QuintLeo
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
 |
December 16, 2016, 09:36:56 AM |
|
What kind of hashes should I except with r9 270x 2gb?
This are actualy prety good.. 135 - 140 sols - v9.1. Good ratio w/sol.. Specialy if undervolted 138-140 me too for 270x The R9 270x was a rebadged HD 7870 with faster RAM. I see 125-130 on my HD 7870s with v9.1 |
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
December 16, 2016, 09:43:52 AM |
|
NVDIA's miner did huge progress. Worry they will be better for ZCASH mining. Lots of AMD users may be upset.
On a $/hash basis, Claymore v9.1 on my RX 470s leads the Nicehash eqm miner on my 1070s by a fair bit even though I haven't worked with settings on the RX 470s as much - but the advantage got a LOT narrower with the .3a eqm version, and the 1070 does win now on hash/watt by a narrow margin if you aim for max efficiency. I don't think the AMD fanboys have much to worry about, nor do the NVidia fanboys have a lot to crow over. Just out of curiosity though, I would be interested in seeing what a Titan X Pascal could do on sol/s. 8-O |
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
bolt1909
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
December 16, 2016, 10:41:58 AM |
|
9.1 going to be slow...nvidia card take over ZCASH...
|
|
|
|
|
|
joaocha
|
|
December 16, 2016, 10:50:32 AM |
|
Mostly of Problems in stabilty are in Psu or the Pcie Riser power cable,
I have 7 Rigs, 2 of them was getting freeze/reboot problems,
*What i Did, replaced all Pcie Riser power cable, almost all of them have the yellow cable pretty burned or destroyed (chinese crapy)
*On my 5x480 Rig, I have 2 Corsair 750W, 1 PSU for 3x480 and 1 PSU for 2x480 + motherboard, everything is pretty smooth now
|
|
|
|
|
kuna95
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
December 16, 2016, 10:59:38 AM |
|
On flypool they use fix difficulty (2000) for default setting. You can set it manually in password parameter.
Should I set the diff higher for a 6*RX400 rig?
Is vardiff better than using fix difficulty?
For the 6X RX 400 cards, it is better to use the default 2000 difficulty level so you send out one share about 1.5 second. test with 32768 1 share = 2000 (diff) real share 1 share = 32768 (diff) real share |
|
|
|
|
gaah
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
December 16, 2016, 11:06:52 AM |
|
Claymore PLS drop new ver today! <3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mapuo
|
|
December 16, 2016, 12:07:12 PM |
|
NVDIA's miner did huge progress. Worry they will be better for ZCASH mining. Lots of AMD users may be upset.
On a $/hash basis, Claymore v9.1 on my RX 470s leads the Nicehash eqm miner on my 1070s by a fair bit even though I haven't worked with settings on the RX 470s as much - but the advantage got a LOT narrower with the .3a eqm version, and the 1070 does win now on hash/watt by a narrow margin if you aim for max efficiency. I don't think the AMD fanboys have much to worry about, nor do the NVidia fanboys have a lot to crow over. Just out of curiosity though, I would be interested in seeing what a Titan X Pascal could do on sol/s. 8-O Please, stop spaming. Use edit button. |
|
|
|
|
|
Apened
|
|
December 16, 2016, 01:12:22 PM |
|
Claymore; are you planning to fix the stability issues in 9.1? my rigs are still crashing in this version but work fine with 8.0.
They question has been answered already. There's no issues with the miner. Make sure your PSU's have plenty of capacity or downgrade to v8 as future releases will probably push GPU cards more. Sometimes can help driver uninstalling after DDU cleaning... btw i have 2xCorsair cs850m for 6xSapphire 390 - -30mv at the afterburner power consumtion 1140 core and 1500 mem. -1830 sols with -i 6 This rig always starts ok and crashes very seldom - 1-3 times per month There is nothing wrong with the driver. You just need to reduce the core or the memory frequency. It will be fine then. |
|
|
|
|
patientx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
December 16, 2016, 01:36:33 PM |
|
Anyone here using 9.1 with nicehashminer ? I am still at v9.0 and didn't update it yet. Is it working good with that software and is there any improvements at all if I update ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
naeme18720
|
|
December 16, 2016, 01:43:48 PM |
|
Hi to all
why my share found very very hight 327ms-1200ms--120ms--its Different why???
My memoory rom 4GB---and--cpu g3240 3.1Ghz..motherboard b85 asus
im tested all connection in pool drawfpool...but not fixed...what are you doing ...this see picture
in realy this problem in flypool i have......my problem where???
|
|
|
|
|
anticlimax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 16, 2016, 01:49:52 PM |
|
Hi to all
why my share found very very hight 327ms-1200ms--120ms--its Different why???
My memoory rom 4GB---and--cpu g3240 3.1Ghz..motherboard b85 asus
im tested all connection in pool drawfpool...but not fixed...what are you doing ...this see picture
in realy this problem in flypool i have......my problem where??? My god, those poor fans. |
twitter @antiiclimax
|
|
|
ivomm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1917
Merit: 3245
All good things to those who wait
|
|
December 16, 2016, 02:18:02 PM |
|
Hi to all
why my share found very very hight 327ms-1200ms--120ms--its Different why???
My memoory rom 4GB---and--cpu g3240 3.1Ghz..motherboard b85 asus
im tested all connection in pool drawfpool...but not fixed...what are you doing ...this see picture
in realy this problem in flypool i have......my problem where???
Кo peчe, кo? |
|
|
|
|
thecasabe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
December 16, 2016, 02:22:18 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
carlo_0000
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 16, 2016, 03:27:15 PM |
|
Anyone here using 9.1 with nicehashminer ? I am still at v9.0 and didn't update it yet. Is it working good with that software and is there any improvements at all if I update ?
fees are 5 too 3% if i remember, so yes you get more after update |
|
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
December 16, 2016, 03:27:39 PM |
|
9.1 going to be slow...nvidia card take over ZCASH...
there are maybe 1/10th as many nVidia cards in mining operation as AMD, and they cost roughly 2.5x as much to reach equivalent hash rate. It won't even be noticeable. |
|
|
|
GTCG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
December 16, 2016, 03:30:31 PM |
|
I'm running Claymore version 9.1. Everything is running stable: ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:21 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 374.633 H/s, Total Shares: 12364, Rejected: 61, Time: 18:59
ZEC: GPU0 201.921 H/s, GPU1 172.712 H/s
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:30 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:42 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:57 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:59 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:01 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=53C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:26 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:32 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:33 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (202 ms)!
ZEC: Share accepted (218 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:37 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (437 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:50 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:52 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (374 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:45:02 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 375.053 H/s, Total Shares: 12386, Rejected: 61, Time: 19:01
ZEC: GPU0 201.920 H/s, GPU1 173.142 H/s
This line concerns me: GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16% I have 2 GPU's running: 2x HD 7950 GPU1 seems to be acting lazy. How comes that the fan is only at 16% and t = 52C? It seems to me like the card is not performing as it should. Is this behavior normal? There does not seem to be any ouput about the amount of sols. Is there a way I can calculate this looking at the amount of Hashes per second? I'm concerned about the fanspeed of GPU 0 as well, it's about 87%. What is the normal fan speed while mining? |
|
|
|
|
|
ghostfaceuk
|
|
December 16, 2016, 03:35:00 PM |
|
I'm running Claymore version 9.1. Everything is running stable: ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:21 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 374.633 H/s, Total Shares: 12364, Rejected: 61, Time: 18:59
ZEC: GPU0 201.921 H/s, GPU1 172.712 H/s
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:30 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:42 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:57 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:59 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:01 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=53C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:26 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:32 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:33 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (202 ms)!
ZEC: Share accepted (218 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:37 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (437 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:50 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:52 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (374 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:45:02 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 375.053 H/s, Total Shares: 12386, Rejected: 61, Time: 19:01
ZEC: GPU0 201.920 H/s, GPU1 173.142 H/s
This line concerns me: GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16% I have 2 GPU's running: 2x HD 7950 GPU1 seems to be acting lazy. How comes that the fan is only at 16% and t = 52C? It seems to me like the card is not performing as it should. Is this behavior normal? There does not seem to be any ouput about the amount of sols. Is there a way I can calculate this looking at the amount of Hashes per second? I'm concerned about the fanspeed of GPU 0 as well, it's about 87%. What is the normal fan speed while mining? GPU 1 is giving you 172 sol/s, whiich is lower than GPU 0's 201. have you attempted any clocking with the cards? it may be worth checking with GPU-z or afterburner what clock/memory settings the cards are using. as for the fan usage have you set a -tt figure in the batch file? the lower you set the temperature the harder the fans have to work |
|
|
|
|
|
naeme18720
|
|
December 16, 2016, 03:40:02 PM |
|
Hi to all
why my share found very very hight 327ms-1200ms--120ms--its Different why???
My memoory rom 4GB---and--cpu g3240 3.1Ghz..motherboard b85 asus
im tested all connection in pool drawfpool...but not fixed...what are you doing ...this see picture
in realy this problem in flypool i have......my problem where??? My god, those poor fans. what??? how are you?? what are i doing?? |
|
|
|
|
|
naeme18720
|
|
December 16, 2016, 03:42:34 PM |
|
I'm running Claymore version 9.1. Everything is running stable: ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:21 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 374.633 H/s, Total Shares: 12364, Rejected: 61, Time: 18:59
ZEC: GPU0 201.921 H/s, GPU1 172.712 H/s
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:30 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:42 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:57 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:59 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:01 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=53C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:26 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:32 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:33 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (202 ms)!
ZEC: Share accepted (218 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:37 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (437 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:50 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:52 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (374 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:45:02 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 375.053 H/s, Total Shares: 12386, Rejected: 61, Time: 19:01
ZEC: GPU0 201.920 H/s, GPU1 173.142 H/s
This line concerns me: GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16% I have 2 GPU's running: 2x HD 7950 GPU1 seems to be acting lazy. How comes that the fan is only at 16% and t = 52C? It seems to me like the card is not performing as it should. Is this behavior normal? There does not seem to be any ouput about the amount of sols. Is there a way I can calculate this looking at the amount of Hashes per second? I'm concerned about the fanspeed of GPU 0 as well, it's about 87%. What is the normal fan speed while mining? please help me...my share found 300 ms ..whay??? how i fixed this share found??? |
|
|
|
|
|
ghostfaceuk
|
|
December 16, 2016, 03:47:13 PM |
|
please help me...my share found 300 ms ..whay??? how i fixed this share found???
are you using the pool closest to your location? using a pool in a different location can increase the time it takes for a share to be accepted |
|
|
|
|
|
