BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 2976
Far, Far, Far Right Thug
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 10:25:35 AM |
|
Marty! You gotta come back with me! Back To The Future!  What happens to us in the future? Do we end up like assholes, investing in a cryptocurrency, it fails and we have to work at McDonald's?   Is that McDonald's in the UK, or McDonald's in America?  
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 2976
Far, Far, Far Right Thug
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 10:39:51 AM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 2477
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 11:02:27 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gachapin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 2942
bitcoin retard
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 11:06:19 AM |
|
another reason to avoid processed food
|
|
|
|
|
Gachapin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 2942
bitcoin retard
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 11:09:11 AM |
|
pretty strong arms, especially the left one she is not one of the recent trans-athletes popping up everywhere, right?
|
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 6876
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 11:14:13 AM |
|
At least the AI renders teeth alright, or it would look pretty weird...
BTW, don't blindly trust what OpenAI says. I asked it a technical question, and the answer was totally wrong (albeit with perfect English). It learns though. I challenged its response, citing a source that proved it was wrong. It apologized, and answered correctly the next time I asked the same question. Based on the few interactions I've had with it, it's a natural language-polished source of raw data, without much "concern" about their accuracy or even correctness. Don't rely on it. Not yet anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 2976
Far, Far, Far Right Thug
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 11:18:35 AM |
|
pretty strong arms, especially the left one she is not one of the recent trans-athletes popping up everywhere, right? I wasn't looking at the arms. 
|
|
|
|
|
Gachapin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 2942
bitcoin retard
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 11:29:19 AM |
|
pretty strong arms, especially the left one she is not one of the recent trans-athletes popping up everywhere, right? I wasn't looking at the arms.  better do, or you might end up with a surprise these days 
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 2976
Far, Far, Far Right Thug
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 11:46:03 AM Merited by sirazimuth (1) |
|
pretty strong arms, especially the left one she is not one of the recent trans-athletes popping up everywhere, right? I wasn't looking at the arms.  better do, or you might end up with a surprise these days  
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 2477
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 12:02:34 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 5346
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 12:04:42 PM |
|
Crypto these days 😂😂  Soruce: TGM Poets hodling? O que será que será? Chico Buarque? #haiku
|
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 10819
Blockchain Historian, Renaissance Shitposter
|
BTW, don't blindly trust what OpenAI says. I asked it a technical question, and the answer was totally wrong (albeit with perfect English).
It learns though. I challenged its response, citing a source that proved it was wrong. It apologized, and answered correctly the next time I asked the same question.
Based on the few interactions I've had with it, it's a natural language-polished source of raw data, without much "concern" about their accuracy or even correctness. Don't rely on it. Not yet anyway.
Apparently its really good at coming up with creative solutions to coding problems. The way it "thinks" about coding is uninhibited by traditional concepts of what commands can or should be used for what, allowing it to generate sleek, perfectly-functioning code. 
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 2477
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 01:02:27 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 6876
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
BTW, don't blindly trust what OpenAI says. I asked it a technical question, and the answer was totally wrong (albeit with perfect English).
It learns though. I challenged its response, citing a source that proved it was wrong. It apologized, and answered correctly the next time I asked the same question.
Based on the few interactions I've had with it, it's a natural language-polished source of raw data, without much "concern" about their accuracy or even correctness. Don't rely on it. Not yet anyway.
Apparently its really good at coming up with creative solutions to coding problems. The way it "thinks" about coding is uninhibited by traditional concepts of what commands can or should be used for what, allowing it to generate sleek, perfectly-functioning code.  Very nice, but here's an important question: is the resulting code generated by the AI itself, or is it just being pulled off some page on the internet, based on the real (human) programmer's description and how well it matches the query? In any case, how can one be sure that the code is bug-free? Also, is the AI engine capable of avoiding, detecting, and possibly correcting, bugs that are more complex than syntax errors or simple overflow/memory corruption cases? I'm talking generally here, and not specifically about the code you posted. The possibilities of an AI generating efficient code that goes beyond conventional coding practices is very exciting, but I would avoid using the generated code in a copy/paste fashion. I'd prefer to have the AI check my own code, in case it can spot bugs I missed. But then, not everyone would want to send their own code to an AI. Regardless of the above concerns, I'm sure we'll see significant and very exciting developments in the AI field.
|
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 10819
Blockchain Historian, Renaissance Shitposter
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 01:55:17 PM |
|
is the resulting code generated by the AI itself, or is it just being pulled off some page on the internet, based on the real (human) programmer's description and how well it matches the query?
Its completely novel. In any case, how can one be sure that the code is bug-free? Also, is the AI engine capable of avoiding, detecting, and possibly correcting, bugs that are more complex than syntax errors or simple overflow/memory corruption cases? I'm talking generally here, and not specifically about the code you posted.
I haven't seen it put into wide practice yet but for this particular problem the answer was extremely straight-forward and doesn't leave room for error. I'm sure it is also capable of making buggy code as well. The possibilities of an AI generating efficient code that goes beyond conventional coding practices is very exciting, but I would avoid using the generated code in a copy/paste fashion. I'd prefer to have the AI check my own code, in case it can spot bugs I missed.
The difference is it is capable of putting things together that don't normally go together, that most programmers would never consider as a possibility. But yes it is all highly context dependent. I just thought it was really interesting that it was even capable of such a thing.
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 2477
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 02:02:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3626
Merit: 5300
diamond-handed zealot
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 02:29:59 PM |
|
BTW, don't blindly trust what OpenAI says. I asked it a technical question, and the answer was totally wrong (albeit with perfect English).
It learns though. I challenged its response, citing a source that proved it was wrong. It apologized, and answered correctly the next time I asked the same question.
Based on the few interactions I've had with it, it's a natural language-polished source of raw data, without much "concern" about their accuracy or even correctness. Don't rely on it. Not yet anyway.
Apparently its really good at coming up with creative solutions to coding problems. The way it "thinks" about coding is uninhibited by traditional concepts of what commands can or should be used for what, allowing it to generate sleek, perfectly-functioning code. 
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 2477
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 03:02:34 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shahzadafzal
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 3198
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 03:32:00 PM |
|
I don’t know why but I felt it amusing… sorry for thevinnocent people who lost their savings but Apple, Binance and Netflix hahaha 🤣 So they all fell for the scam? JUST IN: FTX owes money to Apple, Binance, Coinbase, Netflix, Southwest Airlines, and others, filing shows.https://twitter.com/watcherguru/status/1618613006639980550
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 2976
Far, Far, Far Right Thug
|
 |
January 26, 2023, 04:01:04 PM Last edit: January 26, 2023, 04:15:58 PM by BitcoinBunny |
|
I don’t know why but I felt it amusing… sorry for thevinnocent people who lost their savings but Apple, Binance and Netflix hahaha 🤣 So they all fell for the scam? JUST IN: FTX owes money to Apple, Binance, Coinbase, Netflix, Southwest Airlines, and others, filing shows.https://twitter.com/watcherguru/status/1618613006639980550Either SBF was a genius..... Everything that has transpired has done so according to my design. Or he was a complete and utter imbecile.... I know-ah nothing. I learn the English from a book. I know-ah nothing. How are-ah you? Why you look upset with the anger? What is the bit of a coin? What you lose? I exchange? What is the C I O? I run the company? FTX? What the Fuck TX mean? I know-ah nothing. How are-ah you?
|
|
|
|
|
|