjgLTMwhaq.1 When I tried to use something like t1RjQjDbPQ9Syp97DHFyzvgZhcjgLTMwhaq.a1 in past, when setting up ETH mining, I got errors until I discovered that only numbers worked. Not for DwarfPool: 1. rig01 1610.76 16-12-12, 12:24:58 (1 minute ago) 1240 158720 517 66176 2. rig02 1374.81 16-12-12, 12:25:02 (1 minute ago) 1020 130560 429 54912 3. rig03 1535.46 16-12-12, 12:24:59 (1 minute ago) 1190 152320 492 62976
It worked for Ethereum as well @ DwarfPool. I was on coinmine.pl now I have to switch to dwarfpool I think its better, update: after switching diff port to 3337 I got zero rejected shares, but I don't understand the difference between mining difficulties
It controls the share rate of your rig. If you have lot of "easy" shares, it only adds load to pool and your Internet link. If you have "difficult" shares, they come with big time intervals and hashrate shown will have high variance. So using vardiff the pool adapts to the hashrate of your rig making share rate optimal. You may want to choose easier shares for a single reason: if your internet uplink is not ideal and sometimes loses shares, then you lose more in case of "difficult" share (you may mine a minute and share is lost thus all minute is lost). In that case I would choose easier ones so one lost share does not cost me few percents. If your uplink is good, use vardiff port. PS.Statistically, losses should not depend on share rate if probability of lost share is the same. But in reality we have a TCP connection that may be lost. So the sooner you find it's lost, the better. In case of lot of easy shares you find that soon and lose few seconds of mining. In case of rare shares (let's say 1 per 5 minutes) losses are higher. so you are saying no matter how big my farm is I have to use vardiff port 3333 to loose less ? but why on 3333 port was so much rejected shares ?
|
|
|
|
markus124
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:55:28 AM |
|
I'm also getting more at dwarf. much better that fly pool.
it's definitely v9-9.1 issue with regards to spikes & instability.
let's see if next version fixes it.
I switched 1/5 of all my rigs lets see what happens, also I'm confused about different difficulties on dwarfpool Main-Port (vardiff): 3333 Stratum-Port (diff=8): 3334 for CPU Stratum-Port (diff=128): 3335 for videocards Stratum-Port (diff=512): 3336 for rigs Stratum-Port (diff=1024): 3337 for big rigs if ur rig is hashing at 1024 in claymore miner and u use port=3337 then u should see one share per second in ur miner control. If u use 3336 u should get 2 shares. Vardiff port, adjust difficulty to not spam the pool with shares, in my case im mining at 1020 hashes per second and my difficulty is adjusted to 16384. So I'm getting one share per 16 seconds. (16384/1020).
|
|
|
|
osnwt
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:56:55 AM |
|
I can't get what Shares with diff means :/
Shares: real shares you rig sent Shares with diff: equivalent number of "easiest" shares (same for all miners and rigs). Now you see that single real share for your last rig is equal to 1024 easiest shares. In my case I have not so good uplink and I chose easier shares (not vardiff), and my real share is equal to 128 easiest ones. Probably I will switch back to another port.
|
|
|
|
mettalmag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
|
|
December 12, 2016, 12:04:57 PM |
|
So for me using high diff port is good choice right ?
|
|
|
|
gaah
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2016, 12:07:14 PM |
|
i have been on flypool 30 days and dwarfpool for 38 hours flypool took 0.02 every 24 hours from me i did get 0.04 there on dwarfpool i get 0.06 it's like 20% more on dwarf so don't use flypool they rob you.
|
|
|
|
osnwt
|
|
December 12, 2016, 12:09:02 PM |
|
So for me using high diff port is good choice right ?
If you have low share losses, then it should be good. But vardiff works well and adopts difficulty to hashrate of your rigs. So I would not bother if have less then 0.5% lost shares and use 3333 port.
|
|
|
|
|