Bitcoin Forum
November 02, 2024, 01:39:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will BTC get back above $70K:
7/14 - 0 (0%)
7/21 - 1 (0.8%)
7/28 - 11 (9.1%)
8/4 - 16 (13.2%)
8/11 - 7 (5.8%)
8/18 - 6 (5%)
8/25 - 8 (6.6%)
After August - 72 (59.5%)
Total Voters: 121

Pages: « 1 ... 23367 23368 23369 23370 23371 23372 23373 23374 23375 23376 23377 23378 23379 23380 23381 23382 23383 23384 23385 23386 23387 23388 23389 23390 23391 23392 23393 23394 23395 23396 23397 23398 23399 23400 23401 23402 23403 23404 23405 23406 23407 23408 23409 23410 23411 23412 23413 23414 23415 23416 [23417] 23418 23419 23420 23421 23422 23423 23424 23425 23426 23427 23428 23429 23430 23431 23432 23433 23434 23435 23436 23437 23438 23439 23440 23441 23442 23443 23444 23445 23446 23447 23448 23449 23450 23451 23452 23453 23454 23455 23456 23457 23458 23459 23460 23461 23462 23463 23464 23465 23466 23467 ... 33873 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26485027 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 02:42:47 AM
Last edit: April 29, 2019, 02:57:55 AM by realr0ach


I posted it months ago.

Massive amounts of drug money is laundered BY THE BANKS into the US stock market which provides a lot of it's liquidity.  If you remove the drug money laundering, the stock market loses much of it's liquidity and crashes (unless the PPT picks up the slack).  It appears they are doing the exact same thing with digital shitcoins now.  Criminal banks like HSBC laundering massive amounts of money in Bitfinex which artificially raises the market.

Even if that were completely true, it is only a tiny drop in the bucket.  World-wide the illegal drug trade isn't even worth $400 billion US dollars.   Just the New York stock exhange market alone is worth over $30 trillion US dollars.   If you are going to post FUD at least try to have a small amount of intelligence in the post.  Wink  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_drug_trade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Stock_Exchange

Lol.  I'm sure Wikpedia has really legit sources on the financial industry of the illegal drug trade.  It's basically written by Gmaxwell afterall, my #1 go to source for information like this.  And how is $400 billion a "drop in the bucket" if the bitcoin market cap is $93 billion?  It's a fact much of the high end, white collar crime money laundering is done through the stock market and real estate, and I'm sure much of bitcoin's market cap has been a funnel for that as well.  

There's a lot of stupid art that's sold for ridiculously high prices not because it's actually worth it, but because art is also used to launder money.  Kind of like how an imaginary, valueless timestamp (bitcoin) has been sold for thousands of dollars.  Also, your example of the US stock market comparing numbers is meaningless because it's mostly about providing marginal buyer liquidity, so the total market caps don't matter.  If you can keep a steady trickle of consistent marginal buyer liquidity, you can keep a much bigger bubble afloat as long as not everybody tries to sell at once.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 03:00:45 AM

Mo pixels...



It's definitely not a "diverse" neighborhood full of snowcone head negroes that you seem to endorse so much, otherwise those old people in lawn chairs/rascal scooters would be dead.
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3990
Merit: 5425


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 03:05:20 AM

does the new electric E type count?

It is the correct answer to most questions.

It certainly looks the part, I would like to see some reliability data on the "bespoke" electric powertrain.

No offense, but y'alls' British motorcars, while stunningly beautiful, are not renowned for their electrical systems.

I've owned a few Jags and I can tell you, Lucas Wiring sucks Balls.
Who else uses grey wires that fade to white and call them slate?

The older ones are damn sexy though. Smiley
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 03:10:47 AM

Mo pixels....

HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 03:48:51 AM

does the new electric E type count?

It is the correct answer to most questions.

It certainly looks the part, I would like to see some reliability data on the "bespoke" electric powertrain.

No offense, but y'alls' British motorcars, while stunningly beautiful, are not renowned for their electrical systems.

I've owned a few Jags and I can tell you, Lucas Wiring sucks Balls.
Who else uses grey wires that fade to white and call them slate?

The older ones are damn sexy though. Smiley

It’s astonishing how being owned by an Indian conglomerate has resulted in JLR getting its shit together
Paashaas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3566
Merit: 4704



View Profile
April 29, 2019, 03:54:24 AM

European cities with the highest measurable amounts of cocaine in their wastewater.

Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3990
Merit: 5425


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 03:54:35 AM

does the new electric E type count?

It is the correct answer to most questions.

It certainly looks the part, I would like to see some reliability data on the "bespoke" electric powertrain.

No offense, but y'alls' British motorcars, while stunningly beautiful, are not renowned for their electrical systems.

I've owned a few Jags and I can tell you, Lucas Wiring sucks Balls.
Who else uses grey wires that fade to white and call them slate?

The older ones are damn sexy though. Smiley

It’s astonishing how being owned by an Indian conglomerate has resulted in JLR getting its shit together

Thats good as Ford did not do its brand any favors. Smiley


Looks like TPTB really have a hard on for Them, glad I noticed today that I had a sell hit @5589 a while back and had some tether sitting on Binance.

Just figured I'd mention that has been rectified.

Funny that it was the first time I have ever owned any tether.
GreatArkansas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 1394



View Profile WWW
April 29, 2019, 03:55:29 AM

Mo pixels....


Germany?
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 03:55:30 AM

So we have the world’s slowest run on the bank on Bitfinex, and it’s slowly dragging the Bitstamp price up with it.

No guesses so far are close.  This one is hard mode. 
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3332
Merit: 4615


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:00:04 AM


Everything is natural. If something exists it's natural.


From the horse's mouth kids...literally Mr. Natural.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:04:57 AM

This is under the assumption that the block size wouldn't grow when needed, blocks aren't full without outside attacks so there's no evidence that when the time comes we won't increase the block size to a common sense size.

Well, other than the evidence that blocks were kept small the last time they became persistently full. Which, in itself, is pretty strong evidence.

Once the need resurfaces (and it most certainly will), how long do you think it will take to implement the necessary change?
dyask
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 510


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:07:00 AM
Last edit: April 29, 2019, 05:21:20 AM by dyask


I posted it months ago.

Massive amounts of drug money is laundered BY THE BANKS into the US stock market which provides a lot of it's liquidity.  If you remove the drug money laundering, the stock market loses much of it's liquidity and crashes (unless the PPT picks up the slack).  It appears they are doing the exact same thing with digital shitcoins now.  Criminal banks like HSBC laundering massive amounts of money in Bitfinex which artificially raises the market.

Even if that were completely true, it is only a tiny drop in the bucket.  World-wide the illegal drug trade isn't even worth $400 billion US dollars.   Just the New York stock exhange market alone is worth over $30 trillion US dollars.   If you are going to post FUD at least try to have a small amount of intelligence in the post.  Wink  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_drug_trade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Stock_Exchange

Lol.  I'm sure Wikpedia has really legit sources on the financial industry of the illegal drug trade.  It's basically written by Gmaxwell afterall, my #1 go to source for information like this.  And how is $400 billion a "drop in the bucket" if the bitcoin market cap is $93 billion?  It's a fact much of the high end, white collar crime money laundering is done through the stock market and real estate, and I'm sure much of bitcoin's market cap has been a funnel for that as well.  

There's a lot of stupid art that's sold for ridiculously high prices not because it's actually worth it, but because art is also used to launder money.  Kind of like how an imaginary, valueless timestamp (bitcoin) has been sold for thousands of dollars.  Also, your example of the US stock market comparing numbers is meaningless because it's mostly about providing marginal buyer liquidity, so the total market caps don't matter.  If you can keep a steady trickle of consistent marginal buyer liquidity, you can keep a much bigger bubble afloat as long as not everybody tries to sell at once.

I choose a source I figured you might be able to understand.   You clearly have a very weak understanding of concepts like liquidity or the size of the markets.   Even the New York stock exchange market is chicken feed compared to things like Forex.   BTC is headed to that type of currency market.   Your FUD is totally ineffective.  

If one doesn't consider government criminals, the actual amount of money involved is crime is small compared to everyday national sums of capital.   It is possible that drug money could influence a stock or two, no chance on the whole market.   It is just too small of a money flow.   Sure it huge to personal finances, but tiny compared to even the US equity market, let alone the much larger global markets.    If you want to see where the big money is, you need to learn about what central banks are doing.   That have vastly more impact on equity markets than any illegal laundering of money.    
  
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:12:50 AM

This is under the assumption that the block size wouldn't grow when needed, blocks aren't full without outside attacks so there's no evidence that when the time comes we won't increase the block size to a common sense size.

Well, other than the evidence that blocks were kept small the last time they became persistently full. Which, in itself, is pretty strong evidence.

Once the need resurfaces (and it most certainly will), how long do you think it will take to implement the necessary change?

If it was urgent it could probably be done in 48 hours.   But it won’t be urgent.  

And “resurfaces” is the wrong term as it implies that the need has previously surfaced, which it has not.  The need may never surface.
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3990
Merit: 5425


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:12:54 AM

This is under the assumption that the block size wouldn't grow when needed, blocks aren't full without outside attacks so there's no evidence that when the time comes we won't increase the block size to a common sense size.

Well, other than the evidence that blocks were kept small the last time they became persistently full. Which, in itself, is pretty strong evidence.

Once the need resurfaces (and it most certainly will), how long do you think it will take to implement the necessary change?

Not long, lots of shitcoin examples of doing it wrong out there. Smiley
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:13:17 AM


For the IOTA? smh
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:22:10 AM
Merited by MirkoIta (5)

This is under the assumption that the block size wouldn't grow when needed, blocks aren't full without outside attacks so there's no evidence that when the time comes we won't increase the block size to a common sense size.

Well, other than the evidence that blocks were kept small the last time they became persistently full. Which, in itself, is pretty strong evidence.

Once the need resurfaces (and it most certainly will), how long do you think it will take to implement the necessary change?

If it was urgent it could probably be done in 48 hours.   But it won’t be urgent.  

It ain't just a river in Egypt.

Quote
And “resurfaces” is the wrong term as it implies that the need has previously surfaced, which it has not.  The need may never surface.

You've already banished it from your revisionist history?
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 4170



View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:38:39 AM




4h
#dyor



#stronghands'19
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:43:18 AM

And “resurfaces” is the wrong term as it implies that the need has previously surfaced, which it has not.  The need may never surface.

You've already banished it from your revisionist history?

There were some high fees in 2017. There was no need for a block size increase as demonstrated by the failure of BCH.

If it was “necessary”, BCH would have won. 
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 4170



View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:48:05 AM

So we have the world’s slowest run on the bank on Bitfinex, and it’s slowly dragging the Bitstamp price up with it.

No guesses so far are close.  This one is hard mode. 

Pat..I'd like to buy a continent.
JSRAW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 1548


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:51:43 AM

Looks India to me.
Pages: « 1 ... 23367 23368 23369 23370 23371 23372 23373 23374 23375 23376 23377 23378 23379 23380 23381 23382 23383 23384 23385 23386 23387 23388 23389 23390 23391 23392 23393 23394 23395 23396 23397 23398 23399 23400 23401 23402 23403 23404 23405 23406 23407 23408 23409 23410 23411 23412 23413 23414 23415 23416 [23417] 23418 23419 23420 23421 23422 23423 23424 23425 23426 23427 23428 23429 23430 23431 23432 23433 23434 23435 23436 23437 23438 23439 23440 23441 23442 23443 23444 23445 23446 23447 23448 23449 23450 23451 23452 23453 23454 23455 23456 23457 23458 23459 23460 23461 23462 23463 23464 23465 23466 23467 ... 33873 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!