rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
January 03, 2017, 05:14:04 PM |
|
We are releasing EQM v1.0.4b.
nice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
vaulter
|
|
January 03, 2017, 05:31:57 PM |
|
EU server down.please check
Must be only you, everything working fine here. We are releasing EQM v1.0.4b.
666 Sol/s on Titan Pascal.. Stock or OC? Try with mem overclock (as high as possible to be stable) and then lower the TDP. See how far that brings you with minimal power usage. OCd with +110 Core and +700 Mem (Resulting 5200 - max stable) tdp 60(150W) - 560 s/s tdp 70 (175W) - 620 s/s tdp 80(200w) - 650s/s tdp 90 (225w) - 666s/s tdp 100(250w) - 690 s/s
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
January 03, 2017, 05:34:22 PM |
|
We are releasing EQM v1.0.4b. Download: https://www.nicehash.com/tools/eqm_v1.0.4b_Win64.zipLinux bins are following shortly. This version is specially tuned for low TDP and mem OC scenarios. In any case, in our tests, stock GTX 1070 does 400 Sol/s. Like with all other previous versions, we again used some new tricks. Now, remember what and WHEN we did it. You will see, that competition will just copy these new ideas. When this happens (in following few days), we will release the source. Have you guys considered making the source harder to decompile? Also take a look at Cryptonote please.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1898
Merit: 1024
|
|
January 03, 2017, 05:38:56 PM |
|
@vaulter You know when you use very low TDP you can push OC to +180-220 on core with right TDP miner that can result undervolt but its hard to find stable settings, because on low GPU usage GPU will boost as mad... Same results can be done with afterburner graph ctrl+f and limiting freq/voltage to <1v for 1900-2000Mhz but its a bit hard to do with more then one card, stupid afterburner must to it for each card one by one, and looks like the graph have some issues, the graph must not be linear to the end as last 3-4 settings must be higher then the rest of graph For best undervolt we need BETTER OC tool for NV that can do manual volt/freq adjustment!
|
|
|
|
Slava_K
|
|
January 03, 2017, 05:45:45 PM |
|
[19:40:59][0x000026b4][info] net | Connecting to private.equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3329 [19:40:59][0x00002d74][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1080 (#0) M=1 [19:40:59][0x000004dc][info] device#1 | Initializing thread #1 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1080 (#0) M=1 [19:40:59][0x00000fd0][info] device#2 | Initializing thread #2 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1080 (#0) M=1 [19:40:59][0x00001fa4][info] device#3 | Initializing thread #3 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1080 (#0) M=1 [19:40:59][0x00003b88][info] device#4 | Initializing thread #4 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1080 (#0) M=1 [19:40:59][0x00003fbc][info] device#5 | Initializing thread #5 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1080 (#0) M=1 [19:40:59][0x00002878][info] device#6 | Initializing thread #6 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1080 (#0) M=1 [19:40:59][0x00002258][info] device#7 | Initializing thread #7 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1080 (#0) M=1 [19:40:59][0x0000358c][info] device#8 | Initializing thread #8 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1080 (#0) M=1 [19:40:59][0x00001b0c][info] device#9 | Initializing thread #9 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1080 (#0) M=1 [19:40:59][0x000035c4][info] device#10 | Initializing thread #10 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1080 (#0) M=1 [19:40:59][0x00003fe8][info] net | Connected! [19:40:59][0x00003fe8][info] net | New job #14399568066973270016, diff=256 [19:41:02][0x00003fe8][info] net | Share with id 4 accepted [19:41:04][0x00003fe8][info] net | New job #8131401810603671552, diff=256 [19:41:04][0x00003fe8][info] net | Share with id 5 accepted [19:41:09][0x00003fe8][info] net | Share with id 6 accepted [19:41:13][0x00003fe8][info] net | Share with id 7 accepted [19:41:14][0x000026b4][info] =====> 275.054 I/s, 521.131 Sols/s [19:41:14][0x000026b4][info] Accepted: 15.3276 /m Rejected: 0 /m [19:41:23][0x00003fe8][info] net | New job #14113870965611954176, diff=256 [19:41:30][0x000026b4][info] =====> 262.631 I/s, 491.296 Sols/s [19:41:30][0x000026b4][info] Accepted: 7.67018 /m Rejected: 0 /m [19:41:36][0x00003fe8][info] net | Share with id 8 accepted [19:41:42][0x00003fe8][info] net | Share with id 9 accepted [19:41:44][0x00003fe8][info] net | Share with id 10 accepted [19:41:45][0x00003fe8][info] net | Share with id 11 accepted [19:41:46][0x000026b4][info] =====> 258.207 I/s, 482.33 Sols/s
Strange behavior...
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
January 03, 2017, 05:50:40 PM |
|
Using so many threads will only reduce performance. Max to use is 2, do not use more, it only has negative effects.
|
|
|
|
Slava_K
|
|
January 03, 2017, 06:01:28 PM |
|
Using so many threads will only reduce performance. Max to use is 2, do not use more, it only has negative effects.
2 threads give me 445 sols.
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
January 03, 2017, 06:14:23 PM |
|
Yes, that is about right for stock. If you want more speed, OC memory.
|
|
|
|
percy_tc
|
|
January 03, 2017, 06:48:29 PM |
|
Could someone please check hashrate with this new release on 1060 3g and 6g?
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 03, 2017, 07:00:38 PM |
|
Had to tone down the OC a bit because it was unstable also reduced thread from 3 to 2, doing overall 2400sols/s @ 400sols per card. Not bad
|
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 03, 2017, 07:12:14 PM |
|
Improved hash and a linux version, you guys sure know how to please, good job !
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1003
|
|
January 03, 2017, 07:31:34 PM |
|
Could you give a batch file example for the SM calls plz thx windows 8.1
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 03, 2017, 07:34:41 PM |
|
Could you give a batch file example for the SM calls plz thx windows 8.1 eqm -help give you the help... (well duh :p) -cm [mode] Working mode (1 or 2, 0 = auto) auto by default it should run into the proper mode depending of your card compute capabilities
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1898
Merit: 1024
|
|
January 03, 2017, 07:45:34 PM |
|
EWBF is also out 0.9v speed is 2% less but comparing memory controller usage is not same 85 vs 81% same setting NH vs EWBF
|
|
|
|
Redmonk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
January 03, 2017, 08:55:04 PM |
|
I deal with this miner. There's a file "changelog" said "mode 1 for SM52 and SM61 cards, mode 2 for SM50 cards", well for my mod 1 means necessary. And where to change it? In the file "start + restart_script" there is some "DEBUG_MODE = 2" written "set to 1 to print out speed of devices", this is it or not?
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 03, 2017, 09:04:09 PM |
|
I deal with this miner. There's a file "changelog" said "mode 1 for SM52 and SM61 cards, mode 2 for SM50 cards", well for my mod 1 means necessary. And where to change it? In the file "start + restart_script" there is some "DEBUG_MODE = 2" written "set to 1 to print out speed of devices", this is it or not?
read just 2 post above... i know it's hard to do, but try to make an effort
|
|
|
|
datBTC
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
January 03, 2017, 09:06:02 PM |
|
1080 no speedup. My 1080 reports 535 SOL/sec
|
|
|
|
moaddip
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
January 03, 2017, 09:19:53 PM |
|
-cm 1 or -cm 1 1 1 1 or -cm 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
|
|
|
|
Slava_K
|
|
January 03, 2017, 09:49:28 PM |
|
1080 no speedup. My 1080 reports 535 SOL/sec Overclock and what settings?
|
|
|
|
|