...
Nullius, i went through your post several times, but i could not extract any sense out of it
It was not addressed to you. It is good that you managed to read it, however—even if you did not understand it. Most people never get that far.
Our respective worldviews are fundamentally irreconcilable, as explained simply and seriously below. But first...
<snip>
Speaking of arrogance:
Formatting is in the original:So what's the fucking fuzz all about?If everything i did was hurting you in your pride (aka. EGO), i feel sorry for that. So please forgive me (again, iirc)!
If you can't, i won't make it my problem, cause it's yours. Thanks 
Whatever gave you the idea that you hurt my pride?
Of a sudden, I lack words. I need to
borrow this image:
I have to leave, spend the rest of the day trying to FEEL more than THINKING. Never did any harm to me.
As aforesaid, our respective
Weltanschauungen are
fundamentally irreconcilable. To you, I may as well be an alien from some planet in the neighbourhood of Alpha Centauri. I can see now that you will not be able to understand me. (I can say this, because I understand you.)
Your worldview is subjective
almost to the point of solipsism—actually, it
is a thinly-veiled solipsism:
But how can you PROVE that what you think is REAL? (-EDIT- or: valid for everybody)
See, you can't, even if you try as hard AF.
Because it's only your individual reality.
To go on: You are believing your reality.
There is nothing wrong with subjectivity,
per se. (Indeed,
all morality is subjective.) However, you outright deny the existence of an external reality—you deny reality
per se.
I do not say this to be snarky:
This is why LSD and shrooms are bad
.My worldview is premised on the existence of a reality independent of myself—
independent of my ego—which can be examined by observational and otherwise scientific means,
objectively and
dispassionately—
thinking, NOT
feeling.
If you
feel that that’s wrong, then I can’t help you.
trying to FEEL more than THINKING
In my infinite, almost saintly patience, I wrote the foregoing before I saw this—one for the “why do I bother?” department:
I replied to him through my ego, i was well aware of that,
not even upset in any way, other than the caps and bolds did make it seem. I was just curious if he'd even make an attempt (to prove to be able to)
see through a different angle.
A seemingly brilliant mind, but also another lost soul, imo.
So here's my honest, unjudging reply: [blank]
First of all, I may remind you that you are taking advice from one whose basic reading comprehension is so abysmal, he once
accused me of a “feminist tangent” for my proposal that women should be banned from pubs in most circumstances (!), because women belong with their children (!!).
* nullius is one hell of a “feminist”.
And zeroth of all,
nice attempt to
save face after an unhinged rant in giant letters.
Sure, your feelings weren’t hurt. Have a cookie.
I need not remark on the irony of one so wrapped up in his own worldview that he fails to realize, I see his world better than he does.
Poll
