centove
|
|
May 07, 2013, 03:15:51 PM |
|
Your node connected to any peers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
Merit: 2100
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
May 07, 2013, 03:24:53 PM |
|
Your node connected to any peers? From the graph, it looks so. However, I had turned QOS back on which may have been causing me issues before. Turned it back off now and we'll see how it goes. Then I need to try making p2pool high priority and see if it starts working then.
|
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
Merit: 2100
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
May 07, 2013, 03:56:53 PM |
|
Yep. It was that pesky QOS again. No idea why it would be causing issues, doesn't make much sense. P2Pool should still be getting bandwidth.
|
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
|
Searinox
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
Do you like fire? I'm full of it.
|
|
May 07, 2013, 07:03:49 PM |
|
Returning with an answer to yesterday's issue: my p2pool is again showing payout if a block were found now at 0 btc and I have 6 peers out 3 in. Why does it say i'd get 0?
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
Merit: 2100
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
May 07, 2013, 07:07:15 PM |
|
Returning with an answer to yesterday's issue: my p2pool is again showing payout if a block were found now at 0 btc and I have 6 peers out 3 in. Why does it say i'd get 0?
I believe you earn shares in quantum increments. Until you earn a share, it will be at zero.
|
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
|
Searinox
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
Do you like fire? I'm full of it.
|
|
May 07, 2013, 07:09:51 PM |
|
Returning with an answer to yesterday's issue: my p2pool is again showing payout if a block were found now at 0 btc and I have 6 peers out 3 in. Why does it say i'd get 0?
I believe you earn shares in quantum increments. Until you earn a share, it will be at zero. Could you explain more about earning shares? I've been mining for a month and until yesterday I never saw 0. What exactly is my node doing less of?
|
|
|
|
Krak
|
|
May 07, 2013, 07:21:49 PM |
|
Returning with an answer to yesterday's issue: my p2pool is again showing payout if a block were found now at 0 btc and I have 6 peers out 3 in. Why does it say i'd get 0?
I believe you earn shares in quantum increments. Until you earn a share, it will be at zero. Could you explain more about earning shares? I've been mining for a month and until yesterday I never saw 0. What exactly is my node doing less of? What's your hashrate? Also, are you using a static payout address with the -a flag or using a bitcoin address for your miner's username?
|
BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
|
|
|
Searinox
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
Do you like fire? I'm full of it.
|
|
May 07, 2013, 07:41:26 PM |
|
Returning with an answer to yesterday's issue: my p2pool is again showing payout if a block were found now at 0 btc and I have 6 peers out 3 in. Why does it say i'd get 0?
I believe you earn shares in quantum increments. Until you earn a share, it will be at zero. Could you explain more about earning shares? I've been mining for a month and until yesterday I never saw 0. What exactly is my node doing less of? What's your hashrate? Also, are you using a static payout address with the -a flag or using a bitcoin address for your miner's username? Hashrate varies between 110 and 280 Mh/s with an average of 190 over a month of nonstop mining. I'm using bitcoin-qt's address to send the payment and not the -a flag.
|
|
|
|
Krak
|
|
May 07, 2013, 07:44:53 PM |
|
Hashrate varies between 110 and 280 Mh/s with an average of 190 over a month of nonstop mining. I'm using bitcoin-qt's address to send the payment and not the -a flag.
I highly recommend specifying a static address. If you don't, p2pool will pick different addresses when you restart the Bitcoin client and your share count will start over with the new address.
|
BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
|
|
|
Searinox
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
Do you like fire? I'm full of it.
|
|
May 07, 2013, 07:53:07 PM Last edit: May 07, 2013, 08:38:52 PM by Searinox |
|
Hashrate varies between 110 and 280 Mh/s with an average of 190 over a month of nonstop mining. I'm using bitcoin-qt's address to send the payment and not the -a flag.
I highly recommend specifying a static address. If you don't, p2pool will pick different addresses when you restart the Bitcoin client and your share count will start over with the new address. When I first started P2Pool, it generated a new, dedicated address to mine to. Ever since, and including during the 0btc estimates, it has been mining only to that address. I have no other addresses in my wallet. Also, the sharecount ins't lost when I reset P2Pool, it happens spontaneously.
|
|
|
|
maqifrnswa
|
|
May 07, 2013, 08:37:17 PM |
|
Returning with an answer to yesterday's issue: my p2pool is again showing payout if a block were found now at 0 btc and I have 6 peers out 3 in. Why does it say i'd get 0?
I believe you earn shares in quantum increments. Until you earn a share, it will be at zero. Could you explain more about earning shares? I've been mining for a month and until yesterday I never saw 0. What exactly is my node doing less of? your node is unlucky at the moment. When you hash, you're basically guessing a number. Sometimes you'll guess the right number (and solve a share - kind of like solving a block), and sometimes you'll guess a wrong number. As difficulty goes up, it's harder and harder to guess the right number. When you guess the right number, you get credit for a share which then means you get paid every time p2pool finds a block over the next day (currently for p2pool, but this can change). Your node has been unlucky at guessing numbers lately, so you haven't gotten a share and won't get paid until you do. Sometimes you'll get luck and guess two in a row, in which case you'll get paid 2x more than if you found just one share. regarding static address: p2pool generates one the first time you run it, and as long as there is a "p2pool" address in your wallet it will mine to that one. It wo't create a new one with new address unless you wipe your wallet.
|
|
|
|
Searinox
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
Do you like fire? I'm full of it.
|
|
May 07, 2013, 08:39:23 PM |
|
Returning with an answer to yesterday's issue: my p2pool is again showing payout if a block were found now at 0 btc and I have 6 peers out 3 in. Why does it say i'd get 0?
I believe you earn shares in quantum increments. Until you earn a share, it will be at zero. Could you explain more about earning shares? I've been mining for a month and until yesterday I never saw 0. What exactly is my node doing less of? your node is unlucky at the moment. When you hash, you're basically guessing a number. Sometimes you'll guess the right number (and solve a share - kind of like solving a block), and sometimes you'll guess a wrong number. As difficulty goes up, it's harder and harder to guess the right number. When you guess the right number, you get credit for a share which then means you get paid every time p2pool finds a block over the next day (currently for p2pool, but this can change). Your node has been unlucky at guessing numbers lately, so you haven't gotten a share and won't get paid until you do. Sometimes you'll get luck and guess two in a row, in which case you'll get paid 2x more than if you found just one share. regarding static address: p2pool generates one the first time you run it, and as long as there is a "p2pool" address in your wallet it will mine to that one. It wo't create a new one with new address unless you wipe your wallet. Unlucky sounds about right. I haven't gotten lucky at all the past few days. Glad that explains it.
|
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
|
May 08, 2013, 12:18:35 AM |
|
Yeah, it seems to me that the last week has been very unlucky - sort of corresponds to ASCIminer bringing more power online, but I don't know if that's just coincidental or not.
|
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
GrapeApe
|
|
May 08, 2013, 12:20:14 AM |
|
I am new to bitcoins and even newer to p2p. I am gpu mining with cgminer and I noticed it is mining with two threads. Would it be better to mine with one thread? I am getting 200 MH/s with a 7770 I am told that is as good as gets. Also what does the below quote mean and should I be doing it to make sure I stay updated, and if so how? EDIT I am using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (which is also very new to me)
"Run the latest code: you can run something like the bash script I run by cron everyday to restart p2pool after updating it when there's a new version available. You'll need to know how to install p2pool from git, create a "pool.sh" script to run your node"
|
|
|
|
crunchy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
May 08, 2013, 11:52:42 AM Last edit: May 08, 2013, 12:57:43 PM by crunchy |
|
This is not designed to get me the best results i can get.
This is designed so some other can get on top of things and profit the most.
I can run @ 130% efficiency continuous, but the program rather sets things so that i end up @ 90% efficiency.
in effect this program works against me, add in all the latencyfuckers and were done.
"Skipping from block" , thats what i'm gonna do before i put in a ton that will never pay off itself even.
and asking 1.0% for the author ?
decent people wait for it , they dont take it.
care to explain why skipping from block punishes anywhere from 1 to 20 times per skipped block ? wheres the logic in that.
and why are ip's like 54.250.3.112 and 24.214.18.71 having days off continuously requesting shares from my peer ? (u can guess where the latency goes , to the moon and back all day).
|
|
|
|
gyverlb
|
|
May 08, 2013, 02:07:57 PM |
|
This is not designed to get me the best results i can get. [...]
Maybe if you described the problem you have more accurately someone could help. At least I didn't even understand half of what you were referring to in your post. See http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html for guidelines.
|
|
|
|
rav3n_pl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1361
Merit: 1003
Don`t panic! Organize!
|
|
May 08, 2013, 02:42:31 PM |
|
and why are ip's like 54.250.3.112 and 24.214.18.71 having days off continuously requesting shares from my peer ? (u can guess where the latency goes , to the moon and back all day).
Just ban those IPs. Problem solved.
|
|
|
|
walf_man
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 08, 2013, 03:44:42 PM |
|
Memory usage graph now works in Windows, thanks to David Kassa can not work on windows server 2012 how to? thanks very a lot!
|
|
|
|
Searinox
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
Do you like fire? I'm full of it.
|
|
May 08, 2013, 07:33:47 PM |
|
This is not designed to get me the best results i can get.
This is designed so some other can get on top of things and profit the most.
I can run @ 130% efficiency continuous, but the program rather sets things so that i end up @ 90% efficiency.
in effect this program works against me, add in all the latencyfuckers and were done.
"Skipping from block" , thats what i'm gonna do before i put in a ton that will never pay off itself even.
and asking 1.0% for the author ?
decent people wait for it , they dont take it.
care to explain why skipping from block punishes anywhere from 1 to 20 times per skipped block ? wheres the logic in that.
and why are ip's like 54.250.3.112 and 24.214.18.71 having days off continuously requesting shares from my peer ? (u can guess where the latency goes , to the moon and back all day).
Have you tried using 11.3 instead? When I used 11.4 I noticed my latency was going up after every few hours and staying there until I restarted everything. Several other people noticed this too. I switched back to 11.3 and latency was back to normal.
|
|
|
|
forrestv (OP)
|
|
May 08, 2013, 08:16:30 PM |
|
care to explain why skipping from block punishes anywhere from 1 to 20 times per skipped block ? wheres the logic in that.
It's not punishing you, it's punishing some other person who made a share when there was already a new Bitcoin block. The message being repeated doesn't really mean anything.
|
1J1zegkNSbwX4smvTdoHSanUfwvXFeuV23
|
|
|
|