Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

We pop 4% after many weeks of 10% drop after 10% drops, and you guys are posting rocket gifs?   

They cut off the part where the rocket explodes.

[1714817234]

1714817234

[1714817234]

1714817234

[1714817234]

1714817234

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

This Parkland teen got destroyed in the very first reply to her tweet:

https://twitter.com/delaneytarr/status/980806714743296002/photo/1

John W. Rollins
‏ @johnwrollins
10h10 hours ago
Replying to @delaneytarr

So the 4th Amend is OK, but not the 2nd? When did our Constitution become an a la carte buffet?

Be careful what you wish for, folks.

Well to be fair our "Constitution become an a la carte buffet" officially became one with the Patriot act, but it has always been a selective one where the Oligarchy are fully protected by it and the rest have to pay to use it as a shield.

#freecorzine !!!! #freeweinstein !!! #sethrichisacriminallikeassange #gmoaregood #therearenojetstreamfromjapan #cellphoneradiationarehealthy #fluoridisgoodforyou #freedomofspeechisdangerousforyou #youraretoodumbtouseguns #hillaryismyleader #podestadoesnthavesexualchildrenpictureseverywhere #billclintonisnotarapists #jeffreyepsteinisinnocent...

I can continue... on and on.

Was GWB ever in jail for cocaine? please... which cop, fbi, doj, cia or what ever would have dared... don't pretend... H would have killed you, simply.

[Raja_MBZ]

I don't know why we consider the "India" factor that much in crypto. Indian contribution towards crypto volume is surely not above 2.5% to 3% or so.

India has a population of 1.3 billion I would have thought a ban there is significant even if user adoption is low currently.

Actually, more than 90% of population is completely un-banked as Torque said, more than 750 million have no access to even toilets (I'm sorry if it hurts someone around), and around only 400 million have access to internet.

Now, at most, IMO, 0.4 million people would be using crypto in India, and almost all of them would be having very low volume.

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

I don't know why we consider the "India" factor that much in crypto. Indian contribution towards crypto volume is surely not above 2.5% to 3% or so.

India has a population of 1.3 billion I would have thought a ban there is significant even if user adoption is low currently.

Actually, more than 90% of population is completely un-banked as Torque said, more than 750 million have no access to even toilets (I'm sorry if it hurts someone around), and around only 400 million have access to internet.

Now, at most, IMO, 0.4 million people would be using crypto in India, and almost all of them would be having very low volume.

Are you sure about the 90% figure? Sounds a bit far fetched given that Europe and the US alone have more than 1B people.

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

I don't know why we consider the "India" factor that much in crypto. Indian contribution towards crypto volume is surely not above 2.5% to 3% or so.

India has a population of 1.3 billion I would have thought a ban there is significant even if user adoption is low currently.

Actually, more than 90% of population is completely un-banked as Torque said, more than 750 million have no access to even toilets (I'm sorry if it hurts someone around), and around only 400 million have access to internet.

Now, at most, IMO, 0.4 million people would be using crypto in India, and almost all of them would be having very low volume.

when they made a plant used since 2000 BC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_in_India) illegal, there was no hope left, and war become the only legit and realistic option.

Cannabis in India has been used since as early as 2000 BCE. In Indian society, common terms for cannabis preparations include charas (resin), ganja (flower), and bhang (seeds and leaves), with a milkshake made from bhang being one of the most common licit usages in India.

As of 2000, per the UNODC the "prevalence of abuse" of cannabis in India was 3.2%.[1] According to the UNODC’s World Drug report 2016, the retail price of cannabis in India was US$0.10 per gram, the lowest of any country in the world.[2]



    To the five kingdoms of the plants which Soma rules as Lord we speak.

    darbha, hemp, barley, mighty power: may these deliver us from woe,
    — Translated by Ralph T. H. Griffith[6], Atharva Veda 11.6.15

    The five kingdoms of plants, having Soma as their chief, we address;

    the darbha, hemp, barley, saha — let them free us from distress.
    — Translated by William Dwight Whitney[7], Atharva Veda 11.6.15

and please don't ask me why the united nations is a terrorist organization, the child project of those who created the federal reserve...

[Raja_MBZ]

I don't know why we consider the "India" factor that much in crypto. Indian contribution towards crypto volume is surely not above 2.5% to 3% or so.

India has a population of 1.3 billion I would have thought a ban there is significant even if user adoption is low currently.

Actually, more than 90% of population is completely un-banked as Torque said, more than 750 million have no access to even toilets (I'm sorry if it hurts someone around), and around only 400 million have access to internet.

Now, at most, IMO, 0.4 million people would be using crypto in India, and almost all of them would be having very low volume.

Are you sure about the 90% figure? Sounds a bit far fetched given that Europe and the US alone have more than 1B people.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/slideshows/economy/what-government-plans-to-do-with-the-old-rs-500-1000-notes/98-of-all-consumer-payments-in-india-use-cash/slideshow/55579468.cms

98% of all consumer payments in India use cash

About 98 percent of all consumer payments in India use cash, and the high frequency of handling forces the monetary authority to withdraw about 75 percent of its notes in circulation in a typical year - more than the number of bank notes collectively produced by all countries taken together with the exception of China.

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

I don't know why we consider the "India" factor that much in crypto. Indian contribution towards crypto volume is surely not above 2.5% to 3% or so.

India has a population of 1.3 billion I would have thought a ban there is significant even if user adoption is low currently.

Actually, more than 90% of population is completely un-banked as Torque said, more than 750 million have no access to even toilets (I'm sorry if it hurts someone around), and around only 400 million have access to internet.

Now, at most, IMO, 0.4 million people would be using crypto in India, and almost all of them would be having very low volume.

Are you sure about the 90% figure? Sounds a bit far fetched given that Europe and the US alone have more than 1B people.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/slideshows/economy/what-government-plans-to-do-with-the-old-rs-500-1000-notes/98-of-all-consumer-payments-in-india-use-cash/slideshow/55579468.cms

98% of all consumer payments in India use cash

About 98 percent of all consumer payments in India use cash, and the high frequency of handling forces the monetary authority to withdraw about 75 percent of its notes in circulation in a typical year - more than the number of bank notes collectively produced by all countries taken together with the exception of China.

but I read in zh that they took cash away and that it was a giant mess... even saw it in tv 

[Raja_MBZ]

I don't know why we consider the "India" factor that much in crypto. Indian contribution towards crypto volume is surely not above 2.5% to 3% or so.

India has a population of 1.3 billion I would have thought a ban there is significant even if user adoption is low currently.

Actually, more than 90% of population is completely un-banked as Torque said, more than 750 million have no access to even toilets (I'm sorry if it hurts someone around), and around only 400 million have access to internet.

Now, at most, IMO, 0.4 million people would be using crypto in India, and almost all of them would be having very low volume.

Are you sure about the 90% figure? Sounds a bit far fetched given that Europe and the US alone have more than 1B people.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/slideshows/economy/what-government-plans-to-do-with-the-old-rs-500-1000-notes/98-of-all-consumer-payments-in-india-use-cash/slideshow/55579468.cms

98% of all consumer payments in India use cash

About 98 percent of all consumer payments in India use cash, and the high frequency of handling forces the monetary authority to withdraw about 75 percent of its notes in circulation in a typical year - more than the number of bank notes collectively produced by all countries taken together with the exception of China.

but I read in zh that they took cash away and that it was a giant mess... even saw it in tv 

Yup, they took a lot out from circulation, happened like 15 months back, to promote use of banks.

But do you really believe that within 15 months of time span, almost everyone being new to banks, would've even bothered to see what crypto is all about?

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

I don't know why we consider the "India" factor that much in crypto. Indian contribution towards crypto volume is surely not above 2.5% to 3% or so.

India has a population of 1.3 billion I would have thought a ban there is significant even if user adoption is low currently.

Actually, more than 90% of population is completely un-banked as Torque said, more than 750 million have no access to even toilets (I'm sorry if it hurts someone around), and around only 400 million have access to internet.

Now, at most, IMO, 0.4 million people would be using crypto in India, and almost all of them would be having very low volume.

Are you sure about the 90% figure? Sounds a bit far fetched given that Europe and the US alone have more than 1B people.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/slideshows/economy/what-government-plans-to-do-with-the-old-rs-500-1000-notes/98-of-all-consumer-payments-in-india-use-cash/slideshow/55579468.cms

98% of all consumer payments in India use cash

About 98 percent of all consumer payments in India use cash, and the high frequency of handling forces the monetary authority to withdraw about 75 percent of its notes in circulation in a typical year - more than the number of bank notes collectively produced by all countries taken together with the exception of China.

but I read in zh that they took cash away and that it was a giant mess... even saw it in tv  

Yup, they took a lot out from circulation, happened like 15 months back, to promote use of banks.

But do you really believe that within 15 months of time span, almost everyone being new to banks, would've even bothered to see what crypto is all about?

lol, no I just discarded as madness. first plants, then bank notes, then cryptos... then freespeech, guns, forced vaccinations then what? your daughters to them?

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

I don't know why we consider the "India" factor that much in crypto. Indian contribution towards crypto volume is surely not above 2.5% to 3% or so.

India has a population of 1.3 billion I would have thought a ban there is significant even if user adoption is low currently.

Actually, more than 90% of population is completely un-banked as Torque said, more than 750 million have no access to even toilets (I'm sorry if it hurts someone around), and around only 400 million have access to internet.

Now, at most, IMO, 0.4 million people would be using crypto in India, and almost all of them would be having very low volume.

Are you sure about the 90% figure? Sounds a bit far fetched given that Europe and the US alone have more than 1B people.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/slideshows/economy/what-government-plans-to-do-with-the-old-rs-500-1000-notes/98-of-all-consumer-payments-in-india-use-cash/slideshow/55579468.cms

98% of all consumer payments in India use cash

About 98 percent of all consumer payments in India use cash, and the high frequency of handling forces the monetary authority to withdraw about 75 percent of its notes in circulation in a typical year - more than the number of bank notes collectively produced by all countries taken together with the exception of China.

I should've read more thoroughly. This is just about India and not the whole world, right? If so that sounds much more reasonable.

[Raja_MBZ]

I don't know why we consider the "India" factor that much in crypto. Indian contribution towards crypto volume is surely not above 2.5% to 3% or so.

India has a population of 1.3 billion I would have thought a ban there is significant even if user adoption is low currently.

Actually, more than 90% of population is completely un-banked as Torque said, more than 750 million have no access to even toilets (I'm sorry if it hurts someone around), and around only 400 million have access to internet.

Now, at most, IMO, 0.4 million people would be using crypto in India, and almost all of them would be having very low volume.

Are you sure about the 90% figure? Sounds a bit far fetched given that Europe and the US alone have more than 1B people.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/slideshows/economy/what-government-plans-to-do-with-the-old-rs-500-1000-notes/98-of-all-consumer-payments-in-india-use-cash/slideshow/55579468.cms

98% of all consumer payments in India use cash

About 98 percent of all consumer payments in India use cash, and the high frequency of handling forces the monetary authority to withdraw about 75 percent of its notes in circulation in a typical year - more than the number of bank notes collectively produced by all countries taken together with the exception of China.

I should've read more thoroughly. This is just about India and not the whole world, right? If so that sounds much more reasonable.

Of course, it's India we were talking about.

Time to get back to graphs...



What's next? Hoping for Angelo...

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

btw there is an BTC/INR on bisq.network .

[fabiorem]

and please don't ask me why the united nations is a terrorist organization, the child project of those who created the federal reserve...

And there will still be people FUDing about tether printing.

Thats it, central banks can print money from nowhere, covered by nothing, causing inflation and the consequent unemployment and impoverishment, and nobody cares.

But when its tether printing, to pump the price of bitcoin, to make everybody happy, then its a scam, its a fraud, its FUD, its the trolls saying bitcoin will be outlawed and the price will go down.

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

and please don't ask me why the united nations is a terrorist organization, the child project of those who created the federal reserve...

And there will still be people FUDing about tether printing.

Thats it, central banks can print money from nowhere, covered by nothing, causing inflation and the consequent unemployment and impoverishment, and nobody cares.

But when its tether printing, to pump the price of bitcoin, to make everybody happy, then its a scam, its a fraud, its FUD, its the trolls saying bitcoin will be outlawed and the price will go down.

they print fiat to buy pussies (and all the necessary equipment to retain (yachts, mcmansion, pool, cars, you understand the spirit), if pussies were honest it wouldn't happen, but i guess the quest of the provider, how ever he gets it, costed the lives of more than a queen and her offspring .

anyway ready to meet the friends of lois lerner in 12 days? they can't wait... specially if you voted for trump. they must salivate.

[Hueristic]

Most of you probably seen this when it was published but if you have not I would encourage checking out this article by Jimmy Song.  Who has a great ability imo to express critical thinking in ways that are easy to understand and digest.

https://medium.com/@jimmysong/why-bitcoin-is-different-e17b813fd947

Nice article but I cannot but note the glaring obvious of not mentioning privacy nor the ability to blacklist coins, but that doesn't fit the narrative.

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

Most of you probably seen this when it was published but if you have not I would encourage checking out this article by Jimmy Song.  Who has a great ability imo to express critical thinking in ways that are easy to understand and digest.

https://medium.com/@jimmysong/why-bitcoin-is-different-e17b813fd947

Nice article but I cannot but note the glaring obvious of not mentioning privacy nor the ability to blacklist coins, but that doesn't fit the narrative.

once the objective of the narrative is understood, they become the easiest things to see through in the world  .

[Last of the V8s]

On a quick skim, privacy comes up twice in that article. 'Blacklisting' is for people who don't understand opsec, aka monero shills. Don't believe everything your centralised shitcoin figureheads tell you.

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

On a quick skim, privacy comes up twice in that article. 'Blacklisting' is for people who don't understand opsec, aka monero shills. Don't believe everything your centralised shitcoin figureheads tell you.

could you please tell us more about OpSec... some general guidelines... I would appreciate it , or maybe some resources online (if possible in .onion webiste ).

[Last of the V8s]

http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1299 Don’t Blame the Mice.

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1299 Don’t Blame the Mice.

the website seems already shaddy... i am not sure my opsec allows me to visit it 

thanks a lot.