Bitcoin Forum
August 14, 2020, 11:49:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 [256] 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 ... 814 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2587182 times)
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2632
Merit: 1048


https://keybase.io/bitpop


View Profile WWW
April 26, 2013, 09:59:24 PM
 #5101

It cant be down

Reputation  |  PGP  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
100% First Deposit Bonus Instant Withdrawals Best Odds 10+ Sports Since 2014 No KYC Asked Play Now
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1597448954
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1597448954

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1597448954
Reply with quote  #2

1597448954
Report to moderator
1597448954
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1597448954

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1597448954
Reply with quote  #2

1597448954
Report to moderator
twmz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 26, 2013, 10:01:07 PM
 #5102

It cant be down

Well, it can be down, but only when the Internet is down.

Was I helpful?  1TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs
WoT, GPG

Bitrated user: ewal.
davidkassa
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 02:10:27 AM
 #5103

It cant be down

Well, it can be down, but only when the Internet is down.

+1
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3220
Merit: 1292


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 02:42:45 AM
 #5104

It cant be down

Well, it can be down, but only when the Internet is down.

+1
Well ... technically, no.
You just may be making your own BTC fork (I you find any blocks) or share chain fork (if you find any shares) which isn't advisable coz it will lose as soon as the internet comes back up.

Pool: https://kano.is - lowest fee PPLNS 3 Days Here on Bitcointalk: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks!
Smoovious
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500

Scattering my bits around the net since 1980


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 08:56:06 AM
 #5105

It cant be down

Well, it can be down, but only when the Internet is down.

+1
Well ... technically, no.
You just may be making your own BTC fork (I you find any blocks) or share chain fork (if you find any shares) which isn't advisable coz it will lose as soon as the internet comes back up.
Think someone should try to decentralize the internet so if part of it goes down, the rest of it stays up and keeps on working...

oh... wait... nvm... :trlf:

-- Smoov
chxcn2002
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 10:19:07 PM
 #5106

can someone help me,
what's this mean?
http://i.imgur.com/7MYYXTS.jpg
bustaballs
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 03:33:36 AM
 #5107



Huh?

Xenotron
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 07:26:18 AM
 #5108

Huh?
"Authorization required".
Something wrong with login/password.
I got such messages when I tried to do merge mining with NMC. That time I didn't put rpcuser/password in bitcoin.cong file in Namecoin folder.
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2380
Merit: 1008



View Profile
April 28, 2013, 10:18:04 AM
 #5109

it's litecoin the same to bitcoin, to configure?
and what about the adress, is also the same?
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001



View Profile
April 28, 2013, 11:15:00 AM
 #5110

Huh?
"Authorization required".
Something wrong with login/password.
I got such messages when I tried to do merge mining with NMC. That time I didn't put rpcuser/password in bitcoin.cong file in Namecoin folder.

I've also had this problem when the password is too long. 

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
wacko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1014


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 03:44:22 PM
 #5111

2nd time this happens, a block mined by p2pool (LTC), and the reward is shared between the set of addresses all starting from "1" (like BTC addresses), how's it possible? Block #343029, found today at 13:48 UTC: http://explorer.litecoin.net/block/fcfb92180fb433cfd9d5f1bc5b587995232d72e6b5370d343265a8bbbb5ccd96
gyverlb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 28, 2013, 04:20:51 PM
 #5112

2nd time this happens, a block mined by p2pool (LTC), and the reward is shared between the set of addresses all starting from "1" (like BTC addresses), how's it possible? Block #343029, found today at 13:48 UTC: http://explorer.litecoin.net/block/fcfb92180fb433cfd9d5f1bc5b587995232d72e6b5370d343265a8bbbb5ccd96


Maybe someone configured a LTC P2Pool and connected it to a local Bitcoin node instead of a Litecoin node ? I'm a bit surprised it make it through P2Pool and a Litecoin node to be published on the P2P network though.

It was orphaned (maybe only some Litecoin nodes accept this kind of block and there's one of such active on LTC P2Pool).

P2pool tuning guide
Trade BTC for €/$ at bitcoin.de (referral), it's cheaper and faster (acts as escrow and lets the buyers do bank transfers).
Tip: 17bdPfKXXvr7zETKRkPG14dEjfgBt5k2dd
Xenotron
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 05:50:16 PM
 #5113

it's litecoin the same to bitcoin, to configure?
and what about the adress, is also the same?
The same steps. But don't forget to add a copy of litecoin.conf in a data folder if it's not default one. Had big problems with that.
gnomicide
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 06:59:11 PM
 #5114

(LTC)
How long should I let it keep saying "Shares: 0" before I get concerned something is wrong?

Restarted p2pool and cgminer, and it was at 0 for ~8 hours yesterday, then miner crashed for some reason, and when I started it back up I got a share. Of course it's been 12 hours now and all payouts have been less than half what they were before it. Host downtime seems very punishing with p2pool.
gnomicide
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 07:13:00 PM
 #5115

Also, is there any way to filter out all the "Worker user submitted...", "Hash", and "Target" lines in the output? It just seems like spam, and the other messages are actually useful.
forrestv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 516
Merit: 514


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 07:50:34 PM
 #5116

2nd time this happens, a block mined by p2pool (LTC), and the reward is shared between the set of addresses all starting from "1" (like BTC addresses), how's it possible? Block #343029, found today at 13:48 UTC: http://explorer.litecoin.net/block/fcfb92180fb433cfd9d5f1bc5b587995232d72e6b5370d343265a8bbbb5ccd96


That's a bug in the block explorer you're using. There is no way for a Litecoin transaction to pay Bitcoin addreses - the network ID isn't even encoded in the block. All addresses in a block are just 160-bit hashes, without any identifying information.

1J1zegkNSbwX4smvTdoHSanUfwvXFeuV23
wacko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1014


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 08:01:58 PM
 #5117

2nd time this happens, a block mined by p2pool (LTC), and the reward is shared between the set of addresses all starting from "1" (like BTC addresses), how's it possible? Block #343029, found today at 13:48 UTC: http://explorer.litecoin.net/block/fcfb92180fb433cfd9d5f1bc5b587995232d72e6b5370d343265a8bbbb5ccd96


That's a bug in the block explorer you're using. There is no way for a Litecoin transaction to pay Bitcoin addreses - the network ID isn't even encoded in the block. All addresses in a block are just 160-bit hashes, without any identifying information.
You mean, it's a bug of explorer.litecoin.net? If so, then why is that block listed in the p2pool history? And why haven't I got any reward for it?
forrestv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 516
Merit: 514


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 08:05:44 PM
 #5118

2nd time this happens, a block mined by p2pool (LTC), and the reward is shared between the set of addresses all starting from "1" (like BTC addresses), how's it possible? Block #343029, found today at 13:48 UTC: http://explorer.litecoin.net/block/fcfb92180fb433cfd9d5f1bc5b587995232d72e6b5370d343265a8bbbb5ccd96


That's a bug in the block explorer you're using. There is no way for a Litecoin transaction to pay Bitcoin addreses - the network ID isn't even encoded in the block. All addresses in a block are just 160-bit hashes, without any identifying information.
You mean, it's a bug of explorer.litecoin.net? If so, then why is that block listed in the p2pool history? And why haven't I got any reward from it?

It's a real Litecoin-P2Pool block, but the Litecoin explorer is displaying Litecoin addresses as Bitcoin addresses for some reason. It appears to have been orphaned, so you didn't get a payout. The explorer displaying Bitcoin addresses and the block being orphaned might have some common cause, however..

1J1zegkNSbwX4smvTdoHSanUfwvXFeuV23
wacko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1014


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 08:21:07 PM
 #5119

It's a real Litecoin-P2Pool block, but the Litecoin explorer is displaying Litecoin addresses as Bitcoin addresses for some reason. It appears to have been orphaned, so you didn't get a payout. The explorer displaying Bitcoin addresses and the block being orphaned might have some common cause, however..
That makes sense, thank you for the answers.
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3192
Merit: 1353


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2013, 10:34:09 PM
 #5120

So I tried the current version of p2pool on a single 5.7GHz Jalapeño with cgminer connecting via stratum. This works out to about 80 diff1 shares per minute. It "works" in a sense of the word, without causing any weird errors or duplicating work that happen with the Avalon but there are huge lags between share submission and responses from p2pool after a while. Watching the CPU usage, I see a spike to 100% of one core whenever a block of transactions comes in and that coincides with the lag to respond to share submission, leading to more stale rejects if that occurs at the wrong time. The CPU in question is a 12 thread 3.4GHz CPU so it is clearly not underpowered. I suspect what happens on the Avalon is simply a grossly exaggerated form of this leading to misbehaviour.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Pages: « 1 ... 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 [256] 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 ... 814 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!