gaah
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 06:56:46 PM |
|
do u guys saw an increase in zec earnings after 24 hours? I'm getting the exact same amount. Maybe we should focus in power efficiency instead of hashing speed. postimg.org/image/qk0nyxjvf/ What i mean is in the miner i have like 1000 shares in 1h on flypool only 141 where is the rest?
|
|
|
|
lordzc
|
|
December 10, 2016, 07:24:28 PM |
|
Nice miner.well done.
|
|
|
|
Akafnf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 07:48:30 PM |
|
Hi there!!
I updated to new 9.1 version but I faced some weird bug appeared only with versions 9.0 and 9.1
One of my card Sapphire Radeon RX 480 NITRO+ 8192MB in rig shows mistake
gpu#1 returned incorrect data ... Constantly !!!! before update to these versions all was ok and this card is with basic bios so far
I changed mining pool same thing goes on... only one of 6 cards in rig shows this mistake and doesn't give shares
Plz suggest me if anyone faced same issue and what to do? Cheers
maybe you need to decrease overclocking Well it's not overlocked at all... that's the thing.... it's absolutely native bios used still
|
|
|
|
miningpoolhub
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1006
Mining Pool Hub
|
|
December 10, 2016, 07:49:19 PM |
|
Zcash/Zclassic Mining Pool Hubhttps://zcash.miningpoolhub.comhttps://zclassic.miningpoolhub.comPool supports Claymore's SSL/TLS mining. All previous ports are compatible, so you don't need to worry about changing port numbers. Just add "ssl://" before the hostname at commandline. Also pool provides auto switching according to profitability. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
markus124
|
|
December 10, 2016, 07:59:18 PM |
|
do u guys saw an increase in zec earnings after 24 hours? I'm getting the exact same amount. Maybe we should focus in power efficiency instead of hashing speed. postimg.org/image/qk0nyxjvf/ What i mean is in the miner i have like 1000 shares in 1h on flypool only 141 where is the rest? OH thats normal they count the shares in the pool differently since mining difficulty change alot. I'm getting the same than u. Anyways shares doesnt matter, what matters is how much zec u get every 24 hours. You should be getting +- 0.04 i think.
|
|
|
|
gaah
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 08:02:00 PM |
|
do u guys saw an increase in zec earnings after 24 hours? I'm getting the exact same amount. Maybe we should focus in power efficiency instead of hashing speed. postimg.org/image/qk0nyxjvf/ What i mean is in the miner i have like 1000 shares in 1h on flypool only 141 where is the rest? OH thats normal they count the shares in the pool differently since mining difficulty change alot. I'm getting the same than u. Anyways shares doesnt matter, what matters is how much zec u get every 24 hours. You should be getting +- 0.04 i think. Good guess almost 0.05
|
|
|
|
|
taylub
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 08:18:19 PM |
|
Since most of the posts are now becoming the same thing and blaming the miner for card(s) going down or whole system crashing until one or more cards are removed with v8,9,9.1 I figured I would try to clear this up.
There have been posts saying check your psu and such but that is clearly not getting the point across. Each version of claymore uses slightly more power so there are really only a handful of issues to check before posting for the majority of the issues here. 1. PSU wattage load 2. PSU ripple suppression 3. PSU voltage regulation at different load variations 4. Bad risers and other cables. (Least likely if still working in other versions) 5. Incorrectly configuring windows
All PSU are created slightly different even at the same rates wattage and having way more watts than you're using doesn't mean you're running your psu at a better efficiency.
If you're using a multi gpu setup you need to use a gold or higher rated PSU. The evga super nova / super flower leadex series have great ripple suppression. Keep each PSU at at maximum of 80% load and keep it cool!
There is much more I could get into but it would require knowing each rig full hardware config.
|
|
|
|
Tmdz
|
|
December 10, 2016, 08:52:51 PM |
|
for the people using r9 390, what is your hash and watts at the wall?
|
|
|
|
Densitymax
|
|
December 10, 2016, 09:03:36 PM |
|
Difference between 9.0 and 9.1 only in reducing fee, I would not go to new version as 0.5% are not important for me.
|
|
|
|
Belligerent Fool
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 10, 2016, 09:03:56 PM |
|
I have been using 2x 280x GPU's since the early versions with no trouble at all then all of the sudden v9.0 comes out and then starts sucking heaps more power then the previous version and giving those red invalid messages at times, I thought 9.1 would fix it but it didn't..... So I went back to v8 with no problems whatsoever, all for 10sol less, less power and a bit more fee, Bios & Settings are set to stock and Intensity is at 2 like always.
|
|
|
|
gaah
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 09:21:59 PM |
|
I use dwarfpool now coming back in 24h for resultats i have use flypool before will be fun to se how much more dwarf will give me.
|
|
|
|
forato
|
|
December 10, 2016, 09:26:16 PM |
|
for the people using r9 390, what is your hash and watts at the wall?
Stock is about 280 I have more than 80 r9 390 and never get 300 sol. The max I get is 285
|
|
|
|
anticlimax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 10, 2016, 09:38:44 PM |
|
v9.1 crashes using anything above -i 3 with my furies, where as v9.0 was stable -i 5 with the same settings?
|
twitter @antiiclimax
|
|
|
densets
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 10:09:17 PM |
|
for the people using r9 390, what is your hash and watts at the wall?
my 390x never passed 290 sols. probably takes 250w of the wall, maybe a bit more. its dying now 94c
|
|
|
|
rwhiteman
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 10:10:07 PM |
|
Seeing 315+ H/s on each of my 390x clocked at 1180, though the temp hits 90C. One of the cards occasionally drops out now with 9.1 (was stable on 8 ).. even drops without overclocking. At least the miner resets itself.
|
|
|
|
ober
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 10:18:41 PM |
|
for the people using r9 390, what is your hash and watts at the wall?
my 390x never passed 290 sols. probably takes 250w of the wall, maybe a bit more. its dying now 94c my 290 passed 290 sols with v8
|
|
|
|
mikkowendell
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 10:20:45 PM |
|
Seeing 315+ H/s on each of my 390x clocked at 1180, though the temp hits 90C. One of the cards occasionally drops out now with 9.1 (was stable on 8 ).. even drops without overclocking. At least the miner resets itself.
Even doing -tt -80 or higher?
|
|
|
|
moosetech
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 10:21:15 PM |
|
My R9 290 never had any improvements since V7 I'm not sure why. It got stuck to 250-260Sols even at 1100/1300
About the random restart, My rig shuts down 15 mins - 1hr after miner starts and the bad thing about it is that my pc wouldn't restart by itself unless I discharge all the PSU capacitors (disconnect from wall sockets). Good thing about this is I fixed it by getting all settings back to stock and a little Undervolt. This minimized my gains when switching v8-v9 from 20% to 10%, but it's still a good improvement nonetheless. Never had any random crashes for almost 24hrs now.
My setup is composed of 2x RX470s (1200core,2000mem) 210 sols and an R9290 (950core,1250 mem) 250 sols My PSU is AcBel R88 1100Watts 80+ Silver. My rig is almost half of that PSU's capacity, maybe it is really that bad.
|
|
|
|
Puffy23
Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 11
|
|
December 10, 2016, 10:23:21 PM Last edit: December 16, 2016, 07:36:42 PM by Puffy23 |
|
v9.1 crashes using anything above -i 3 with my furies, where as v9.0 was stable -i 5 with the same settings?
Can you give a few more details on your setup? I ran 6 Fury Nitros on -i 6 with v9.0 rock solid (15.12 drivers). I had tons of trouble when I went to v9.1, but I also updated my drivers to 16.12 at the same time so I haven't been able to pin-point the exact cause. I'm rolling the drivers back now to test v9.1 on 15.12 and 16.11.5.
|
|
|
|
|